with an observer from Red Deer, Bob Gosselin. When theopportunity presents itself, he said he would take the southernlimit, saving us from a longer drive and of course providinganother chord.You may be wondering, “Doesn’t the asteroid rotate as itmoves?” Yes, but most of these events take only a few minutesto cross the face of the Earth, so it typically does not matter. But,an extraordinarily well-observed event spanning continentscould reveal a change in shape, though this has yet to be done.This was a really fun way to do science — we are eagerlyawaiting more asteroid occultations.Alister Ling enjoys all aspects of visual astronomy sincediscovering Jupiter with a 4.5-inch Tasco in the mid-1970s.Slowly but surely, he is adding impartial scientific measurementto the mix; the challenge is to do it unattended so he can keepthe eye at the eyepiece when it’s clear!On Another WavelengthM81/M82 & Arp’s Loopby David Garner, Kitchener-Waterloo Centre (jusloe1@wightman.ca)Figure 1 — M81 and M82 image courtesy of Ron Brecher, Kitchener-Waterloo Centre. Exposure: 51 x 90-sec unguided exposures using amodified Canon Digital Rebel XT, 105-mm f/6 refractor, and HutechLPS filter. Acquired and processed with Images Plus.The M81 Group of galaxies, containing M81 and M82along with several smaller associates, is located 12million light-years away in the constellation UrsaMajor. M81, also known as NGC 3031 and Bode’s Galaxy, isa beautiful type Sb spiral galaxy. It appears to have an activegalactic nucleus that is very luminous across the entireelectromagnetic spectrum. This extraordinary luminosity atthe core of M81 may be caused by hot gas spiralling into asupermassive black hole lurking at its centre. As gas falls intosuch a black hole, it can be heated to millions of degrees andemit extremely intense radiation.M81 is found at right ascension 09h 55m 33.2s,declination +69° 3´ 55“, and has an apparent magnitudeof 7.89, which is beyond the naked-eye limit for most of us.The way to find M81 by starhopping is to look for the BigDipper, start at the bottom-inside star (Phad) of the bucket,go diagonally up and across to the top of the bucket (Dubhe).This line points almost directly at M81, which is about thesame distance again as your diagonal line.In Figure 1, M82, an irregular galaxy (a.k.a. the CigarGalaxy), can be seen somewhat edge-wise near the top, tothe left of M81. Both galaxies can be viewed with binoculars,but you will need at least an 8-inch telescope to see anystructure.M81 and M82 have been tugging on each othergravitationally for the past billion years and now appear tobe orbiting around each other with a period of about 100million years. M82 seems to have suffered recently from aclose encounter with M81, causing it to form several darklanes throughout its structure. As a result of the interaction,density waves of gas have created many star-forming areascharacterized by bright blue stars in both galaxies. Theseare found in M81’s spiral arms and scattered around M82’souter areas. Gravitational interactions have also caused infallinggas to create many hot blue stars in the centres of thegalaxies. Today, M82 is usually described as a starburst-typegalaxy with stars forming at a rate fifty to a hundred timesfaster than a normal galaxy of its size.Since massive stars generally have short lifespans, astar in M82 explodes on average about every ten years. Theseviolent explosions heat the surrounding gas, blasting it outof the galaxy and creating filamentary structures with acharacteristic red (Hα) colour that extend perpendicularlyoutward from the galaxy core. Because all the hot new starsin M82 radiate and heat up any nearby dust clouds, M82 isalso the brightest infrared galaxy in the sky.Recently, researchers (deMello et al. 2008), using datafrom the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) satellite and the76 Celebrating the International Year of Astronomy (IYA2009)JRASC April / avril 2009
