ON THE NATURE OF PREJUDICE

Recommendations

Info

The Political Psychology of Racism 357Hutchings, V. L. & Valentino, N. A.(2004). The centrality of race inAmerican politics. Annual Review ofPolitical Science, 7, 383–408.Jackman, M. R. & Muha, M. J. (1984).Education and intergroup attitudes:Moral enlightenment, superficialdemocratic commitment, or ideologicalrefinement? American SociologicalReview, 49, 751–69.Katz, I. (1981). Stigma: A social psychologicalanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum.Kinder, D. R. & Sanders, L. M. (1996).Divided by color: Racial politics and democraticideals. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.Klinkner, P. A. & Smith, R. M. (1999).The unsteady march: The rise and declineof racial equality in America. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Krysan, M. (2000). Prejudice, politics,and public opinion: Understandingthe sources of racial policy attitudes.Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 135–68.LeVine, R. A. & Campbell, D. T.(1972). Ethnocentrism. New York:Wiley.McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modernracism, ambivalence, and the modernracism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L.Gaertner (eds.), Prejudice, discrimination,and racism (pp. 91–126). New York:Academic Press.Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card:Campaign strategy, implicit messages, andthe norm of equality. Princeton:Princeton University Press.Myrdal, G. (1944). An American dilemma.New York: Harper and Row.Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., &Krysan, M. (1997). Racial attitudes inAmerica: Trends and interpretations (rev.ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress.Sears, D. O. (1993). Symbolic politics:A socio-psychological theory. InS. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (eds.),Explorations in political psychology(pp. 113–49). Durham, NC: DukeUniversity Press.Sears, D. O. & Funk, C. L. (1991).The role of self-interest in social andpolitical attitudes. In M. Zanna (ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology(vol. 24, pp. 1–91). Orlando, FL:Academic Press.Sears, D. O. & Henry, P. J. (2003).The origins of symbolic racism. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology,85, 259–75.Sears, D. O. & Henry, P. J. (in press).Over thirty years later: A contemporarylook at symbolic racism. In M. P.Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimentalsocial psychology (vol. 35).Sears, D. O., Henry, P. J., & Kosterman,R. (2000). Egalitarian values and contemporaryracial politics. In D. O.Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (eds.),Racialized politics: The debate aboutracism in America. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press.Sears, D. O. & Valentino, N. A. (2002).Is the proof in the pulpit? Race, religion,and party realignment in theSouth. Presented at the annual meetingof the American Political ScienceAssociation, Boston, MA, Aug. 31.Sears, D. O., van Laar, C., Carrillo, M.,& Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it reallyracism? The origins of white Americans’opposition to race-targetedpolicies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61,16–53.
358 SearsSidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Socialdominance: An intergroup theory of socialhierarchy and oppression. New York:Cambridge University Press.Sniderman, P. M. & Tetlock, P. E.(1986). Symbolic racism: Problems ofmotive attribution in political debate.Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129–50.Tarman, C. & Sears, D. O. (in press). Theconceptualization and measurement ofsymbolic racism. Journal of Politics.Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., &White, I. K. (2002). Cues thatmatter: How political ads prime racialattitudes during campaigns. AmericanPolitical Science Review, 96, 75–9.
Page 2 and 3:
ON THE NATURE OFPREJUDICE
Page 4 and 5:
On the Nature of PrejudiceFifty Yea
Page 6 and 7:
ContentsList of ContributorsForewor
Page 8 and 9:
ContentsviiPart V: Acquiring Prejud
Page 10 and 11:
ContributorsixMiles Hewstone, Depar
Page 12 and 13:
ForewordThe Society for the Psychol
Page 14 and 15:
PrefaceThe year 2004 marked the 50t
Page 16 and 17:
Prefacexvconstruct influential theo
Page 18 and 19:
2 Dovidio, Glick, and Rudmanmaneuve
Page 20 and 21:
4 Dovidio, Glick, and Rudmansocial
Page 22 and 23:
6 Dovidio, Glick, and RudmanHodson
Page 24 and 25:
8 Dovidio, Glick, and Rudmanwill fr
Page 26 and 27:
10 Dovidio, Glick, and RudmanAllpor
Page 28 and 29:
12 Dovidio, Glick, and RudmanThe No
Page 30 and 31:
14 Dovidio, Glick, and RudmanThus,
Page 32 and 33:
What is the Problem? 17PART IPREFER
Page 34 and 35:
20 Eagly and DiekmanAllport’s Vie
Page 36 and 37:
22 Eagly and Diekmanhold benevolent
Page 38 and 39:
24 Eagly and Diekmanwarranted by th
Page 40 and 41:
26 Eagly and Diekmanpossess overall
Page 42 and 43:
28 Eagly and Diekmanweighting of gr
Page 44 and 45:
30 Eagly and Diekmanhas proved to b
Page 46 and 47:
32 Eagly and Diekmansocial roles te
Page 48 and 49:
34 Eagly and Diekmanindividual diff
Page 50 and 51:
36 FiskeChapter 3ThreeSocial Cognit
Page 52 and 53:
38 Fiskecognitive revolution in psy
Page 54 and 55:
40 FiskePeople find it convenient t
Page 56 and 57:
42 Fiskeemotional, cultural, and pe
Page 58 and 59:
44 Fiskeare interdependent within t
Page 60 and 61:
46 FiskeA final recent analysis def
Page 62 and 63:
48 FiskeConversely, if their black
Page 64 and 65:
