31.08.2015 Views

Prefiled Direct Testimony of Robert B. Hevert on Behalf of ...

Prefiled Direct Testimony of Robert B. Hevert on Behalf of ...

Prefiled Direct Testimony of Robert B. Hevert on Behalf of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Public Service Regulati<strong>on</strong><br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana Public Service Commissi<strong>on</strong><br />

Docket No. 2012.9.94<br />

Natural Gas General Filing<br />

NorthWestern Energy<br />

PREFILED DIRECT TESTIMONY<br />

OF<br />

ROBERT B. HEVERT<br />

ON BEHALF OF<br />

NORTHWESTERN ENERGY


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF ROBERT B. REVERT ...........................................•... ES-l<br />

I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1<br />

ll. PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW OF TESTIMONY .....•.............................................. 2<br />

III. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ..•.......................................................................... 5<br />

IV. REGULATORY GUIDELINES AND FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS .......... 7<br />

V. PROXY GROUP SELECTION .................................................................................. 8<br />

VI. COST OF EQUITY ESTIMATION ........................................................................ 12<br />

Quarterly Growth DCF Model ...•.............................•................................................. 14<br />

Dividend Yield and Growth Rates for the Quarterly DCF Model.. ........................... 16<br />

Results for the Quarterly Growth DCF Model .......................................................... 21<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF ModeL ...•................................................................................ 22<br />

Dividend Yield and Growth Ratesfor the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Model ................ 22<br />

Results for C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF ModeL. ................................................................ 23<br />

Multi-Stage DCF Model .............•............................................•.................................. 24<br />

Discounted Cash Flow Model Results ........................................................................ 29<br />

CAPM Analysis ........................................................................................................... 32<br />

B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium Approach .................................................................42<br />

VIT. BUSINESS RISKS ..................................................................................•.................. 45<br />

Small Size Premium ..................................................•................................................. 45<br />

Revenue Stabilizati<strong>on</strong> Mechanisms ............................................................................ 48<br />

Flotati<strong>on</strong> Costs ...•........................................................................................................ 49<br />

VIII. CAPITAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT ................................................................. 51<br />

Incremental Credit Spreads ........................................................................................ 52<br />

Yield Spreads ............................................................................................................... 55<br />

Equity Market Volatility and Return Correlati<strong>on</strong>s .................................................... 57<br />

IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION ..................................................... 62<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


EXHIBITS<br />

Exhibit<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-l<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-2<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-4<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-6<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-7<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-9<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-IO<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-ll<br />

Descripti<strong>on</strong><br />

Quarterly Growth DCF Results<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Results<br />

Retenti<strong>on</strong> Growth Estimate<br />

Multi-Stage DCF Results<br />

Market Risk Premium Calculati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Beta Coefficients<br />

CAPM Results<br />

B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium Analysis<br />

Small Size Premium<br />

Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Proxy Group Revenue Stabilizati<strong>on</strong> Mechanisms<br />

Flotati<strong>on</strong> Costs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


ES-l<br />

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF ROBERT B. HEVERT<br />

2 My direct testim<strong>on</strong>y establishes that, for NorthWestern Corporati<strong>on</strong>, which does business<br />

3 as NorthWestern Energy ("NorthWestern" or the "Company"), a Return <strong>on</strong> Equity<br />

4 ("ROE") <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lO.50 percent is reas<strong>on</strong>able. My recommended 10.50 percent ROE c<strong>on</strong>siders<br />

5 a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors that affect the required return to equity investors in the Company. My<br />

6 testim<strong>on</strong>y:<br />

7 • Discusses the multiple analytical approaches that were evaluated to develop the<br />

8 ROE;<br />

9 • Explains how the analysis to determine an appropriate ROE is affected by the<br />

10 various business and operating risks faced by the Company; and<br />

11 • Describes the current capital markets and ec<strong>on</strong>omic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, and the degree to<br />

12 which those c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s affect NorthWestern's ROE.<br />

13 Together with the exhibits attached to my testim<strong>on</strong>y, this evidence dem<strong>on</strong>strates that a<br />

14 10.50 percent ROE should be approved for NorthWestern in order to provide the<br />

15 Company with an opportunity to create earnings sufficient to provide an appropriate<br />

16 return to its equity investors.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3 Q.<br />

4<br />

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT B. HEVERT<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, AFFILIATION AND<br />

ADDRESS.<br />

BUSINESS<br />

5 A.<br />

My name is <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

I am Managing Partner <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sussex Ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8 Q.<br />

9 A.<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13 Q.<br />

14 A.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17 Q.<br />

18<br />

19 A.<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

Advisors, LLC ("Sussex"). My business address is 161 Worcester Road, Suite<br />

503, Framingham, MA 01701.<br />

ON WHOSE BEHALF ARE YOU SUBMITTING THIS TESTIMONY?<br />

I am submitting this direct testim<strong>on</strong>y ("<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>") before the M<strong>on</strong>tana<br />

Public Service Commissi<strong>on</strong> ("Commissi<strong>on</strong>") <strong>on</strong> behalf <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWestern<br />

Corporati<strong>on</strong>, which does business as NorthWestern Energy ("NorthWestern" or the<br />

"Company").<br />

PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND.<br />

I hold a Bachelor's degree in Business and Ec<strong>on</strong>omics from the University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Delaware, and an MBA with a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> in Finance from the University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Massachusetts. I also hold the Chartered Financial Analyst designati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR EXPERIENCE IN THE ENERGY AND<br />

UTILITY INDUSTRIES.<br />

I have worked in regulated industries for over twenty five years, having served as<br />

an executive and manager with c<strong>on</strong>sulting firms, a financial <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a publiclytraded<br />

natural gas utility (at the time, Bay State Gas Company), and an analyst at<br />

a telecommunicati<strong>on</strong>s utility. In my role as a c<strong>on</strong>sultant, I have advised numerous<br />

energy and utility clients <strong>on</strong> a wide range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> financial and ec<strong>on</strong>omic issues<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

including corporate and asset-based transacti<strong>on</strong>s, asset and enterprise valuati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

transacti<strong>on</strong> due diligence, and strategic matters. As an expert witness, I have<br />

provided testim<strong>on</strong>y in over 80 proceedings regarding various financial and<br />

regulatory matters before numerous state utility regulatory agencies and the<br />

Federal Energy Regulatory Commissi<strong>on</strong>. A summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al and<br />

educati<strong>on</strong>al background, including a list <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my testim<strong>on</strong>y in prior proceedings, is<br />

included in Exhibit A to my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

8<br />

II.<br />

PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW OF TESTIMONY<br />

9 Q.<br />

10 A.<br />

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY?<br />

The purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> is to present evidence and provide a<br />

11<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong> regarding the Company's return <strong>on</strong> equity ("ROE").'<br />

My<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15 Q.<br />

16<br />

17 A.<br />

analysis and c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s are supported by the data presented in Exhibit No. RBB-<br />

1 through Exhibit No. RBB-11, which have been prepared by me or under my<br />

directi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

WHAT ARE YOUR CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE APPROPRIATE<br />

COST OF EQUITY?<br />

My analyses indicate that the Company's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity currently is in the range<br />

18<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.00 percent to 10.75 percent.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the quantitative and qualitative<br />

19<br />

20<br />

analyses discussed throughout my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>, I c<strong>on</strong>clude that an ROE <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

10.50 percent is reas<strong>on</strong>able and appropriate.<br />

Throughout my testim<strong>on</strong>y, I interchangeably use the terms "ROE" and "Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity".<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2<br />

3 A.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ANALYSES THAT<br />

LED TO YOUR ROE RECOMMENDATION.<br />

As discussed in more detail in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI, in light <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recent market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

and given the fact that equity analysts and investors tend to use multiple<br />

methodologies in developing their return requirements, it is important to c<strong>on</strong>sider<br />

the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> several analytical approaches in determining the Company's ROE.<br />

In order to develop my ROE recommendati<strong>on</strong>, I therefore applied the Quarterly<br />

Growth, C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth, and Multi-Stage forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Discounted Cash Flow<br />

("DCF") model, the Capital Asset Pricing Model ("CAPM"), and the Risk<br />

10<br />

Premium approach.<br />

As discussed later in my testim<strong>on</strong>y, it is important to<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sider a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors, both quantitative and qualitative, in arriving at an<br />

ROE determinati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to the methodologies noted above, my recommendati<strong>on</strong> also<br />

takes into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> the regulatory and capital envir<strong>on</strong>ment in which the<br />

Company operates. In particular, I note that credit spreads between A -rated utility<br />

b<strong>on</strong>ds and Baa-rated utility b<strong>on</strong>ds have increased, which suggests that debt<br />

investors have increased their marginal return requirements. During the same<br />

period in which credit spreads increased, the correlati<strong>on</strong> between those spreads<br />

and the 30-year Treasury b<strong>on</strong>d was negative, indicating that required risk<br />

premiums increased as l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn Treasury yields decreased. I also note that the<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship between the 30-year Treasury yield and the proxy group average<br />

dividend yield has become inverted relative to its l<strong>on</strong>g-run norm. Finally, natural<br />

gas stocks have been somewhat more volatile than their historical average, and<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

their returns have become more correlated with the broader market than they<br />

2<br />

historically had been.<br />

As discussed in greater detail in Secti<strong>on</strong> VIII, the<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15 Q.<br />

16<br />

17 A.<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tinuing instability in the capital markets indicates that the current historically<br />

low level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 3D-year Treasury does not necessarily indicate that the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Equity is at a commensurately low level.<br />

Since estimating the ROE is a market-based exercise, it is important to<br />

understand the risks faced by the Company relative to its peers. As such, I also<br />

took into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> business risks and costs which affect the Company, such<br />

as: (1) its relatively small size compared to the proxy group; (2) the lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

revenue stabilizati<strong>on</strong> mechanisms employed by the Company relative to the proxy<br />

group; and (3) flotati<strong>on</strong> costs. While I did not make any explicit adjustments to<br />

my ROE estimates for those factors, I did take them into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> in<br />

determining the appropriate estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Company's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity within the<br />

10.00 percent to 10.75 percent range.<br />

HOW DID YOU DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE RANGE OF<br />

REASONABLENESS FOR THE COMPANY'S COST OF EQUITY?<br />

In order to develop the reas<strong>on</strong>able range for NorthWestern's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, I<br />

reviewed the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the three DCF models, as well as the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CAPM<br />

analyses, and B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium approach.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sistent with my prior practice, I did not apply specific weights to those<br />

analyses. As discussed further in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI, in my review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the DCF models I<br />

disregarded the mean low results, because the results are not a reas<strong>on</strong>able<br />

estimati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any company's ROE. As noted above, I also c<strong>on</strong>sidered the effects<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> current capital market envir<strong>on</strong>ment, as well as the effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> specific business<br />

risks faced by the Company in determining my ROE range and estimate.<br />

In light <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the factors noted above, I have set the low end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my range by<br />

reference to the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mean, and mean high results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my DCF models.<br />

The high end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the range generally is estimated by the average mean high results<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my DCF models. That approach suggests a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.96 percent to 10.73<br />

7<br />

percent.<br />

As discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI, the CAPM and B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk<br />

8<br />

Premium analyses corroborate the reas<strong>on</strong>ableness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that range.<br />

As such, I<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

believe an ROE within the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.00 to 10.75 is reas<strong>on</strong>able. In light <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s discussed throughout the balance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

regarding the Company's relative business risks, it is my opini<strong>on</strong> that within that<br />

range, an ROE <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.50 percent is reas<strong>on</strong>able and appropriate.<br />

13<br />

III.<br />

SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS<br />

14 Q.<br />

15<br />

16 A.<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

WHAT ARE THE KEY FACTORS CONSIDERED IN YOUR ANALYSES<br />

AND UPON WHICH YOU BASE YOUR RECOMMENDED ROE?<br />

My analyses and recommendati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sidered the following:<br />

• The Hope and Bluefield decisi<strong>on</strong>s 2 that established the standards for<br />

determining a fair and reas<strong>on</strong>able allowed return <strong>on</strong> equity including;<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the allowed return with other businesses having similar<br />

risk; adequacy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the return to provide access to capital and support credit<br />

quality; and that the end result must lead to just and reas<strong>on</strong>able rates.<br />

2<br />

Bluefield Waterworks & Improvement Co., v. Public Service Commissi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> West Virginia, 262 U.S.<br />

679 (1923); Federal Power Commissi<strong>on</strong> v. Hope Natural Gas Co .• 320 U.S. 591 (1944).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 6 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7 Q.<br />

8 A.<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

• The effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the current capital market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> investors' return<br />

requirements, and in particular, the Company's c<strong>on</strong>tinuing need to access<br />

the capital markets.<br />

• The Company's business risks relative to the proxy group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> comparable<br />

companies and the implicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those risks in arriving at the appropriate<br />

ROE.<br />

WHAT ARE THE RESULTS OF YOUR ANALYSES?<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the analytical results presented throughout my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and in<br />

light <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s discussed throughout the balance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>, it is my view that a reas<strong>on</strong>able range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimates is from 10.00<br />

percent to 10.75 percent, and within that range, an ROE <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.50 percent is<br />

reas<strong>on</strong>able and appropriate.<br />

13 Q.<br />

HOW IS<br />

THE REMAINDER OF YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY<br />

14<br />

15 A.<br />

ORGANIZED?<br />

The balance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> is organized as follows:<br />

16<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> IV -<br />

Discusses the regulatory guidelines and financial c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

17<br />

pertinent to the development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital;<br />

18<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> V -<br />

Explains my selecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> natural gas<br />

19<br />

distributi<strong>on</strong> utilities used to develop my analytical results;<br />

20<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> VI -<br />

Explains my analyses and the analytical bases for my ROE<br />

21<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>;<br />

22<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> VII -<br />

Provides a discussi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> specific business risks that have a direct<br />

23<br />

bearing <strong>on</strong> the Company's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity;<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 7 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 IV.<br />

5 Q.<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8 A.<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15 Q.<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18 A.<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> VIII - Discusses current capital market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s and the effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the Company's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity; and<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> IX - Summarizes my c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s and recommendati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

REGULATORY GUIDELINES AND FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

PLEASE DESCRIBE THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES TO BE CONSIDERED<br />

IN ESTABLISHING THE COST OF CAPITAL FOR A REGULATED<br />

UTILITY.<br />

The United States Supreme Court's precedent-setting Hope and Bluefield cases<br />

established the standards for determining the fairness or reas<strong>on</strong>ableness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

utility's allowed ROE. Am<strong>on</strong>g the standards established by the Court in those<br />

cases are: (I) c<strong>on</strong>sistency with other businesses having similar or comparable<br />

risks; (2) adequacy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the return to support credit quality and access to capital;<br />

and (3) the principle that the specific means <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> arriving at a fair return are not<br />

important, <strong>on</strong>ly that the end result leads to just and reas<strong>on</strong>able rates.<br />

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT FOR A UTILITY TO BE ALLOWED THE<br />

OPPORTUNITY TO EARN A RETURN ADEQUATE TO ATTRACT<br />

EQUITY CAPITAL AT REASONABLE TERMS?<br />

A return that is adequate to attract capital at reas<strong>on</strong>able terms enables the utility to<br />

provide service while maintaining its financial integrity. In keeping with the<br />

Hope and Bluefield standards, that return should be commensurate with the<br />

returns expected elsewhere in the market for investments <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equivalent risk.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> those standards, the Commissi<strong>on</strong>'s decisi<strong>on</strong> in this case should provide<br />

the Company with the opportunity to earn an ROE that is: (I) adequate to attract<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 8 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

capital at reas<strong>on</strong>able terms, thereby enabling it to c<strong>on</strong>tinue to provide safe and<br />

reliable natural gas service; (2) sufficient to ensure its financial integrity; and (3)<br />

commensurate with returns <strong>on</strong> investments in enterprises having corresp<strong>on</strong>ding<br />

4<br />

risks.<br />

The allowed ROE should enable the Company to finance capital<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

lO<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Q.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17 A.<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

expenditures at reas<strong>on</strong>able cost rates and maintain its financial flexibility over the<br />

period during which rates are expected to remain in effect. While the "capital<br />

attracti<strong>on</strong>" and "financial integrity" standards are important principles in normal<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, the practical implicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those standards are even more<br />

pr<strong>on</strong>ounced during periods <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital market instability. As discussed in more<br />

detail in Secti<strong>on</strong> VIII, for example, sustained increases in the incremental spread<br />

<strong>on</strong> utility debt (i.e., the difference in debt yields <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> utilities varying credit ratings)<br />

have intensified the importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintaining a str<strong>on</strong>g financial pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ile.<br />

V. PROXY GROUP SELECTION<br />

AS A PRELIMINARY MATTER, WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO SELECT<br />

A GROUP OF PROXY COMPANIES TO DETERMINE THE COST OF<br />

EQUITY FOR NORTHWESTERN?<br />

First, it is important to bear in mind that the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity for a given enterprise<br />

depends <strong>on</strong> the risks attendant to the business in which the company is engaged.<br />

According to financial theory, the value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a given company is equal to the<br />

aggregate market value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its c<strong>on</strong>stituent business units. The value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

individual business units reflects the risks and opportunities inherent in the<br />

business sectors in which those units operate. In this proceeding, we are focused<br />

<strong>on</strong> estimating the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity for the Company's gas distributi<strong>on</strong> operati<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11 Q.<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 A.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 Q.<br />

20<br />

21 A.<br />

22<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana. Since the ROE is a market-based c<strong>on</strong>cept, and given the fact that the<br />

NorthWestern's M<strong>on</strong>tana jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al gas operati<strong>on</strong>s do not make up the entirety<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the publicly traded entity, it is necessary to establish a group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> companies that<br />

are both publicly traded and comparable to NorthWestern to serve as its "proxy"<br />

for purposes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ROE estimati<strong>on</strong> process.<br />

Even if NorthWestern's assets did c<strong>on</strong>stitute the entirety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Company's<br />

operati<strong>on</strong>s, it is possible that transitory events could bias its market value in <strong>on</strong>e<br />

way or another over a given period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time. A significant benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> using a proxy<br />

group, therefore, is to moderate the effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> anomalous, temporary events that<br />

may be associated with any<strong>on</strong>e company.<br />

DOES THE SELECTION OF A PROXY GROUP SUGGEST THAT<br />

ANALYTICAL RESULTS WILL BE TIGHTLY CLUSTERED AROUND<br />

AVERAGE (LE., MEAN) RESULTS?<br />

Not necessarily. Notwithstanding the care taken to ensure risk comparability,<br />

market expectati<strong>on</strong>s with respect to future risks and growth opportunities will<br />

vary from company to company. Therefore, even within a group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> similarly<br />

situated companies, it is comm<strong>on</strong> for analytical results to reflect a seemingly wide<br />

range.<br />

PLEASE NOW PROVIDE A SUMMARY PROFILE OF<br />

NORTHWESTERN.<br />

NorthWestern distributes natural gas to approximately 182,000 customers in<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana. The Company also serves an additi<strong>on</strong>al 31,000 customers through<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tracts with other distributors. 3<br />

NorthWestern currently has l<strong>on</strong>g-term issuer<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

Q.<br />

A.<br />

credit ratings <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> BBB from Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings, and senior<br />

unsecured ratings <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Baal, BBB and BBB+ from Moody's Investors Service,<br />

Standard & Poor's, and Fitch Ratings, respectively.4<br />

HOW DID YOU SELECT THE COMPANIES INCLUDED IN YOUR<br />

PROXY GROUP?<br />

I began with the universe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> companies that Value Line classifies as Electric or<br />

Natural Gas Utilities, which includes a group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 59 domestic U.S. utilities, and<br />

applied the following screening criteria:<br />

• I excluded companies that do not c<strong>on</strong>sistently pay quarterly cash<br />

dividends;<br />

• I excluded companies not covered by at least two utility industry equity<br />

analysts;<br />

• All <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the companies in my proxy group have investment grade senior<br />

b<strong>on</strong>d and/or corporate credit ratings from Standard and Poor's;<br />

• To ensure that my proxy group represents natural gas distributi<strong>on</strong><br />

operati<strong>on</strong>s, I included companies with at least 60.00 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>solidated net operating income derived from regulated natural gas<br />

utility operati<strong>on</strong>s; and<br />

• I eliminated companies that are currently known to be party to a merger,<br />

or other significant transacti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

NorthWestern Corporati<strong>on</strong>, SEC Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2011, at II.<br />

S<strong>on</strong>rce: SNL Financial.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 11 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q. DID YOU INCLUDE NORTHWESTERN IN YOUR ANALYSIS?<br />

2 A. No, in order to avoid the circular logic that otherwise would occur, it has been my<br />

3 c<strong>on</strong>sistent practice to exclude the subject company from the proxy group. In any<br />

4 event, the percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> operating income derived from NorthWestern's regulated<br />

5 gas operati<strong>on</strong>s relative to the combined entity would not have met my 60.00<br />

6 percent threshold.<br />

7 Q. WHAT COMPANIES MET THOSE SCREENING CRITERIA?<br />

8 A. The criteria discussed above resulted in a proxy group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the following nine<br />

9 companies:<br />

10 Table 1: Proxy Group Screening Results<br />

11<br />

Company<br />

AGL Resources<br />

Atmos Energy<br />

Laclede Group<br />

New Jersey Resources<br />

Northwest Natural Gas<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas<br />

South Jersey Industries<br />

Southwest Gas<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas Light<br />

Ticker<br />

GAS<br />

ATO<br />

LG<br />

NJR<br />

NWN<br />

PNY<br />

SIT<br />

SWX<br />

WGL<br />

12 Q. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT A PROXY GROUP OF NINE COMPANIES IS<br />

13 SUFFICIENTLY LARGE?<br />

14 A. Yes, I do. The analyses performed in estimating the ROE are more likely to be<br />

15 representative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the subject utility's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity to the extent that the chosen<br />

16 proxy companies are fundamentally comparable to the subject utility. Because all<br />

17 analysts use some form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> screening process to arrive at a proxy group, the group,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 12 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

by definiti<strong>on</strong>, is not randomly drawn from a larger populati<strong>on</strong>. C<strong>on</strong>sequently,<br />

there is no reas<strong>on</strong> to place more reliance <strong>on</strong> the quantitative results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a larger<br />

proxy group simply by virtue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the resulting larger number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> observati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Moreover, because I am using market-based data, my analytical results<br />

will not necessarily be tightly clustered around a central point. Results that may<br />

be somewhat dispersed, however, do not suggest that the screening approach is<br />

inappropriate or the results less meaningful. In my view, including companies<br />

whose fundamental comparability is tenuous at best simply for the purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

expanding the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> observati<strong>on</strong>s does not add relevant informati<strong>on</strong> to the<br />

analysis.<br />

11<br />

VI.<br />

COST OF EOUITY ESTIMATION<br />

12 Q.<br />

13<br />

14 A.<br />

PLEASE BRIEFLY DISCUSS THE ROE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE<br />

REGULATED RATE OF RETURN.<br />

Regulated utilities primarily use comm<strong>on</strong> stock and l<strong>on</strong>g-term debt to finance<br />

15<br />

their permanent property, plant, and equipment.<br />

The overall rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return<br />

16<br />

17<br />

("ROR") for a regulated utility is based <strong>on</strong> its weighted average cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital, in<br />

which the cost rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the individual sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital are weighted by their<br />

18<br />

respective book values.<br />

While the costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> debt and preferred stock can be<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21 Q.<br />

22 A.<br />

23<br />

directly observed, the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity is market-based and, therefore, must be<br />

estimated based <strong>on</strong> observable market informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

HOW IS THE REQUIRED ROE DETERMINED?<br />

The required ROE is estimated by using <strong>on</strong>e or more analytical techniques that<br />

rely <strong>on</strong> market -based data to quantify investor expectati<strong>on</strong>s regarding required<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 13 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

equity returns, adjusted for certain incremental costs and risks. By their very<br />

nature, quantitative models produce a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> results from which the market<br />

required ROE must be selected. As discussed throughout my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

that selecti<strong>on</strong> must be based <strong>on</strong> a comprehensive review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> relevant data and<br />

informati<strong>on</strong>, and does not necessarily lend itself to a strict mathematical soluti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the key c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> in detennining the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity is to<br />

ensure that the methodologies employed reas<strong>on</strong>ably reflect investors' view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

financial markets in general, and the subject company (in the c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy<br />

group) in particular.<br />

Although we cannot directly observe the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, we can observe<br />

the methods frequently used by analysts to arrive at their return requirements and<br />

expectati<strong>on</strong>s. While investors and analysts tend to use multiple approaches in<br />

developing their estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return requirements, each methodology requires<br />

certain judgment with respect to the reas<strong>on</strong>ableness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> assumpti<strong>on</strong>s and the<br />

validity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> proxies in its applicati<strong>on</strong>. In essence, analysts and academics<br />

understand that ROE models are tools to be used in the ROE estimati<strong>on</strong> process<br />

and that strict adherence to any single approach, or the specific results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any<br />

single approach, can lead to flawed and irrelevant c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s. That positi<strong>on</strong> is<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the Hope and Bluefield finding that it is the analytical result, as<br />

opposed to the methodology, that is c<strong>on</strong>trolling in arriving at ROE<br />

determinati<strong>on</strong>s. A reas<strong>on</strong>able ROE estimate therefore c<strong>on</strong>siders alternative<br />

methodologies, observable market data, and the reas<strong>on</strong>ableness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their individual<br />

and collective results.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 14 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 In my view, therefore, it is both prudent and appropriate to use multiple<br />

2 methodologies in order to mitigate the effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> assumpti<strong>on</strong>s and inputs<br />

3 associated with relying exclusively <strong>on</strong> any single approach. Such use, however,<br />

4 must be tempered with due cauti<strong>on</strong> as to the results generated by each individual<br />

5 approach. As such, I have c<strong>on</strong>sidered the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth and<br />

6 Multi-Stage forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the DCF model, the Capital Asset Pricing Model, and the<br />

7 Risk Premium approach.<br />

8 Quarterly Growth DCF Model<br />

9 Q.<br />

10<br />

11 A.<br />

ARE DCF MODELS WIDELY USED IN REGULATORY<br />

PROCEEDINGS?<br />

Yes, in my experience the DCF model is widely recognized in regulatory<br />

12<br />

proceedings.<br />

N<strong>on</strong>etheless, neither the DCF nor any other model should be<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15 Q.<br />

16 A.<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

applied without c<strong>on</strong>siderable judgment in the selecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data and the<br />

interpretati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> results<br />

PLEASE DESCRIBE THE DCF APPROACH.<br />

The DCF approach is based <strong>on</strong> the theory that a stock's current price represents<br />

the present value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all expected future cash flows. In its simplest form, the DCF<br />

model expresses the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity as the sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the expected dividend yield and<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth rate, and is expressed as follows:<br />

20<br />

p = ~+~+ ... + D",<br />

(1+k) (1+k)2 (1+k)'"<br />

Equati<strong>on</strong> [1]<br />

21<br />

22<br />

Where P represents the current stock price, Dl ... D", represent expected<br />

future dividends, and k is the discount rate, or required ROE. Equati<strong>on</strong> [1] is a<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 15 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

standard present value calculati<strong>on</strong>, which can be simplified and rearranged into<br />

the familiar form:<br />

k -_ Do (Hg) + 9 Equati'<strong>on</strong> [2]<br />

p<br />

Equati<strong>on</strong> [2] <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten is referred to as the "C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF" model, in<br />

which the first term is the expected dividend yield and the sec<strong>on</strong>d term is the<br />

expected l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth rate.<br />

In its simplest form, the DCF model expresses the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity as the<br />

sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the expected dividend yield and l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth rate. However, most<br />

dividend or distributi<strong>on</strong>-paying companies, including utilities, pay dividends <strong>on</strong> a<br />

quarterly, (as opposed to an annual basis). The yield comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Quarterly<br />

Growth DCF model, therefore, accounts for the quarterly payment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dividends.<br />

Thus, the Quarterly Growth DCF model incorporates investors' expectati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

quarterly payment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dividends, and the associated quarterly compounding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

those dividends as they are reinvested at investors' required ROE. As noted by<br />

Dr. Roger Morin:<br />

Clearly, given that dividends are paid quarterly and that the<br />

observed stock price reflects the quarterly nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dividend<br />

payments, the market-required return must recognize quarterly<br />

compounding, for the investor receives dividend checks and<br />

reinvests the proceeds <strong>on</strong> a quarterly schedule ... The annual DCF<br />

model inherently understates the investors' true return because it<br />

assumes all cash flows received by investors are paid annually. 5<br />

23<br />

5<br />

Roger A. Morin, New Regulatory Finance, Public Utility Reports, Inc., 2006 at 344.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 16 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q. HOW IS THE DIVIDEND YIELD COMPONENT OF THE QUARTERLY<br />

2 GROWTH DCF MODEL CALCULATED?<br />

3 A. The dividend yield is calculated such that it incorporates the time value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />

4 associated with quarterly compounding. To do so, D comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the C<strong>on</strong>stant<br />

5 Growth DCF model is replaced with the following equati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

6 Equati<strong>on</strong> [3]<br />

7 where:<br />

8 db d 2 , d 3 , d 4 = expected quarterly dividends over the coming year<br />

9 k = the required return <strong>on</strong> equity<br />

10 Due to the fact that the required ROE (Ie) is a variable in the dividend calculati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

11 the Quarterly Growth DCF model is solved in an iterative fashi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

12 Dividend Yield and Growth Rates/or the Quarterly DCF Model<br />

13 Q.<br />

14<br />

15 A.<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

WHAT MARKET DATA DID YOU USE TO CALCULATE THE<br />

DIVIDEND YIELD IN YOUR QUARTERLY GROWTH DCF MODEL?<br />

To calculate the expected dividends over the coming year for the proxy group<br />

companies (i.e., db d20 d 3 , and d 4 ), I obtained the last four paid quarterly dividends<br />

for each company, and multiplied them by <strong>on</strong>e plus the growth rate (i.e., 1 +g).<br />

For the Po comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the dividends yield, I obtained the closing stock prices<br />

over the 30,90, and 180-trading days ended August 31, 2012 for each company in<br />

the proxy group.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Bevert<br />

NortbWestern Energy


Page 17 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q. WHY DID YOU USE THREE AVERAGING PERIODS TO CALCULATE<br />

2 THE AVERAGE STOCK PRICE?<br />

3 A. I did so to ensure that the model's results are not skewed by anomalous events<br />

4 that may affect stock prices <strong>on</strong> any given trading day. At the same time, the<br />

5 averaging period should be reas<strong>on</strong>ably representative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected capital market<br />

6 c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s over the l<strong>on</strong>g term. In my view, the use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 30-, 90- and 180-day<br />

7 averaging periods reas<strong>on</strong>ably balances those c<strong>on</strong>cerns.<br />

8 Q. IS IT IMPORTANT TO SELECT APPROPRIATE MEASURES OF<br />

9 LONG-TERM GROWTH IN APPLYING THE DCF MODEL?<br />

10 A. Yes. In its C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth form, the DCF model (i.e., as presented in Equati<strong>on</strong><br />

11 [2J above) assumes a single growth estimate in perpetuity. This same assumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

12 is made in the Quarterly Growth DCF model. Accordingly, in order to reduce the<br />

13 l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth rate to a single measure, <strong>on</strong>e must assume a c<strong>on</strong>stant payout<br />

14 ratio, and that earnings per share, dividends per share and book value per share all<br />

15 grow at the same c<strong>on</strong>stant rate. Over the l<strong>on</strong>g term, however, dividend growth<br />

16 can <strong>on</strong>ly be sustained by earnings growth. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, it is important to<br />

17 incorporate a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-term earnings growth into the C<strong>on</strong>stant<br />

18 Growth DCF model. That can be accomplished by averaging those measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

19 l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth that tend to be least influenced by capital allocati<strong>on</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

