28.08.2015 Views

POL 201 Week 3 DQ 1 Presidential Leadership and the Electoral College

Presidential Leadership and the Electoral College. Americans expect their presidents to get things done, to solve problems, to govern effectively, and to be strong leaders. The framers of the Constitution did not envision such presidential leadership. A scholar of the presidency points out that Article II of the Constitution gives the president scant formal power to influence congressional policy-making (Simon, n.d.). He also notes that the framers intentionally designed a process for selecting presidents that would minimize their political power – the Electoral College. They hoped this institution would insulate the chief executive from the public because they feared the power of presidents who might be elected by the people. Therefore, the Constitution provides that "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress..." Having state legislatures "appoint" the Electors who select the chief executive would minimize the president's capacity to lead on the basis of his popular support. In a very real sense, the president would not be accountable to the people but rather to the state legislatures who appoint Electors. This procedure was also seen as a way to encourage the selection of statesmen with "characters preeminent for ability and virtue” rather than mere politicians with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” (Hamilton, 1788).

Presidential Leadership and the Electoral College. Americans expect their presidents to get things done, to solve problems, to govern effectively, and to be strong leaders. The framers of the Constitution did not envision such presidential leadership. A scholar of the presidency points out that Article II of the Constitution gives the president scant formal power to influence congressional policy-making (Simon, n.d.). He also notes that the framers intentionally designed a process for selecting presidents that would minimize their political power – the Electoral College. They hoped this institution would insulate the chief executive from the public because they feared the power of presidents who might be elected by the people. Therefore, the Constitution provides that "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress..." Having state legislatures "appoint" the Electors who select the chief executive would minimize the president's capacity to lead on the basis of his popular support. In a very real sense, the president would not be accountable to the people but rather to the state legislatures who appoint Electors. This procedure was also seen as a way to encourage the selection of statesmen with "characters preeminent for ability and virtue” rather than mere politicians with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” (Hamilton, 1788).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>POL</strong> <strong>201</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 3 <strong>DQ</strong> 1 <strong>Presidential</strong> <strong>Leadership</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Electoral</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

To Purchase This Material Click below Link<br />

http://www.snaptutorial.com/<strong>POL</strong>-<strong>201</strong>/<strong>POL</strong>-<strong>201</strong>-<strong>Week</strong>-3-<strong>DQ</strong>-1-<strong>Presidential</strong>-<br />

<strong>Leadership</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-<strong>Electoral</strong>-<strong>College</strong><br />

For more classes visit<br />

www.snaptutorial.com<br />

<strong>Presidential</strong> <strong>Leadership</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Electoral</strong> <strong>College</strong>. Americans expect <strong>the</strong>ir presidents to get<br />

things done, to solve problems, to govern effectively, <strong>and</strong> to be strong leaders. The framers of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Constitution did not envision such presidential leadership. A scholar of <strong>the</strong> presidency<br />

points out that Article II of <strong>the</strong> Constitution gives <strong>the</strong> president scant formal power to<br />

influence congressional policy-making (Simon, n.d.). He also notes that <strong>the</strong> framers<br />

intentionally designed a process for selecting presidents that would minimize <strong>the</strong>ir political<br />

power – <strong>the</strong> <strong>Electoral</strong> <strong>College</strong>. They hoped this institution would insulate <strong>the</strong> chief executive<br />

from <strong>the</strong> public because <strong>the</strong>y feared <strong>the</strong> power of presidents who might be elected by <strong>the</strong><br />

people. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> Constitution provides that "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner<br />

as <strong>the</strong> Legislature <strong>the</strong>reof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to <strong>the</strong> whole Number of


Senators <strong>and</strong> Representatives to which <strong>the</strong> State may be entitled in <strong>the</strong> Congress..." Having<br />

state legislatures "appoint" <strong>the</strong> Electors who select <strong>the</strong> chief executive would minimize <strong>the</strong><br />

president's capacity to lead on <strong>the</strong> basis of his popular support. In a very real sense, <strong>the</strong><br />

president would not be accountable to <strong>the</strong> people but ra<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> state legislatures who<br />

appoint Electors. This procedure was also seen as a way to encourage <strong>the</strong> selection of<br />

statesmen with "characters preeminent for ability <strong>and</strong> virtue” ra<strong>the</strong>r than mere politicians<br />

with “talents for low intrigue, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> little arts of popularity” (Hamilton, 1788).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!