- Page 1 and 2: Credibility and Evidence Based Natu
- Page 3 and 4: Aim of presentation • How far the
- Page 5 and 6: The relationship between exposure t
- Page 7 and 8: Conflict of interest (COI) The trad
- Page 9 and 10: Candidate List of Categories of Fin
- Page 11 and 12: Actual or reasonably perceived conf
- Page 13 and 14: Physician relationships with the in
- Page 15 and 16: Physician Relationships With The In
- Page 17 and 18: Physician Relationships With The In
- Page 19 and 20: Concerns Regarding Physician Relati
- Page 21 and 22: Ethics And Compliance Payments to
- Page 23 and 24: Ethics And Compliance Biopharmaceut
- Page 25 and 26: Guidelines For Physician-Pharmaceut
- Page 27 and 28: Financial Conflicts of Interest Che
- Page 29 and 30: Financial Conflicts of Interest Che
- Page 31: Financial Conflicts of Interest Che
- Page 35 and 36: Systems for assessment of postmarke
- Page 37 and 38: Systems for assessment of postmarke
- Page 39 and 40: Exposures to information from pharm
- Page 41 and 42: Why we as prescribers still meet ph
- Page 43 and 44: This is how each of the companies l
- Page 45 and 46: After two decades of decimation, on
- Page 47 and 48: Incretin Drugs Contribute Heavily t
- Page 49 and 50: A Clouded Future For Big Pharma's B
- Page 51 and 52: The largest health fraud settlement
- Page 53 and 54: Use of drugs and its budgetary impl
- Page 55 and 56: Key functions of drug regulatory ag
- Page 57 and 58: Relationships Between Authors of Cl
- Page 59 and 60: Conflicts (Dualities) of interest i
- Page 61 and 62: Conflicts (Dualities) of interest a
- Page 63 and 64: Cross-sectional survey of 192 autho
- Page 65 and 66: Clinical practice guidelines for di
- Page 67 and 68: Hierarchy of evidence-based medicin
- Page 69 and 70: Criteria for assigning levels of ev
- Page 71 and 72: Criteria for assigning grades of re
- Page 73 and 74: Criteria for assigning levels of ev
- Page 75 and 76: Meta-analysis may not consider COI
- Page 77 and 78: Financial disclosures in RCT’s* 5
- Page 79 and 80: Large trials that compared clinical
- Page 81 and 82: HBA1C targets suggested by differen
- Page 83 and 84:
The goal for A1c may not be safely
- Page 85 and 86:
A Patient- Centered Approach to Typ
- Page 87 and 88:
According to subset analyses from a
- Page 89 and 90:
Approach to management of hyperglyc
- Page 91 and 92:
VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline
- Page 93 and 94:
What is Algorithm (in guidelines)?
- Page 95 and 96:
Types of medical practice setting
- Page 97 and 98:
In summary why we need clinical pra
- Page 99 and 100:
Dissemination and implementation an
- Page 101 and 102:
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)
- Page 103 and 104:
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)
- Page 105 and 106:
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)
- Page 107 and 108:
Personalized medicine Using a pers
- Page 109 and 110:
Delaying the Onset of Type 2 Diabet
- Page 111 and 112:
Intervention studies on the prevent
- Page 113 and 114:
Management of hyperglycaemia in typ
- Page 115 and 116:
General recommendations for managem
- Page 117 and 118:
ADA-EASD Position Statement: Manage
- Page 119 and 120:
Management of Hyperglycemia in T2DM
- Page 121 and 122:
AACE/ACE* Diabetes Algorithm For Gl
- Page 123 and 124:
Dr. Alashbal’ s observation regar
- Page 125 and 126:
AACE/ACE* Diabetes Algorithm For Gl
- Page 127 and 128:
AACE/ACE* Diabetes Algorithm For Gl
- Page 129 and 130:
AACE/ACE* Diabetes Algorithm For Gl
- Page 131 and 132:
AACE/ACE* Diabetes Algorithm For Gl
- Page 133 and 134:
Management of hyperglycemia in type
- Page 135 and 136:
Relevant comments on ADA/EASD algor
- Page 137 and 138:
ADA-EASD Position Statement: Manage
- Page 139 and 140:
ADA-EASD Position Statement: Manage
- Page 141 and 142:
ADA-EASD Position Statement: Manage
- Page 144 and 145:
Sequential insulin strategies in ty
- Page 146 and 147:
ADA/EASD position statement 2012 In
- Page 148 and 149:
ADA/EASD position statement 2012 L
- Page 150 and 151:
Individualization of therapy ADA/EA
- Page 152 and 153:
NICE Type 2 diabetes algorithm for
- Page 154 and 155:
Relevant comments on NICE algorithm
- Page 156 and 157:
Relevant comments on SIGN algorithm
- Page 158 and 159:
Relevant comments on DoD/VA algorit
- Page 160 and 161:
Comparison of the ADA/EASD algorith
- Page 162 and 163:
Comparison of the ADA/EASD algorith
- Page 164 and 165:
Pharmacotherapy of Type 2 Diabetes
- Page 166 and 167:
Maximum blood glucose lowering effe
- Page 168 and 169:
Dose-response relationships of sulp
- Page 170 and 171:
Hazard ratios (95% CI) for differen
- Page 172 and 173:
"metformin, sulfonylureas, • •
- Page 174 and 175:
Efficacy of monotherapy Drug Thiazo
- Page 176 and 177:
Insulin is the most effective diabe
- Page 178 and 179:
Burdens of insulin therapy as a fir
- Page 180 and 181:
Why health care providers and patie
- Page 182 and 183:
ADA-EASD Position Statement: Manage
- Page 184 and 185:
The maximum period after which we m
- Page 186 and 187:
Doctor, patient, and system barrier
- Page 188 and 189:
Painful truth and big question why
- Page 190 and 191:
Report of Institute for Quality and
- Page 192 and 193:
Report of Institute for Quality and
- Page 194 and 195:
Insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin In
- Page 196 and 197:
Safety of Incretin-Based Therapies
- Page 198 and 199:
The use of incretin-based glucose-l
- Page 200 and 201:
Dr. Alashbal’ s observation regar
- Page 202 and 203:
Conclusions The pendulum is swingin
- Page 204 and 205:
Suggested seven deadly sins of drug
- Page 206 and 207:
Never be And the first, this sin is
- Page 208:
hank you Dr. Abdulameer Abdullah Al