20 that companies may make in resp<strong>on</strong>se to near-term changes in the business<br />

21 envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Since such decisi<strong>on</strong>s may directly affect near-term dividend payout<br />

22 ratios, estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings growth are more indicative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-term investor<br />

23 expectati<strong>on</strong>s than are dividend growth estimates. Therefore, for the purposes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 18 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3 Q.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6 A.<br />

the Quarterly Growth DCF model, growth in earmngs per share ("EPS")<br />

represents the appropriate measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth.<br />

PLEASE SUMMARIZE THE FINDINGS OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH<br />

ON THE APPROPRIATE MEASURE FOR ESTIMATING EQUITY<br />

RETURNS USING THE DCF MODEL.<br />

The relati<strong>on</strong>ship between various growth rates and stock valuati<strong>on</strong> metrics has<br />

7<br />

8<br />

been the subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> much academic research. 6<br />

Charles Phillips in The Ec<strong>on</strong>omics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Regulati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

As noted over 40 years ago by<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

For many years, it was thought that investors bought utility stocks<br />

largely <strong>on</strong> the basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dividends. More recently, however, studies<br />

indicate that the market is valuing utility stocks with reference to<br />

total per share earnings, so that the earnings-price ratio has<br />

assumed increased emphasis in rate cases. 7<br />

Philips' c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinues to hold true. Subsequent academic research<br />

has clearly and c<strong>on</strong>sistently indicated that measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings and cash flow are<br />

str<strong>on</strong>gly related to returns, and that analysts' forecasts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth are superior to<br />

17<br />

other measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth in predicting stock prices. 8<br />

For example, Vander<br />

18<br />

19<br />

Weide and Carlet<strong>on</strong> state that, "[our] results ... are c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the hypothesis<br />

that investors use analysts' forecasts, rather than historically oriented growth<br />

20<br />

calculati<strong>on</strong>s, in making stock buy-and-sell decisi<strong>on</strong>s.,,9<br />

Other research<br />

21<br />

specifically notes the importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysts' growth estimates in determining the<br />

6<br />

7<br />

9<br />

See, for example, Harris, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Using Analysts' Growth Forecasts to Estimate Shareholder Required<br />

Rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Return, Financial Management, Spring 1986.<br />

Charles F. Phillips, Jr., The Ec<strong>on</strong>omics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Regulati<strong>on</strong>, Revised Editi<strong>on</strong>, 1969, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., at<br />

285.<br />

See, for example, Christ<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>i, Christ<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>i, Lori and Moliver, Evaluating Comm<strong>on</strong> Stocks Using Value<br />

Line's Projected Cash Flows and Implied Growth Rate, Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Investing (Spring 1999); Harris and<br />

Marst<strong>on</strong>, Estimating Shareholder Risk Premia Using Analysts' Growth Forecasts, Financial<br />

Management. 21 (Snmmer 1992); and Vander Weide and Carlet<strong>on</strong>, Investor Growth Expectati<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

Analysts vs. History, The Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Portfolio Management, Spring 1988.<br />

Vander Weide and Carlet<strong>on</strong>, Investor Growth Expectati<strong>on</strong>s: Analysts vs. History, The Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Portfolio Management, Spring 1988.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 19 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, and in the valuati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equity securities. Dr. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> Harris noted<br />

that "a growing body <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge shows that analysts' earnings forecast are<br />

indeed reflected in stock prices." Citing Cragg and Malkiel, Dr. Harris notes that<br />

those authors "found that the evaluati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> companies that analysts make are the<br />

sorts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>es <strong>on</strong> which market valuati<strong>on</strong> is based. ,,10 Similarly, Brigham, Shome<br />

and Vins<strong>on</strong> noted that "evidence in the current literature indicates that (i)<br />

analysts' forecasts are superior to forecasts based solely <strong>on</strong> time series data; and<br />

(ii) investors do rely <strong>on</strong> analysts' forecasts."ll<br />

To that point, the research <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Carlet<strong>on</strong> and Vander Weide dem<strong>on</strong>strates<br />

that earnings growth projecti<strong>on</strong>s have a statistically significant relati<strong>on</strong>ship to<br />

11<br />

stock valuati<strong>on</strong> levels, while dividend growth projecti<strong>on</strong>s do not. 12<br />

Those<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

findings suggest that investors form their investment decisi<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong><br />

expectati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth in earnings, not dividends. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, earnings growth<br />

not dividend growth is the appropriate estimate for the purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the C<strong>on</strong>stant<br />

Growth DCF model.<br />

Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE RETENTION GROWTH ESTIMATE AS<br />

APPLIED IN YOUR QUARTERLY GROWTH DCF MODEL.<br />

A. The Retenti<strong>on</strong> Growth model, which is a generally recognized and widely taught<br />

method <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimating l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth, is an alternative approach to the use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

analysts' earnings growth estimates. In essence, the model is premised <strong>on</strong> the<br />

10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. Harris, Using Analysts' Growth Forecasts to Estimate Shareholder Required Rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Return,<br />

Financial Management, Spring 1986.<br />

II Eugene F. Brigham, Dilip K. Shome, and Steve R. Vins<strong>on</strong>, The Risk Premium Approach to Measuring<br />

a Utility's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, Financial Management, Spring 1985.<br />

12<br />

Vander Weide and Carlet<strong>on</strong>, Investor Growth Expectati<strong>on</strong>s: Analysts vs. History, The Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Portfolio Management, Spring 1988.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 20 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 propositi<strong>on</strong> that a firm's growth is a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its expected earnings, and the<br />

2 extent to which it retains earnings to invest in the enterprise. In its simplest form,<br />

3 the model represents l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth as the product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the retenti<strong>on</strong> ratio (i.e.,<br />

4 the percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings not paid out as dividends, referred to below as (''b'')<br />

5 and the expected return <strong>on</strong> book equity (referred to below as "r"). Thus, the<br />

6 simple ''b x r" form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the model projects growth as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> internally<br />

7 generated funds. That form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the model is limiting, however, in that it does not<br />

8 provide for growth funded from external equity.<br />

9 The "br + sv" form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Retenti<strong>on</strong> Growth estimate used in my DCF<br />

10 analysis is meant to reflect growth from both internally generated funds (i.e., the<br />

11 "br" term) and from issuances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equity (i.e., the "sv" term). The first term, which<br />

12 is the product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the retenti<strong>on</strong> ratio (i.e., "b", or the porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> net income not paid<br />

13 in dividends) and the expected return <strong>on</strong> equity (i.e., "r") represents the porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

14 net income that is "plowed back" into the Company as a means <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> funding<br />

15 growth. The "sv" term is represented as:<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

(: - 1) x Growth rate in Comm<strong>on</strong> Shares Equati<strong>on</strong> [4]<br />

where : is the Market-to-Book ratio.<br />

In this form, the "sv" term reflects an element <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth as the product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(a) the growth in shares outstanding, and (b) that porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the market-to-book<br />

ratio that exceeds unity. As shown in Exhibit No. RBH-3, all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the comp<strong>on</strong>ents<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Retenti<strong>on</strong> Growth Model can be derived from data provided by Value Line.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 21 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q. HOW DID YOU CALCULATE THE mGH AND LOW DCF RESULTS?<br />

2 A. I calculated the proxy group mean high DCF result using the maximum EPS<br />

3 growth rate as reported by Value Line, Zack's, First Call and the retenti<strong>on</strong> growth<br />

4 estimate for each proxy group company in combinati<strong>on</strong> with the dividend yield<br />

5 for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group companies. The average mean high result then<br />

6 reflects the average maximum DCF result for the proxy group as a whole. I used<br />

7 a similar approach to calculate the proxy group mean low results, using instead<br />

8 the minimum growth rate as reported by Value Line, Zack's, First Call and the<br />

9 retenti<strong>on</strong> growth estimate for each proxy group company.<br />

10 Results for the Quarterly Growth DCF Model<br />

11 Q. WHAT ARE THE RESULTS OF YOUR QUARTERLY GROWTH DCF<br />

12 ANALYSIS?<br />

13 A. As shown in Table 2 (below) (see also Exhibit No. RBH-l), the mean Quarterly<br />

14 Growth DCF results for my proxy group are 9.00 percent, 9.11 percent, and 9.09<br />

15 percent for the 30, 90, and l80-trading day periods, respectively. The mean high<br />

16 DCF result for the 30, 90, and 180-day averaging periods are 11.00 percent, 11.11<br />

17 percent, and 11.09 percent, respectively.<br />

18 Table 2: Quarterly Growth DCF Results<br />

30-Day Average<br />

90-Day Average<br />

180-Day Average<br />

Mean Low<br />

Mean<br />

7.34% 9.00%<br />

7.44% 9.11%<br />

7.42% 9.09%<br />

Mean Hiah<br />

11.00%<br />

11.11%<br />

11.09%<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 22 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Model<br />

2 Q. WHAT ASSUMPTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTANT<br />

3 GROWTH DCF MODEL?<br />

4 A. The C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF model requires the following assumpti<strong>on</strong>s: (1) a<br />

5 c<strong>on</strong>stant average growth rate for earnings and dividends; (2) a stable dividend<br />

6 payout ratio; (3) a c<strong>on</strong>stant price-to-earnings multiple; and (4) a discount rate<br />

7 greater than the expected growth rate.<br />

8 Dividend Yield and Growth Rates for the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Model<br />

9 Q.<br />

10<br />

11 A.<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Q.<br />

15<br />

16 A.<br />

17<br />

WHAT MARKET DATA DID YOU USE TO CALCULATE THE<br />

DIVIDEND YIELD COMPONENT OF YOUR DCF MODEL?<br />

The dividend yield is based <strong>on</strong> the proxy companies' current annualized dividend,<br />

and average closing stock prices over the 30, 90, and 180-trading days as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

August 31,2012.<br />

DID YOU MAKE ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE DIVIDEND YIELD TO<br />

ACCOUNT FOR PERIODIC GROWTH IN DIVIDENDS?<br />

Yes, I did. Since utility companies tend to increase their quarterly dividends at<br />

different times throughout the year, it is reas<strong>on</strong>able to assume that dividend<br />

18<br />

increases will be evenly distributed over calendar quarters.<br />

Given that<br />

19<br />

assumpti<strong>on</strong>, it is appropriate to calculate the expected dividend yield by applying<br />

20<br />

<strong>on</strong>e-half <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the l<strong>on</strong>g-term growth rate to the current dividend yield. 13<br />

That<br />

21<br />

adjustment ensures that the expected dividend yield is, <strong>on</strong> average, representative<br />

13 See Exhibit No. RBH-2.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 23 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the coming twelve-m<strong>on</strong>th period, and does not overstate the dividends to be<br />

2 paid during that time.<br />

3 Q. WHAT GROWTH RATES DID YOU USE IN YOUR CONSTANT<br />

4 GROWTH DCF MODEL ANALYSIS?<br />

5 A. I used the same projected EPS growth rates as well as the retenti<strong>on</strong> growth<br />

6 estimate applied in my Quarterly Growth DCF model analysis.<br />

7 Results for C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Model<br />

8 Q.<br />

9<br />

10 A.<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22 Q.<br />

23<br />

24 A.<br />

25<br />

PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR INPUTS TO THE CONSTANT GROWTH<br />

DCFMODEL.<br />

I applied the DCF model to the proxy group companies using the following inputs<br />

for the price and dividend terms:<br />

terms:<br />

1. The average daily closing prices for the 30-trading days, 90-trading<br />

days, and 180-trading days ended August 31, 2012 for the term Po; and<br />

2. The annualized dividend per share as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31, 2012 for the term<br />

Do.<br />

r then calculated the DCF results using each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the following growth<br />

1. The Zacks c<strong>on</strong>sensus l<strong>on</strong>g-term earnings growth estimates;<br />

2. The First Call c<strong>on</strong>sensus l<strong>on</strong>g-term earnings growth estimates;<br />

3. The Value Line l<strong>on</strong>g-term earnings growth estimates; and<br />

4. An estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Retenti<strong>on</strong> Growth.<br />

WHAT ARE THE RESULTS OF YOUR CONSTANT GROWTH DCF<br />

ANALYSIS?<br />

As shown in Table 3 (below) (see also Exhibit No. RBH-2), the mean C<strong>on</strong>stant<br />

Growth DCF results for my proxy group are 8.82 percent, 8.92 percent, and 8.90<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 24 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 percent for the 30, 90, and ISO-trading day periods, respectively. The mean high<br />

2 DCF result for the 30,90, and ISO-day averaging periods are 10.75 percent, 10.S6<br />

3 percent, and 1 0.S4 percent, respectively.<br />

4 Table 3: C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Results<br />

Mean Low Mean Mean High<br />

30-Day Average 7.20% 8.82% 10.75%<br />

90-Day Average 7.31% 8.92% 10.86%<br />

180-Day Average 7.28% 8.90% 10.84%<br />

5 Multi-Stage DCF Model<br />

6 Q.<br />

7 A.<br />

S<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16 Q.<br />

17<br />

18 A.<br />

19<br />

20<br />

WHAT OTHER FORMS OF THE DCF MODEL HAVE YOU USED?<br />

In order to address certain limiting assumpti<strong>on</strong>s underlying the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth<br />

f<strong>on</strong>n <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the DCF model, I also c<strong>on</strong>sidered the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Multi-Stage (threestage)<br />

Discounted Cash Flow Model. The Multi-Stage model, which is an<br />

extensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth f<strong>on</strong>n, enables the analyst to specify growth<br />

rates over three distinct stages. As with the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth f<strong>on</strong>n <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the DCF<br />

model, the Multi-Stage f<strong>on</strong>n defines the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity as the discount rate that<br />

sets the current price equal to the discounted value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> future cash flows. Unlike<br />

the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth f<strong>on</strong>n, however, the Multi-Stage model must be solved in an<br />

iterative fashi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

PLEASE GENERALLY DESCRIBE THE STRUCTURE OF YOUR<br />

MULTI-STAGE MODEL.<br />

As noted above, the model sets the subject company's stock price equal to the<br />

present value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> future cash flows received over three "stages". In the first two<br />

stages, "cash flows" are defined as projected dividends. In the third stage, "cash<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 25 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

flows" equal both dividends and the expected price at which the stock will be sold<br />

at the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the period (i.e., the "terminal price"). I calculated the terminal price<br />

based <strong>on</strong> the Gord<strong>on</strong> model, which defines the price as the expected dividend<br />

divided by the difference between the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity (i.e., the discount rate) and<br />

the l<strong>on</strong>g-term expected growth rate. In essence, the terminal price is defined by<br />

the present value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the remaining "cash flows" in perpetuity. In each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the three<br />

stages, the dividend is the product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the projected earnings per share and the<br />

expected dividend payout ratio. A summary descripti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the model is provided<br />

in Table 4 (below).<br />

Table 4: Multi-Stage DCF Structure<br />

Sta~e 0 1 2 3<br />

Cash Flow Initial Stock Expected Expected Expected<br />

Comp<strong>on</strong>ent Price Dividend Dividend Dividend +<br />

Terminal<br />

Value<br />

Inputs Stock Price Expected EPS Expected EPS Expected EPS<br />

Earnings Per Expected DPS Expected DPS Expected DPS<br />

Share (EPS)<br />

Terminal<br />

Dividends Per<br />

Value<br />

Share (DPS)<br />

Assumpti<strong>on</strong>s 30, 90, and EPS Growth Growth Rate L<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

ISO-day Rate Change Growth Rate<br />

average stock Payout Ratio Payout Ratio L<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

price Change Payout Ratio<br />

11<br />

12 Q.<br />

l3<br />

14 A.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

WHAT ARE THE ANALYTICAL BENEFITS OF YOUR THREE-STAGE<br />

MODEL?<br />

The primary benefits relate to the flexibility provided by the model's formulati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Since the models provide the ability to specify near, intermediate, and l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

growth rates, for example, it avoids the sometimes limiting assumpti<strong>on</strong> that the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 26 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

subject company will grow at the same, c<strong>on</strong>stant rate in perpetuity. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

by calculating the dividend as the product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings and the payout ratio, the<br />

model enables analysts to reflect assumpti<strong>on</strong>s regarding the timing and extent- <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

changes in the payout ratio to reflect, for example, increases or decreases in<br />

expected capital spending, or transiti<strong>on</strong> from current payout levels to l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

expected levels. In that regard, because the model relies <strong>on</strong> multiple sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

earnings growth rate assumpti<strong>on</strong>s, it is not limited to a single source, such as<br />

Value Line, for all inputs, and mitigates the potential bias associated with relying<br />

<strong>on</strong> a single source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth estimates. 14<br />

The model also enables the analyst to assess the reas<strong>on</strong>ableness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

inputs and results by reference to certain market-based metrics. For example, the<br />

stock price estimate can be divided by the expected earnings per share in the final<br />

year to calculate an average PIE ratio. Similarly, the terminal PIE ratio can be<br />

divided by the terminal growth rate to develop a Price to Earnings Growth<br />

("PEG") ratio. To the extent that either the projected PIE or PEG ratios are<br />

inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with either historical or expected levels, it may indicate incorrect or<br />

inc<strong>on</strong>sistent assumpti<strong>on</strong>s within the balance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the model.<br />

Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR INPUTS TO THE MULTI-STAGE DCF<br />

MODEL.<br />

A. I applied the Multi-Stage model to the proxy group described earlier in my <str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

21<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

My assumpti<strong>on</strong>s with respect to the various model inputs are<br />

22<br />

described in Table 5 (below).<br />

14 See, for example, Harris and Marst<strong>on</strong>, Estimating Shareholder Risk Premia Using Analysts' Growth<br />

Forecasts, Financial Management, 21 (Summer 1992).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 27 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Table 5: Multi-Stage DCF Model Assumpti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Stage Initial First Transiti<strong>on</strong> Terminal<br />

2<br />

Stock Price 30, 90, and<br />

180-day<br />

average stock<br />

price as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

August 31,<br />

2012<br />

Earnings 2011 actual EPS growth as Transiti<strong>on</strong> to L<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

Growth EPS escalated average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> (1) L<strong>on</strong>g-term GDP growth<br />

by Period I Value Line; (2) GDP growth<br />

growth rate Zacks; (3) First<br />

Call; (4)<br />

Retenti<strong>on</strong><br />

Growth rates<br />

Payout Ratio Value Line Transiti<strong>on</strong> to L<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

company- l<strong>on</strong>g-term expected<br />

specific industry payout payout ratio<br />

ratio<br />

Terminal Value<br />

Expected<br />

dividend in<br />

fmal year<br />

divided by<br />

solved Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Equity less<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

growth rate<br />

3 Q. HOW DID YOU CALCULATE THE LONG-TERM GDP GROWTH<br />

4 RATE?<br />

5 A. The l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn growth rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5.61 percent is based <strong>on</strong> the real Gross Domestic<br />

6 Product (GDP) growth rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3.24 percent from 1929 through 2011,15 and an<br />

7 inflati<strong>on</strong> rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.30 percent. The GDP growth rate is calculated as the<br />

8 compound growth rate in the chain-weighted GDP for the period from 1929<br />

9 through 2011. The rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inflati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>2.30 percent is a compound annual forward<br />

10 rate starting in ten years (i.e., 2022, which is the beginning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the tennina~ period)<br />

15 Bureau <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ee<strong>on</strong>ornie Analysis, August 29, 2012 update.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 28 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

and is based <strong>on</strong> the 30-day average projected inflati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> the spread<br />

between yields <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn nominal Treasury Securities and l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn Treasury<br />

Inflati<strong>on</strong> Protected Securities, known as the "TIPS spread".<br />

In essence, my real GDP growth rate projecti<strong>on</strong> is based <strong>on</strong> the<br />

assumpti<strong>on</strong> that absent specific knowledge to the c<strong>on</strong>trary, it is reas<strong>on</strong>able to<br />

assume that over time, real GDP growth will revert to its l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn mean.<br />

Furthennore, since estimating the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity is a market-based exercise, it is<br />

important to reflect the sentiments and expectati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> investors to the extent<br />

possible. In that important respect, the TIPS spread represents the collective<br />

views <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> investors regarding l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn inflati<strong>on</strong> expectati<strong>on</strong>s. Equally important,<br />

by using forward yields, we are able to infer the level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn inflati<strong>on</strong><br />

expected by investors as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the terminal period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Multi-Stage model (that is,<br />

ten years in the future).<br />

Q. WHAT WERE YOUR SPECIFIC ASSUMPTIONS WITH RESPECT TO<br />

THE PAYOUT RATIO?<br />

A. As noted in Table 5, for the first two periods I relied <strong>on</strong> the first year and l<strong>on</strong>gtenn<br />

projected payout ratios reported by Value Line l6 for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group<br />

companies. I then assumed that by the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sec<strong>on</strong>d period (i.e., the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

year 10), the payout ratio will c<strong>on</strong>verge to the industry expected ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 65.00<br />

percent. 17<br />

I6 As reported in the Value Line Investment Survey as "All Div'ds to Net Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>."<br />

17 Source: Value Line Investment Survey<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 29 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Discounted Cash Flow Model Results<br />

2 Q. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THE MEAN LOW RESULTS OF YOUR DCF<br />

3 MODELS IN DETERMINING YOUR RECOMMENDED ROE RANGE?<br />

4 A. No. The mean low results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my DCF models are far below any reas<strong>on</strong>able<br />

5 estimati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tbe Company's ROE. In fact, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tbe 945 rate cases in which an<br />

6 autborized ROE has been disclosed since 1980, there has been <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e instance<br />

7 in which the autborized ROE was below 9.00 percent for a natural gas utility in<br />

8 any jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>. 18 That authorized ROE, 8.83 percent, is still approximately 125<br />

9 to 150 basis points higher than the mean low results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my Quarterly Growth DCF<br />

10 and C<strong>on</strong>stant Growtb DCF models. In fact, from January 2011 (i. e. the<br />

11 beginning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tbe test period) through August 2012 tbe median authorized ROE<br />

12 was 10.00 percent. Chart 1, below, shows tbat tbe most frequently authorized<br />

13 ROE over that period was between 10.25 percent and 10.50 percent.<br />

18 Source: SNL Financial<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 30 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Chart 1: Frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Natural Gas Authorized ROEs<br />

(January 2011- August 2012)<br />

8T-----·------------------------------------------<br />

7+-----------------------------------<br />

6 +--.-----------.. ---.. ----------... -----------<br />

5 +------------<br />

4 +-.--------.------.--<br />

3 +--.. ---. ----. --.. ---. -------.----.. --.<br />

2 +----------<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

O+---~<br />

" 8.76%- 9.01%- 9.26%- 9.51%- 9.76%-1U.01%-10.26%-10.51%- ><br />

8.75% 9.00% 9.25% 9.50% 9.75% 10.00% 10.25% 10.50% 10.75% 10.75%<br />

Moreover, there have been no events suggesting that the Company's Cost<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity has fallen by as much as 133 to 299 basis points since the Order <strong>on</strong><br />

Remand in the Company's most recent rate case was issued <strong>on</strong> June 30, 2011. 19<br />

In that regard, Baird Equity Research has also noted that, "Investors view a 10.0%<br />

authorized ROE as an acceptable floor. Authorized ROEs materially below that<br />

level are typically viewed negatively by investors.,,20 As such, I did not c<strong>on</strong>sider<br />

the mean low results from the three DCF models when determining the<br />

appropriate ROE for NorthWestern.<br />

19<br />

20<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana Public Service Commissi<strong>on</strong>, Docket No. D2009.9.129, Order <strong>on</strong> Remand Dated June 30,<br />

2011 at para. 93. NorthWestern current authorized ROE is 10.25 percent. The average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the low end<br />

results for the Multi-Stage DCF model is approximately 8.92 percent, or 133 basis points below the<br />

current authorized ROE, and the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mean low results for the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF model<br />

is 7.26 percent, or 299 basis points below the current authorized ROE.<br />

Baird Equity Research, Utilities: Initial Publicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Baird's RegulatOlY Toolkit, September 20,<br />

2011, at 3.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 31 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 A.<br />

S<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8 Q.<br />

9 A.<br />

10<br />

11<br />

IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE THE MEAN LOW RESULTS OF YOUR DCF<br />

MODELS ARE REASONABLE, WHY HAVE YOU PROVIDED THEM<br />

THROUGHOUT YOUR TESTIMONY?<br />

While I do not believe any weight should be given to the mean low DCF results, I<br />

believe it is important to provide transparency in the presentati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> analyses. As<br />

such, I have presented the mean low results, which reflect the c<strong>on</strong>verse<br />

calculati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the mean high results.<br />

PLEASE SUMMARIZE THE RESULTS OF YOUR DCF ANALYSES.<br />

Table 6 (below), (see also Exhibit No. RBH-l, Exhibit No. RBH-2 and Exhibit<br />

No. RBH-4), presents the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Quarterly Growth, C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth and<br />

Multi-Stage DCF analyses. Setting aside the low results, the Quarterly Growth<br />

12<br />

DCF produces a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> results from 9.00 percent to 11.11 percent. 21<br />

The<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF model produces a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> results from 8.82 percent to<br />

10.86. percent. The Multi-Stage DCF analysis produces a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> results from<br />

9.53 percent to 10.36 percent.<br />

21<br />

Excludes mean low results.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 32 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

Table 6: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Discounted Cash Flow Model Results<br />

Mean<br />

Mean<br />

Low Mean High<br />

Quarterly Growth DCF Results<br />

30-Day Average 7.34% 9.00% 11.00%<br />

90-Day Average 7.44% 9.11% 11.11%<br />

180-Day Average 7.42% 9.09% 11.09%<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF Results<br />

30-Day Average 7.20% 8.82% 10.75%<br />

90-Day Average 7.31% 8.92% 10.86%<br />

180-Day Average 7.28% 8.90% 10.84%<br />

Multi-Stage DCF Results<br />

Low Mean High<br />

30-Day Average 8.91% 9.53% 10.24%<br />

90-Day Average 8.95% 9.64% 10.36%<br />

180-Day Average 8.89% 9.62% 10.32%<br />

1 CAPM Analysis<br />

2 Q. DID YOU UNDERTAKE ANY ADDITIONAL ANALYSES IN ADDITION<br />

3 TO YOUR DCF MODEL RESULTS?<br />

4 A. Yes. As noted earlier, I also applied the CAPM in estimating the Company's Cost<br />

5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity.<br />

6 Q. PLEASE BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE GENERAL FORM OF THE CAPM<br />

7 ANALYSIS.<br />

8 A. The CAPM is a risk premium model that estimates the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity as a<br />

9 functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a risk-free return plus a risk premium (to compensate investors for the<br />

10 n<strong>on</strong>-diversifiable or "systematic" risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that security). As shown in Equati<strong>on</strong> [5],<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 33 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

IS<br />

the CAPM is defined by four comp<strong>on</strong>ents, each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which theoretically is a<br />

forward-looking estimate:<br />

Equati<strong>on</strong> [5]<br />

where:<br />

k= the required market ROE;<br />

~ = Beta coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an individual security;<br />

rf= the risk free rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>return; and<br />

r m = the required return <strong>on</strong> the market as a whole.<br />

In Equati<strong>on</strong> [5], the term (rm - rf) represents the Market Risk Premium.<br />

According to the theory underlying the CAPM (and as discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> V),<br />

since unsystematic risk can be diversified away by adding securities to their<br />

investment portfolio, investors should be c<strong>on</strong>cerned <strong>on</strong>ly with systematic or n<strong>on</strong>diversifiable<br />

risk.<br />

which is defined as:<br />

N<strong>on</strong>-diversifiable risk is measured by the Beta coefficient,<br />

Equati<strong>on</strong> [6]<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

where (Jj is the standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns for company ''j''; (Jm is the standard<br />

deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns for the broad market (as measured, for example, by the S&P<br />

500 Index), and Pj,m is the correlati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns in between company j and the<br />

broad market. Thus, the Beta coefficient represents both relative volatility (i.e.,<br />

the standard deviati<strong>on</strong>) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns, and the correlati<strong>on</strong> in returns between the<br />

subject company and the overall market.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 34 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2<br />

3 A.<br />

HAS THE CAPM BEEN AFFECTED BY RECENT ECONOMIC<br />

CONDITIONS?<br />

Yes, it has. First, as noted above, the risk free rate, "r/', in the CAPM formula is<br />

4<br />

represented by the interest rate <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-term U.S. Treasury securities.<br />

As<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VIII (below), during periods <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> increased equity market<br />

volatility investors tend to seek the relative safety low-risk securities such as<br />

Treasury b<strong>on</strong>ds. In additi<strong>on</strong>, since the 2008 Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing,<br />

Federal policy has focused <strong>on</strong> maintaining low l<strong>on</strong>g-term interest rates. As a<br />

result, the first term in the model (i.e., the risk-free rate) is lower than it would<br />

have been absent such events. As also discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VIII, the persistently<br />

high level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> correlati<strong>on</strong>s between natural gas utility stocks and the broad market<br />

has put upward pressure <strong>on</strong> Beta coefficients.<br />

Finally, as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the extraordinary loss in equity values during 2008,<br />

the Market Risk Premium, when measured <strong>on</strong> a historical basis, actually<br />

decreased from the prior year, even though other measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk sentiment, in<br />

particular market volatility, indicated extremely high levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk aversi<strong>on</strong>. That<br />

result is, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> course, counter-intnitive. While the subsequent market rally resulted<br />

in a somewhat higher historical average Market Risk Premium, it still remains<br />

below its pre-financial crisis level. 22<br />

22<br />

See, Risk Premia Over Time Report, 2012 Ibbots<strong>on</strong> SBBI Morningstar, Inc., at 9.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page350f63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2<br />

3 A.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7 Q.<br />

8<br />

9 A.<br />

10<br />

WITH THOSE OBSERVATIONS IN MIND, WHAT ASSUMPTIONS DID<br />

YOU INCLUDE IN YOUR CAPM ANALYSIS?<br />

Since utility assets represent l<strong>on</strong>g-term investments, I used two different<br />

specificati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the risk-free rate as my estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the risk-free rate: (1) the<br />

current 3D-day average yield <strong>on</strong> 3D-year Treasury b<strong>on</strong>ds (i.e., 2.71 percent), and<br />

(2) the projected 3D-year Treasury yield (i.e., 3.00 percent).23<br />

WHY HAVE YOU RELIED UPON THE 30-YEAR TREASURY YIELD<br />

FOR YOUR CAPM ANALYSIS?<br />

In determining the security most relevant to the applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CAPM, it is<br />

important to select the term (or maturity) that best matches the life <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

11<br />

underlying investment.<br />

Natural gas utilities typically are l<strong>on</strong>g-durati<strong>on</strong><br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Q.<br />

15<br />

16 A.<br />

17<br />

18 Q.<br />

19<br />

20 A.<br />

21<br />

22<br />

investments and as such, the 3D-year Treasury yield is more suitable for the<br />

purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> calculating the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity.<br />

WHAT MARKET RISK PREMIUM DID YOU USE IN YOUR CAPM<br />

MODEL?<br />

For the reas<strong>on</strong>s discussed above, I did not use a historical average; rather, I<br />

developed two forward-looking (ex-ante) estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Market Risk Premium.<br />

PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR FIRST EX-ANTE APPROACH TO<br />

ESTIMATING THE MARKET RISK PREMIUM.<br />

The first approach is based <strong>on</strong> the market required return, less the current 3D-year<br />

Treasury b<strong>on</strong>d yield. To estimate the market required return, I calculated the<br />

market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> weighted average ROE based <strong>on</strong> the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF<br />

23<br />

Blue Chip Financial Forecast, Vol. 31, No.8, August I, 2012, at 2.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 36 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

model. To do so, I relied <strong>on</strong> data from two sources: (1) Bloomberg; and (2)<br />

Capital IQ. With respect to Bloomberg-derived growth estimates, I calculated the<br />

expected dividend yield (using the same <strong>on</strong>e-half growth rate assumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

described earlier), and combined that amount with the projected earnings growth<br />