50 FiskeDovidio, J. F., Brigham, J.
Page 66 and 67:
52 FiskeSaenz, D. S. (1994). Token
Page 68 and 69:
54 Brown and ZagefkaChapter 4FourIn
Page 70 and 71:
56 Brown and Zagefkawhether ingroup
Page 72 and 73:
58 Brown and Zagefkastrength of ide
Page 74 and 75:
60 Brown and Zagefka(Deaux et al.,
Page 76 and 77:
62 Brown and Zagefkaexpect identifi
Page 78 and 79:
64 Brown and Zagefkamight be simila
Page 80 and 81:
66 Brown and Zagefkathat strong ing
Page 82 and 83:
68 Brown and ZagefkaBrown, R. J., H
Page 84 and 85:
70 Brown and ZagefkaTropp, L. R. &
Page 86 and 87:
72 Gaertner and Dovidioproposed tha
Page 88 and 89:
74 Gaertner and Dovidiomembers, the
Page 90 and 91:
76 Gaertner and DovidioNew Framewor
Page 92 and 93:
78 Gaertner and DovidioConditions o
Page 94 and 95:
80 Gaertner and Dovidioidentity rem
Page 96 and 97:
82 Gaertner and Dovidioconditions.
Page 98 and 99:
84 Gaertner and Dovidiobut other ti
Page 100 and 101:
86 Gaertner and Dovidiothe same tim
Page 102 and 103:
88 Gaertner and Dovidiointergroup r
Page 104 and 105:
90 Jackmandominant groups in unequa
Page 106 and 107:
92 Jackman(e.g., Adorno, Frenkel-Br
Page 108 and 109:
94 Jackmanviolence, a chain of comm
Page 110 and 111:
96 Jackmanmarked by pervasive spati
Page 112 and 113:
98 Jackmanfreelance. Most people’
Page 114 and 115:
100 Jackmanthis volume; Rudman, ch.
Page 116 and 117:
102 Jackmanand yet men display cons
Page 118 and 119:
104 JackmanGoldhagen, D. J. (1996).
Page 120 and 121:
106 RudmanChapter 7SevenRejection o
Page 122 and 123:
108 RudmanGender Prejudice as Antip
Page 124 and 125:
110 Rudmanhinges on a redefinition
Page 126 and 127:
112 RudmanBut there is also evidenc
Page 128 and 129:
114 Rudmanaccount for the pervasive
Page 130 and 131:
116 RudmanFuture DirectionsThe anal
Page 132 and 133:
118 Rudmaninterest in implicit asse
Page 134 and 135:
120 RudmanScott, R. & Tetreault, L.
Page 136 and 137:
Group Differences and Stereotype Ac
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
The Psychological Impact of Prejudi
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Mechanisms for Coping with Victimiz
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Cognitive Process 17511Chapter Elev
Page 188 and 189:
Cognitive Process 177discussed the
Page 190 and 191:
Cognitive Process 179to bias people
Page 192 and 193:
Cognitive Process 181Stereotype act
Page 194 and 195:
Cognitive Process 183influence judg
Page 196 and 197:
Cognitive Process 185suppression (f
Page 198 and 199:
Cognitive Process 187processes is a
Page 200 and 201:
Cognitive Process 189Guinote, A., J
Page 202 and 203:
Cognitive Process 191people. In E.
Page 204 and 205:
Linguistic Factors 193Negro, Italia
Page 206 and 207:
Linguistic Factors 195“the people
Page 208 and 209:
Linguistic Factors 197(1967) showed
Page 210 and 211:
Linguistic Factors 199direct and ef
Page 212 and 213:
Linguistic Factors 201such as ident
Page 214 and 215:
Linguistic Factors 203verbal realis
Page 216 and 217:
Linguistic Factors 205Bushman, B. J
Page 218 and 219:
Linguistic Factors 207Mullen, B. &
Page 220 and 221:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 209under
Page 222 and 223:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 211A few
Page 224 and 225:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 213from
Page 226 and 227:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 215p. 19
Page 228 and 229:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 217of di
Page 230 and 231:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 219favor
Page 232 and 233:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 221needs
Page 234 and 235:
Stereotypes in Our Culture 223evide
Page 236 and 237:
Instrumental Relations Among Groups
Page 238 and 239:
228 Esses, Jackson, Dovidio, and Ho
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
244 Glick15Chapter FifteenChoice of
Page 256 and 257:
246 Glickonto an innocent target if
Page 258 and 259:
248 Glickscapegoating and explains
Page 260 and 261:
250 Glickemotions theory. For examp
Page 262 and 263:
252 GlickPrior envious stereotypest
Page 264 and 265:
254 Glickand, if basic premises abo
Page 266 and 267:
256 Glickby low frustration toleran
Page 268 and 269:
258 GlickHas Allport Been Supported
Page 270 and 271:
260 GlickAltemeyer, B. (1981). Righ
Page 272 and 273:
262 Pettigrew and Tropp16Chapter Si
Page 274 and 275:
264 Pettigrew and Troppof the Bulge
Page 276 and 277:
266 Pettigrew and TroppMore broadly
Page 278 and 279:
268 Pettigrew and Tropp0.6Analysis
Page 280 and 281:
270 Pettigrew and TroppNot included
Page 282 and 283:
272 Pettigrew and Troppis consisten
Page 284 and 285:
274 Pettigrew and TroppAronson, E.
Page 286 and 287:
276 Pettigrew and TroppPettigrew, T
Page 288 and 289:
278 Kenworthy, Turner, Hewstone, an
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Conformity and Prejudice 295Chapter
Page 306 and 307:
Conformity and Prejudice 297Develop
Page 308 and 309:
Conformity and Prejudice 299To the
Page 310 and 311:
Conformity and Prejudice 301The Eas
Page 312 and 313:
Conformity and Prejudice 303to two
Page 314 and 315:
Conformity and Prejudice 305conform
Page 316 and 317: Conformity and Prejudice 307and thi
Page 318 and 319: Conformity and Prejudice 309Feagin,
Page 320 and 321: Prejudice in Childhood and Adolesce
Page 336 and 337: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 32720C
Page 338 and 339: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 329alt
Page 340 and 341: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 331vie
Page 342 and 343: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 333dis
Page 344 and 345: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 335Pos
Page 346 and 347: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 337ree
Page 348 and 349: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 339com
Page 350 and 351: Breaking the Prejudice Habit 341REF
Page 352 and 353: The Political Psychology of Racism
Page 368 and 369: Aggression, Hatred, and Other Emoti
Page 370 and 371: 362 Smith and Mackieform do those f
Page 372 and 373: 364 Smith and MackieThe change in t
Page 374 and 375: 366 Smith and MackieKey points of e
Page 376 and 377: 368 Smith and Mackieor event may st
Page 378 and 379: 370 Smith and Mackieof pity (e.g.,
Page 380 and 381: 372 Smith and Mackie(Berkowitz, 199
Page 382 and 383: 374 Smith and Mackieto reduce preju
Page 384 and 385: 376 Smith and MackieMackie, D. M.,
Page 386 and 387: 378 Newman and Caldwellshadow of th
Page 388 and 389: 380 Newman and CaldwellAllport on P
Page 390 and 391: 382 Newman and Caldwellby him), and
Page 392 and 393: 384 Newman and Caldwellunwanted tra
Page 394 and 395: 386 Newman and CaldwellAs already d
Page 396 and 397: 388 Newman and Caldwellto critiques
Page 398 and 399: 390 Newman and CaldwellREFERENCESAc
Page 400 and 401: 392 Newman and Caldwellmemory, past
Page 402 and 403: Personality and Prejudice 395Chapte
Page 404 and 405: Personality and Prejudice 397But wo
Page 406 and 407: Personality and Prejudice 399Develo
Page 408 and 409: Personality and Prejudice 401that t
Page 410 and 411: Personality and Prejudice 403et al.
Page 412 and 413: Personality and Prejudice 405Confor
Page 414 and 415: Personality and Prejudice 407contra
Page 416 and 417:
Personality and Prejudice 409each i
Page 418 and 419:
Personality and Prejudice 411(ed.),
Page 420 and 421:
Religion and Prejudice 413Chapter25
Page 422 and 423:
Religion and Prejudice 415of differ
Page 424 and 425:
Religion and Prejudice 417religion
Page 426 and 427:
Religion and Prejudice 419see also
Page 428 and 429:
Religion and Prejudice 421relation
Page 430 and 431:
Religion and Prejudice 423been the
Page 432 and 433:
Religion and Prejudice 425to the ex
Page 434 and 435:
Religion and Prejudice 427meta-anal
Page 436 and 437:
Intergroup Relations Program Evalua
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Author Index 447Author IndexAbelson
Page 454 and 455:
Author Index 449Brophy, I. N., 263,
Page 456 and 457:
Author Index 451du Plessis, I., 410
Page 458 and 459:
Author Index 453Guinote, A., 186, 1
Page 460 and 461:
Author Index 455Kendler, K. S., 160
Page 462 and 463:
Author Index 457Milgram, S., 93, 10
Page 464 and 465:
Author Index 459Rosenberg, M., 140,
Page 466 and 467:
Author Index 461Swanson, J., 154Swe
Page 468 and 469:
Author Index 463Subject IndexAffirm
Page 470:
Subject Index 465Self-categorizatio
show all

ON THE NATURE OF PREJUDICE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?