Hubble Space Telescope, discovered “blue blobs” in a structurecalled Arp’s Loop, a wispy bridge of neutral hydrogen gasthat stretches between M81 and M82. These “blue blobs”were interpreted as small clusters of O and B stars recentlycondensed from the gas that was tidally stripped from M81and M82. In effect, they are orphaned clusters of blue starsthat may be as young as 10 million years and that do notappear to belong to either galaxy. The next time you lookthrough your telescope at M81 and M82, just try to imagineArp’s Loop and the “blue blobs” between them.ReferencedeMello, D.F., Smith, L.J., Sabbi, E., Gallagher, J.S., Mountain,M., and Harbeck, D.R. 2008, AJ, 135, February, 548Dave Garner teaches astronomy at Conestoga College inKitchener, Ontario, and is a Past President of the Kitchener-Waterloo Centre of the RASC. He enjoys observing both deep-skyand Solar System objects, and especially trying to understandtheir inner workings.Through My EyepiecePerception and Realityby Geoff Gaherty, Toronto Centre (geoff@foxmead.ca)Now that the International Year of Astronomy is uponus, we all probably find ourselves talking to the publicmore about astronomy. Sometimes this communicationfails because what we, experienced astronomers, see in thesky is quite different from what someone who rarely looks atthe sky will see. I spend a fair bit of time these days answeringquestions in the Astronomy & Space category of Yahoo!Answers(http://ca.answers.yahoo.com). Most of the peopleasking questions know little about astronomy, so this gives mea good sense of the difficulties people have in understandingwhat they see in the sky. Here is a good example:Did anyone notice the overly huge star next to theMoon last night? I saw it around 7-ish p.m. (Centraltime). I don’t know if it was just a planet getting closeto earth, UFO, or just a big-*** comet about to crashinto our planet.This refers to the conjunction of the Moon and Venus on2009 January 29 [see Ralph Croning’s photo in Pen & Pixel - Ed].You will notice that Y!A has a “profanity filter” which coylyhides words it considers to be offensive with asterisks; thismakes it particularly hard to discuss human evolution whenour species always comes out as “**** sapiens”!The first problem is that Venus is described as an“overly huge star.” I’m not surprised at people confusing starsand planets; I expect that. What concerns me is the highlyinaccurate “overly huge.” This person is clearly confusing sizeand brightness. On this night, Venus was 29 arcseconds indiameter: to anyone with normal vision, this is a point sourceof light. It’s certainly very bright (magnitude -4.5), but nothuge. I see this mistake again and again, people describingbright objects as being large in size.The other distressing issue in this question is the person’sreadiness to jump from a factual description to a far-fetchedinterpretation. To the inexperienced observer, most objectsin the sky are UFOs, in its true meaning: Unidentified FlyingObjects. After all, they wouldn’t be asking what this was ifthey could identify it. Unfortunately, for most people on Y!A,UFO means “alien spacecraft.” To an advanced astronomer, theinterpretation of Venus as a comet may seem strange, but I stillremember my first night as an amateur astronomer, trying tofigure out whether the bright object I saw in Leo was a cometor not; it turned out to be Jupiter. What does bother me is theleap from a comet to its being about to crash into our planet!What’s going on with the Moon? I live in Illinoisand the Moon is acting weird. It is on the completelyopposite side of the sky it is usually on, looks twiceas big. Here’s the weirdest part. It is crescent, but thevisible crescent is on the bottom, not sideways.Non-astronomers have a lot of trouble with the Moon’sphases. A very large number of the people on Y!A are convincedthe phases are caused by the shadow of the Earth falling onthe Moon; this is by far the most common astronomical errorpeople make. They are baffled when they notice that a gibbousMoon’s terminator is convex. Related to this is the belief thatthe Moon can only be seen at night; they are greatly surprisedwhen they see the Moon in a daylight sky. They also seem tobelieve that the Moon is always in the same location in thesky. These three beliefs are all mutually exclusive and are allcontrary to Kepler’s Laws, but somehow some people manageto believe all three simultaneously. It is amazing what you canbelieve if you don’t think — are these the same people whodeny the Apollo Moon landings?April / avril 2009JRASCCelebrating the International Year of Astronomy (IYA2009)77