5<br />

rate to arrive at the market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> weighted average DCF result.<br />

I<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13 Q.<br />

14 A.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

performed that calculati<strong>on</strong> for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the companies for which Bloomberg<br />

provided both dividend yields and c<strong>on</strong>sensus growth rates. I then subtracted the<br />

current 30-year Treasury yield from that amount to arrive at the sec<strong>on</strong>d market<br />

DCF-derived ex-ante MRP estimate. In the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Capital IQ, I performed the<br />

same calculati<strong>on</strong>, again using all companies for which five-year earnings growth<br />

rates were available. The results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those calculati<strong>on</strong>s are provided in Exhibit No.<br />

REB-5.<br />

PLEASE NOW DESCRIBE THE SECOND EX-ANTE APPROACH.<br />

The sec<strong>on</strong>d approach assumes a c<strong>on</strong>stant Sharpe Ratio, which is the ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

risk premium relative to the risk, or standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a given security or<br />

index <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> securities. The Sharpe Ratio is relied up<strong>on</strong> by financial pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>als to<br />

assess the incremental return received for holding a risky (i. e., more volatile) asset<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 37 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

rather than a risk-free (i.e., less volatile) asset?4 The formula for calculating the<br />

Sharpe Ratio is expressed as follows:<br />

where:<br />

-'.(R..:x,--_R.!..f) ...<br />

Sx = - Equati<strong>on</strong> [7]<br />

Sx = Sharpe Ratio for security "x";<br />

Rx = the average return <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> security "x";<br />

Rf= the rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a risk free security; and<br />

CJx = the standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rx.<br />

As shown in Exhibit No. RBH-5, the c<strong>on</strong>stant Sharpe Ratio is the ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the historical market risk premium <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 6.60 percent (the numerator <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equati<strong>on</strong> [7]<br />

above) and the historical market volatility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20.30 percent (the denominator <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

12<br />

Equati<strong>on</strong> [7]).25<br />

The expected market risk premium is then calculated as the<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Sharpe Ratio and the expected market volatility. For the purpose<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that calculati<strong>on</strong>, I used the thirty-day average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CBOE's three-m<strong>on</strong>th<br />

volatility index (i. e., the VXV) and the average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> settlement prices over the same<br />

24<br />

Substantial research has been c<strong>on</strong>ducted by both the academic community and government agencies<br />

which supports the presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a relati<strong>on</strong>ship between the market risk premium and volatility. (See,<br />

e.g., French, Kenneth R., et aI., Expected Stock Returns and Volatility: Pricing the Short-Run and<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Run, Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Financial Ec<strong>on</strong>omics, Vol. 19, 1987, at 3-29; Campbell, John Y. and Taksler,<br />

Glen B., Equity Volatility and CO/porate B<strong>on</strong>d Yields, The Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Finance, Vol. 58, No.6,<br />

December 2003, at 2321-2349; Li, Qi, et aI., The relati<strong>on</strong>ship between stock returns and volatility in<br />

internati<strong>on</strong>al stock markets, Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Empirical Finance, Vol. 12, September 2005, at 650-665;<br />

Adrian, Tobias and Rosenberg, Joshua, Pricing the Short-Run and L<strong>on</strong>g-Run Comp<strong>on</strong>ents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Market<br />

Risk, Federal Reserve Bank <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> New York Staff Reports, No. 254, July 2006; revised February 2008;<br />

and Chen, L<strong>on</strong>g, et aI., Equity Market Volatility and Expected Risk Premium, Federal Reserve Bank <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

St. Louis, January 2006).<br />

25 See Risk Premia Over Time Report, 2012 Ibbots<strong>on</strong> SBBI Morningstar, Inc., at 9. I recognize that the<br />

VIX forward settlement prices are liquid for approximately six to eight m<strong>on</strong>ths; n<strong>on</strong>etheless, that data<br />

represents a market-based measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected volatility that should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered in estimating the<br />

ex-ante Market Risk Premium.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 38 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3 Q.<br />

4<br />

5 A.<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8 Q.<br />

9 A.<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 Q.<br />

20<br />

21 A.<br />

22<br />

23<br />

thirty-day period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> futures <strong>on</strong> the CBOE's <strong>on</strong>e-m<strong>on</strong>th volatility index (i.e., the<br />

VIX) for February, 2013 tmough April, 2013.<br />

HOW DID YOU APPLY YOUR EXPECTED MARKET RISK PREMIUM<br />

AND RISK FREE RATE ESTIMATES?<br />

I relied <strong>on</strong> each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ex-ante Market Risk Premia discussed above, together with<br />

the current and near-term projected 30-year Treasury b<strong>on</strong>d yields as inputs to my<br />

CAPM analyses.<br />

WHAT BETA COEFFICIENT DID YOU USE IN YOUR CAPM MODEL?<br />

With respect to the Beta coefficient, I c<strong>on</strong>sidered two methods <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> calculati<strong>on</strong>. My<br />

first approach simply employs the average reported Beta coefficient from<br />

Bloomberg and Value Line for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group companies. While both <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

those services adjust their calculated (or "raw") Beta coefficients to reflect the<br />

tendency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Beta coefficient to regress to the market mean <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.00, Value Line<br />

calculates the Beta coefficient over a five-year period, while Bloomberg'S<br />

calculati<strong>on</strong> is based <strong>on</strong> two years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data. I also calculated Beta coefficients over<br />

a more recent time period to provide a more current view as to investors'<br />

perspectives with respect to the systematic risk represented by the proxy group<br />

companies.<br />

PLEASE DESCRIBE HOW YOU CALCULATED THE MEAN ADJUSTED<br />

BETA COEFFICIENT FOR YOUR PROXY GROUP.<br />

As shown in Equati<strong>on</strong> [6], the Beta coefficient is calculated as the ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns for the subject company and the market,<br />

respectively, multiplied by the correlati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>returns between the two. I therefore<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 39 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

calculated the "raw" Beta coefficient for each member <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group, based<br />

<strong>on</strong> Equati<strong>on</strong> [6], and adjusted those raw Beta coefficients to address the tendency<br />

to regress toward the market Beta coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> unity. For the purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that<br />

calculati<strong>on</strong>, I used weekly returns, and calculated the standard deviati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

5<br />

6<br />

correlati<strong>on</strong>s over the twelve m<strong>on</strong>th period ended August 31, 20 12.<br />

those results produces an adjusted Beta coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.732.<br />

Averaging<br />

7 Q,<br />

8 A.<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13 Q.<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16 A.<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

HOW AND WHY DID YOU ADJUST THE RAW BETA COEFFICIENT?<br />

I adjusted my raw Beta coefficient c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the methodology used by<br />

Bloomberg, which multiplies the raw Beta coefficient by 0.67, and adds 0.33 to<br />

that product. The purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that adjustment is to reflect the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> substantial<br />

academic research indicating that, over time, raw Beta coefficients tend to regress<br />

to the market mean <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.00. 26<br />

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY YOU RELIED ON A TWELVE-MONTH<br />

ESTIMATE OF THE PROXY GROUP MEAN ADJUSTED BETA<br />

COEFFICIENT.<br />

As discussed further in Secti<strong>on</strong> VIII (below), while volatility in the broad market<br />

and the utility sector recently have begun to moderate, the correlati<strong>on</strong> in returns<br />

remains at historically elevated levels. And, as discussed above, the Market Risk<br />

Premium tends to change over time. In my view, the use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Beta Coefficients<br />

calculated over shorter periods is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the noti<strong>on</strong> that market<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, and the risk premium required by investors in resp<strong>on</strong>se to those<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, also may change over shorter periods. In any case, by relying <strong>on</strong> both<br />

26<br />

The regressi<strong>on</strong> tendency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Beta coefficients to c<strong>on</strong>verge to 1.0 over time is well known and widely<br />

discussed in financial literature. (See, e.g., Blume, Marshall E., On the Assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Risk, The<br />

Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Finance, Vol. 26, No.1, March 1971, at 1-10).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 40 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3 Q.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6 A.<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11 Q.<br />

12 A.<br />

13<br />

Value Line and Bloomberg, my CAPM analysis reflects Beta Coefficients<br />

calculated over l<strong>on</strong>ger periods, as well.<br />

IS YOUR CALCULATED BETA COEFFICIENT REASONABLE<br />

RELATIVE TO THOSE CALCULATED BY VALUE LINE AND<br />

BLOOMBERG?<br />

Yes, it is. As shown in Exhibit No. RBH-6, the proxy group average Value Line,<br />

Bloomberg, and Calculated Beta Coefficients are 0.67, 0.73, and 0.73,<br />

respectively. In light <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the market dynamics noted earlier, the calculated Beta<br />

Coefficient reas<strong>on</strong>ably reflects current c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, although it is not materially<br />

different than those provided by Value Line and Bloomberg.<br />

WHAT ARE THE RESULTS OF YOUR CAPM ANALYSES?<br />

As shown in Table 7, (see Exhibit No. RBH-7), the CAPM analyses suggest an<br />

ROE range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8.19 percent to 10.80 percent. 27<br />

27<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> average results for respective Market Risk Premium approaches.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 41 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Table 7: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> CAPM Results<br />

2<br />

Bloomberg CapitalIQ<br />

Sharpe Ratio Derived Derived<br />

Derived Market Market Risk Market Risk<br />

Risk Premium Premium Premium<br />

Average Calculated Beta Coefficient<br />

Current 30-Year Treasury (2.71 %) 8.72% 10.50% 10.33%<br />

Near Term Projected 30-Year<br />

Treasury (3.00%)<br />

9.01% 10.78% 10.62%<br />

Average Bloomberg Beta Coefficient<br />

Current 30-Year Treasury (2.71 %) 8.74% 10.52% 10.36%<br />

Near Term Projected 30-Year<br />

9.03% 10.80% 10.64%<br />

Treasury (3.00%)<br />

Average Value Line Beta Coefficient<br />

Current 30-Year Treasury (2.71 %) 8.19% 9.81% 9.66%<br />

Near Term Projected 30-Year<br />

Treasury (3.00%)<br />

8.48% 10.09% 9.94%<br />

3 Q. HOW DID YOU INCORPORATE THE CAPM RESULTS IN YOUR ROE<br />

4 RECOMMENDATION?<br />

5 A. As noted earlier in my testim<strong>on</strong>y, current market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, which are directly<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

reflected in the Beta, Risk Premium, and Risk Free rate terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the model<br />

indicate that the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity is higher than the levels suggested by other<br />

approaches, in particular, the C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth DCF model. While I realize that<br />

certain <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the factors that influence the CAPM results, such as the elevated<br />

degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return correlati<strong>on</strong>s, are symptomatic <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> current market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, it<br />

would be inappropriate not to recognize the effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

determining the Company's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, I have c<strong>on</strong>sidered the<br />

CAPM results in arriving at my ROE recommendati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 42 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium Approach<br />

2 Q.<br />

3<br />

4 A.<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16 Q.<br />

17<br />

18 A.<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

PLEASE GENERALLY DESCRIBE THE BOND YIELD PLUS RISK<br />

PREMIUM APPROACH.<br />

In general terms, this approach is based <strong>on</strong> the fundamental principle that equity<br />

investors bear the residual risk associated with ownership and therefore require a<br />

premium over the return they would have earned as a b<strong>on</strong>dholder. That is, since<br />

returns to equity holders are more risky than returns to b<strong>on</strong>dholders, equity<br />

investors must be compensated for bearing that risk. Risk premium approaches,<br />

therefore, estimate the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity as the sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the equity risk premium and<br />

the yield <strong>on</strong> a particular class <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> b<strong>on</strong>ds. As noted in my discussi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CAPM,<br />

since the equity risk premium is not directly observable, it typically is estimated<br />

using a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> approaches, some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which incorporate ex-ante, or forwardlooking<br />

estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, and others that c<strong>on</strong>sider historical, or expost,<br />

estimates. An alternative approach is to use actual authorized returns for<br />

natural gas utilities to estimate the Equity Risk Premium.<br />

PLEASE NOW EXPLAIN HOW YOU PERFORMED YOUR BOND<br />

YIELD PLUS RISK PREMIUM ANALYSIS.<br />

As suggested above, I first defined the Risk Premium as the difference between<br />

the authorized ROE and the then-prevailing level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-term (i.e., 30-year)<br />

Treasury yield. I then gathered data for 945 natural gas rate proceedings between<br />

January, 1980 and August 31, 2012. In additi<strong>on</strong> to the authorized ROE, I also<br />

calculated the average period between the filing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the case and the date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

final order (the "lag period"). In order to reflect the prevailing level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NortbWestern Energy


Page 43 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8 Q.<br />

9<br />

10 A.<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

28<br />

29<br />

rates during the pendency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proceedings, I calculated the average 30-year<br />

Treasury yield over the average lag period (approximately 188 days).<br />

Because the data cover a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic cycles,28 the analysis also<br />

may be used to assess the stability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Equity Risk Premium. Prior research,<br />

for example, has shown that the Equity Risk Premium is inversely related to the<br />

level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest rates. 29<br />

historically low level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> current Treasury yields.<br />

That analysis is particularly relevant given the<br />

HOW DID YOU MODEL THE RELATIONSIDP BETWEEN INTEREST<br />

RATES AND THE EQUITY RISK PREMIUM?<br />

The basic method used was regressi<strong>on</strong> analysis, in which the observed Equity<br />

Risk Premium is the dependent variable, and the average 30-year Treasury yield<br />

is the independent variable. Because the analytical period includes interest rates<br />

and authorized ROEs that during <strong>on</strong>e period (i.e., the 1980's) are quite high and<br />

another (the post-Lehman bankruptcy period) that are quite low relative to the<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g-term historical average, I used the semi-log regressi<strong>on</strong>, in which the Equity<br />

Risk Premium is expresses as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the natural log <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 30-year Treasury<br />

yield:<br />

RP = a + P(LN(T 30 )) Equati<strong>on</strong> [8]<br />

As shown <strong>on</strong> Chart 2 (below), the semi-log form is useful when measuring<br />

an absolute change in the dependent variable (in this case, the Risk Premium)<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al Bureau <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Research, U.S. Business Cycle Expansi<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

See, for example, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. Harris and Felicia C. Marst<strong>on</strong>, Estimating Shareholder Risk Premia Using<br />

Analysts' Growth Forecasts, Financial Management, Summer 1992, at 63-70; Eugene F. Brigham,<br />

Dilip K. Shome, and Steve R. Vins<strong>on</strong>, The Risk Premium Approach to Measuring a Utility's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Equity, Financial Management, Spring 1985, at 33-45; and Farris M. Maddox, D<strong>on</strong>na T. Pippert, and<br />

Rodney N. Sullivan, An Empirical Study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ex Ante Risk Premiums for the Electric Utility Industry,<br />

Financial Management, Autumn 1995, at 89-95.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 44 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

relative to a proporti<strong>on</strong>al change III the independent variable (the 30-year<br />

Treasury yield).<br />

Chart 2: Equity Risk Premium<br />

10.UG%<br />

B.OO%<br />

5<br />

'1: 6.00%<br />

..<br />

~<br />

... ""<br />

4.00%<br />

IE<br />

:e-<br />

:0<br />

~ 2.00%<br />

y= -0.0295In(x)-


Page 45 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Table 8: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium Results<br />

2<br />

Current 30-Year Treasury (2.71 %) 10.13%<br />

Near Tenn Projected 30-Year Treasury (3.00%) 10.12%<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g Tenn Projected 30-Year Treasury (5.30%) 10.74%<br />

3 VII. BUSINESS RISKS<br />

4 Q. WITH REGARD TO THE DCF AND CAPM MODELS, DO THE MEAN<br />

5 RESULTS FOR THE PROXY GROUP PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATE<br />

6 ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF EQUITY FOR THE COMPANY?<br />

7 A. Not necessarily. In my view, there are additi<strong>on</strong>al factors that must be c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

8 when determining where the Company's Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity falls within the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

9 results, in particular the relatively small size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Company, the lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revenue<br />

10 stabilizati<strong>on</strong> mechanisms employed by the Company relative to the proxy group,<br />

11 and flotati<strong>on</strong> costs.<br />

12 Small Size Premium<br />

13 Q.<br />

14 A.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

30<br />

PLEASE EXPLAIN THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH SMALL SIZE.<br />

Both the financial and academic communities have l<strong>on</strong>g accepted the propositi<strong>on</strong><br />

that the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity for small firms is subject to a "size effect.,,30 While<br />

empirical evidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the size effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten is based <strong>on</strong> studies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> industries bey<strong>on</strong>d<br />

regulated utilities, utility analysts also have noted the risks associated with small<br />

market capitalizati<strong>on</strong>s. Specifically, Ibbots<strong>on</strong> Associates noted: "For small<br />

utilities, investors face additi<strong>on</strong>al obstacles, such as a smaller customer base,<br />

limited financial resources, and a lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> diversificati<strong>on</strong> across customers, energy<br />

See Mario Levis, The record <strong>on</strong> smal! companies: A review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the evidence, Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Asset<br />

Management, March 2002, at 368-397, for a review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>iiterature relating to the size effect.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 46 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Q.<br />

A.<br />

sources, and geography. These obstacles imply a higher investor return.,,3! Small<br />

size, therefore, leads to two categories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> increased risk for investors: (1)<br />

liquidity risk (i.e., the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> not being able to sell <strong>on</strong>e's shares in a timely<br />

manner due to the relatively thin market for the securities); and (2) fundamental<br />

business risks.<br />

HOW DOES NORTHWESTERN COMPARE IN SIZE TO THE PROXY<br />

COMPANIES?<br />

NorthWestern's M<strong>on</strong>tana gas utility operati<strong>on</strong>s are significantly smaller than the<br />

average for the proxy group companies both in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> customers and<br />

annual revenues. Exhibit No. RBH-9 estimates the implied market capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

for NorthWestern (i.e., the implied market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWestern's<br />

12<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al gas operati<strong>on</strong>s).<br />

That is, because NorthWestern's<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al gas operati<strong>on</strong>s do not comprise the entirety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

Company, an estimated stand-al<strong>on</strong>e market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> for NorthWestern's<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al gas operati<strong>on</strong>s must be calculated. The implied market<br />

capitalizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWestern is calculated by applying the median market-tobook<br />

ratio for the proxy group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.57 to the Company's implied total comm<strong>on</strong><br />

equity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $147 milli<strong>on</strong>. 32 The implied market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> that<br />

calculati<strong>on</strong> is $231 milli<strong>on</strong>, which is <strong>on</strong>ly 11.71 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group<br />

median <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.97 billi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

3! Michael Annin, Equity and the Small-Stock Effect, Public Utilities Fortnightly. October 15,1995.<br />

32 Equity value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWestern is estimated from proposed rate base and recommended capital structure.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 47 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 A.<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10 Q.<br />

11<br />

12<br />

HOW DOES THE COMPARATIVELY SMALL SIZE OF<br />

NORTHWESTERN AFFECT ITS BUSINESS RISKS RELATIVE TO THE<br />

PROXY GROUP OF COMPANIES?<br />

In general, smaller companies are less able to withstand adverse events that affect<br />

their revenues and expenses. Capital expenditures for n<strong>on</strong>-revenue producing<br />

investments such as system maintenance and replacements will put<br />

proporti<strong>on</strong>ately greater pressure <strong>on</strong> customer costs, potentially leading to<br />

customer attriti<strong>on</strong> or demand reducti<strong>on</strong>. These risks affect the return required by<br />

investors for smaller companies.<br />

HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THE COMPARATIVELY SMALL SIZE OF<br />

NORTHWESTERN IN YOUR ESTIMATED RETURN ON COMMON<br />

EQUITY?<br />

13 A.<br />

Yes.<br />

While I have quantified the small size effect, rather than proposing a<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 Q.<br />

20<br />

21 A.<br />

22<br />

specific premium, I have c<strong>on</strong>sidered the small size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWestern in my<br />

assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> business risks in order to determine where, within a reas<strong>on</strong>able<br />

range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns, NorthWestern's required ROE appropriately falls. In that regard,<br />

NorthWestern's comparatively small size further supports my c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that an<br />

ROE above the proxy group mean is reas<strong>on</strong>able.<br />

HOW DID YOU ESTIMATE THE SIZE PREMIUM FOR<br />

NORTHWESTERN?<br />

In its Risk Premia Over Time Report: 2012, Morningstar Inc. ("Morningstar")<br />

presents its calculati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the size premium for deciles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> market capitalizati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

23<br />

relative to the S&P 500 Index.<br />

An additi<strong>on</strong>al estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the size premium<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 48 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 associated with NorthWestern, therefore, is the difference in the Morningstar size<br />

2 risk premiums for the proxy group median market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> relative to the<br />

3 implied market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> for NorthWestern.<br />

4 As shown <strong>on</strong> Exhibit No. RBH-9, based <strong>on</strong> recent market data, the median<br />

5 market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy group was approximately $1.97 billi<strong>on</strong>, which<br />

6 corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to the fifth decile <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Morningstar's market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> data. Based<br />

7 <strong>on</strong> the Morningstar analysis, that decile has a size premium <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.74 percent (or<br />

8 174 basis points). The implied market capitalizati<strong>on</strong> for NorthWestern is<br />

9 approximately $231 milli<strong>on</strong>, which falls within the ninth decile and corresp<strong>on</strong>ds<br />

10 to a size premium <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.80 percent (or 280 basis points). The difference between<br />

11 those size premiums is 106 basis points (2.80 percent - 1.74 percent).<br />

12 Revenue Stabilizati<strong>on</strong> Mechanisms<br />

13 Q. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THE COMPANY'S CURRENT TARIFF<br />

14 MECHANISMS IN YOUR ASSESSMENT OF THE APPROPRIATE ROE?<br />

15 A. Yes, I have. As shown in Exhibit No. RBH-I0, each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the companies in my<br />

16 proxy group employs a fuel adjustment mechanism similar to that which the<br />

17 Company employs, indicating that the Company is comparable to the proxy group<br />

18 in that regard. In additi<strong>on</strong>, NorthWestern utilizes a Lost Revenue Adjustment<br />

19 Mechanism ("LRAM") that allows for the recovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lost revenue associated<br />

20 with natural gas energy c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> programs. Again, all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

companies employ some form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revenue stabilizati<strong>on</strong> mechanism in at least <strong>on</strong>e<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their operating jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s; <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proxy companies does not employ<br />

a decoupling mechanism in at least <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its operating jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s. Because the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 49 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Company does not have such a structure (bey<strong>on</strong>d the LRAM) in place, nor has it<br />

2 proposed any such mechanism, my recommended ROE reflects the Company's<br />

3 higher risk relative to the proxy group.<br />

4 Flotati<strong>on</strong> Costs<br />

5 Q.<br />

6 A.<br />

WHAT ARE FLOTATION COSTS?<br />

Flotati<strong>on</strong> costs are the costs associated with the sale <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> new issues <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> comm<strong>on</strong><br />

7<br />

stock.<br />

Such costs include out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-pocket expenditures for preparati<strong>on</strong>, filing,<br />

8<br />

9 Q.<br />

10<br />

11 A.<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16 Q.<br />

17<br />

18 A.<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

underwriting and other issuance costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> comm<strong>on</strong> stock.<br />

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE FLOTATION COSTS IN<br />

THE ALLOWED ROE?<br />

In order to attract and retain new investors, a regulated utility must have the<br />

opportunity to earn a return that is both competitive and compensatory. To the<br />

extent that a company is denied the opportunity to recover prudently incurred<br />

flotati<strong>on</strong> costs, actual returns will fall short <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expected (or required) returns,<br />

thereby diminishing its ability to attract adequate capital <strong>on</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>able terms.<br />

ARE FLOTATION COSTS PART OF THE UTILITY'S INVESTED<br />

COSTS OR PART OF THE UTILITY'S EXPENSES?<br />

Flotati<strong>on</strong> costs are part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the invested costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the utility, which are properly<br />

reflected <strong>on</strong> the balance sheet under "paid in capital." They are not current<br />

expenses, and therefore are not reflected <strong>on</strong> the income statement. Rather, like<br />

investments in rate base or the issuance costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>l<strong>on</strong>g-term debt, flotati<strong>on</strong> costs are<br />

incurred over time. As a result, the great majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a utility's flotati<strong>on</strong> cost is<br />

incurred prior to the test year, but remains part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cost structure that exists<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 50 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6 Q.<br />

7<br />

8<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

9 A.<br />

15 Q.<br />

16<br />

17 A.<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

during the test year and bey<strong>on</strong>d, and as such, should be recognized for ratemaking<br />

purposes. Therefore, recovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> flotati<strong>on</strong> costs is appropriate even if no new<br />

Issuances are planned in the near future because failure to allow such cost<br />

recovery may deny NorthWestern the opportunity to earn its required rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

return in the future.<br />

DO THE DCF AND CAPM MODELS ALREADY INCORPORATE<br />

INVESTOR EXPECTATIONS OF A RETURN IN ORDER TO<br />

COMPENSATE FOR FLOTATION COSTS?<br />

No. The models used to estimate the appropriate ROE assume no "fricti<strong>on</strong>" or<br />

transacti<strong>on</strong> costs, as these costs are not reflected in the market price (in the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the DCF model) or risk premium (in the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CAPM and the B<strong>on</strong>d Yield<br />

Plus Risk Premium model). Therefore, it is appropriate to c<strong>on</strong>sider flotati<strong>on</strong> costs<br />

when determining where within the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>able results NorthWestern's<br />

return should fall.<br />

IS THE NEED TO CONSIDER FLOTATION COSTS RECOGNIZED BY<br />

THE ACADEMIC AND FINANCIAL COMMUNITIES?<br />

Yes. The need to reimburse investors for equity issuance costs is justified by the<br />

academic and financial communities in the same spirit that investors are<br />

reimbursed for the costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> issuing debt. This treatment is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the<br />

philosophy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a fair rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return. As explained by Dr. Shann<strong>on</strong> Pratt:<br />

Flotati<strong>on</strong> costs occur when a company issues new stock. The<br />

business usually incurs several kinds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> flotati<strong>on</strong> or transacti<strong>on</strong><br />

costs, which reduce the actual proceeds received by the business.<br />

Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these are direct out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-pocket outlays, such as fees paid to<br />

underwriters, legal expenses, and prospectus preparati<strong>on</strong> costs.<br />

Because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this reducti<strong>on</strong> in proceeds, the business's required<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 51 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7 Q.<br />

8<br />

9 A.<br />

returns must be greater to compensate for the additi<strong>on</strong>al costs.<br />

Flotati<strong>on</strong> costs can be accounted for either by amortizing the cost,<br />

thus reducing the net cash flow to discount, or by incorporating the<br />

cost into the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equity capital. Since flotati<strong>on</strong> costs typically<br />

are not applied to operating cash flow, they must be incorporated<br />

into the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equity capital. 33<br />

HAVE YOU CALCULATED THE EFFECT OF FLOTATION COSTS ON<br />

THE RETURN ON EQUITY?<br />

Yes, I have. I modified the DCF calculati<strong>on</strong> to derive the dividend yield that<br />

10<br />

would reimburse investors for direct issuance costs.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the weighted<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Q.<br />

15<br />

16 A.<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 Q.<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22 A.<br />

23<br />

24<br />

average issuance costs shown in Exhibit No. RBH-ll, a reas<strong>on</strong>able estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

flotati<strong>on</strong> costs is approximately 0.15 percent (15 basis points).<br />

VIII. CAPITAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT<br />

DO ECONOMIC CONDITIONS INFLUENCE THE REQUIRED COST OF<br />

CAPITAL AND REQUIRED RETURN ON COMMON EQUITY?<br />

Yes. As discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI, the models used to estimate the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity<br />

are meant to reflect, and therefore are influenced by, current and expected capital<br />

market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

HAVE YOU REVIEWED ANY SPECIFIC INDICES TO ASSESS THE<br />

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS AND<br />

INVESTOR RETURN REQUIREMENTS?<br />

Yes, I c<strong>on</strong>sidered several measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital market risk, including: (1)<br />

incremental credit spreads <strong>on</strong> investment grade utility debt; (2) the relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />

between natural gas utility dividend yields and l<strong>on</strong>g-term Treasury yields; and (3)<br />

25<br />

equity market volatility and correlati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

As discussed below, each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those<br />

33<br />

Shann<strong>on</strong> P. Pratt, Roger J. Grabowski, Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Capital: Applicati<strong>on</strong>s and Examples, 4th ed. (John<br />

Wiley & S<strong>on</strong>s, Inc., 2010), at 586.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 52 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 measures provide informati<strong>on</strong> that is relevant to the implementati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> models<br />

2 used to estimate the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, and in the interpretati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the model results.<br />

3 Incremental Credit Spreads<br />

4 Q.<br />

5<br />

6 A.<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

HOW HAVE CREDIT SPREADS BEEN AFFECTED BY CURRENT<br />

MARKET CONDITIONS?<br />

The "credit spread" is the return required by debt investors to take <strong>on</strong> the default<br />

risk associated with securities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> differing credit quality. For a given credit rating,<br />

the credit spread is measured by reference to a Treasury security <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> similar tenure.<br />

That is, the credit spread <strong>on</strong> A -rated utility b<strong>on</strong>ds may be measured by reference<br />

to the 30-year Treasury b<strong>on</strong>d yield;34 the same would be true <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Baa-rated<br />

securities. Because lower credit ratings reflect higher levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk, credit spreads<br />

typically are higher for lower-rated securities. In that regard, the incremental<br />

credit spread (e.g., the difference between the credit spreads associated with A<br />

and Baa-rated securities, respectively) is an indicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> incremental return<br />

required by investors to take <strong>on</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk. As Chart 3<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strates, since the beginning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20 I 0, the Moody's Utility B<strong>on</strong>d Index<br />

Baa! A credit spread has steadily increased, indicating that debt investors have<br />

increased their marginal return requirements.<br />

34<br />

The minimum maturity for the b<strong>on</strong>ds in this index is 20 years, with an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 30 years. Moody's<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Corporate B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Averages are derived from pricing data <strong>on</strong> a regularly replenished<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nearly 100 seas<strong>on</strong>ed corporate b<strong>on</strong>ds in the U.S. market, each with current outstandings<br />

over $100 milli<strong>on</strong>. The b<strong>on</strong>ds have maturities as close as possible to 30 years, they are dropped from<br />

the list if their remaining life falls below 20 years, if they are susceptible to redempti<strong>on</strong>, or if their<br />

ratings change. All yields are yield-to- maturity calculated <strong>on</strong> a semi-annual basis. Each observati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

an unweighted average, with Average Corporate yields representing the unweighted average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>ding Average Industrial and Average Public Utility observati<strong>on</strong>s. See Bloomberg.com<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 53 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

Chart 3: Moody's Utility B<strong>on</strong>d Index Baa-A Credit Spread<br />

1.00%<br />

0.90%<br />

0.80% "~~ ...' ........ "iII<br />

O.7{)%<br />

0.60% .•...<br />

0.50%<br />

0.40% 1\i:~/'w:(.:jiJI'~.-............... - ...... '<br />

0.30%<br />

020%<br />

0.10%<br />

O.OO%+--~-~--~-~-~-~--~-~-~-~~­<br />

Jan~·IO Apr~10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

--BaaJA Spread - - - - - Linear (BaarA Spread)<br />

It also is interesting to note that the incremental credit spread has<br />

increased as l<strong>on</strong>g-term Treasury yields have decreased. In fact, as Chart 4<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strates, even since January 2010, changes in the incremental spread are<br />

negatively correlated with changes in the 30-year Treasury yield.<br />

Chart 4: Incremental Credit Spread and 30-Year Treasury Yield<br />

1.00% ,~.__.... ~.~ .... ~ ......... - ..- .... ~.-..... ~~~ •..... ~ ..•. ~ .............<br />

