BUS 250 Week 5 Final Case Analysis Paper (Mattel and Toy Safety) (Ash)

BUS 250 Week 5 Final Case Analysis Paper (Matteland Toy Safety) (Ash)Click Here to Buy the Tutorialhttp://www.bus250.com/product-23-BUS-250-Week-5-Final-Case-Analysis-PaperWeek 5 Final paperFor more course tutorials visitFinal Case Analysis Paperwww.bus250.comThe Final Case Analysis Paper should demonstrate understanding ofthe reading as well as the implications of new knowledge. The eightpagepaper should integrate readings and class discussions into workand life experiences. It may include explanation and examples fromprevious experiences as well as implications for future applications.The purpose of the Final Case Analysis Paper is for you to culminatethe learning achieved in the course by describing your understandingand application of knowledge in the field.Focus of the Final Case Analysis Paper:The Final Case Analysis Paper should focus on real life, real timeapplication of topics covered in this course; the uses you have seenand the uses you can envision. The paper must be submitted to yourinstructor no later than 11:59 pm of the time zone in which you resideon the last day of class.Read Mattel and Toy Safety, which is Case Eight in the Cases inBusiness and Society section at the end of the book. This case

describes the 2007 Mattel toy recalls, which were in response tofindings that several children’s toys were coated in lead-based paint.Write an eight to ten page paper that addresses the followingquestions. Support your opinions with scholarly research.Do you believe that Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethicalmanner with regard to the safety of its toys? Why or why not? Whatshould or could Mattel have done differently, if anything? Be sure tosupport your answer using your research findings. Who or what doyou believe was responsible for the fact that children were exposed topotentially dangerous toys? Why do you think so? Be sure to supportyour answer using your research findings. What is the best way toensure the safety of children’s toys? In responding, please considerhow the following groups would answer this question: governmentregulators (in the U.S. and China); consumer advocates, the toyindustry, children’s product retailers; and standard-settingorganizations. What might explain the differences in their point ofview? Be sure to support your answer using your research findings.What do you think is the best way for society to protect children fromharmful toys? Specifically, what are the appropriate roles for variousstakeholders in this process? Be sure to support your answer usingyour research findings.Writing the Final Case Analysis PaperThe Final Case Analysis Paper:Must be eight double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title page,reference page, exhibits, etc.) and formatted according to APA styleas outlined in your approved APA style guide. Must include a coverpage: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and numberInstructor’s name Date submitted Must include an introductoryparagraph with a clearly stated thesis or topic. Must address the topicof the paper with critical thought. That is, what is your response to

the content, either positive or negative, and then defend your position.If multiple options/alternatives/positions are present and are beingrejected you must also defend the reasons for rejecting an option.Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis or topic and a closingparagraph that summarizes the main point or points of your paper.Must use at least four scholarly resources Must use APA style asoutlined in your approved APA style guide to document all sources.Must include, on the final page, a Reference List that is completedaccording to APA style as outlined in your approved APA style guide.Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be usedto evaluate your assignment.