0.90%<br />

::;::~:':"J.\<br />

0.60%<br />

0.50%<br />

6.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

4.00%<br />

3.00%<br />

OAO%<br />

0.30%<br />

2.00%<br />

020%<br />

1.00%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.00% 0.00%<br />

J.n-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12<br />

8<br />

--BaaiASpread<br />

----- 30 Year' B<strong>on</strong>d<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 54 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2<br />

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THOSE FINDINGS IN<br />

ASSESSING THE COMPANY'S COST OF EQUITY?<br />

3 A.<br />

The implicati<strong>on</strong>s are tw<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>old.<br />

First, the recent decline in l<strong>on</strong>g-term Treasury<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

yields has been accompanied by an increase in the premium required by investors<br />

to accept incremental levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> credit risk. That is, the incremental credit spread<br />

has increased as the level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Treasury yields have decreased. While that inverse<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship applies to the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> debt, as noted earlier, prior academic research<br />

has dem<strong>on</strong>strated that the equity risk premium likewise is inversely related to<br />

interest rates. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, neither the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity nor the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> debt has<br />

decreased in lock step with Treasury yields.<br />

Those results also dem<strong>on</strong>strate the importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintaining a financial<br />

and credit pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ile that supports the Company's current BBB (Standard & Poor's)<br />

rating. Because incremental credit spreads have steadily increased, the benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

maintaining a BBB rating is greater in the current market than it has been, even<br />

over the past two years. That c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with recent findings by<br />

FitchRatings ("Fitch"), which noted that:<br />

While it appears that the credit spread differential between the<br />

rating categories has a relatively small impact during times <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic stability, during recent periods <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic stress, a<br />

higher credit rating produces a meaningful difference in credit<br />

spreads ... and provides more assured access to capital. 35<br />

22<br />

35<br />

FitchRatings, Fitch's Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Utility ROE Trends, March 22, 2010, at 3.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 55 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Yield Spreads<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

Q.<br />

A.<br />

PLEASE BRIEFLY DEFINE THE TERM "YIELD SPREAD", AND<br />

EXPLAIN ITS MEANING IN ASSESSING CAPITAL MARKET<br />

CONDITIONS.<br />

In general, the "yield spread" is the difference between the yields <strong>on</strong> two different<br />

securities. As used in the analyses discussed below, the yield spread represents<br />

the difference in yields <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-term Treasury securities <strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>e hand, and<br />

8<br />

dividend yields <strong>on</strong> the other.<br />

Investors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten c<strong>on</strong>sider yield spreads in their<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

Q.<br />

A.<br />

assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> security valuati<strong>on</strong> and capital market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

HAVE YOU REVIEWED THE CURRENT AND HISTORICAL YIELD<br />

SPREAD FOR NATURAL GAS UTILITY COMPANIES?<br />

Yes, I have. As shown in Chart 5, for much <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the period from January 1, 2000<br />

through August 31, 2012, the 30-year Treasury yield has exceeded the proxy<br />

group average dividend yield. In fact, over that time, the yield spread averaged<br />

approximately 48 basis pOints. 36 That period, however, includes the 2002 - 2003<br />

credit c<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong>, during which the Treasury yields and utility dividend yields<br />

were essentially equal, and the post-Lelnnan Brothers bankruptcy period, during<br />

which the yields inverted, such that the proxy company average dividend yield<br />

exceeded the 30-year Treasury yield. Excluding those two periods, the average<br />

yield spread was 87 basis points (that is, <strong>on</strong> average, the 30-year Treasury yield<br />

exceeded the dividend yield by 87 basis pOints).37<br />

36<br />

That is to say that <strong>on</strong> average, the 3D-year Treasury yield exceeded the proxy gr<strong>on</strong>p average dividend<br />

yield by 48 basis points.<br />

37 Calculati<strong>on</strong> excludes yield spreads from July 2002 to June 2003, and after September 15,2008.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 56 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

Chart 5: TreasurylDividend Yield Spread 38<br />

8.00% .- ...._._.._._.__...._ ... - ......_._ .. _-_...-...<br />

2002 -200S Credn C<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong> Post-Lehman Bankruptc),<br />

7.00%<br />

6.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

4.00%<br />

3.00% 1-----1<br />

2.00% _ ..................................................................................................................... .<br />

1.00% +-__ -~.L..-~L,_-,-~-_-~-1~-_-_-_-<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

2<br />

3<br />

--Prol


Page 57 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q. HOW DOES SUCH DATA ENTER INTO YOUR ASSESSMENT OF THE<br />

2 COMPANY'S COST OF EQUITY?<br />

3 A. First, as noted above, investors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten look to the relati<strong>on</strong>ships am<strong>on</strong>g financial<br />

4 metrics to assess current and expected levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> market stability. As also noted<br />

5 above, to the extent that current relati<strong>on</strong>ships am<strong>on</strong>g such indices materially<br />

6 deviate from l<strong>on</strong>g-term norms, it may be an indicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tinuing or expected<br />

7 market instability. Moreover, such data provide market-based methods by which<br />

8 to assess the implicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the currently low Treasury yields for the Company's<br />

9 Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity. If, for example, the currently low level Treasury yields indicated<br />

10 a corresp<strong>on</strong>dingly low Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, the average dividend yield would be<br />

11 approximately 2.23 percent, or lower. 4o As shown <strong>on</strong> Exhibit No. RBH-2,<br />

12 however, the current (proxy group) 30-day average dividend yield is 3.66 percent.<br />

13 Again, low Treasury yields are not necessarily indicative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> corresp<strong>on</strong>dingly low<br />

14 equity return requirements.<br />

15 Equity Market Volatility and Return Correlati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

16 Q.<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 A.<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

PLEASE BRIEFLY DEFINE THE TERM "VOLATILITY" AND<br />

EXPLAIN ITS RELEVANCE TO DETERMINING THE COST OF<br />

EQUITY.<br />

In finance, volatility is a statistical measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the dispersi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns for a given<br />

security or market index. Securities for which returns are more broadly dispersed<br />

(that is, they have a higher degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> deviati<strong>on</strong> from the mean) are thought to be<br />

less certain and, therefore, more risky than securities whose returns historically<br />

40<br />

2.23 percent equals 2.71 percent, less the l<strong>on</strong>g-term average yield spread <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 48 basis points.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 58 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

have been less dispersed. The most comm<strong>on</strong> measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> such dispersi<strong>on</strong> is the<br />

standard deviati<strong>on</strong>,41 which (as discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI) is an important variable<br />

in certain Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity estimati<strong>on</strong> models.<br />

Q. PLEASE NOW DEFINE THE TERM "CORRELATION" AND EXPLAIN<br />

ITS RELEVANCE TO DETERMINING THE COST OF EQUITY.<br />

A. Correlati<strong>on</strong> is a measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the extent to which two variables tend to move in<br />

relati<strong>on</strong> to each other. By definiti<strong>on</strong>, correlati<strong>on</strong> (as measured by correlati<strong>on</strong><br />

coefficients) range from -1.00 to 1.00; a negative correlati<strong>on</strong> indicates that the<br />

returns <strong>on</strong> two securities move in opposite directi<strong>on</strong>s, while a positive correlati<strong>on</strong><br />

suggests that they move together. The closer the correlati<strong>on</strong> coefficient is to -1.00<br />

or 1.00, the str<strong>on</strong>ger that relati<strong>on</strong>ship. Because securities with low or negative<br />

correlati<strong>on</strong>s are less likely to move in tandem, investors c<strong>on</strong>sider such<br />

investments to <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fer certain diversificati<strong>on</strong> benefits; highly correlated securities<br />

14<br />

do not.<br />

As discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI, under portfolio-based Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

techniques such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model, stocks with high correlati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

to the broad market tend to represent greater risk (and therefore require higher<br />

returns) than stocks with lower market correlati<strong>on</strong>s. 42<br />

41 , See, for example, Ross, Westerfield, Jaffe and Jord<strong>on</strong>, Comorate Finance: Core Principals &<br />

Applicati<strong>on</strong>s, 2"d Ed., McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2009, at 313.<br />

42<br />

As discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> VI, the Beta coefficient factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Capital Asset Pricing Model reflects both<br />

the degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> correlati<strong>on</strong> between the subj ect company and the overall market, and measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

volatility.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 59 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q. HAVE YOU REVIEWED THE RECENT AND HISTORICAL DEGREES<br />

2 OF VOLATILITY AND CORRELATION FOR NATURAL GAS UTILITY<br />

3 STOCKS?<br />

4 A. Yes, I have. For the purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my review, I calculated the standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

daily returns for the S&P 500, and the proxy group average, respectively, for the<br />

period January 1, 2000 through August 31,2012 (see Chart 6, below). As Chart 6<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strates, the volatility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns (for both indices) increased significantly<br />

during the 2002 - 2003 credit c<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong>, the 2008 - 2009 recent financial crisis<br />

and, most recently, during the latter part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011. Although volatility recently has<br />

begun to decrease, market estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> future volatility still remain somewhat<br />

above the l<strong>on</strong>g-term average. 43<br />

Chart 6: Daily Return Volatility 44<br />

0.045 , .................................................._...................._ ..- ...._......................................<br />

0.040 + ............ ..<br />

0.035<br />

0.030 +<br />

...............-..............- ............................................. ..\ ..........................-<br />

I<br />

0.025 +-... ----...-~..- ....---.. ~.-... -.---......--...-.--.--.~-. ------....-.....<br />

0.020 + .......---.....- .."',.-----...--..- ..--.....----.....-I.. ................ .. ...<br />

0.015<br />

I<br />

0.000 -i-i -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~~~~-__....-<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

- - -NWE PraxyGroup --S&P 500<br />

43 See Exhibit No. RBH·5, at 1.<br />

44<br />

Represents standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> daily returns over 90-day period. Source: SNL Finaocial.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 60 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2 Q.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5 A.<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

TURNING NOW TO RETURN CORRELATIONS, HOW HAVE THE<br />

PROXY GROUP COMPANY RETURNS MOVED RELATIVE TO THE<br />

S&P500?<br />

Since 2000, correlati<strong>on</strong>s between proxy group returns and the S&P 500 returns<br />

have been trending upward, as shown by the linear trend in Chart 7, below.<br />

Despite correlati<strong>on</strong>s moderating in the near term, the prevailing l<strong>on</strong>g-term trend<br />

remains toward increased correlati<strong>on</strong> between the two indices.<br />

Chart 7: Daily Return Correlati<strong>on</strong>s 45<br />

1.00<br />

0.90 +~ ........................ ~-.-........ -~ ....... ~~ ... ~.~-.~.~-~~ ... ~.;-.~-~-~ .. -.. -- .••.. ~ .(''\_ ... .<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.:10<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00 +--~~-~-~-~-_-~-_~-_-_-~-<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

--SPlOPr0lo/ - - - - - Unesr (SPXlFroxy)<br />

10<br />

11 Q.<br />

12<br />

13 A.<br />

14<br />

HAS THE INCREASED CORRELATION OF RETURNS BEEN NOTED<br />

BY THE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY?<br />

Yes, it has. A January 4, 2012 article in The Wall Street Journal, for example,<br />

noted that "[a J fact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> life for investors in recent years, especially in the stock<br />

45<br />

Represents the rolling 90-day average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> daily returns.<br />

Financial.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy<br />

S<strong>on</strong>rce: SNL


Page 61 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

Q.<br />

A.<br />

market, has been the dramatic rise in correlati<strong>on</strong>s. One surprise <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011 was the<br />

degree to which correlati<strong>on</strong>s within and across financial markets returned with a<br />

vengeance.,,46 Citing a study by BCA Research, the article c<strong>on</strong>cluded by noting<br />

that:<br />

.. .in order for correlati<strong>on</strong>s to decline dramatically to pre-Lehman<br />

levels, investors will likely need some sense that the headwinds<br />

facing the U.S. ec<strong>on</strong>omy have largely dissipated, and that the<br />

expansi<strong>on</strong> has successfully transiti<strong>on</strong>ed to a sustainable, selfreinforcing<br />

phase (i.e. the recovery will not fall apart in the<br />

absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tinual shots <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>on</strong>etary or fiscal stimulus). It may<br />

be years before such a realizati<strong>on</strong> occurs, suggesting that the "high<br />

vollhiqh correlati<strong>on</strong>" world is likely to persist, even if we have<br />

seen the worst for this cycle. 47<br />

My findings, that natural gas utility stocks remain somewhat more volatile<br />

than their historical average, but are far more correlated with the broad market<br />

than they historically have been, are c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the observati<strong>on</strong>s noted by<br />

The Wall Street Journal.<br />

WHAT CONCLUSIONS DO YOU DRAW FROM THOSE ANALYSES?<br />

First, it is important to recognize the relati<strong>on</strong>ships am<strong>on</strong>g financial measures<br />

relied up<strong>on</strong> by investors, and to reflect those relati<strong>on</strong>ships in Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity<br />

estimates. Simply observing, for example, that l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn Treasury rates are at<br />

historically low levels is not a sufficient level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis to c<strong>on</strong>clude that the Cost<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity is at a commensurately low level. As noted above, for example, if<br />

investors believed that the current level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-tenn Treasury yields is indicative<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity, natural gas utility dividend yields would be about 143 basis<br />

points below their current level. Similarly, both sector and market-wide volatility<br />

46<br />

High Stock Correlati<strong>on</strong>s Could Be Here to Stay, The Wall Street Journal, January 4, 2012.<br />

47 Ibid.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 62 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

should not be viewed in isolati<strong>on</strong>; rather, they should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered together with<br />

the correlati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> returns. Doing so provides a more complete perspective, and<br />

enables a more reas<strong>on</strong>ed determinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Equity.<br />

4<br />

IX.<br />

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION<br />

5 Q.<br />

6<br />

7 A.<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

WHAT IS YOUR CONCLUSION REGARDING THE COMPANY'S COST<br />

OF EQUITY?<br />

As discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> II, the low end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>ableness is<br />

calculated by averaging the mean and mean high results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my DCF models; the<br />

high end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the range is calculated by averaging the mean high results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my DCF<br />

models. Those results suggest a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.96 percent to 10.73 percent. That<br />

range is corroborated by the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my CAPM and B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk<br />

Premium analyses. As shown in Table 7, a majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CAPM<br />

model fall within or just outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that range. In additi<strong>on</strong>, as shown in Table 8,<br />

all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium results fall within that range. As such, I<br />

believe that a rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return <strong>on</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> equity in the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.00 percent to<br />

10.75 percent represents the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equity investors' required rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> return for<br />

investment in natural gas utilities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> comparable risk to NorthWestern.<br />

The Company faces business risks associated with: (1) its relatively small<br />

sIze compared to the proxy group; (2) the lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revenue stabilizati<strong>on</strong><br />

mechanisms employed by it relative to the proxy group; and (3) flotati<strong>on</strong> costs.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> those factors, as well as taking into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> the current state <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

capital markets, I recommend an ROE <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10.50 percent, which is somewhat above<br />

the midpoint <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my range.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hevert</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NorthWestern Energy


Page 63 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63<br />

1 Q.<br />

2 A.<br />

DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY?<br />

Yes, it does.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Direct</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Testim<strong>on</strong>y</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> B. Revert<br />

N ortb Western Energy


Exhibit No. RBH-1<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3<br />

Quarterly Discounted Cash Flow Model<br />

30 Day Average Siock Price<br />

(11 121 [3[ [4J 15J 16J [7] 18] 191 [10J [11J 112J [131 [141<br />

[151<br />

[161 [171<br />

ComEan:,:<br />

Ticker<br />

Exp!;l;led Expected Expected Expected<br />

Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend<br />

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4<br />

Zacks First Call Value line Sustainable Average<br />

Earnings Earnings Earnings Growth Earnings<br />

Stock Price Growth Growth Growth Rate Growth<br />

Low<br />

ROE<br />

Mean<br />

ROE<br />

High<br />

ROE<br />

AGl Resources Inc.<br />

Almos Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

laclede Group. Inc. (The)<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc.<br />

South Jersey Industries, Inc.<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

WGl Holdings. Inc.<br />

GAS<br />

ATO<br />

LG<br />

NJR<br />

NWN<br />

PNY<br />

SJI<br />

SWX<br />

WGL<br />

$0.45 $0.48 $0.46 $0.46 $0.47 $0.48 $0.48 $0.48<br />

$0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.36 $0.36 $0.36 $0.36<br />

$0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $0.43 $0.43 $0.43 $0.43<br />

$0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40<br />

$0.45 $0.45 $0.45 $0.45 $0.47 $0.47 $0.47 $0.47<br />

$0.29 $0.29 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.31 $0.31<br />

$0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.44 $0.44 $0.44 $0.44<br />

$0.27 $0.27 $0.30 $0.30 $0.28 $0.28 $0.31 $0.31<br />

SO.39 SO.39 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.42 $0.42<br />

$40.10 4.28% NA 5.50% 5.96% 5.25%<br />

$35.97 5.83% 5.500/0 4.00% 4.01% 4.84%<br />

$42.07 3.00% 5.30% 2.00% 5.57% 3.97%<br />

$45.53 3.35% 1.85% 5.50% 7.20% 4.47%<br />

$49.03 4.17% 4.50% 4.00% 7.34% 5.00%<br />

$31.63 4.70% 4.70% 2.50% 2.19% 3.52%<br />

$51.95 6.00% 6.00% 9.00% 11.58% 8.15%<br />

$43.74 4.37% 4.05% 9.00% 6.60% 6.01%<br />

$40.29 5.37% 5.60% 3.00% 3.78% 4.44%<br />

9.20%<br />

8.11%<br />

6.12%<br />

5.32%<br />

7.69%<br />

8.09%<br />

9.40%<br />

6.78%<br />

7.13%<br />

10.23% 10.98%<br />

6.99% 10.04%<br />

8.19% 9.89%<br />

8.07% 10.92%<br />

8.94% 11.40%<br />

7.49% 8.73%<br />

11.64% 15.23%<br />

8.81% 11.91%<br />

8.65% 9.88%<br />

Mean<br />

4.56% 4.69% 4.94% 6.02% 5.07%<br />

7.34%<br />

9.00% 11.00%<br />

Notes:<br />

[lJ Soun:;e: Bloomberg PrOfessi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[2J Soun:;e: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[3] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[4] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[5] Equals Col. [1] x (1 + Col. [14])<br />

[6] Equals Col. [2] x (1 + Col. (14])<br />

[7] Equals Col. [3] x (1 + Cot [14])<br />

[6] Equals Col. [4] x (1 + Col. (14])<br />

[9] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service, equals indicated number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Irading day average as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31, 2012<br />

[10] Source: Zacks<br />

[11] Source: Yahool Finance<br />

[12] Source: Value Une<br />

[13] Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

[14] Equals Average (Cols. [10], (11J. [12J. [13])<br />

[15] Implied low DCF<br />

[16] Implied Mean DCF<br />

[17] Implied High DCF


Exhibit No. RBH-1<br />

Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>3<br />

Quarterly Discounted Cash Flow Model<br />

90 Day Average Stock Price<br />

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] {10] [11] 112] [13] [14]<br />

[151<br />

(161 [17]<br />

ComE!an:r:<br />

Ticker<br />

Expe


Exhibit No. RBH-1<br />

Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3<br />

Quarterly Discounted Cash Flow Model<br />

180 Day Average Siock Price<br />

[11 [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] m [8] [9] [10] [111 [12] [131 [141<br />

[15)<br />

(16) [17]<br />

ComE!an:t<br />

Ticker<br />

Expected Expected Expected Expected<br />

Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend Dividend<br />

1 , 3 4 1 , 3 4<br />

Zacks First Call Value Une Sustainable Average<br />

Eamings Earnings Eamings Grnwth Earnings<br />

Stock Price Growth Growth Growth Rate Growth<br />

L~<br />

ROE<br />

Mean<br />

ROE<br />

High<br />

ROE<br />

AGL Resources Inc.<br />

Atmos Energy Corporall<strong>on</strong><br />

Laclede Group. Inc. (The)<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company. Inc.<br />

South Jersey Industries. Inc.<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

WGL Holdings. Inc.<br />

GAS<br />

ATO<br />

LG<br />

NJR<br />

NWN<br />

PNY<br />

SJI<br />

SWX<br />

WGL<br />

$0.45 $0.46 $0.46 $0.46 $0.47 $0.45 $0.48 $0.48<br />

SO.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.36 $0.36 $0.36 $0.36<br />

$0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $0.43 $0.43 $0.43 $0.43<br />

$0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40<br />

$0.45 SO.45 $0.45 $0.45 $0.47 $0.47 $0.47 $0.47<br />

$0.29 SO.29 $0.30 SO.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.31 $0.31<br />

$0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.44 $0.44 $0.44 $0.44<br />

$0.27 $0.27 SO.30 SO.30 $0.28 $0.28 SO.31 $0.31<br />

$0.39 $0.39 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.42 $0.42<br />

S39.62 4.28% NA 5.50% 5.96% 5.25%<br />

$33.26 5.53% 5.50% 4.00% 4.01% 4.84%<br />

$40.29 3.00% 5.30% 2.00% 5.57% 3.97%<br />

$45.32 3.35% 1.85% 5.50% 7.20% 4.47%<br />

$47.09 4.17% 4.50% 4.00% 7.34% 5.00%<br />

$31.81 4.70% 4.70% 2.50% 219% 3.52%<br />

$51.74 8.00% 6.00% 9.00% 11.55% 8.15%<br />

$42.81 4.37% 4.05% 9.00% 6.60% 6.01%<br />

$40.76 5.37% 5.60% 3.00% 3.78% 4.44%<br />

9.26%<br />

8.45%<br />

6.30%<br />

5.33%<br />

8.05%<br />

6.07%<br />

9.41%<br />

6.84%<br />

7.08%<br />

10.29% 11,05%<br />

9.33% 10,39%<br />

8.38% 10.08%<br />

8.08% 10.93%<br />

9.10% 11.57%<br />

7.47% 6.71%<br />

11.65% 15.25%<br />

8.87% 11.97%<br />

8.60% 9.83%<br />

Mean<br />

4.56% 4.69% 4.94% 6.02% 5.07%<br />

7.42%<br />

9.09% 11.09%<br />

Noles:<br />

[1] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[2] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[3] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[4] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[5] Equals Col. [1] x (1 + Col. [14])<br />

[6] Equals Col. [2] x (1 + Col. 114])<br />

[7] Equals Col. [3] x (1 + Col. [14])<br />

[5] Equals Col. [4] x (1 + Col. 114])<br />

[9] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essI<strong>on</strong>al Service, equals indicated number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trading day average es <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31. 2012<br />

[10] Source: Zacks<br />

[11] Source: Yahool Finance<br />

[12] Source: Value Une<br />

[13] Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

[14] Equals Average (Cols. [10], [11]. [12]. [13])<br />

[15]lmpned Low DCF<br />

[15]lmpned Mean DCF<br />

[17] Impned High DCF


Exhibit No. RBH-2<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth Discounted Cash Flow Model<br />

30 Day Average Stock Price<br />

11) [2) [3) 14) IS)<br />

Average Expected Zacks<br />

Annualized Stock Dividend Dividend Earnings<br />

Company Ticker Dividend Price Yield Yield Growth<br />

16)<br />

First Call<br />

Earnings<br />

Growth<br />

EI 18) 19)<br />

Value Line Sustainable Average<br />

Earnings Growth Earnings<br />

Growth Estimate Growth<br />

{10)<br />

Low<br />

ROE<br />

111) 112)<br />

Mean<br />

ROE<br />

High<br />

ROE<br />

AGL Resources Inc. GAS $1.84 $40.10 4.59% 4.71% 4.28%<br />

Atmas Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> ATO $1.38 $35.97 3.84% 3.93% 5.83%<br />

Laclede Group, Inc. LG $1.66 $42.07 3.95% 4.02% 3,00%<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> NJR $1.52 $45.53 3.34% 3.41% 3.35%<br />

NorthlNest Natural Gas Company NWN $1.78 $49.03 3.63% 3.72% 4.17%<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc. PNY $1.20 $31.63 3.79% 3.86% 4.70%<br />

South Jersey Industries, Inc. SJI $1.61 $51.95 3.10% 3.23% 6.00%<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> SWX $1.18 $43.74 2.70% 2.78% 4.37%<br />

WGL Holdings, Inc. WGL $1.60 $40.29 3.97% 4.06% 5.37%<br />

NA<br />

5.50%<br />

5.30%<br />

1.85%<br />

4.50%<br />

4.70%<br />

6.00%<br />

4.05%<br />

5.60%<br />

5.50% 5.96% 5.25%<br />

4.00% 4.01% 4.84%<br />

2.00% 5.57% 3.97%<br />

5.50% 7.20% 4.47%<br />

4.00% 7.34% 5.00%<br />

2.50% 2.19% 3.52%<br />

9.00% 11.58% 8.15%<br />

9.00% 6.60% 6.01%<br />

3.00% 3.78% 4.44%<br />

8.97%<br />

7.91%<br />

5.99%<br />

5.22%<br />

7.70%<br />

6.03%<br />

9.19%<br />

6.80%<br />

7.03%<br />

9.95% 10.68%<br />

8.77% 9.78%<br />

7.99% 9.62%<br />

7.89% 10.65%<br />

8.72% 11.10%<br />

7.38% 8.58%<br />

11.37% 14.86%<br />

8.78% 11.82%<br />

8.50% 9.68%<br />

Mean 3.66% 3.75% 4.56%<br />

4.69%<br />

4.94% 6.02% 5.07%<br />

7.20%<br />

8.82% 10.75%<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[2] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service, equals indicated number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trading day average as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31, 2012<br />

[3J Equals [1J f [2J<br />

[4J Equals [3J x [1 + 0.5 x [9])<br />

[5] Source: Zacks<br />

[6] Source: Yahool Finance<br />

[7] Source: Value Line<br />

[8] Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

[9J Equals Average([5]. [6J. [7J. [8])<br />

[10J Equals [3J x (1 + 0.5 x Minimum([5J. [6J. [7J. [8])) + Minimum([5J. [6J. [7J. [8])<br />

[11 J Equals [4J + [9J<br />

[12J Equals [3J x (1 + 0.5 x Maximum([5]. [6]. [7]. [8])) + Maximum([5J, [6J, [7J, [8])


Exhibit No. RBH-2<br />

Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>3<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth Discounted Cash Flow Model<br />

90 Day Average Stock Price<br />

[1] [2] [3] [4] [51<br />

Average Expected Zacks<br />

Annualized Stock Dividend Dividend Earnings<br />

Company Ticker Dividend Price Yield Yield Growth<br />

[6]<br />

First Call<br />

Earnings<br />

Growth<br />

F] [81 [9]<br />

Average<br />

Earnings Growth Earnings<br />

Growth Estimate Growth<br />

Value Line Sustainable<br />

[10]<br />

Low<br />

ROE<br />

[11] [12]<br />

Mean<br />

ROE<br />

High<br />

ROE<br />

AGL Resources Inc. GAS $1.84 $38.92 4.73% 4.85% 4.28%<br />

Atmas Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> ATO $1.38 $34.65 3.98% 4.08% 5.83%<br />

Laclede Group, Inc. LG $1.66 $40.12 4.14% 4.22% 3.00%<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> NJR $1.52 $44.15 3.44% 3.52% 3.35%<br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company NWN $1.78 $47.53 3.75% 3.84% 4.17%<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc. PNY $1.20 $31.27 3.84% 3.91% 4.70%<br />

South Jersey Industries, Inc. SJI $1.61 $50.56 3.18% 3.31% 6.00%<br />

South~st Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> SWX $1.18 $43.43 2.72% 2.80% 4.37%<br />

WGL Holdings, Inc. WGL $1.60 $39.82 4.02% 4.11% 5.37%<br />

NA<br />

5.50%<br />

5.30%<br />

1.85%<br />

4.50%<br />

4.70%<br />

6.00%<br />

4.05%<br />

5.60%<br />

5.50% 5.96% 5.25%<br />

4.00% 4.01% 4.84%<br />

2.00% 5.57% 3.97%<br />

5,50010 7.20% 4.47%<br />

4.00% 7.34% 5.00%<br />

2.50% 2.19% 3.52%<br />

9.00% 11.58% 8.15%<br />

9.00% 6.60% 6.01%<br />

3.00% 3.78% 4.44%<br />

9.11%<br />

8.06%<br />

6.18%<br />

5,32%<br />

7.82%<br />

6.07%<br />

9.28%<br />

6.82%<br />

7.08%<br />

10.10% 10.82%<br />

8.92% 9,93%<br />

8.19% 9.82%<br />

7.99% 10.76%<br />

8.84% 11.22%<br />

7.43% 8.63%<br />

11.46% 14.95%<br />

8.80% 11.84%<br />

8.54% 9.73%<br />

Mean 3.75% 3.85% 4.56%<br />

4.69%<br />

4.94% 6.02% 5.07%<br />

7.31%<br />

8.92% 10.86%<br />

Notes:<br />

[1J Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[2] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service, equals indicated number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trading day average as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31, 2012<br />

[3[ Equals [1J I [2[<br />

[4] Equals [3] x (1 + 0.5 x [9])<br />

(51 Source: Zacks<br />

[6] Source: Yahool Finance<br />

[7J Source: Value Line<br />

(8J Exhibil No. RBH-3<br />

[9[ Equals Average([5J, [6[, [7[. [8])<br />

(10[ Equals [3J x (1 + 0.5 x Minimum([5[. [6J. [7J, [8])) + Minimum[(5J. [6J. [7J, (8])<br />

[11[ Equals [4J + [9[<br />

[12[ Equals [3J x (1 + 0.5 x Maximum([5J, [6J, [7[. [8])) + Maximum([5[. [6J. [7[. [81)


Exhibit No. RBH-2<br />

Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>3<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth Discounted Cash Flow Model<br />

180 Day Average Stock Price<br />

11] [2] 13] 141 [5]<br />

Average Expected Zacks<br />

Annualized Stock Dividend Djvidend Earnings<br />

Com!?:anx Ticker Dividend Price Yield Yield Growth<br />

IB]<br />

First Call<br />

Earnings<br />

Grov.1h<br />

17] [8] [9]<br />

Value Line Sustainable Average<br />

Earnings Growtl1 Earnings<br />

Growth Estimate Growth<br />

[10[<br />

Low<br />

ROE<br />

[11[ [12)<br />

Mean<br />

ROE<br />

High<br />

ROE<br />

AGL Resources Inc. GAS $1.84 $39.62 4.64% 4.77% 4.28%<br />

Atmas Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> ATO $1.38 $33.26 4.15% 4.25% 5.83%<br />

laclede Group, Inc. LG $l.BB $40.29 4.12% 4.20% 3.00%<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> NJR $1.52 $45.32 3.35% 3.43% 3.35%<br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company NWN $1.78 $47.09 3.78% 3.87% 4.17%<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc. PNY $1.20 $31.81 3.77% 3.84% 4.70%<br />

South Jersey Industries, Inc. SJI $1.Bl $51.74 3.11% 3.24% 6.00%<br />

Southv.oest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> SWX $1.1B $42.81 2.76% 2.84% 4.37%<br />

WGL Holdings, Inc. WGL $1.BO $40.7B 3.93% 4.01% 5.37%<br />

NA<br />

5.50%<br />

5.30%<br />

1.85%<br />

4.50%<br />

4.70%<br />

6.00%<br />

4.05%<br />

5.60%<br />

5.50% 5.96% 5.25%<br />

4.00% 4.01% 4.84%<br />

2.00% 5.57% 3.97%<br />

5.50% 7.20% 4.47%<br />

4.00% 7.34% 5.00%<br />

2.50% 2.19% 3.52%<br />

9.00% 11.58% 8.15%<br />

9.00% 6.60% 6.01%<br />

3.00% 3.78% 4.44%<br />

9.02%<br />

8.23%<br />

6.16%<br />

5.23%<br />

7.86%<br />

6.00%<br />

9.20%<br />

6.86%<br />

6.98%<br />

10.01% 10.74%<br />

9.09% 10.10%<br />

8.17% 9.80%<br />

7.90% 10.67%<br />

8.88% 11.26%<br />

7.36% 8.56%<br />

11.38% 14.87%<br />

8.84% 11.88"/"<br />

8.45% 9.64%<br />

Mean 3.73% 3.83% 4.56%<br />

4.69%<br />

4.94% 6.02% 5.07%<br />

7.28%<br />

8.90% 10.84%<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[2] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service, equals indicated number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trading day average as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31, 2012<br />

[3) Equals [1) 1[2)<br />

[4J Equals [3J x (1 + 0.5 x [9))<br />

[5] Source: Zacks<br />

[6] Source: Yahoo! Finance<br />

[7] Source: Value Line<br />

[8] Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

[9) Equals Average([5), [B), [7), [8))<br />

[10) Equals [3) x (1 + 0.5 x Minimum([5). [B). [7), [8))) + Minimum([5), [B), [7), [8))<br />

[11) Equals [4) + [9)<br />

[12) Equals [3) x (1 + 0.5 x Maximum([5), [B), [7).[8))) + Maximum([5). [B). [7). [8))


Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1<br />

Company Name<br />

AGl Resources Inc.<br />

Atmos Energy Corporall<strong>on</strong><br />

Laclede Group, Inc.<br />

New JOl'5ey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Northwost Natural Gas Company<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc.<br />

South Jel'5ey Industries, Inc.<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

WGL Holdings. Inc.<br />

Ticker<br />

GAS<br />

ATO<br />

LG<br />

NJR<br />

NWN<br />

PNY<br />

SJI<br />

SWX<br />

WGL<br />

Projected<br />

Earnings<br />

per share<br />

2015-17<br />

4.10<br />

2.70<br />

3.00<br />

>AS<br />

3.40<br />

1.85<br />

4.50<br />

3.75<br />

2."<br />

Retenti<strong>on</strong> Gl(lwth Estimate<br />

[t] [2] [3] [41 lSI 161 J7J [8] [91 1101 [II] 1121 [13\ [14\ 1151 [161 [17] 1181<br />

Projected Projected Projected<br />

Oivldend Projected Comm<strong>on</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong><br />

Oeclared Book Value Return <strong>on</strong> Shares Shares<br />

per share Retenti<strong>on</strong> per Share<br />

2015-17 Re~o (8) 21)15-17<br />

2.01) 51.22% 36.35<br />

1.48 45.19% 34.65<br />

1.81 39.67% 27.00<br />

1.68 51.30% 24.60<br />

1.94 42.94% 29.10<br />

1.35 27.03% 14.65<br />

225 50.00% 28.55<br />

1.60 57.33% 37.25<br />

1.75 37.50% 28.65<br />

BookValue<br />

(R)<br />

11.28%<br />

7.79%<br />

11.11%<br />

14.02%<br />

11.68%<br />

12.63%<br />

15.76%<br />

10.07%<br />

9.77%<br />

B,R<br />

5.78%<br />

3.52%<br />

4.41%<br />

7.20%<br />

5.02%<br />

3.41%<br />

7.88%<br />

5.77%<br />

3.66%<br />

Outstanding Outstanding<br />

2013 2015-17<br />

119.00 121.00<br />

91.00 103.00<br />

23.50 25.00<br />

40.00 40.00<br />

28.00 31.00<br />

70.00 68.00<br />

32.00 35.00<br />

48.00 51.00<br />

51.75 52.00<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong><br />

Shares<br />

Gmwth<br />

Rete<br />

0.55%<br />

4.17%<br />

2.06%<br />

0.00'10<br />

3.42%<br />

.0.95%<br />

3.00%<br />

2.02%<br />

0.16%<br />

21112 High 2012 Low 2012 price<br />

Price Price midpoint<br />

", 36.6 $ 39.75<br />

33.9 30.4 $ 32.15<br />

43.0 37.8 $ 40.40<br />

50.3 41.5 $ 45.90<br />

49.5 43.9 $ 48.70<br />

"., 28.9 $ 31.75<br />

58.0 46.5 $ 52.25<br />

43.6 40.5 $ 42.05<br />

45.0 37.9 $ 41.45<br />

Projected<br />

BookValue<br />

per Share<br />

2012<br />

30.05<br />

28.75<br />

25.85<br />

18.20<br />

27.80<br />

13.90<br />

23.40<br />

29.80<br />

24.50<br />

Markell<br />

Book RaUo 'S' ..,. S,V BR+SV<br />

1.32 0.73% 24.40% 0.18% 5.96%<br />

1.12 4.67% 10.58% 0.49% 4.01%<br />

1.56 3.22% 36.01% 1.16% 5.57%<br />

2.52 0.00% 60.35'10 0.00% 7.20'10<br />

1.'" 5.74% 40.47% 2.32% 7.34%<br />

2.28 ·2.17% 56.22% ·1.22% 2.19%<br />

2.23 6.70% 55.22% 3.70% 11.58%<br />

1.41 2.85% 29.13% 0.83% 6.60%<br />

1.69 0.27% 40.89% 0.11% 3.78%<br />

Notes:<br />

[I] Source: Value Une<br />

[21 Source: Value Une<br />

[3] Equals 1. (21 I [I]<br />

[4] Source: Value line<br />

[5] Equals [1]1 [4]<br />

[61 Equals [31 x [51<br />

[7] SOurCll: Value lIno<br />

[8] Source: Value line<br />

[91 Equals ([81 I [7J) h 0.33·1<br />

[10] Source: Value Une<br />

[11J Source:Value Une<br />

[12] Equals Average ([10), Ill/)<br />

[131 Source:Value LIne<br />

[14J Equals [12)1[13]<br />

[15] Equals [9J x [14J<br />

[16J Equals I • (11 [14])<br />

[171 Equals (15) x 11Sj<br />

[181 Equals 161 + 1171


Exhibit No. RBH-4<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4<br />

InpUts [I! BI<br />

" "'<br />

Multistage Growth Dtscount9d Cash Flow Model<br />

30 Dey AWl/age stock Pli::&<br />

[5) ~<br />

!~<br />

[10] rIll [11] [131 [14]<br />

.~,<br />

EPS Growt~ Rate EsIlmatas L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Ps)'Ot/lRatio tteratr;B Soluti<strong>on</strong> Term"",[ Terminal<br />

SUstainable<br />

Company TICker Price Fi'sI Can Val .... LIM<br />

""~<br />

,- A\'6f8Si!& ,.."<br />

2616 ,=,<br />

PIE RBlio PEG Ratio<br />

AGL Resoorces<br />

G"<br />

$40.113 426% 5.60% 5.96% 5.25% 5.61% 49.00% "" 49.00% 65.DO% "" '"<br />

~. 9.25% 17.85 3.18<br />

AImosEnergy Am 535.91 5.63% 5.50% "' 4.60% 4.61% 4.84% 5.61% 69.00% 54.00% 65.00% ~. 9.97% 14.91 2.66<br />

Laclede Group $42.67 3.00% 5.3Dr. 5.57% 3.97% 5.61% 65.00% 613.00%<br />

'G '" "00' (SO,OQI 16.12% 14.41 2.57<br />

New Jersey Resources ."." 3.35% 1.85%<br />

""'<br />

"'" 7.20% 4.47% 5.61% 53.00% "'00% "00% (SO.DOI ,.m; 17.49 3.12<br />

Ncrttmesl Net Gas "w" $49.133 4.17%<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natura' Gas<br />

6.91% 19.71 3.52<br />

'''"' '00% 7.34% 5.00% 5.61% 71.00% ".00% 65.00% $0.00 9.135% 19.88 3.37<br />

$31.63 4.10% 4.70%<br />

'"<br />

Z""' Z'". 3.52% 5.61% 77.00% nOO% ~.OO<br />

"'0%<br />

South Jersey 1000s. $51.95<br />

." 0.0'" 0.0'"<br />

9.00% 11.58% 8.15% 5,81% 54.00% 51.00% 65.00% ($0.00) 10.24% 14.03 2.50<br />

Scutlme51 Gas Corp. 'WX $43.74 4.37% 4.05% '.00% 6.60% 6.01% 5,81% 43.00% 'Z"", ($0.00) 9.53% 16.58<br />

"",. ,."<br />

WGL Hok!~s I"". WO, 5.37% 5.60"':'<br />

"'20 ,""' m% 4.44% 5.61% 54.00% 6200% 65.00% '"00 ",. 17.02 3.03<br />

M8V<<br />

'''''<br />

Projected Anrual<br />

Eamlms ~ Shara [15] [16] [In [lS] [1~ ~O] ~1]<br />

'"<br />

'"<br />

"'" 10.24%<br />

MW &91%<br />

[23] ~4] [25] [26] [2n ~8] ~9] @O] [31]<br />

""<br />

2015 2016 2017 201S 2019 2020 2021<br />

2024 2025<br />

""<br />

"" ""<br />

'I'"<br />

"" .,." $223 $247<br />

'Z" .ZOO $274 m' $3.04 .a." .,,' 53.57 S3.n 53.98 m .... M ....<br />

...'" "" 0;<br />

"" .,,'" $3.16<br />

53.69<br />

$4.12<br />

'''' "" '"'''<br />

"<br />

$4.59 "<br />

""<br />

''"'<br />

$3.78 $4.17 ...... ...... .... 00 $.5.17<br />

,0.0,<br />

""'<br />

""'<br />

"" $5,n "-"<br />

52.70 $3.07 $3.21<br />

'Z" ''''<br />

.,," 53.70 ,,,. $4.11<br />

''"'<br />

"'"' "" ..... .,,'<br />

$.5.11 $5.39<br />

$3.74<br />

$4.17 $4.41<br />

""<br />

...." $4.91 $5.19<br />

$1.57 51.63 $1.88 $1.74 $1.80 $1.87 $1.94 S211<br />

'"<br />

"-"' .Z" 52.33 .,... $275 .ZOO $3.07<br />

""'"<br />

""'"<br />

$3.13<br />

'"' '20' .,,' .,,' .,,' $4.28 $4.61 ...... $5.28 $5.62 55.00 sa .. $1.02 51.41 $7.83 sa27<br />

Coml!!!~ n:kar 2011 2012 2013<br />

AGL Resoorcos<br />

Almos Energy Am .,." 'Z,., .Z"'" .,.oo .zn<br />

Lecleda Groop<br />

'0 .Z" 'Z"' .,,' $3.21 .,,' $3.47<br />

New Jersey Resources<br />

Norttwa51 Nal Gas "W" .,."<br />

$251 'Z.. .m $29t $3.05 $3.21 ",.,<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas<br />

''"'<br />

South Jersey Ind5-<br />

Scuttme51 Gas Corp. 'WX .Z", 5273<br />

'Z" .,."<br />

$3.07 ,a., .,.,<br />

"" "'" ..... "'"<br />

$4.31 $4.81<br />

..." ".M ",., $5.67<br />

""'<br />

WGL Holdi!l!sl.-.::. woe .Z" 'Z$ 'Z" 'ZOO .Z"' .,," .Z"' .,,' "" .,,' .,,' $3.51 S3.n $4.21 ".M $4.69 ...."<br />

Projected AMJaI<br />

Oivaend P8~ Ratio<br />

""<br />

[33] ~ Ill' Il!I P:!! Il!I<br />

!40j (411 (42) (43) IMI<br />

(46)<br />

""<br />

Coml!!!!!l n:ke, 2013 2014 2015<br />

2019<br />

'1m<br />

2025<br />

"''' "" "" "" '"" "''' 'I'"<br />

AGL Rescuces<br />

49.00% "00% 49.00% 49.00% 49.00% 51.67% 54.33% 57.00% 59.67% 6233% 65.00% 65.00% "00% "" 65.00% 65.00% 'I'"<br />

A!mcs Energy AW ''''<br />

69.00% 65.25% 61.60% 57.75% ".00% 55.83% 57.67% 59.50% 61.33% 63.17% 65,00% 65,00% O£OO% 65.00% 55.00%<br />

Lacleda Gr5.97) 50.00 50,55 51,67 $1.60 $1.58 $1.55 $1.68 $1,82 $1.98 $215<br />

"'"'<br />

'ZOO 'z"' ,a,<br />

"'" 579.52<br />

Laclede Groop CG ($4207) $0.00 $0.65 $1.97 $201 .Z'" 52.08<br />

"-'" .Z"' S248<br />

53.18<br />

""' "''' 'M' '"'' .,,' $91.52<br />

New Jersey Resources<br />

'"' .Z,," .,." .Z" ($45.53) $0.00 $0.48 $1.46 $1.49 $1.51 $1.54 51.71 $1.89 'Z" 'ZOO 53.14 53.32 5103.14<br />

NorttTNast Nal Gas "W" ($49.03) $0.00 .... 51.83 $l.n $1.76 $1,14 51.67 $201 5217 .Z", "'$2 $271 53.02 $3,19 $108.84<br />

'Z""<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Nawral Gas<br />

(531.63) 50.00 $M2 51.27 $1.30 $1.32 $1.34 $1.37 $1.41 51.45 $1.49 $1.54 $1.60 51.69 $1.79 51.89 $65.81<br />

South Jersey Ind5- '" ($51.95) $0.00 50.56 $1.75 $1.92<br />

'"'<br />

.Z'" $218 $2.46 $2.75<br />

$3.39 53.74 .... W $4.32<br />

"'"<br />

...." ...." $121.09<br />

Scutlme51 Gas Corp. 'WX ($43.74) $0.00 $1.14 $1.23 $1.30 51.37 51.58 $1.81 $207<br />

..." .,." 'Z", 'Z", $3.13<br />

$3.49 $102.91<br />

WGL Holdi~&lnc woe ($40.29) $0.00<br />

$1,54 $1.61 $1.67 $1.73 51.83 $1.93 'ZM $217<br />

"'"<br />

6130122 .,''''' ""'" """" """.<br />

"'"<br />

"'" 'Z"<br />

$259 5273 $289 587,36


Exhibit No. RBH-4<br />

Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4<br />

Multistage Growth Diseount&d Cash Flow Model<br />

90 Day Average SIoc;k Pres<br />

[1] ~l !~<br />

'"""<br />

I!!J I!J IS] ~ (<br />

"' '" 1 °1 1111 [12] [13[ [14]<br />

,~< EPS GI'OVIIIh Rate EsllITIIIle.<br />

SU'Sii,mblil<br />

Lo ...... Term PayoutRati> Itflfllwa Soluti<strong>on</strong> Terminal TlII'minlll<br />

Cam~ny Ticker Pres z..~ Frs! carr Value Line Gro'lVth Average<br />

AGL Resources 0" $36.92 4.28%<br />

5.25% ~.50%<br />

0_<br />

5.51%<br />

2012<br />

49.00% 49.00% ''''<br />

2023<br />

65.00%<br />

~oo,<br />

so,oo<br />

'RR<br />

9.36%<br />

PIE R.!tio<br />

17.34<br />

PEG Ratio<br />

aoo<br />

Almos Enargy Am 534.65 5.83% 5,50% "' 4.00% '''' 4.01% 4.84% 5.61% 69.00% ".00% 65.00% '"00 10.13% ,." ,."<br />

Laclede Group LO $40.12 3.00% ,.". 2.00%<br />

'''' 3.97% 5.61% 65,00% 60.00% 65.00% (SO,OO) 10.34% "" ,."<br />

NewJarseyR~$S "R $44.15 a35% 1.85% 5.50% 7'- 4.47% 5.61% 53.00% "00% 65.00% [s'.DO) 9.44% ,." a"<br />

Norttwest Nat Gas<br />

"w"<br />

$47.53 4.17% ,.". '.00% 1.34%<br />

"''' ,." ,."<br />

5.61% 71.00% 57.00% 65.00% ISo,OO) 9.16%<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t NsllJral GSS<br />

'"' $31.27 4.70% 4.70% 2.60% "" 3.52% 5.61% 77.00% 72.00% 65.00% 6,95%<br />

•• ,." 3.41<br />

South Jersey IOOs.<br />

$50.56 '.00% 0.0" 9.00% 11.58% B.15% 5.61% 54.00% 5UO% 65.00% ($D.DD) 10.36%<br />

'"<br />

"" ,.'"<br />

Souttwesl Gas eorp. 'WX $43.43 4.37% 4.05% '.00% '00% 6.01% 5.61% 43.00% 42.00% 85.00% (SO.DD) 9.55% 16.47 '.M<br />

WGLHoIdI'9slnc. woe $39.82 5.37",(, 5.60% 3.00%<br />

,,'"<br />

4.44% 5.61% 64.00% ~OO% 65.00% 9.47% 16.61<br />

••<br />

'.00<br />

M8W 9.64%<br />

MAX 10.36%<br />

MW 6.~%<br />

Projecled AMJaI<br />

Eflmirgs per Sham 115) 116) 1171 118) (19) [2QJ [21J<br />

!231 !241<br />

[261 !!?J [281 [291 89J !311<br />

""<br />

Comf!!~ TO::ker 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017<br />

2019 2020<br />

2026<br />

AGLRe~s G" $2.12 $2.23<br />

"" "" ''''<br />

"'''<br />

"" "" ""<br />

$2.47<br />

"" ,,"' $2.74 >a",<br />

"" "M $3.67 ,an<br />

'''' "." "" $4.68 Almos EnefgY ATD $2.37<br />

'27' .," $2.60<br />

"''' '''' ""<br />

"00 $3.16<br />

$3.50 $3.69<br />

"~<br />

'aoo $4.12<br />

"" ... W "" $.5.12<br />

lBclede Grcup LO .,,' 52.87 .,,' $3.21 sa" '''7<br />

"" ." $3.97 $4.17 $4.39 .... .... so "n ,...,<br />

$5.17 $5.40<br />

New Jersey Resources "R $2.70<br />

"" .,,' $3.07 $3.21 $3.70 ,a" $4.11 $.5.11 $.5.39 $.5.70<br />

...<br />

""<br />

" " .. NorttrNGstNatGas "W" .,,' $2.51<br />

"" ,m S2.81 53.05 $3.21 ,a" 53.74 $4.17 $4.41<br />

"" ''''<br />

...." $4.91 $.5.19<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas<br />

$1.57 SI.63 51.68 $1.74 $1.80 51.67 $1.114<br />

'"'<br />

""<br />

""<br />

$2.11<br />

"" "" '''' "SO .,,' $7.00 $3.07 $3.24<br />

South Jersey lnels.<br />

'" .aM 53.13 "" sa", $4.28 $4.61 .... S< $5.28 55.62 '''' sa" ,


Exhibit No. RBH-4<br />

Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4<br />

Multistage Growth Discouried Cash Flow Model<br />

160 Day AWlra(lEt Stock Prlca<br />

In~ [I] ~l [5] !!!]<br />

[8] ~l [10] 1111 [12] [13] [14]<br />

"' '"<br />

SUStI!,nallla<br />

Company Ti::ker Price<br />

'"'" Frs! CaB Value Lire G_ Avera!!! Gro .. 2012 ~oo,<br />

"'''<br />

AGL Resources GA' $39.62 4.28% NA 5,50% '.00% 5.25% 5.61% 49,00% 49.00% 61>.00% '"" "00 9.29% '" 17.64 3.15<br />

Almas Energy Am $33.26 ,."" 5,50% 4.00% 4.01% 4.84% 5.61% 69.00% 54,00%<br />

"'."" "00 10.32% 13.78<br />

Laclede Group CG $40,29 3.00% 5.30% 5.57% 3.97% 5.61% 65.00% 80.00%<br />

" "'.00% $0,00 10.32%<br />

'""<br />

'" ,."<br />

New Jersey Reso~ N~' $45.32 3.35% 1.85% '",.. ,-<br />

,.'" 4.47% 5.61% 53.00% 48.00% "'.00%<br />

.".<br />

($0.00) 17.41 3.11<br />

Neil_Natali. NWN $47.09 4.17% 4.50% 4.00% 7.34% S.Bl% 11.00% 57.00%<br />

''"'''' •• 9.19% 18.12 Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas eN' $31.81 4.70% 4.70%<br />

"" •• ..... 2.19",4 3.52"", 5.61% n.OO% 72.00% 65.00% 19.83 ,."<br />

South Jersey Inds. $51.74 6.00% 6.00% 9.00% 11.58% 6.15% 5,61%<br />

."<br />

".00% 51.00% 65.00% ($0.00) 10.26% 13.97 2.49<br />

Souttmest Gas Corp ,,"X $4281 4.37% 4.05% 9.00% 6.60% 6.01% 5.61% 43.00% 4200% 65.00% ($0.00) 9.61% 16.25 '.00<br />

62.00% 65.00% .• 11.22 3.01<br />

'''''<br />

'"<br />

&oc' EPS Growth Rete Estimates L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Pa~Rato;l lteratNeSolutioll Termnal Term .... 1<br />

WGL HoIdI!3i!s loc. WGC $40.16 5.37% , .... .0" 3.18% 4.44% 5.61%<br />

"."" .<br />

"eAN 9.62%<br />

MAX 10.:32%<br />

"'N 8.89%<br />

PIE Ratio PEG Ratio<br />

Projected Anrual<br />

EIImi!!!sl!!!,Shllre [15[ [16] [111 [18] [19] ~[ @1[ ~] @3] ~41 @5] [26] @1I @8] @9] ~[ [31]<br />

Comoan~<br />

n:ker<br />

2013 2016<br />

"''' '''' "''' "'''<br />

AGLResouro:es GAO $212<br />

,,~<br />

.,,' $247<br />

$274<br />

2017<br />

"'''<br />

2019 2020<br />

"" "" "" "" '"'" ""<br />

"'" "" "'~ '"'" ."', $3.57 $3.n .", $4.20 $4.43 '"'."<br />

'"'-..<br />

,,~<br />

AtmosEnergy<br />

"0 "'" "" ".. "" "" .,," ,"00 $3.16 $3.69 $3.90 $4.12 54.59 $5.12<br />

Laclede Group<br />

CO<br />

"'''<br />

"." "." ..'" $2.97 $3.21 $3.47<br />

.." ,a;,<br />

53.78 53.97 $4.17 $4.39 ".00 55.17 ,,~ 55.n<br />

"." '7% 62.50% S3.33% 64.17% 65.00% ",00' ",00% S5.00%<br />

New Jersey Resouroes N" 'aOO% 51.15% 50.50% 49.25% 49.00% 50.83%<br />

""" "'''''<br />

56.50% 59.33% 6217% 65.00% "'00% 65.00% "'00' 65.00%<br />

NortnNeslNBl GBS NWN 71.00% 67.50% 64.00% 60.50% ".00% 58.33% 59.67% 61.00% 6233% 63.67% 65.00% ;;'00% 65.00% 65.00% "'.00%<br />

Projecled Anrual<br />

Cash Flows (48) (49) 150) (51) 152) (53)<br />

[551 156) (Sri {581 (59)<br />

1<br />

." ''''<br />

.'" 61 1 (621<br />

Terminal<br />

ComE!:!!~ Ticker 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />

2017<br />

2019 2020<br />

,~,<br />

"''' "'''<br />

,= Velue<br />

AGLReSOl.ttes GAO $1.09 $1.15 51.21 $1.27 51.34 $1.49 51.65 $1.63 $202<br />

,,~<br />

.", "'" "" "'" "'"<br />

$Z7' $87.26<br />

""<br />

"'~<br />

AtrnosEnergy ATO 51.63 51.62 $1.60 51.58 $1.55 51.68 51.82 51.98 $215<br />

.,,, .,,' "" .,,' .", $3.15 $70.58<br />

Laclede GrClUp CO $1.93 51.97 $201 52.05<br />

"" "'" '''' 52.48 "" .,,' $3.01 53.16 $3.38 ..., 53.75 $63.98<br />

New Jersey Resourtes W, $1.43 51.48 51.49 51.51 51.54 51.71 51.89<br />

$231<br />

"'" "" "" .,,' $3.14 53.51 $99.20<br />

NOrlhNest Nat Gas NWN $1.78 51.78 51.n 51.76 51.14 51.87 $2.01 52.17<br />

"" .,,' 52.11<br />

'''' 53.02 53.19 '"'' 599.32<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Nntuml Ga. PN' $1.25 51.27 51.30 51.32 $1.34 $1.37 $1.41 51.45 $1.49 $1.54 $1.60 51.89 $1.79 $1.89 51.99 564.19<br />

South Jersey Irds.<br />

n69 51.80 51.92<br />

'"<br />

"'" "" "" 5275 53.06 ".w 55.09 $115.57<br />

SoLJthw9s1 Gas Corp. 'WX 51.11 $1.17 $1.23 51.30 51.37 51.58 $1.81 52.07 '''' "" "." $3.13<br />

"" '2" .". ."" "'" "" 53.49 ,a;. $97.23<br />

S2.59 $273 $289 585.30<br />

'"<br />

WGLHotdl!!lslo::: woe 51.50 51.56 $1.61 51.67 51.13 51.83 51.93 $2.04 S2.17<br />

."" "" ..<br />

Projected Anr


Multi-Stage DCF Notes:<br />

[1] Source: Bloomberg; based <strong>on</strong> 30, 90, and 180-dayhistorical average<br />

[2] Source: Zacks<br />

[3] Source: Yahoo! Finance<br />

[4] Source: Value Line<br />

[5] Source: Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

[6] Equals average [2], [3], [4], [5]<br />

[7J Source: Federal Reserve, Bureau <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Analysis<br />

[8] Source: Value Line<br />

[9] Source: Value Line<br />

[10] Source: Value Line<br />

[11] Equals Column [1] + Column [63]<br />

[12] Equals result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Excel Solver functi<strong>on</strong>; goal: Column [11J equals $0.00<br />

[13] Equals Column [62]/ Column [31]<br />

[14] Equals Column [13]/ (Column [7] x 100)<br />

[15] Source: Value Line<br />

[16] Equals Column [15] x (1 + Column [6])<br />

[17] Equals Column [16] x (1 + Column [6])<br />

[18] Equals Column [17] x (1 + Column [6])<br />

[19] Equals Column [18] x (1 + Column [6])<br />

[20] Equals Column [19] x (1 + Column [6])<br />

[21] Equals (1 + (Column [61 + «(Column 171- Column 16]) / (2021 - 2016 + 1» x (2017 - 2016»» x Column [201<br />

[22] Equals (1 + (Column [6] + «(Column [7]- Column 16]) / (2021 - 2016 + 1» x (2018 - 2016)))) x Column [21]<br />

(23] Equals (1 + (Column [6] + ({(Column [71- Column 16]) / (2021 - 2016 + 1» x (2019 - 2016»))) x Column [221<br />

[24] Equals (1 + (Column [6] + «(Column [71- Column 16]) / (2021 - 2016 + 1» x (2020 - 2016»))) x Column [23J<br />

[25] Equals (1 + (Column [6] + «(Column [71- Column (6]) / (2021 - 2016 + 1» x (2021 - 2016»))) x Column [24]<br />

[26] Equals Column [25] x (1 + Column [7])<br />

[27] Equals Column [26J x (1 + Column [7})<br />

[28] Equals Column [27] x (1 + Column [7])<br />

[29] Equals Column [28] x (1 + Column [7J)<br />

[30] Equals Column [29] x (1 + Column [7J)<br />

[31] Equals Column [30] x (1 + Column [7])<br />

[321 Equals Column [8]<br />

[331 Equals Column 1321 + «Column [36]- Column [32]) /4)<br />

[34] Equals Column (33J + «Column [36]- Column [32]) /4)<br />

[35] Equals Column [34J + «Column 136]- Column [321) /4)<br />

[36] Equals Column (9)<br />

[37] Equals Column [36J + «Column (42)- Column [36]) /6)<br />

[38] Equals Column (37) + «Column (42J - Column [36]) /6)<br />

[39] Equals Column [38) + «Column (42J - Column [36]) /6)<br />

[40] Equals Column [39) + «Column [42J - Column [36]) /6)<br />

[41] Equals Column [40) + «Column [42J - Column (36]) /6)<br />

[42J Equals Column [10]<br />

[43J Equals Column [10]<br />

[44] Equals Column [10]<br />

[45J Equals Column [10]<br />

[46J Equals Column [10]<br />

[47] Equals Column [16] x Column [32]<br />

[48J Equals Column [17] x Column [33]<br />

[49J Equals Column [18] x Column [34]<br />

[50] Equals Column [19] x Column [35]<br />

[51] Equals Column [20] x Column [36]<br />

[52] Equals Column [21] x Column [37]<br />

[53] Equals Column [22] x Column [38]<br />

[54) Equals Column [23] x Column [39]<br />

[55] Equals Column [24] x Column [40]<br />

[56] Equals Column [25] x Column [41]<br />

[57] Equals Column [26) x Column [42]<br />

[58] Equals Column [27] x Column [43]<br />

[59] Equals Column [28] x Column [44]<br />

[60] Equals Column 129] x Column [45]<br />

[61] Equals Column [30] x Column [46]<br />

[62] Equals (Column (61] x (1 + Column [7])) I (Column 112)- Column 171)<br />

[63] Equals negative net present value; discount rate equals Column [12], cash flows equal Column [64] through Column [79]<br />

(64) Equals $0.00<br />

[65) Equals (12131/2012 - 813112012)x Column [47]<br />

(661 Equals [47] x (1 + (0.5 x (6]»<br />

[671 Equals Column [49]<br />

[68] Equals Column [50]<br />

[69] Equals Column [51]<br />

[70] Equals Column [52]<br />

[71] Equals Column [53]<br />

[721 Equals Column [54]<br />

(73) Equals Column [55]<br />

(74) Equals Column [56]<br />

[75] Equals Column [57]<br />

[76] Equals Column [58]<br />

[77] Equals Column [591<br />

(78) Equals Column [601<br />

[79) Equals Column [61] + [621<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-4<br />

Page 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>4


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Sharpe Ratio Derived Ex-Ante Market Risk Premium<br />

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]<br />

Historical<br />

Sharpe<br />

RP h Vol h VOL, Ratio RP,<br />

6.60% 20.30% 25.26% 32.52% 8.21%<br />

[6] m [8] [9]<br />

Feb 13 VIX Mar 13 VIX Apr 13 VIX<br />

Date VXV Futures Futures Futures<br />

8/31/2012 20.62 26.65 27.65 28.25<br />

8/30/2012 20.92 27.05 28.05 28.65<br />

8/29/2012 20.46 26.95 27.95 28.50<br />

8/28/2012 19.82 26.80 27.80 28.35<br />

8/27/2012 19.92 26.75 27.75 28.35<br />

8/24/2012 19.24 27.05 27.90 28.40<br />

8/23/2012 20.09 27.10 27.90 28.40<br />

8/22/2012 19.42 26.90 27.65 28.10<br />

8/21/2012 18.80 26.90 27.55 27.90<br />

8/20/2012 18.59 26.45 27.10 27.50<br />

8/17/2012 18.35 26.05 26.70 27.15<br />

8/16/2012 18.55 26.10 26.75 27.20<br />

8/15/2012 18.86 26.15 26.80 27.30<br />

8/14/2012 18.51 26.20 26.85 27.40<br />

8/13/2012 18.07 25.80 26.45 26.95<br />

8/10/2012 18.14 25.85 26.45 26.95<br />

8/9/2012 18.23 26.05 26.65 27.10<br />

8/8/2012 18.58 26.05 26.65 27.40<br />

81712012 18.81 26.35 26.95 27.40<br />

8/6/2012 18.74 26.10 26.65 27.05<br />

8/3/2012 18.68 26.25 26.70 27.35<br />

8/2/2012 20.23 26.95 27.40 27.80<br />

8/1/2012 20.67 27.00 27.35 27.80<br />

7/31/2012 20.78 26.80 27.25 27.70<br />

7/30/2012 20.13 26.50 27.00 27.50<br />

7/27/2012 19.66 26.25 26.70 27.15<br />

7/26/2012 20.24 26.15 26.70 27.30<br />

7/25/2012 21.88 27.15 27.65 28.10<br />

7/24/2012 22.26 27.40 27.85 28.25<br />

7/23/2012 21.18 27.10 27.55 26.10<br />

Average: 25.26<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] Source: Morningstar, Inc.<br />

RP h :;;; historical arithmetic average Risk Premium<br />

[2] Source: Morningstar, Inc.<br />

Vol h :;;; historical market volatility<br />

[3J Vol, = expected market volatility (average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cols. [6J to [9])<br />

[4J Equals [1J 1 [2J<br />

[5J RP, = expected Risk Premium ([3J x [4])<br />

[6J Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[n Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[81 Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[9} Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Ex·Ante Market Risk Premium<br />

Market DCF Method Based - Bloomberg<br />

(1)<br />

S&P500<br />

Est. Required<br />

Market Return<br />

13.35%<br />

(2J<br />

Current 30·Year<br />

Treasury (30-day<br />

average)<br />

2.71%<br />

[3J<br />

Implied Market<br />

Risk Premium<br />

10.64%<br />

Company<br />

TIcker<br />

(4) (5)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong> Weight in Index<br />

(a)<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g.Term Growth<br />

Est.<br />

(8)<br />

DCF Result<br />

(9)<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC<br />

ALCOA INC<br />

APPLE INC<br />

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP<br />

ABBOTT LABORATORIES<br />

ACE LTD<br />

ACCENTURE PLC·CL A<br />

ADOBE SYSTEMS INC<br />

ANALOG DEVICES INC<br />

ARCHER·DANIELS·MIDLAND CO<br />

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING<br />

AUTODESK INC<br />

AMEREN CORPORATION<br />

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER<br />

AES CORP<br />

AETNA INC<br />

AFLACINC<br />

ALLERGAN INC<br />

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP<br />

APARTMENT INVT & MGMT CO-A<br />

ASSURANT INC<br />

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC<br />

ALLSTATE CORP<br />

ALTERACORP<br />

ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS INC<br />

APPLIED MATERIALS INC<br />

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES<br />

AMGENINC<br />

AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC<br />

AMERICAN TOWER CORP<br />

AMAZON.COM INC<br />

AUTONATION INC<br />

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO-CL A<br />

ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES INC<br />

AON PLC<br />

APACHE CORP<br />

ANADARKD PETROLEUM CORP<br />

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC<br />

AMPHENOL CORP-CL A<br />

APOLLO GROUP INC-CL A<br />

AIRGAS INC<br />

ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INC<br />

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC<br />

AVON PRODUCTS INC<br />

AVERY DENNISON CORP<br />

AMERICAN EXPRESS CO<br />

AUTOZONE INC<br />

BOEING COfTHE<br />

BANK OF AMERICA CORP<br />

BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC<br />

BED BATH & BEYOND INC<br />

BB&TCORP<br />

BEST BUY CO INC<br />

CR BARD INC<br />

BECTON DICKINSON AND CO<br />

BEAM INC<br />

FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC<br />

BROWN-FORMAN CORP-CLASS B<br />

BAKER HUGHES INC<br />

BIG LOTS INC<br />

BIOGEN IDEC INC<br />

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP<br />

BLACK ROCK INC<br />

BALL CORP<br />

BMC SOFTWARE INC<br />

BEMIS COMPANY<br />

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO<br />

BROADCOM CORP-CL A<br />

A<br />

AA<br />

AAPL<br />

ABC<br />

ABT<br />

ACE<br />

ACN<br />

ADBE<br />

ADI<br />

ADM<br />

AOP<br />

ADSK<br />

AEE<br />

AEP<br />

AES<br />

AET<br />

AFL<br />

AGN<br />

AIG<br />

AIV<br />

AIZ<br />

AKAM<br />

ALL<br />

ALTR<br />

ALXN<br />

AMAT<br />

AMO<br />

AMGN<br />

AMP<br />

AMT<br />

AMZN<br />

AN<br />

ANF<br />

ANR<br />

AON<br />

APA<br />

APC<br />

APO<br />

APH<br />

APOL<br />

ARG<br />

ATI<br />

AVB<br />

AVP<br />

AVY<br />

AXP<br />

AZO<br />

BA<br />

BAC<br />

BAX<br />

BBBY<br />

BBT<br />

BBY<br />

BCR<br />

BOX<br />

BEAM<br />

BEN<br />

SF/B<br />

BHI<br />

BIG<br />

SIIB<br />

BK<br />

BLK<br />

BLL<br />

BMC<br />

BMS<br />

BMY<br />

SRCM<br />

12,874.g1 0.10%<br />

8,983.23 0.07%<br />

632,346.00 4.91%<br />

9,758.48 0,08%<br />

102,728.59 0,80%<br />

25,292.90 0.20%<br />

42,583.25 0.33%<br />

15,456.10 0.12%<br />

11,764.92 0.09%<br />

17,703.56 0.14%<br />

28,406.06 0.22%<br />

7,218.02 0.06%<br />

7,939.01 0.06%<br />

20,918.70 0.16%<br />

8,444.88 0.07%<br />

12,749.73 0.10%<br />

21,774.63 0.17%<br />

25,997.61 0.20%<br />

56,336.91 0.44%<br />

3,884.57 0.03%<br />

2,859.04 0.02%<br />

6,679.14 0.05%<br />

18,136.25 0.14%<br />

11,853.03 0.09%<br />

20,927.65 0.16%<br />

14,528.19 0.11%<br />

2,575.50 0.02%<br />

64,998.94 0.50%<br />

11,507.89 0.09%<br />

27,969.28 0.22%<br />

112,057.94 0.87%<br />

4,967.92 0.04%<br />

2,885.23 0.02%<br />

1,218.56 0.01%<br />

16,694.21 0.13%<br />

33,006.84 0.26%<br />

34,542.81 0.27%<br />

17,251.96 0.13%<br />

9,878.16 0.08%<br />

3,121.21 0.02%<br />

6,336.72 0.05%<br />

3,080.18 0.02%<br />

13,813.51 0.11%<br />

6,563.11 0.05%<br />

3,003.33 0.02%<br />

66,443.16 0.52%<br />

13,411.80 0.10%<br />

53,279.90 0.41 %<br />

86,215.60 0.67%<br />

32,231.92 0.25%<br />

15,549.63 0.12%<br />

22,176.35 0.17%<br />

6,125.06 0.05%<br />

8,221.13 0.06%<br />

15,281.92 0.12%<br />

9,365.91 0.07%<br />

24,999.98 0.19%<br />

13,637.25 0.11%<br />

19,630.66 0.15%<br />

1,947.44 0.02%<br />

34,759.55 0.27%<br />

26,638.27 0.21 %<br />

30,581.30 0.24%<br />

6,464.65 0.05%<br />

6,697.49 0.05%<br />

3,114.94 0.02%<br />

55,642.79 0.43%<br />

19,755.06 0.15%<br />

0.74% 10.87%<br />

1.43% 10.00%<br />

0.39% 21.75%<br />

1.28% 12.00%<br />

3.12% 9.96%<br />

2.46% 7.56%<br />

2.11% 13.25%<br />

0.00% 11,17%<br />

2.93% 12.33%<br />

2.65% 10.00%<br />

2.83% 10.20%<br />

0.00% 15.40%<br />

4.88% -4.00%<br />

4.40% 4.33%<br />

0.68% 8.50%<br />

1.80% 10.60%<br />

2.86% 13.33%<br />

0.23% 14.50%<br />

0.00% 12.33%<br />

2.87% 9.26%<br />

2.30% 10.33%<br />

0.00% 14.25%<br />

2,35% 9.00%<br />

0.91% 12.29%<br />

0.00% 40.38%<br />

2.84% 8.67%<br />

0.00% 8.75%<br />

1.78% 10.26%<br />

2.37% 10.55%<br />

1.25% 20.86%<br />

0.00% 29.34%<br />

0.00% 20.66%<br />

2.02% 18.29%<br />

0.00% 5.00%<br />

1.20% 8.33%<br />

0.81% 7.83%<br />

0.53% 9.92%<br />

3.07% 9.99%<br />

0.65% 15.00%<br />

0.00% 9.78%<br />

1.81% 12.89%<br />

2.51 % 15.00%<br />

2.73% 10.14%<br />

5.98% .().06%<br />

3.63% 7.00%<br />

1.35% 10.23%<br />

0.00% 16.57%<br />

2.47% 11.83%<br />

0.53% 13.45%<br />

2.38% 8.80%<br />

0.00% 14.67%<br />

2.47% 10.56%<br />

3.27% 7.72%<br />

0.81% 9.75%<br />

2.30% 8.00%<br />

1.38% 12.81%<br />

2.62% 9.00%<br />

1.44% 13.00%<br />

1.34% 23.00%<br />

0.00% 11.63%<br />

0.00% 14.70%<br />

2.31% 17.63%<br />

3.39% 12.50%<br />

0.96% 10.00%<br />

0.00% 10.20%<br />

3.37% 6.00%<br />

4.13% 7.57%<br />

1.13% 15.00%<br />

11.65%<br />

11.50%<br />

22.19%<br />

13.36%<br />

13.24%<br />

10.12%<br />

15.50%<br />

11.17%<br />

15.44%<br />

12.78%<br />

13.17%<br />

15.40%<br />

0.79%<br />

8.83%<br />

9.21%<br />

12.49%<br />

16.38%<br />

14.75%<br />

12.33%<br />

12.26%<br />

12.75%<br />

14.25%<br />

11.46%<br />

13.25%<br />

40.38%<br />

11.63%<br />

8.75%<br />

12.13%<br />

13.04%<br />

22.24%<br />

29.34%<br />

20.66%<br />

20.50%<br />

5.00%<br />

9.59%<br />

8.67%<br />

10.47%<br />

13.21%<br />

15.70%<br />

9.78%<br />

14.82%<br />

17.69%<br />

13.01%<br />

5.92%<br />

10.76%<br />

11.65%<br />

16.57%<br />

14.45%<br />

14.01%<br />

11.29%<br />

14.67%<br />

13.15%<br />

11.12%<br />

10.59%<br />

10.39%<br />

14.28%<br />

11.74%<br />

14.53%<br />

24.50%<br />

11.63%<br />

14.70%<br />

20.15%<br />

16.10%<br />

11.00%<br />

10.20%<br />

9.47%<br />

11.85%<br />

16.22%<br />

0.0116%<br />

0.0080%<br />

1.0894%<br />

0.0101%<br />

0.1056%<br />

0.0199%<br />

0.0512%<br />

0.0134%<br />

0.0141%<br />

0.0176%<br />

0.0291%<br />

0.0086%<br />

0.0005%<br />

0.0143%<br />

0.0060%<br />

0.0124%<br />

0.0277%<br />

0.0298%<br />

0.0540%<br />

0.0037%<br />

0.0028%<br />

0.0074%<br />

0.0161%<br />

0.0122%<br />

0.0656%<br />

0.0131%<br />

0.0017%<br />

0.0612%<br />

0.0117%<br />

0.0483%<br />

0.2553%<br />

0.0080%<br />

0.0046%<br />

0.0005%<br />

0.0124%<br />

0.0222%<br />

0.0281%<br />

0.0177%<br />

0.0120%<br />

0.0024%<br />

0.0073%<br />

0.0042%<br />

0.0139%<br />

0.0030%<br />

0.0025%<br />

0.0601%<br />

0.0173%<br />

0.0598%<br />

0.0938%<br />

0.0282%<br />

0.0177%<br />

0.0226%<br />

0.0053%<br />

0.0068%<br />

0.0123%<br />

0.0104%<br />

0.0228%<br />

0.0154%<br />

0.0373%<br />

0.0018%<br />

0.0397%<br />

0.0417%<br />

0.0382%<br />

0.0055%<br />

0.0053%<br />

0.0023%<br />

0.0512%<br />

0.0249%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company<br />

Ticker<br />

[41<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizatl<strong>on</strong><br />

[5]<br />

Weight In Index<br />

[61<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Growth<br />

Est.<br />

[81<br />

DCF Result<br />

(9)<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B<br />

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP<br />

PEABODY ENERGY CORP<br />

BORGWARNER INC<br />

BOSTON PROPERTIES INC<br />

CITIGROUP INC<br />

CAINC<br />

CONAGRA FOODS INC<br />

CARDINAL HEALTH INC<br />

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORP<br />

CATERPILLAR INC<br />

CHUBB CORP<br />

COOPER INDUSTRIES PLC<br />

CBRE GROUP INC - A<br />

CBS CORP-CLASS B NON VOTING<br />

COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES<br />

CROWN CASTLE INTL CORP<br />

CARNIVAL CORP<br />

CELGENE CORP<br />

CERNERCORP<br />

CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS INC<br />

CARE FUSION CORP<br />

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORP<br />

C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC<br />

CIGNACORP<br />

CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP<br />

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO<br />

CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC<br />

CLDRDX COMPANY<br />

COMERICA INC<br />

COMCAST CORP-CLASS A<br />

CME GROUP INC<br />

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC<br />

CUMMINS INC<br />

CMS ENERGY CORP<br />

CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC<br />

CONSOL ENERGY INC<br />

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP<br />

CABOT OIL & GAS CORP<br />

COACH INC<br />

ROCKWELL COLLINS INC<br />

CONOCOPHILUPS<br />

COSTCD WHOLESALE CORP<br />

COVIDIEN PLC<br />

CAMPBELL SOUP CO<br />

SALESFORCE.COM INC<br />

COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP<br />

CISCO SYSTEMS INC<br />

CSX CORP<br />

CINTAS CORP<br />

CENTURYLINK INC<br />

COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS-A<br />

CITRIX SYSTEMS INC<br />

CABLEVISION SYSTEMS-NY GRP·A<br />

COVENTRY HEALTH CARE INC<br />

CVS CARE MARK CORP<br />

CHEVRON CORP<br />

DOMINION RESOURCES INCNA<br />

DU PONT (E.!.) DE NEMOURS<br />

DEERE & CO<br />

DELL INC<br />

DEAN FOODS CO<br />

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES<br />

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC<br />

DR HORTON INC<br />

DANAHER CORP<br />

WALT DISNEY COfTHE<br />

DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS·A<br />

DOLLAR TREE INC<br />

DUN & BRADSTREET CORP<br />

DENBURY RESOURCES INC<br />

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING<br />

DOVER CORP<br />

DOW CHEMICAL COfTHE<br />

DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP INC<br />

DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC<br />

DTE ENERGY COMPANY<br />

DIRECTV<br />

DUKE ENERGY CORP<br />

BRKlB<br />

BSX<br />

BTU<br />

BWA<br />

BXP<br />

C<br />

CA<br />

CAG<br />

CAH<br />

CAM<br />

CAT<br />

CB<br />

CBE<br />

CBG<br />

CBS<br />

CCE<br />

CCI<br />

CCl<br />

CELG<br />

CERN<br />

CF<br />

CFN<br />

CHK<br />

CHRW<br />

CI<br />

CINF<br />

Cl<br />

ClF<br />

CLX<br />

CMA<br />

CMCSA<br />

CME<br />

CMG<br />

CMI<br />

CMS<br />

CNP<br />

CNX<br />

COF<br />

COG<br />

COH<br />

COL<br />

COP<br />

COST<br />

COY<br />

CPB<br />

CRM<br />

CSC<br />

CSCO<br />

CSX<br />

CTAS<br />

CTl<br />

CTSH<br />

CTXS<br />

CVC<br />

CVH<br />

CVS<br />

CVX<br />

o<br />

DO<br />

DE<br />

DELL<br />

OF<br />

DFS<br />

DGX<br />

DHI<br />

OHR<br />

DIS<br />

DlSCA<br />

DLTR<br />

ONS<br />

DNR<br />

DO<br />

DOV<br />

DOW<br />

DPS<br />

DRI<br />

DTE<br />

DTV<br />

DUK<br />

208,695.30<br />

7,676.69<br />

5.608.15<br />

7,700.74<br />

17,000.03<br />

87,094.76<br />

12,256.03<br />

10.457.09<br />

13,537.62<br />

13,500.94<br />

53,999.19<br />

19,686.12<br />

11,577.81<br />

5,651.94<br />

23,015.68<br />

8,947.04<br />

18,522.90<br />

28,006.29<br />

31,092.73<br />

12,581.58<br />

13,439.36<br />

5,865.24<br />

12,769.13<br />

9,144.30<br />

13,120.54<br />

6,307.46<br />

50,840.47<br />

4,799.15<br />

9,460.50<br />

5,944.18<br />

90,128.85<br />

18,380.36<br />

9,061.11<br />

18,144.18<br />

6,160.94<br />

8,816.98<br />

6,562.54<br />

32,812.27<br />

8,714.53<br />

16,389.64<br />

6,917.10<br />

68,269.82<br />

42,438.97<br />

27,010.24<br />

11,114.48<br />

20,092.42<br />

4,960.25<br />

101,834.27<br />

22,580.90<br />

5,095.36<br />

26,605.82<br />

19,167.88<br />

14,583.30<br />

4,014.99<br />

5,545.76<br />

58,433.79<br />

218,229.22<br />

30,106.73<br />

45,430.12<br />

29,030.37<br />

18,300.07<br />

3,094.22<br />

20,033.75<br />

9,652.06<br />

6,223.07<br />

36,777.35<br />

89,103.68<br />

20,158.91<br />

11,099.38<br />

3,644.45<br />

6,028.34<br />

9,237.14<br />

10,569.89<br />

34,313.79<br />

9,460.23<br />

6,678.44<br />

10,205.67<br />

32,836.74<br />

45,622.03<br />

N/A<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.68%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.42%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.24%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.39%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.70%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.25%<br />

N/A<br />

0.13%<br />

0.05%<br />

N/A<br />

0.33%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.79%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.45%<br />

1.69%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.35%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.29%<br />

0.69%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.03%<br />

N/A<br />

0.07%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.27%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.35%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.63%<br />

0.13%<br />

1.96%<br />

0.16%<br />

3.87%<br />

3.90%<br />

2.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.34%<br />

2.24%<br />

1.69%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.21%<br />

2.15%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.87%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.78%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.43%<br />

2.36%<br />

0.07%<br />

4.17%<br />

2.27%<br />

6.57%<br />

3.59%<br />

1.81%<br />

1.85%<br />

4.53%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.78%<br />

4.10%<br />

3.92%<br />

1.74%<br />

0.35%<br />

0.21%<br />

2.01%<br />

2.19%<br />

4.76%<br />

1.04%<br />

1.54%<br />

3.55%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.50%<br />

2.80%<br />

2.49%<br />

1.47%<br />

6.79%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.06%<br />

1.01%<br />

1.39%<br />

3.15%<br />

3.99%<br />

3.44%<br />

2.33%<br />

1.52%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.08%<br />

1.07%<br />

0.70%<br />

0.19%<br />

1.20%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.87%<br />

0.00%<br />

5.35%<br />

2.24%<br />

4.18%<br />

3.01%<br />

3.86%<br />

4.11%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.70%<br />

N/A<br />

9.25%<br />

12.00%<br />

20.05%<br />

5.41%<br />

8.33%<br />

10.00%<br />

6.50%<br />

10.50%<br />

17.00%<br />

13.33%<br />

7.44%<br />

12.40%<br />

13.33%<br />

10.96%<br />

6.12%<br />

38.93%<br />

16.77%<br />

23.89%<br />

19.14%<br />

6.54%<br />

10.42%<br />

8.89%<br />

14.80%<br />

10.56%<br />

5.00%<br />

8.64%<br />

11.00%<br />

8.42%<br />

12.20%<br />

16.81%<br />

12.67%<br />

22.00%<br />

12.25%<br />

6.00%<br />

5.67%<br />

12.00%<br />

10.15%<br />

N/A<br />

13.57%<br />

8.64%<br />

N/A<br />

13.49%<br />

10.80%<br />

6.33%<br />

26.08%<br />

8.00%<br />

9.56%<br />

15.00%<br />

11.17%<br />

3.14%<br />

18.67%<br />

15.66%<br />

6.80%<br />

12.33%<br />

13.50%<br />

-1.11%<br />

4.85%<br />

7.10%<br />

14.67%<br />

7.33%<br />

5.75%<br />

10.67%<br />

11.38%<br />

4.00%<br />

15.00%<br />

11.94%<br />

20.75%<br />

17.54%<br />

10.00%<br />

N/A<br />

17.33%<br />

14.33%<br />

5.33%<br />

7.30%<br />

12.74%<br />

5.00%<br />

18.19%<br />

4.25%<br />

N/A<br />

9.25%<br />

13.72%<br />

20.19%<br />

7.42%<br />

8.50%<br />

14.06%<br />

10.53%<br />

12.64%<br />

17.00%<br />

15.83%<br />

9.77%<br />

14.20%<br />

13.33%<br />

12.24%<br />

8.33%<br />

38.93%<br />

19.89%<br />

23.89%<br />

19.14%<br />

7.35%<br />

10.42%<br />

10.38%<br />

17.33%<br />

10.64%<br />

9.27%<br />

11.01%<br />

17.94%<br />

12.16%<br />

14.12%<br />

18.82%<br />

17.48%<br />

22.00%<br />

14.14%<br />

10.22%<br />

9.70%<br />

13.84%<br />

10.52%<br />

N/A<br />

15.71%<br />

10.92%<br />

N/A<br />

14.59%<br />

12.43%<br />

10.00%<br />

26.08%<br />

10.60%<br />

12.49%<br />

17.68%<br />

12.72%<br />

10.03%<br />

18.67%<br />

15.66%<br />

11.00%<br />

13.41%<br />

14.99%<br />

2.02%<br />

8.93%<br />

10.67%<br />

17.17%<br />

8.91%<br />

5.75%<br />

11.80%<br />

12.51%<br />

4.71%<br />

15.20%<br />

13.21%<br />

20.75%<br />

17.54%<br />

11.97%<br />

N/A<br />

23.15%<br />

16.73%<br />

9.62%<br />

10.42%<br />

16.84%<br />

9.21%<br />

18.19%<br />

9.05%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0055%<br />

0.0060%<br />

0.0121%<br />

0.0098%<br />

0.0575%<br />

0.0134%<br />

0.0085%<br />

0.0133%<br />

0.0178%<br />

0.0664%<br />

0.0149%<br />

0.0128%<br />

0.0059%<br />

0.0219%<br />

0.0058%<br />

0.0560%<br />

0.0433%<br />

0.0577%<br />

0.0187%<br />

0.0077%<br />

0.0047%<br />

0.0103%<br />

0.0123%<br />

0.0108%<br />

0.0045%<br />

0.0434%<br />

0.0067%<br />

0.0089%<br />

0.0065%<br />

0.1317%<br />

0.0249%<br />

0.0155%<br />

0.0199%<br />

0.0049%<br />

0.0066%<br />

0.0071%<br />

0.0268%<br />

NlA<br />

0.0200%<br />

0.0059%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0481%<br />

0.0261%<br />

0.0086%<br />

0.0407%<br />

0.0041%<br />

0.0988%<br />

0.0310%<br />

0.0050%<br />

0.0207%<br />

0.0278%<br />

0.0177%<br />

0.0034%<br />

0.0058%<br />

0.0680%<br />

0.0343%<br />

0.0209%<br />

0.0376%<br />

0.0387%<br />

0.0127%<br />

0.0014%<br />

0.Q184%<br />

0.0094%<br />

0.0023%<br />

0.0434%<br />

0.0914%<br />

0.0325%<br />

0.0151%<br />

0.0034%<br />

N/A<br />

0.Q166%<br />

0.0137%<br />

0.0256%<br />

0.0077%<br />

0.0087%<br />

0.0073%<br />

0.0464%<br />

0.0321%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company<br />

Ticker<br />

[4J<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

(5J<br />

Weight in Index<br />

[6)<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

rn<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Growth<br />

Est.<br />

[8J<br />

DCF Result<br />

[9]<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

DEVRYINC<br />

DAVITAINC<br />

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION<br />

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC<br />

EBAY INC<br />

ECOLAB INC<br />

CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC<br />

EQUIFAX INC<br />

EDISON INTERNATIONAL<br />

ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES-CL A<br />

EMCCORP/MA<br />

EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO<br />

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO<br />

EOG RESOURCES INC<br />

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL<br />

EaT CORP<br />

EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING CO<br />

ENSCO PLC-CL A<br />

E"TRADE FINANCIAL CORP<br />

EATON CORP<br />

ENTERGY CORP<br />

EDWARDS lIFESCIENCES CORP<br />

EXELON CORP<br />

EXPEDITORS INTL WASH INC<br />

EXPEDIA INC<br />

FORD MOTOR CO<br />

FASTENAL CO<br />

FREEPORT-MCMORAN COPPER<br />

FAMILY DOLLAR STORES<br />

FEDEXCORP<br />

FIRSTENERGY CORP<br />

F5 NETWORKS INC<br />

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORP<br />

FEDERATED INVESTORS INC-CL B<br />

FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATIO<br />

FISERV INC<br />

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP<br />

FliR SYSTEMS INC<br />

FLUOR CORP<br />

FLOWSERVE CORP<br />

FMC CORP<br />

FOSSIL INC<br />

FOREST LABORATORIES INC<br />

FIRST SOLAR INC<br />

FMC TECHNOLOGIES INC<br />

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORP<br />

AGL RESOURCES INC<br />

GANNETT CO<br />

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP<br />

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO<br />

GILEAD SCIENCES INC<br />

GENERAL MILLS INC<br />

CORNING INC<br />

GAMESTOP CORP-CLASS A<br />

GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC-CL A<br />

GOOGLE INC-Cl A<br />

GENUINE PARTS CO<br />

GAP INCfTHE<br />

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC<br />

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO<br />

WW GRAINGER INC<br />

HALLIBURTON CO<br />

HARMAN INTERNATIONAL<br />

HASBROINC<br />

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC<br />

HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC<br />

HEALTH CARE REIT INC<br />

HCP INC<br />

HOME DEPOT INC<br />

HESS CORP<br />

HARTFORD FINANCIAL SVCS GRP<br />

HJ HEINZ CO<br />

HARLEY-DAVIDSON INC<br />

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC<br />

STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS<br />

HELMERICH & PAYNE<br />

HEWLETT-PACKARD CO<br />

H&R BLOCK INC<br />

HaRMEL FOODS CORP<br />

DV<br />

DVA<br />

DVN<br />

EA<br />

EBAY<br />

ECl<br />

ED<br />

EFX<br />

EIX<br />

El<br />

EMC<br />

EMN<br />

EMR<br />

EOG<br />

EaR<br />

EaT<br />

ESRX<br />

ESV<br />

ETFC<br />

ETN<br />

ETR<br />

EW<br />

EXC<br />

EXPD<br />

EXPE<br />

F<br />

FAST<br />

FCX<br />

FDO<br />

FDX<br />

FE<br />

FFIV<br />

FHN<br />

FII<br />

FIS<br />

FISV<br />

FITS<br />

FLIR<br />

FlR<br />

FlS<br />

FMC<br />

FOSL<br />

FRX<br />

FSLR<br />

FTI<br />

FTR<br />

GAS<br />

GCI<br />

GD<br />

GE<br />

GILD<br />

GIS<br />

GlW<br />

GME<br />

GNW<br />

GOOG<br />

GPC<br />

GPS<br />

GS<br />

GT<br />

GWW<br />

HAL<br />

HAR<br />

HAS<br />

HBAN<br />

HCBK<br />

HCN<br />

HCP<br />

HD<br />

HES<br />

HIG<br />

HNZ<br />

HOG<br />

HON<br />

HOT<br />

HP<br />

HPO<br />

HRB<br />

HRl<br />

1,231.17<br />

9,236.74<br />

23,238.53<br />

4,148.67<br />

61,005.64<br />

18,565.76<br />

17,831.29<br />

5.534.12<br />

14,325.92<br />

23,249.55<br />

55,301.27<br />

7,539.19<br />

36,249.82<br />

29,518.97<br />

18,241.49<br />

7,976.38<br />

51,109.68<br />

13,267.55<br />

2,454.51<br />

14,880.03<br />

12,167.65<br />

12,062.00<br />

30,822.53<br />

7,678.49<br />

7,057.17<br />

35,889.61<br />

12,844.20<br />

33,812.21<br />

7,361.12<br />

27,715.14<br />

18,188.23<br />

7,465.73<br />

2,236.80<br />

2,205.28<br />

9,303.82<br />

9,696.31<br />

13,838.83<br />

2,990.82<br />

8,665.66<br />

6,514.96<br />

7,373.97<br />

5,113.73<br />

9,315.23<br />

1,645.47<br />

11,235.06<br />

4.643.14<br />

4,745.30<br />

3.631.00<br />

22,807.12<br />

217,309.84<br />

43,873.41<br />

25,508.97<br />

17,734.21<br />

2,541.04<br />

2,581.06<br />

223,393.59<br />

9,613.15<br />

17,222.29<br />

52,654.40<br />

2,966.11<br />

14,583.32<br />

29,827.17<br />

3,053.96<br />

4,844.53<br />

5,631.11<br />

3,823.68<br />

13,478.67<br />

19,886.94<br />

85,607.62<br />

16,956.09<br />

7,713.92<br />

17,920.26<br />

9,498.88<br />

44,818.47<br />

10,821.56<br />

4,679.02<br />

33,501.43<br />

4,527.74<br />

7,616.31<br />

0.01%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.47%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.43%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.28%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.40%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.24%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.28%<br />

0.10%<br />

NfA<br />

0.06%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.07%<br />

NfA<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.18%<br />

1.69%<br />

0.34%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

1.73%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.41%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.66%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.35%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.06%<br />

1.64%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.36%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.26%<br />

3.98%<br />

1.52%<br />

2.97%<br />

1.21%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.88%<br />

3.21%<br />

0.62%<br />

2.90%<br />

1.65%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.66%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.44%<br />

4.86%<br />

0.00%<br />

5.82%<br />

1.52%<br />

0.79%<br />

2.13%<br />

1.62%<br />

3.46%<br />

1.29%<br />

0.64%<br />

5.06%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.58%<br />

4.62%<br />

1.90%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.36%<br />

1.41%<br />

1.07%<br />

1.12%<br />

0.74%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

8.60%<br />

4.53%<br />

4.72%<br />

3.08%<br />

3.29%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.34%<br />

2.52%<br />

1.98%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.19%<br />

1.35%<br />

1.64%<br />

0.10%<br />

1.47%<br />

1.13%<br />

1.10%<br />

3.78%<br />

2.45%<br />

4.42%<br />

5.03%<br />

4.33%<br />

2.15%<br />

0.82%<br />

2.31%<br />

3.69%<br />

1.49%<br />

2.63%<br />

1.03%<br />

0.63%<br />

2.98%<br />

4.81%<br />

2.31%<br />

9.48%<br />

12.57%<br />

6.20%<br />

16.55%<br />

13.11%<br />

13.60%<br />

3.26%<br />

11.00%<br />

-0.37%<br />

14.07%<br />

15.00%<br />

7.50%<br />

12.33%<br />

10.55%<br />

7.78%<br />

30.00%<br />

16.88%<br />

16.67%<br />

26.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

3.50%<br />

20.17%<br />

-1.85%<br />

9.33%<br />

12.01%<br />

8.62%<br />

19.10%<br />

NfA<br />

13.90%<br />

13.14%<br />

0.33%<br />

18.67%<br />

8.33%<br />

8.00%<br />

12.40%<br />

12.43%<br />

5.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

13.30%<br />

NfA<br />

10.45%<br />

18.45%<br />

10.64%<br />

-1.00%<br />

13.00%<br />

-9.05%<br />

4.00%<br />

6.00%<br />

6.60%<br />

11.50%<br />

17.59%<br />

7.50%<br />

9.50%<br />

8.45%<br />

5.00%<br />

16.23%<br />

8.23%<br />

11.26%<br />

11.03%<br />

46.30%<br />

14.03%<br />

20.50%<br />

20.00%<br />

9.00%<br />

5.33%<br />

0.50%<br />

6.09%<br />

5.23%<br />

15.75%<br />

5.13%<br />

9.50%<br />

7.33%<br />

13.00%<br />

15.00%<br />

20.34%<br />

8.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

11.00%<br />

8.50%<br />

11.19%<br />

12.57%<br />

7.60%<br />

16.55%<br />

13.11%<br />

14.95%<br />

7.30%<br />

12.61%<br />

2.60%<br />

15.37%<br />

15.00%<br />

9.45%<br />

15.74%<br />

11.20%<br />

10.79%<br />

31.90%<br />

16.88%<br />

19.55%<br />

26.00%<br />

13.62%<br />

8.45%<br />

20.17%<br />

3.91%<br />

10.93%<br />

12.86%<br />

10.84%<br />

20.88%<br />

NfA<br />

15.28%<br />

13.82%<br />

5.40%<br />

18.67%<br />

8.94%<br />

12.81%<br />

14.42%<br />

12.43%<br />

7.42%<br />

11.48%<br />

14.44%<br />

NfA<br />

11.22%<br />

18.45%<br />

10.64%<br />

-1.00%<br />

13.00%<br />

-0.84%<br />

8.62%<br />

10.86%<br />

9.79%<br />

14.98%<br />

17.59%<br />

10.96%<br />

12.14%<br />

10.52%<br />

5.00%<br />

16.23%<br />

11.55%<br />

12.69%<br />

12.76%<br />

46.42%<br />

15.59%<br />

21.75%<br />

21.21%<br />

12.96%<br />

7.85%<br />

4.93%<br />

11.28%<br />

9.67%<br />

18.07%<br />

5.97%<br />

11.91%<br />

11.16%<br />

14.58%<br />

17.82%<br />

21.48%<br />

8.66%<br />

13.13%<br />

16.07%<br />

10.91%<br />

0.0011%<br />

0.0090%<br />

0.0137%<br />

0.0053%<br />

0.0621%<br />

0.0215%<br />

0.0101%<br />

0.0054%<br />

0.0029%<br />

0.0277%<br />

0.0644%<br />

0.0055%<br />

0.0443%<br />

0.0257%<br />

0.0153%<br />

0.0198%<br />

0.0670%<br />

0.0201%<br />

0.0050%<br />

0.0157%<br />

0.0080%<br />

0.0189%<br />

0.0094%<br />

0.0065%<br />

0.0070%<br />

0.0302%<br />

0.0208%<br />

NfA<br />

0.0087%<br />

0.0297%<br />

0.0076%<br />

0.D108%<br />

0.0016%<br />

0.0022%<br />

0.0104%<br />

0.0094%<br />

0.0080%<br />

0.0027%<br />

0.0097%<br />

NfA<br />

0.0064%<br />

0.0073%<br />

0.0077%<br />

-0.0001%<br />

0.0113%<br />

-0.0003%<br />

0.0032%<br />

0.0031%<br />

0.0173%<br />

0.2528%<br />

0.0599%<br />

0.0217%<br />

0.0167%<br />

0.0021%<br />

0.0010%<br />

0.2815%<br />

0.0086%<br />

0.0170%<br />

0.0522%<br />

0.0107%<br />

0.0177%<br />

0.0504%<br />

0.0050%<br />

0.0049%<br />

0.0034%<br />

0.0015%<br />

0.0118%<br />

0.0149%<br />

0.1201%<br />

0.0079%<br />

0.0071%<br />

0.0155%<br />

0.0108%<br />

0.0620%<br />

0.0181%<br />

0.0031%<br />

0.0341%<br />

0.0056%<br />

0.0065%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company<br />

Ticker<br />

[4) [5)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong> Weight in Index<br />

[6) m<br />

Estimated L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Growth<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

Est.<br />

[8)<br />

DCF Result<br />

[91<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

HARRIS CORP<br />

HOSPIRA INC<br />

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS INC<br />

HERSHEY COfTHE<br />

HUMANA INC<br />

INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP<br />

INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE INC<br />

INTL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES<br />

INTL GAME TECHNOLOGY<br />

INTEL CORP<br />

INTUIT INC<br />

INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO<br />

INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COS INC<br />

INGERSOLL-RAND PLC<br />

IRON MOUNTAIN INC<br />

INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC<br />

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS<br />

INVESCO LTD<br />

JABIL CIRCUIT INC<br />

JOHNSON CONTROLS INC<br />

J.C. PENNEY CO INC<br />

JDS UNIPHASE CORP<br />

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC<br />

JOHNSON & JOHNSON<br />

JUNIPER NElWORKS INC<br />

JOY GLOBAL INC<br />

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO<br />

NORDSTROM INC<br />

KELLOGG CO<br />

KEYCORP<br />

KRAFT FOODS INC-CLASS A<br />

KIMCO REALTY CORP<br />

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION<br />

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP<br />

KINDER MORGAN INC<br />

CARMAXINC<br />

COCA-COLA COrrHE<br />

KROGER CO<br />

KOHLS CORP<br />

LOEWSCORP<br />

LEGGETT & PLATT INC<br />

LENNAR CORP-A<br />

LABORATORY CRP OF AMER HLDGS<br />

LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP<br />

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS<br />

LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP<br />

ELI LILLY & CO<br />

LEGG MASON INC<br />

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP<br />

LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP<br />

LORILLARD INC<br />

LOWE'S COS INC<br />

LAM RESEARCH CORP<br />

LSI CORP<br />

LIMITED BRANDS INC<br />

LEUCADIA NATIONAL CORP<br />

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO<br />

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL INC-A<br />

MACY'S INC<br />

MASTERCARD INC-CLASS A<br />

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL-CLA<br />

MASCOCORP<br />

MATTEL INC<br />

MCDONALD'S CORP<br />

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC<br />

MCKESSON CORP<br />

MOODY'S CORP<br />

MEDTRONIC INC<br />

METLIFE INC<br />

MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES INC<br />

MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION CO<br />

MCCORMICK & CO-NON VTG SHRS<br />

MARSH & MCLENNAN COS<br />

3MCO<br />

MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP<br />

AL TRIA GROUP INC<br />

MOLEX INC<br />

MONSANTO CO<br />

MOSAIC COfTHE<br />

HRS<br />

HSP<br />

HST<br />

HSV<br />

HUM<br />

IBM<br />

ICE<br />

IFF<br />

IGT<br />

INTC<br />

INTU<br />

IP<br />

IPG<br />

IR<br />

IRM<br />

ISRG<br />

ITW<br />

IVZ<br />

JBL<br />

JCI<br />

JCP<br />

JDSU<br />

JEC<br />

JNJ<br />

JNPR<br />

JOV<br />

JPM<br />

JWN<br />

K<br />

KEV<br />

KFT<br />

KIM<br />

KLAC<br />

KMB<br />

KMI<br />

KMX<br />

KO<br />

KR<br />

KSS<br />

L<br />

LEG<br />

LEN<br />

LH<br />

LIFE<br />

LLL<br />

LLTC<br />

LLV<br />

LM<br />

LMT<br />

LNC<br />

LO<br />

LOW<br />

LRCX<br />

LSI<br />

LTD<br />

LUK<br />

LUV<br />

LXK<br />

M<br />

MA<br />

MAR<br />

MAS<br />

MAT<br />

MCD<br />

MCHP<br />

MCK<br />

MCO<br />

MDT<br />

MET<br />

MHP<br />

MJN<br />

MKC<br />

MMC<br />

MMM<br />

MNST<br />

MO<br />

MOLX<br />

MON<br />

MOS<br />

5,299.62 0.04%<br />

5,612.17 0.04%<br />

11,026.65 0.09%<br />

16,414.29 0.13%<br />

11,274.59 0.09%<br />

222,315.36 1.73%<br />

9,937.80 0.08%<br />

4,890.20 0.04%<br />

3,237.25 0.03%<br />

122,023.16 0.95%<br />

17,194.32 0.13%<br />

14,948.08 0.12%<br />

4,681.63 0.04%<br />

14,133.37 0.11%<br />

5,588.57 0.04%<br />

19,611.25 0.15%<br />

27,622.74 0.21%<br />

10,676.61 0.08%<br />

4,409.64 0.03%<br />

18,362.96 0.14%<br />

5,677.52 0.04%<br />

2,639.08 0.02%<br />

5,122.18 0.04%<br />

185,438.59 1.44%<br />

9,315.34 0.07%<br />

5,466.84 0.04%<br />

140,591.86 1.09%<br />

11,591.45 0.09%<br />

18,119.29 0.14%<br />

7,925.09 0.06%<br />

74,251.30 0.58%<br />

8,338.50 0.06%<br />

8,724.47 0.07%<br />

33,064.23 0.26%<br />

40,417.46 0.31%<br />

6,998.93 0.05%<br />

167,831.70 1.30%<br />

12,168.16 0.09%<br />

12,192.05 0.09%<br />

16,136.38 N/A<br />

3,372.87 0.03%<br />

6,003.42 0.05%<br />

8,464.13 0.07%<br />

8,450.99 0.07%<br />

6,668.02 0.05%<br />

7,529.82 0.06%<br />

52,555.67 0.41%<br />

3,342.66 0.03%<br />

29,369.40 0.23%<br />

6,507.54 0.05%<br />

16,533.15 0.13%<br />

32,751.36 0.25%<br />

6,130.96 0.05%<br />

4,332.26 0.03%<br />

14,107.61 0.11%<br />

5,163.14 N/A<br />

6,576.17 0.05%<br />

1,503.80 0.01 %<br />

16,260.95 0.13%<br />

52,961.91 0.41%<br />

12,145.89 0.09%<br />

5,017.25 0.04%<br />

11,922.29 0.09%<br />

89,800.81 0.70%<br />

6,668.83 0.05%<br />

20,579.97 0.16%<br />

8,829.76 0.07%<br />

42,242.09 0.33%<br />

36,116.52 0.28%<br />

14,311.44 0.11%<br />

14.995.04 0.12%<br />

8,268.57 0.06%<br />

18,562.51 0.14%<br />

63,380.17 0.49%<br />

10,091.74 0.08%<br />

69,998.63 0.54%<br />

4,321.64 0.03%<br />

46,164.14 0.36%<br />

24,146.00 0.19%<br />

2.93% 4.00%<br />

0.00% 3.35%<br />

1.74% 13.30%<br />

2.06% 7.86%<br />

1.47% 9.80%<br />

1.67% 9.67%<br />

0.00% 14.00%<br />

2.14% 3.00%<br />

1.98% 13.00%<br />

3.55% 10.76%<br />

0.69% 14.50%<br />

3.07% 5.00%<br />

2.32% 9.33%<br />

1.36% 11.00%<br />

3.30% 13.67%<br />

0.00% 21.17%<br />

2.50% 7.65%<br />

2.85% 12.00%<br />

1.46% 12.00%<br />

2.54% 16.95%<br />

1.51 % 21.93%<br />

0.00% 14.00%<br />

0.00% 13.23%<br />

3.54% 6.37%<br />

0.00% 15.00%<br />

1.36% 16.80%<br />

3.22% 7.33%<br />

1.77% 12.59%<br />

3.43% 7.97%<br />

2.15% 7.01%<br />

2.79% 7.50%<br />

3.72% 15.15%<br />

2.89% 9.67%<br />

3.52% 8.44%<br />

3.93% 7.00%<br />

0.00% 13.16%<br />

2.94% 7.71%<br />

2.16% 8.60%<br />

2.46% 13.00%<br />

0.61% N/A<br />

4.67% 15.00%<br />

0.48% 4.50%<br />

0.00% 12.25%<br />

0.00% 8.73%<br />

2.82% 1.67%<br />

3.11% 10.00%<br />

4.33% -1.23%<br />

1.81% 11.00%<br />

4.53% 6.88%<br />

1.41% 5.40%<br />

4.81% 9.14%<br />

2.19% 16.60%<br />

0.00% 10.00%<br />

0.00% 15.25%<br />

4.14% 12.54%<br />

0.00% N/A<br />

0.25% 18.12%<br />

5.44% -9.00%<br />

1.99% 10.27%<br />

0.23% 19.16%<br />

1.18% 19.01%<br />

2.14% 10.00%<br />

3.55% 9.00%<br />

3.21% 9.96%<br />

4.10% 10.00%<br />

0.74% 14.33%<br />

1.63% 12.00%<br />

2.53% 6.51%<br />

3.05% 9.50%<br />

1.94% 9.50%<br />

1.63% 11.40%<br />

1.98% 8.00%<br />

2.64% 8.08%<br />

2.38% 12.00%<br />

0.00% 17.50%<br />

4.96% 7.64%<br />

3.30% 11.67%<br />

1.42% 9.65%<br />

1.76% 5.51%<br />

6.99%<br />

3.35%<br />

15.15%<br />

10.00%<br />

11.34%<br />

11.42%<br />

14.00%<br />

5.17%<br />

15.11%<br />

14.50%<br />

15.24%<br />

8.15%<br />

11.76%<br />

12.44%<br />

17.19%<br />

21.17%<br />

10.25%<br />

15.02%<br />

13.55%<br />

19.71%<br />

23.61%<br />

14.00%<br />

13.23%<br />

10.02%<br />

15.00%<br />

18.27%<br />

10.67%<br />

14.46%<br />

11.53%<br />

9.24%<br />

10.40%<br />

19.16%<br />

12.69%<br />

12.11%<br />

11.07%<br />

13.16%<br />

10.76%<br />

10.85%<br />

15.62%<br />

N/A<br />

20.02%<br />

4.99%<br />

12.25%<br />

8.73%<br />

4.52%<br />

13.27%<br />

3.07%<br />

12.91%<br />

11.56%<br />

6.85%<br />

14.17%<br />

18.98%<br />

10.00%<br />

15.25%<br />

16.94%<br />

N/A<br />

18.39%<br />

-3.80%<br />

12.36%<br />

19.40%<br />

20.30%<br />

12.25%<br />

12.71%<br />

13.33%<br />

14.30%<br />

15.13%<br />

13.73%<br />

9.12%<br />

12.69%<br />

11.53%<br />

13.12%<br />

10.06%<br />

10.82%<br />

14.53%<br />

17.50%<br />

12.79%<br />

15.16%<br />

11.14%<br />

7.32%<br />

0.0029%<br />

0.0015%<br />

0.0130%<br />

0.0127%<br />

0.0099%<br />

0.1972%<br />

0.0108%<br />

0.0020%<br />

0.0038%<br />

0.1374%<br />

0.0203%<br />

0.0095%<br />

0.0043%<br />

0.0136%<br />

0.0075%<br />

0.0322%<br />

0.0220%<br />

0.0125%<br />

0.0046%<br />

0.0281%<br />

0.0104%<br />

0.0029%<br />

0.0053%<br />

0.1443%<br />

0.0108%<br />

0.0078%<br />

0.1164%<br />

0.0130%<br />

0.0162%<br />

0.0057%<br />

0.0600%<br />

0.0124%<br />

0.0086%<br />

0.0311%<br />

0.0348%<br />

0.0071%<br />

0.1403%<br />

0.0103%<br />

0.0148%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0052%<br />

0.0023%<br />

0.0081%<br />

0.0057%<br />

0.0023%<br />

0.0078%<br />

0.0125%<br />

0.0033%<br />

0.0264%<br />

0.0035%<br />

0.0182%<br />

0.0483%<br />

0.0048%<br />

0.0051%<br />

0.0186%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0094%<br />

-0.0004%<br />

0.0156%<br />

0.0798%<br />

0.0191%<br />

0.0048%<br />

0.0118%<br />

0.0929%<br />

0.0074%<br />

0.0242%<br />

0.0094%<br />

0.0299%<br />

0.0356%<br />

0.0128%<br />

0.0153%<br />

0.0065%<br />

0.0156%<br />

0.0715%<br />

0.0137%<br />

0.0695%<br />

0.0051%<br />

0.0399%<br />

0.0137%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 6 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company<br />

Ticker<br />

[4J<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[5J<br />

Weight in Index<br />

[6J<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

[7]<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Growth<br />

Est.<br />

{8]<br />

DCF Result<br />

[9J<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP<br />

MERCK & CO. INC.<br />

MARATHON OIL CORP<br />

MORGAN STANLEY<br />

MICROSOFT CORP<br />

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC<br />

M & T BANK CORP<br />

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC<br />

MURPHY OIL CORP<br />

MEADWESTVACO CORP<br />

MYLAN INC<br />

NOBLE ENERGY INC<br />

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD<br />

NASDAQ OMX GROUPfTHE<br />

NOBLE CORP<br />

NEXTERA ENERGY INC<br />

NEWMONT MINING CORP<br />

NETFLIX INC<br />

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION CO<br />

NISOURCE INC<br />

NIKE INC -CL B<br />

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP<br />

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO INC<br />

NRG ENERGY INC<br />

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP<br />

NETAPP INC<br />

NORTHERN TRUST CORP<br />

NORTHEAST UTILITIES<br />

NUCOR CORP<br />

NVIDIA CORP<br />

NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC<br />

NEWS CORP-CL A<br />

NYSE EURONEXT<br />

OWENS-ILLINOIS INC<br />

ONEOK INC<br />

OMNICOM GROUP<br />

ORACLE CORP<br />

O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC<br />

OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP<br />

PAYCHEXINC<br />

PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL<br />

PITNEY BOWES INC<br />

PACCARINC<br />

PG&ECORP<br />

PLUM CREEK TIMBER CO<br />

PRICELlNE.COM INC<br />

PRECISION CASTPARTS CORP<br />

METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS INC<br />

PATTERSON COS INC<br />

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GP<br />

PEPSICO INC<br />

PFIZER INC<br />

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP<br />

PROCTER & GAMBLE COfTHE<br />

PROGRESSIVE CORP<br />

PARKER HANNIFIN CORP<br />

PUL TEGROUP INC<br />

PERKINELMER INC<br />

PROLOGIS INC<br />

PALL CORP<br />

PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL<br />

PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP<br />

PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL<br />

PEPCO HOLDINGS INC<br />

PPG INDUSTRIES INC<br />

PPL CORPORATION<br />

PERRIGO CO<br />

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC<br />

PUBLIC STORAGE<br />

PHILLIPS 66<br />

QUANTA SERVICES INC<br />

PRAXAIR INC<br />

PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES CO<br />

QUALCOMM INC<br />

QEP RESOURCES INC<br />

RYDER SYSTEM INC<br />

REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC<br />

ROWAN COMPANIES PLC-A<br />

REGIONS FINANCIAL CORP<br />

MPC<br />

MRK<br />

MRO<br />

MS<br />

MSFT<br />

MSI<br />

MTB<br />

MU<br />

MUR<br />

MWV<br />

MYl<br />

NBl<br />

NBR<br />

NOAa<br />

NE<br />

NEE<br />

NEM<br />

NFLX<br />

NFX<br />

NI<br />

NKE<br />

NOC<br />

NOV<br />

NRG<br />

NSC<br />

NTAP<br />

NTRS<br />

NU<br />

NUE<br />

NVDA<br />

NWl<br />

NWSA<br />

NYX<br />

01<br />

OKE<br />

OMC<br />

ORCL<br />

ORLY<br />

OXY<br />

PAYX<br />

PBCT<br />

PBI<br />

PCAR<br />

PCG<br />

PCl<br />

PCLN<br />

PCP<br />

PCS<br />

PDCO<br />

PEG<br />

PEP<br />

PFE<br />

PFG<br />

PG<br />

PGR<br />

PH<br />

PHM<br />

PKI<br />

Pla<br />

Pll<br />

PM<br />

PNC<br />

PNW<br />

paM<br />

PPG<br />

PPl<br />

PRGO<br />

PRU<br />

PSA<br />

PSX<br />

PWR<br />

PX<br />

pxa<br />

QCOM<br />

QEP<br />

R<br />

RAI<br />

ROC<br />

RF<br />

17,182.11<br />

131,723.59<br />

19,364.12<br />

30,640.12<br />

254,603.77<br />

13,633.91<br />

11,077.49<br />

6,196.78<br />

9,951.77<br />

4,984.36<br />

9,591.12<br />

15,423.00<br />

4,233.83<br />

3,878.55<br />

9,417.08<br />

28,405.10<br />

24,628.59<br />

3,106.03<br />

4,453.10<br />

7,037.17<br />

44,580.87<br />

16,501.29<br />

33,290.79<br />

4,905.51<br />

22,704.86<br />

12,581.60<br />

11.244.17<br />

11,927.71<br />

11.780.88<br />

8,223.55<br />

5.182.55<br />

55,823.22<br />

6,258.24<br />

2,817.74<br />

9,227.53<br />

13,713.86<br />

154.165.13<br />

9.917.76<br />

67,314.73<br />

12,141.54<br />

4,201.07<br />

2,646.42<br />

13.839.73<br />

18,525.54<br />

6,638.60<br />

29,740.27<br />

23.321.11<br />

3,590.63<br />

3,737.44<br />

16,028.03<br />

112,798.79<br />

177.624.33<br />

8,068.57<br />

185,845.70<br />

11,823.77<br />

11,956.99<br />

5,276.63<br />

3,143.80<br />

15,874.96<br />

6,478.29<br />

151,091.28<br />

33.003.14<br />

5,718.19<br />

4,449.54<br />

16,516.27<br />

17,195.60<br />

10.350.03<br />

25,457.58<br />

26,386.72<br />

26,587.79<br />

5,046.21<br />

31,078.42<br />

11.966.46<br />

103.580.66<br />

5,098.42<br />

2.045.44<br />

26,270.76<br />

4,360.52<br />

9,907.54<br />

0.13%<br />

1.02%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.24%<br />

1.98%<br />

NJA<br />

0.09%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.03%<br />

NIA<br />

0.35%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.43%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.11%<br />

1.20%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.52%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.03%<br />

NJA<br />

0.11%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.88%<br />

1.38%<br />

0.06%<br />

1.44%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.05%<br />

1.17%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.24%<br />

NIA<br />

0.80%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

2.45%<br />

3.86%<br />

2.47%<br />

1.29%<br />

2.75%<br />

2.20%<br />

3.20%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.29%<br />

3.48%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.79%<br />

1.54%<br />

3.55%<br />

3.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.82%<br />

1.57%<br />

3.19%<br />

0.59%<br />

0.59%<br />

2.69%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.63%<br />

3.44%<br />

3.93%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.07%<br />

0.80%<br />

4.72%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.88%<br />

2.31%<br />

0.74%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.53%<br />

3.86%<br />

5.34%<br />

11.32%<br />

3.58%<br />

4.20%<br />

4.09%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.000/0<br />

1.25%<br />

4.48%<br />

2.93%<br />

3.65%<br />

2.74%<br />

3.40%<br />

1.69%<br />

2.12%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.02%<br />

3.38%<br />

1.38%<br />

3.63%<br />

2.49%<br />

4.08%<br />

5.56%<br />

2.15%<br />

4.85%<br />

0.26%<br />

3.01%<br />

3.00%<br />

0.94%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.11%<br />

0.10%<br />

1.49%<br />

0.26%<br />

3.14%<br />

5.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.57%<br />

11.00%<br />

4.50%<br />

-0.42%<br />

11.00%<br />

9.96%<br />

NJA<br />

15.58%<br />

11.28%<br />

10.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

10.05%<br />

7.00%<br />

8.00%<br />

9.00%<br />

13.00%<br />

5.13%<br />

-3.00%<br />

10.44%<br />

11.50%<br />

NIA<br />

13.83%<br />

3.75%<br />

18.00%<br />

-6.84%<br />

14.67%<br />

14.25%<br />

8.74%<br />

6.79%<br />

8.50%<br />

14.33%<br />

9.01%<br />

16.43%<br />

8.50%<br />

8.67%<br />

16.00%<br />

8.00%<br />

13.31%<br />

18.25%<br />

-1.92%<br />

10.33%<br />

7.67%<br />

NJA<br />

10.75%<br />

2.85%<br />

5.00%<br />

20.96%<br />

12.63%<br />

14.76%<br />

12.33%<br />

0.30%<br />

8.81%<br />

3.48%<br />

11.50%<br />

7.52%<br />

7.75%<br />

6.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

10.96%<br />

3.08%<br />

12.05%<br />

10.33%<br />

3.86%<br />

5.00%<br />

5.33%<br />

7.00%<br />

..a.00%<br />

11.63%<br />

11.00%<br />

5.25%<br />

10.00%<br />

16.83%<br />

11.66%<br />

NJA<br />

15.50%<br />

15.00%<br />

8.93%<br />

7.68%<br />

18.33%<br />

8.00%<br />

13.58%<br />

8.44%<br />

2.04%<br />

12.36%<br />

12.84%<br />

NJA<br />

19.03%<br />

11.28%<br />

12.41%<br />

13.66%<br />

10.05%<br />

8.04%<br />

8.00%<br />

10.87%<br />

14.64%<br />

8.77%<br />

0.00%<br />

10.44%<br />

11.50%<br />

NJA<br />

15.51%<br />

7.00%<br />

18.64%<br />

-6.27%<br />

17.55%<br />

14.25%<br />

11.49%<br />

10.34%<br />

12.60%<br />

14.33%<br />

11.18%<br />

17.30%<br />

13.42%<br />

8.67%<br />

19.12%<br />

10.41%<br />

14.10%<br />

18.25%<br />

0.58%<br />

14.40%<br />

13.21%<br />

NJA<br />

14.52%<br />

7.11%<br />

9.19%<br />

20.96%<br />

12.71%<br />

14.76%<br />

13.66%<br />

4.79%<br />

11.88%<br />

7.20%<br />

14.39%<br />

11.04%<br />

9.51%<br />

8.18%<br />

5.00%<br />

12.03%<br />

6.51%<br />

13.52%<br />

14.15%<br />

6.40%<br />

9.19%<br />

11.04%<br />

9.23%<br />

-3.34%<br />

11.90%<br />

14.17%<br />

8.33%<br />

10.99%<br />

16.83%<br />

13.89%<br />

NIA<br />

17.11%<br />

15.28%<br />

12.21%<br />

12.88%<br />

18.33%<br />

8.59%<br />

0.0181%<br />

0.0864%<br />

0.0031%<br />

0.0294%<br />

0.2539%<br />

NJA<br />

0.0164%<br />

0.0054%<br />

0.0096%<br />

0.0053%<br />

0.0075%<br />

0.0096%<br />

0.0026%<br />

0.0033%<br />

0.0107%<br />

0.0194%<br />

0.0000%<br />

0.0025%<br />

0.0040%<br />

NJA<br />

0.0537%<br />

0.0090%<br />

0.0482%<br />

-0.0024%<br />

0.0309%<br />

0.0139%<br />

0.0100%<br />

0.0096%<br />

0.0115%<br />

0.0092%<br />

0.0045%<br />

0.0750%<br />

0.0065%<br />

0.0019%<br />

0.0137%<br />

0.0111%<br />

0.1688%<br />

0.0141%<br />

0.0030%<br />

0.Q136%<br />

0.0043%<br />

NJA<br />

0.0156%<br />

0.0102%<br />

0.0047%<br />

0.0484%<br />

0.0230%<br />

0.0041%<br />

0.0040%<br />

0.0060%<br />

0.1040%<br />

0.0993%<br />

0.0090%<br />

0.1594%<br />

0.0087%<br />

0.0076%<br />

0.0020%<br />

0.0029%<br />

0.0080%<br />

0.0068%<br />

0.1660%<br />

0.0164%<br />

0.0041%<br />

0.0038%<br />

0.0118%<br />

-0.0045%<br />

0.0096%<br />

0.0280%<br />

0.0171%<br />

0.0227%<br />

0.0066%<br />

0.0335%<br />

NJA<br />

0.1376%<br />

0.0061%<br />

0.0019%<br />

0.0263%<br />

0.0062%<br />

0.0066%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 7 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company<br />

Ticker<br />

(4J<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[51<br />

Weight in Index<br />

[61<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g.Term Growth<br />

Est.<br />

[8)<br />

DCF Result<br />

[9]<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

ROBERT HALF INTL INC<br />

RED HAT INC<br />

RALPH LAUREN CORP<br />

ROCKWELL AUTOMATJON INC<br />

ROPER INDUSTRIES INC<br />

ROSS STORES INC<br />

RANGE RESOURCES CORP<br />

RR DONN ELLEY & SONS CO<br />

REPUBLIC SERVICES INC<br />

RAYTHEON COMPANY<br />

SPRINT NEXTEL CORP<br />

SAIC INC<br />

STARBUCKS CORP<br />

SCANACORP<br />

SCHWAB (CHARLES) CORP<br />

SPECTRA ENERGY CORP<br />

SEALED AIR CORP<br />

SEARS HOLDINGS CORP<br />

SHERWIN·WILLIAMS COfTHE<br />

SIGMA·ALDRICH<br />

JM SMUCKER COfTHE<br />

SCHLUMBERGER LTD<br />

SLM CORP<br />

SNAP-ON INC<br />

SANDISK CORP<br />

SCRIPPS NETWORKS INTER·CL A<br />

SOUTHERN COfTHE<br />

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC<br />

STAPLES INC<br />

STERICYCLE INC<br />

SEMPRA ENERGY<br />

SUNTRUST BANKS INC<br />

ST JUDE MEDICAL INC<br />

STATE STREET CORP<br />

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY<br />

CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC·A<br />

SUNOCOINC<br />

STANLEY BLACK & DECKER INC<br />

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY CO<br />

SAFEWAYINC<br />

STRYKER CORP<br />

SYMANTEC CORP<br />

SYSCO CORP<br />

AT&T INC<br />

MOLSON COORS BREWING CO ·B<br />

TERADATA CORP<br />

TECO ENERGY INC<br />

INTEGRYS ENERGY GROUP INC<br />

TE CONNECTIVITY LTD<br />

TERADYNEINC<br />

TARGET CORP<br />

TENET HEAL THCARE CORP<br />

TITANIUM METALS CORP<br />

TIFFANY & CO<br />

T JX COMPANIES INC<br />

TORCH MARK CORP<br />

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC<br />

TRIPADVISOR INC<br />

T ROWE PRICE GROUP INC<br />

TRAVELERS COS INCfTHE<br />

TYSON FOODS INC-CL A<br />

TESORO CORP<br />

TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES INC<br />

TIME WARNER CABLE<br />

TIME WARNER INC<br />

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC<br />

TEXTRON INC<br />

lyCO INTERNATIONAL LTD<br />

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC<br />

UNUM GROUP<br />

UNION PACIFIC CORP<br />

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE·CL 8<br />

URBAN OUTFITTERS INC<br />

US BANCORP<br />

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP<br />

VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES<br />

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC<br />

VF CORP<br />

VJACOM INC·CLASS B<br />

RHI<br />

RHT<br />

RL<br />

ROK<br />

Rap<br />

ROST<br />

RRC<br />

RRD<br />

RSG<br />

RTN<br />

S<br />

SAl<br />

SBUX<br />

SCG<br />

SCHW<br />

SE<br />

SEE<br />

SHLD<br />

SHW<br />

SIAL<br />

SJM<br />

SLB<br />

SLM<br />

SNA<br />

SNDK<br />

SNI<br />

so<br />

SPG<br />

SPLS<br />

SRCL<br />

SRE<br />

STI<br />

STJ<br />

sn<br />

STX<br />

STZ<br />

SUN<br />

SWK<br />

SWN<br />

SWY<br />

SYK<br />

SYMC<br />

SYY<br />

T<br />

TAP<br />

TOC<br />

TE<br />

TEG<br />

TEL<br />

TER<br />

TGT<br />

THC<br />

TIE<br />

TIF<br />

TJX<br />

TMK<br />

TMO<br />

TRIP<br />

TROW<br />

TRV<br />

TSN<br />

TSO<br />

TSS<br />

TWC<br />

TWX<br />

TXN<br />

TXT<br />

TYC<br />

UNH<br />

UNM<br />

UNP<br />

UPS<br />

URBN<br />

USB<br />

UTX<br />

V<br />

VAR<br />

VFC<br />

VIAB<br />

3,682.63<br />

11,008.29<br />

14,312.97<br />

10,099.16<br />

10,024.43<br />

15,670.91<br />

10,628.17<br />

1,990.51<br />

10,041.46<br />

18.742.47<br />

14,401.82<br />

4,136.16<br />

37,627.60<br />

6,289.24<br />

16,983.84<br />

18,587.22<br />

2,741.54<br />

5,657.01<br />

14,690.79<br />

8,512.41<br />

9,502.03<br />

94,776.35<br />

7,411.86<br />

4,072.39<br />

9,876.76<br />

8.990.22<br />

39,777.02<br />

48,751.55<br />

7,410.59<br />

7,837.99<br />

15,983.59<br />

13,790.58<br />

12,062.73<br />

19,988.28<br />

12,871.49<br />

5,882.97<br />

4,999.97<br />

11,086.60<br />

10,910.14<br />

3,788.89<br />

20,475.51<br />

12,568.75<br />

17,768.26<br />

212,356.89<br />

8,060.90<br />

13,053.01<br />

3,788.04<br />

4,254.17<br />

14,973.33<br />

2,922.69<br />

41,807.88<br />

2,212.90<br />

2,098.99<br />

7,660.31<br />

33,978.40<br />

4,913.99<br />

20,949.79<br />

4,931.81<br />

15.740.17<br />

24,909.55<br />

5.751.22<br />

5,495.36<br />

4.385.78<br />

27,107.21<br />

39,238.00<br />

32,744.67<br />

7,419.66<br />

25,789.80<br />

56.344.43<br />

5,460.00<br />

57,903.28<br />

70,924.76<br />

5,517.23<br />

62,772.30<br />

71,438.53<br />

86,063.70<br />

6,607.49<br />

16,623.25<br />

25,431.26<br />

0.03%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.29%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.02%<br />

N/A<br />

0.11%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.74%<br />

N/A<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.31%<br />

0.38%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.09%<br />

N/A<br />

0.03%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.14%<br />

1.65%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.32%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.30%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.44%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.45%<br />

0.55%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.49%<br />

0.55%<br />

0.67%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.20%<br />

2.29%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.83%<br />

2.42%<br />

0.51%<br />

0.80%<br />

0.25%<br />

9.42%<br />

3.27%<br />

3.48%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.51%<br />

1.40%<br />

4.13%<br />

1.78%<br />

4.00%<br />

3.61%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.08%<br />

1.13%<br />

2.37%<br />

1.51%<br />

3.17%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.78%<br />

4.29%<br />

2.60%<br />

3.96%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.36%<br />

0.80%<br />

2.27%<br />

2.22%<br />

3.72%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.65%<br />

2.72%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.10%<br />

1.29%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.72%<br />

4.81%<br />

3.06%<br />

0.00%<br />

5.03%<br />

5.01%<br />

2.23%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.98%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.21%<br />

2.06%<br />

0.98%<br />

1.11%<br />

0.79%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.19%<br />

2.81%<br />

1.04%<br />

0.65%<br />

1.67%<br />

2.53%<br />

2.50%<br />

2.36%<br />

0.30%<br />

1.85%<br />

1.38%<br />

2.37%<br />

1.99%<br />

3.08%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.34%<br />

2.55%<br />

0.68%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.93%<br />

2.11%<br />

12.67%<br />

17.00%<br />

12.33%<br />

15.00%<br />

14.00%<br />

13.29%<br />

10.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

6.60%<br />

7.75%<br />

5.00%<br />

3.87%<br />

18.08%<br />

4.34%<br />

16.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

7.00%<br />

N/A<br />

18.97%<br />

6.78%<br />

7.33%<br />

18.00%<br />

N/A<br />

10.00%<br />

13.43%<br />

15.64%<br />

5.50%<br />

5.23%<br />

8.23%<br />

16.00%<br />

7.00%<br />

7.67%<br />

10.00%<br />

7.40%<br />

7.77%<br />

10.82%<br />

-2.09%<br />

13.00%<br />

N/A<br />

8.75%<br />

10.33%<br />

7.67%<br />

10.00%<br />

6.71%<br />

3.34%<br />

14.40%<br />

3.67%<br />

4.30%<br />

15.00%<br />

11.40%<br />

12.58%<br />

11,20%<br />

15.00%<br />

13.73%<br />

11.89%<br />

9.00%<br />

10.84%<br />

16.80%<br />

13.33%<br />

7.75%<br />

7.33%<br />

29.10%<br />

9.71%<br />

11.61%<br />

13.35%<br />

9.50%<br />

31.29%<br />

13.00%<br />

11.00%<br />

9.50%<br />

13.00%<br />

9.10%<br />

18.31%<br />

14.14%<br />

1D.88%<br />

18.71%<br />

12.67%<br />

13.00%<br />

14.75%<br />

15.10%<br />

17.00%<br />

13.21%<br />

17.60%<br />

14.55%<br />

14.13%<br />

10.26%<br />

14.66%<br />

9.98%<br />

11.37%<br />

5.00%<br />

7.45%<br />

19.60%<br />

8.56%<br />

17.92%<br />

9.10%<br />

10.74%<br />

N/A<br />

20.15%<br />

7.95%<br />

9.79%<br />

19.65%<br />

N/A<br />

10.00%<br />

13.43%<br />

16.48%<br />

9.91%<br />

7.90%<br />

12.36%<br />

16.00%<br />

10.48%<br />

8.50%<br />

12.39%<br />

9.70%<br />

11.64%<br />

10.82%<br />

-0.46%<br />

15.90%<br />

N/A<br />

13.03%<br />

11.69%<br />

7.67%<br />

13.91%<br />

11.68%<br />

6.45%<br />

14.40%<br />

8.79%<br />

9.41%<br />

17.39%<br />

11.40%<br />

14.68%<br />

11.20%<br />

17.38%<br />

15.93%<br />

12.93%<br />

10.16%<br />

11.66%<br />

16.80%<br />

15.67%<br />

10.67%<br />

8.42%<br />

29.84%<br />

11.46%<br />

14.28%<br />

16.02%<br />

11.97%<br />

31.64%<br />

14.97%<br />

12.46%<br />

11.98%<br />

15.12%<br />

12.32%<br />

18.31%<br />

16.65%<br />

13.57%<br />

19.46%<br />

12.67%<br />

15.06%<br />

17.01%<br />

0.0043%<br />

0.0145%<br />

0.0147%<br />

0.0138%<br />

0.0113%<br />

0.0172%<br />

0.0085%<br />

0.0023%<br />

0.0078%<br />

0.0165%<br />

0.0056%<br />

0.0024%<br />

0.0573%<br />

0.0042%<br />

0.0236%<br />

0.0131%<br />

0.0023%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0230%<br />

0.0053%<br />

0.0072%<br />

0.1446%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0032%<br />

0.0103%<br />

0.0115%<br />

0.0306%<br />

0.0299%<br />

0.0071%<br />

0.0097%<br />

0.0130%<br />

0.0091%<br />

0.0116%<br />

0.0151%<br />

0.0116%<br />

0.0049%<br />

-0.0002%<br />

0.0137%<br />

N/A<br />

0.0038%<br />

0.0186%<br />

0.0075%<br />

0.0192%<br />

0.1925%<br />

0.0040%<br />

0.0146%<br />

0.0026%<br />

0.0031%<br />

0.0202%<br />

0.0026%<br />

0.0477%<br />

0.0019%<br />

0.0028%<br />

0.0095%<br />

0.0341%<br />

0.0039%<br />

0.0190%<br />

0.0064%<br />

0.0192%<br />

0.0206%<br />

0.0038%<br />

0.0127%<br />

0.0039%<br />

0.0301%<br />

0.0488%<br />

0.0304%<br />

0.0182%<br />

0.0300%<br />

0.0545%<br />

0.0051%<br />

0.0680%<br />

0.0679%<br />

0.0078%<br />

0.0811%<br />

0.0753%<br />

0.1300%<br />

0.0065%<br />

0.0194%<br />

0.0336%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 8 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

(4] [5] [6] m [8] [9]<br />

Markel Estimated L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Growth Weighted<br />

Comeanl Ticker Caeitalizati<strong>on</strong> Welsh! in Index Dividend Yield Est. DCF Result DCF Result<br />

VALERO ENERGY CORP VLO 17,110.82 0.13% 2.04% 6.13% 8.23% 0.0109%<br />

VULCAN MATERIALS CO VMe 4,877.98 0.04% 0.11% 9.67% 9.78% 0.0037%<br />

VORNADO REALlY TRUST VNO 15,116.03 0.12% 3.43% -3.44% -0.07% -0.0001%<br />

VERISIGN INC VRSN 7,522.57 0.06% 0.00% 14.17% 14.17% 0.0083%<br />

VENTAS INC VTR 19,592.23 0.15% 3.74% 5.21% 9.05% 0.0138%<br />

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC VZ 124,501.30 0.97% 4.62% 6.35% 11.12% 0.1075%<br />

WALGREEN CO WAG 33,624.32 0.26% 2.59% 13.20% 15.96% 0.0417%<br />

WATERS CORP WAT 7,002.85 0.05% 0.00% 10.02% 10.02% 0.0054%<br />

WESTERN DIGITAL CORP WDe 10,464.13 0.08% 0.00% 2.72% 2.72% 0.0022%<br />

WISCONSIN ENERGY CORP WEe 8,844.86 0.07% 3.13% 4.75% 7.95% 0.0055%<br />

WELLS FARGO & CO WFe 178,537.88 1.39% 2.51% 25.38% 28.21% 0.3911%<br />

WHOLE FOODS MARKET INC WFM 17.844.41 0.14% 0.58% 19.08% 19.71% 0.0273%<br />

WHIRLPOOL CORP WHR 5,896.56 NfA 2.63% NfA NfA NfA<br />

WINDSTREAM CORP WIN 5,862.31 0.05% 10.03% -3.21% 6.66% 0.0030%<br />

WELLPOINT INC WLP 19.312.83 0.15% 1.91% 10.80% 12.82% 0.0192%<br />

WASTE MANAGEMENT INC WM 16,113.27 0.13% 4.09% 4.00% 8.17% 0.0102%<br />

WILLIAMS COS INC WMB 20,278.75 0.16% 3.81% 12.00% 16.04% 0.0253%<br />

WAL-MART STORES INC WMT 248,724.09 1.93% 2.19% 9.78% 12.08% 0.2333%<br />

WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS INC WPI 10,602.23 0.08% 0.00% 11.40% 11.40% 0.0094%<br />

WASHINGTON POST-CLASS B WPO 2,645.43 NfA 0.00% NfA NfA NfA<br />

WPX ENERGY INC WPX 3,154.73 NfA 0.00% NfA NfA NfA<br />

WESTERN UNJON CO WU 10,638.25 0.08% 2.27% 11.10% 13.49% 0.0111%<br />

WEYERHAEUSER CO WY 13,471.08 0.10% 2.39% 5.00% 7.45% 0.0078%<br />

WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORP WYN 7,315.56 0.06% 1.79% 20.00% 21.97% 0.0125%<br />

WYNN RESORTS LTD WYNN 10,124.59 0.08% 1.97% 9.00% 11.05% 0.0087%<br />

UNITED STATES STEEL CORP X 2,709.55 0.02% 1.06% 6.50% 7.60% 0.0016%<br />

XCEL ENERGY INC XEL 13,690.51 0.11% 3.80% 4.65% 8.54% 0.0091%<br />

XL GROUP PLC XL 7,104.60 0.06% 1.93% 8.33% 10.35% 0.0057%<br />

XllINX INC XLNX 8,858.72 0.07% 2.60% 14.00% 16.78% 0.0115%<br />

EXXON MOBIL CORP XOM 402,140.66 3.12% 2.49% 3.44% 5.97% 0.1865%<br />

DENTSPL Y INTERNATIONAL INC XRAY 5,152.47 0.04% 0.58% 11.50% 12.11% 0.0048%<br />

XEROX CORP XRX 9,490.29 NfA 2.34% NfA NfA NfA<br />

XYLEM INC XVL 4,454.25 0.03% 1.69% 15.00% 16.81% 0.0058%<br />

YAHOO! INC YHOO 17,638.96 0.14% 0.00% 11.14% 11.14% 0.0153%<br />

YUMI BRANDS INC YUM 28,709.44 0.22% 1.89% 11.50% 13.49% 0.0301%<br />

ZIONS BANCORPORATJON ZION 3,559.58 0.03% 0.21% 7.75% 7.97% 0.0022%<br />

ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC ZMH 11,005.77 0.09% 0.44% 10.25% 10.71% 0.0092%<br />

Total Market Capitalizati<strong>on</strong>: 12,878,362.57 13.35%<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] Equals sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Col. [9]<br />

[2] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[3] Equals [1]- [2]<br />

[4] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[5] Equals weight In S&P 500 based <strong>on</strong> market capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[6] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essI<strong>on</strong>al<br />

(7) Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[8] Equals {[6] x (1 + (0.5 x (7)))) + [7]<br />

[9] Equals Col. [5] x Col. [81


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Ex-Ante Market Risk Premium<br />

Market DCF Method Based - CapitallQ<br />

[lJ<br />

S&P500<br />

Est. Required<br />

Market Return<br />

13.13%<br />

[2J<br />

Current 30-Year<br />

Treasury (30-day<br />

average)<br />

2.71%<br />

[3]<br />

Implied Market<br />

Risk Premium<br />

10.42%<br />

Company mcker)<br />

[4)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[5)<br />

Weight in Index<br />

[6)<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term<br />

Growth Est.<br />

[8)<br />

DCF Result<br />

[91<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

3M Co. (NYSE:MMM)<br />

Abbott laboratories (NYSE:ABT)<br />

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (NYSE:ANF)<br />

Accenture pic (NYSE:ACN)<br />

ACE limited (NYSE:ACE)<br />

Adobe Systems Inc. (NasdaqGS:ADBE)<br />

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NYSE:AMD)<br />

Aetna Inc. (NYSE:AET)<br />

AFLAC Inc. (NYSE:AFl)<br />

Agilent Technologies Inc. (NYSE:A)<br />

AGL Resources Inc. (NYSE:GAS)<br />

Air Products & Chemicals Inc. (NYSE:APD)<br />

Airgas. Inc. (NYSE:ARG)<br />

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NasdaqGS:AKAM)<br />

Alcoa, Inc. (NYSE:AA)<br />

Alexi<strong>on</strong> Pharmaceuticals. Inc. (NasdaqGS:ALXN)<br />

Allegheny Technologies Inc. (NYSE:ATI)<br />

AIIergan Inc. (NYSE:AGN)<br />

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (NYSE:ANR)<br />

Altera Corp. (NasdaqGS:AL TR)<br />

Allria Group Inc. (NYSE:MO)<br />

Amaz<strong>on</strong>.com Inc. (NasdaqGS:AMZN)<br />

Ameren Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:AEE)<br />

American Electric Power Co., Inc. (NYSE:AEP)<br />

American Express Company (NYSE:AXP)<br />

American Internati<strong>on</strong>al Group, Inc. (NYSE:AIG)<br />

American Tower Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:AMT)<br />

Ameriprise Financial Inc. (NYSE:AMP)<br />

AmerisourceBergen Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:ABC)<br />

Amgen Inc. (NasdaqGS:AMGN)<br />

Amphenol Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:APH)<br />

Anadarko Petroleum Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:APC)<br />

Analog Devices, Inc. (NasdaqGS:ADI)<br />

A<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:AON)<br />

Apache Corp. (NYSE:APA)<br />

Apartment Investment & Management Co. (NYSE:AIV)<br />

Apollo Group Inc. (NasdaqGS:APOL)<br />

Apple Inc. (NasdaqGS:AAPl)<br />

Applied Materials Inc. (NasdaqGS:AMAT)<br />

Archer Daniels Midland Company (NYSE:ADM)<br />

Assurant Inc. (NYSE:AIZ)<br />

AT&T, Inc. (NYSE:T)<br />

Autodesk, Inc. (NasdaqGS:ADSK)<br />

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (NasdaqGS:ADP)<br />

AutoNati<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NYSE:AN)<br />

AutoZ<strong>on</strong>e Inc. (NYSE:AZO)<br />

Aval<strong>on</strong>bay Communities Inc. (NYSE:AVB)<br />

Avery Dennis<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:AVY)<br />

Av<strong>on</strong> Products Inc. (NYSE:AVP)<br />

Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI)<br />

Ball Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:BLLj<br />

Bank <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> America Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:BAC)<br />

Baxter Internati<strong>on</strong>al Inc. (NYSE:BAX)<br />

BB&T Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:BBT)<br />

Beam, Inc. (NYSE:BEAM)<br />

Bect<strong>on</strong>, Dickins<strong>on</strong> and Company (NYSE:BDX)<br />

Bed Bath & Bey<strong>on</strong>d Inc. (NasdaqGS:BBBY)<br />

Bemis Company, Inc. (NYSE:BMS)<br />

BerkshIre Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A)<br />

Best Buy Co. Inc. (NYSE:BBY)<br />

Big Lots Inc. (NYSE:BIG)<br />

Biogen Idec Inc. (NasdaqGS:BIIB)<br />

BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BlK)<br />

BMC S<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware Inc. (NasdaqGS:BMC)<br />

BorgWarner Inc. (NYSE:BWA)<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong> Properties Inc. (NYSE:BXP)<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong> Scientific Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:BSX)<br />

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY)<br />

63.380.10<br />

102,728.60<br />

2,885.70<br />

38,760.90<br />

25,292.90<br />

15,458.60<br />

2,575.50<br />

12,752.50<br />

21,774.60<br />

12,874.90<br />

4.745.30<br />

17,252.00<br />

6,336.70<br />

6,679.10<br />

8.983.20<br />

20,927.60<br />

3.080.20<br />

26,564.90<br />

1.212.50<br />

11,854.60<br />

70,038.70<br />

112,057.90<br />

7,939.00<br />

20,918.70<br />

66,443.20<br />

56,336.90<br />

27,969.30<br />

11,507.90<br />

9,758.50<br />

64,998.90<br />

9,878.20<br />

34,542.80<br />

11,764.90<br />

16,694.20<br />

33,006.80<br />

3,884.60<br />

3,121.20<br />

632,720.90<br />

14,528.20<br />

17,703.60<br />

2,859.00<br />

212,356.90<br />

7,120.60<br />

28,149.70<br />

4.967.90<br />

13,411.90<br />

13,813.60<br />

3,003.30<br />

6,563.10<br />

19,630.70<br />

6,464.70<br />

86,215.60<br />

32,231.90<br />

22,176.30<br />

9,365.90<br />

15.281.90<br />

15,270.30<br />

3,115.00<br />

208,695.30<br />

6,125.10<br />

1,947.40<br />

34,759.60<br />

30,591.40<br />

6.697.50<br />

7,700.70<br />

17,000.00<br />

7.676.70<br />

55,642.80<br />

0.48%<br />

0.77%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.29%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.53%<br />

0.84%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.50%<br />

0.42%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.49%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

4.76%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.02%<br />

1.60%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.65%<br />

0.24%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.02%<br />

1.57%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.42%<br />

2.55%<br />

3.11%<br />

1.94%<br />

2.19%<br />

2.66%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.82%<br />

2.86%<br />

1.08%<br />

4.64%<br />

3.10%<br />

1.93%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.40%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.43%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.07%<br />

4.83%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.89%<br />

4.37%<br />

1.37%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.25%<br />

2.55%<br />

1.35%<br />

1.72%<br />

0.69%<br />

0.52%<br />

3.02%<br />

1.21%<br />

0.79%<br />

3.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.59%<br />

3.08%<br />

2.62%<br />

2.38%<br />

4.80%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.72%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.74%<br />

3.46%<br />

5.95%<br />

1.32%<br />

0.95%<br />

0.50%<br />

3.07%<br />

2.54%<br />

1.41%<br />

2.37%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.30%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.61%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.40%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.96%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.12%<br />

10.90%<br />

8.73%<br />

18.70%<br />

11.60%<br />

7.54%<br />

10.00%<br />

10.60%<br />

11.10%<br />

9.92%<br />

12.10%<br />

4.37%<br />

10.60%<br />

14.00%<br />

14.20%<br />

7.10%<br />

31.90%<br />

15.00%<br />

13.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

14.70%<br />

8.03%<br />

37.50%<br />

-4.05%<br />

3.11%<br />

11.80%<br />

18.50%<br />

18.70%<br />

13.40%<br />

11.80%<br />

10.40%<br />

14.30%<br />

3.03%<br />

13.00%<br />

9.18%<br />

3.79%<br />

7.72%<br />

12.80%<br />

23.40%<br />

8.67%<br />

10.00%<br />

8.50%<br />

6.80%<br />

15.30%<br />

9.74%<br />

16.50%<br />

15.80%<br />

11.60%<br />

9.25%<br />

-5.10%<br />

20.90%<br />

11.40%<br />

7.50%<br />

8.69%<br />

10.50%<br />

12.60%<br />

8.53%<br />

14.20%<br />

7.15%<br />

8.60%<br />

7.47%<br />

11.20%<br />

15.20%<br />

12.40%<br />

9.53%<br />

19.70%<br />

6.74%<br />

7.07%<br />

4.63%<br />

13.59%<br />

11.98%<br />

20.82%<br />

13.92%<br />

10.30%<br />

10.00%<br />

10.60%<br />

13.02%<br />

12.92%<br />

13.25%<br />

9.11%<br />

13.86%<br />

16.07%<br />

14.20%<br />

8.55%<br />

31.90%<br />

17.61%<br />

13.25%<br />

5.00%<br />

15.85%<br />

13.05%<br />

37.50%<br />

0.74%<br />

7.55%<br />

13.25%<br />

18.50%<br />

20.07%<br />

16.12%<br />

13.23%<br />

12.21%<br />

15.04%<br />

3.56%<br />

16.22%<br />

10.45%<br />

4.60%<br />

10.86%<br />

12.80%<br />

25.18%<br />

11.88%<br />

12.75%<br />

10.98%<br />

11.76%<br />

15.30%<br />

12.59%<br />

16.50%<br />

15.80%<br />

14.50%<br />

12.87%<br />

0.70%<br />

22.36%<br />

12.40%<br />

8.02%<br />

11.89%<br />

13.17%<br />

14.10%<br />

11.00%<br />

14.20%<br />

10.57%<br />

8.60%<br />

11.21%<br />

11.20%<br />

15.20%<br />

16.01%<br />

9.53%<br />

19.70%<br />

8.77%<br />

7.07%<br />

8.85%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.32%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.20%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.04%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company (TIcker)<br />

[4]<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[5]<br />

Weight in Index<br />

f61<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

[?]<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g-Term<br />

Growth Est.<br />

(8)<br />

DCF Result<br />

(9)<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

Broadcom Corp. (NasdaqGS:BRCM)<br />

Brown-Forman Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:BF.B)<br />

CA Technologies (NasdaqGS:CA)<br />

Cablevisi<strong>on</strong> Systems Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CVCj<br />

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:COG)<br />

Camer<strong>on</strong> IntemaU<strong>on</strong>al Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CAM)<br />

Campbell Soup Co. (NYSE:CPB)<br />

Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE:COF)<br />

Cardinal Health, Inc. (NYSE:CAH)<br />

Care Fusi<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CFNj<br />

CarMax Inc. (NYSE:KMX)<br />

Carnival Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CCL)<br />

Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT)<br />

CBRE Group, Inc (NYSE:CBG)<br />

CBS Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CBS)<br />

Celgene Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:CELG)<br />

CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (NYSE:CNP)<br />

CenturyLink, Inc. (NYSE:CTL)<br />

Cerner Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:CERN)<br />

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CF)<br />

CH Robins<strong>on</strong> Worldwide Inc. (NasdaqGS:CHRW)<br />

Chesapeake Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CHK)<br />

Chevr<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CVX)<br />

ChlpoUe Mexican GriU, Inc. (NYSE:CMG)<br />

Cigna Corp. (NYSE:CI)<br />

Cincinnati Financial Corp. (NasdaqGS:CINF)<br />

Cintas Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:CTAS)<br />

Cisco Systems, Inc. (NasdaqGS:CSCO)<br />

Cltlgroup, Inc. (NYSE:C)<br />

Citrix Systems, Inc. (NasdaqGS:CTXS)<br />

Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (NYSE:ClF)<br />

CME Group Inc. (NasdaqGS:CME)<br />

CMS Energy Corp. (NYSE:CMS)<br />

Coach, Inc. (NYSE:COH)<br />

Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (NYSE:CCE)<br />

Cognizant Technology Soluti<strong>on</strong>s Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:CTSH)<br />

Colgate-Palmolive Co. (NYSE:CL)<br />

Com cast Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:CMCS.A)<br />

Comerica Incorporated (NYSE:CMA)<br />

Computer Sciences Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CSC)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>Agra Foods, Inc. (NYSE:CAG)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>ocoPhillips (NYSE:COP)<br />

CONSOl Energy Inc. (NYSE:CNX)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>solidated Edis<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NYSE:ED)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stellati<strong>on</strong> Brands Inc. (NYSE:STZ)<br />

Cooper Industries pic (NYSE:CBE)<br />

Coming Inc. (NYSE:GlW)<br />

Costce Wholesale Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:COST)<br />

Coventry Health Care Inc. (NYSE:CVH)<br />

Covidien pic (NYSE:COV)<br />

CR Bard Inc. (NYSE:BCR)<br />

Crown Castle Internati<strong>on</strong>al Corp. (NYSE:CCI)<br />

CSX Corp. (NYSE:CSX)<br />

Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI)<br />

CVS Caremark Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CVS)<br />

Danaher Corp. (NYSE;DHR)<br />

Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE:DRI)<br />

DaVila Inc. (NYSE:DVA)<br />

Dean Foods Company {NYSE:DF}<br />

Deere & Company (NYSE:DE)<br />

Dell Inc. (NasdaqGS:DEll)<br />

Denbury Resources Inc. (NYSE:DNR)<br />

DENTSPlY Internati<strong>on</strong>al Inc. (NasdaqGS:XRAY)<br />

Dev<strong>on</strong> Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:DVN)<br />

DeVry, Inc. (NYSE:DV)<br />

Diam<strong>on</strong>d Offshore Drilling, Inc. (NYSE:DO)<br />

DlRECTV (NasdaqGS:DTV)<br />

Discover Financial Services (NYSE:DFS)<br />

Discovery CommunIcati<strong>on</strong>s, Inc. (NasdaqGS:DlSCA)<br />

Dollar Tree, Inc. (NasdaqGS:Ol TR)<br />

Domini<strong>on</strong> Resources, Inc. (NYSE:D)<br />

Dover Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:DOV)<br />

DR Hort<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NYSE:DHI)<br />

Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (NYSE:DPS)<br />

DTE Energy Co. (NYSE:DTE)<br />

Duke Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:DUK)<br />

Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (NYSE:DNB)<br />

E"TRADE Financial Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:ETFC)<br />

E. I. du P<strong>on</strong>t de Nemours and Company (NYSE:DD)<br />

19,755.10<br />

13,637.30<br />

12,256.00<br />

3,945.40<br />

8,714.50<br />

13,501.00<br />

11,097.90<br />

25,713.40<br />

13,537.60<br />

5,865.20<br />

6,998.90<br />

27,086.10<br />

53,999.20<br />

5,647.10<br />

23,015.70<br />

31,092.70<br />

8,817.00<br />

26,605.80<br />

12,581.60<br />

12,837.20<br />

9,144.30<br />

12,324.30<br />

218,229.20<br />

9,061.10<br />

13,120.50<br />

6,302.60<br />

5,095.40<br />

101,753.90<br />

87,094.70<br />

14,583.30<br />

4,799.20<br />

18,391.40<br />

6,130.80<br />

16,389.60<br />

8,782.00<br />

19,175.30<br />

50,840.50<br />

89,296.20<br />

5,944.20<br />

4,964.40<br />

10,415.70<br />

68.269.80<br />

6,562.50<br />

17,831.30<br />

5,883.40<br />

11,629.20<br />

17,734.20<br />

42,434.70<br />

5.545.40<br />

27,010.30<br />

8.221.10<br />

18,373.40<br />

22,599.00<br />

18,144.20<br />

58,433.80<br />

36,777.30<br />

6,637.10<br />

9.236.70<br />

3,094.20<br />

29,030.40<br />

18,317.40<br />

5,945.90<br />

5,152.50<br />

23,238.50<br />

1.231.20<br />

9,237.20<br />

33,043.90<br />

19,952.80<br />

20,415.80<br />

11,099.40<br />

30,106.70<br />

10,569.90<br />

6,223.10<br />

9,460.20<br />

10,205.70<br />

45,634.30<br />

3,644.40<br />

2,450.80<br />

45,430.10<br />

0.15%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.41%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.09%<br />

1.64%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.77%<br />

0.66%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.38%<br />

0.67%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.51%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.32%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.44%<br />

0.28%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.34%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.34%<br />

1.13%<br />

0.97%<br />

3.84%<br />

4.01%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.30%<br />

0.35%<br />

2.40%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.88%<br />

2.44%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.10%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.97%<br />

6.86%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.77%<br />

2.33%<br />

1.81%<br />

3.21%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.09%<br />

4.16%<br />

1.34%<br />

1.68%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.00%<br />

6.98%<br />

3.25%<br />

4.16%<br />

2.06%<br />

2.17%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.33%<br />

1.94%<br />

1.95%<br />

2.48%<br />

3.82%<br />

4.65%<br />

1.66%<br />

3.99%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.70%<br />

2.50%<br />

1.12%<br />

1.20%<br />

1.61%<br />

0.82%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.49%<br />

2.06%<br />

1.43%<br />

0.19%<br />

3.85%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.45%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.61%<br />

1.38%<br />

1.55%<br />

5.22%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.02%<br />

2.18%<br />

0.79%<br />

3.04%<br />

4.25%<br />

4.72%<br />

1.88%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.46%<br />

15.10%<br />

12.70%<br />

9.67%<br />

11.90%<br />

35.00%<br />

18.60%<br />

4.20%<br />

9.95%<br />

10.90%<br />

10.60%<br />

13.30%<br />

12.50%<br />

16.30%<br />

13.20%<br />

12.80%<br />

22.20%<br />

5.42%<br />

5.21%<br />

19.20%<br />

12.30%<br />

14.60%<br />

3.02%<br />

-5.80%<br />

22.20%<br />

10.40%<br />

7.50%<br />

10.70%<br />

10.10%<br />

8.64%<br />

17.60%<br />

8.33%<br />

10.00%<br />

6.02%<br />

14.70%<br />

8.00%<br />

19.00%<br />

8.56%<br />

15.60%<br />

9.60%<br />

0.18%<br />

7.00%<br />

-5.49%<br />

12.00%<br />

3.29%<br />

10.30%<br />

13.00%<br />

7.88%<br />

12.80%<br />

9.88%<br />

9.74%<br />

9.03%<br />

31.30%<br />

13.30%<br />

13.00%<br />

12.00%<br />

15.10%<br />

12.30%<br />

12.20%<br />

17.90%<br />

10.70%<br />

8.00%<br />

30.30%<br />

12.80%<br />

-1.63%<br />

12.00%<br />

13.50%<br />

18.30%<br />

6.13%<br />

20.10%<br />

17.80%<br />

5.18%<br />

13.60%<br />

38.60%<br />

8.58%<br />

4.93%<br />

4.00%<br />

9.95%<br />

16.60%<br />

8.00%<br />

16.32%<br />

13.73%<br />

13.70%<br />

16.15%<br />

35.23%<br />

18.60%<br />

7.57%<br />

10.32%<br />

13.43%<br />

10.60%<br />

13.30%<br />

15.56%<br />

18.94%<br />

13.20%<br />

13.97%<br />

22.20%<br />

9.50%<br />

12.25%<br />

19.20%<br />

13.12%<br />

17.10%<br />

4.86%<br />

-2.68%<br />

22.20%<br />

10.49%<br />

11.82%<br />

12.11%<br />

11.86%<br />

8.78%<br />

17.60%<br />

15.60%<br />

13.41%<br />

10.31%<br />

16.91%<br />

10.26%<br />

19.00%<br />

10.99%<br />

17.69%<br />

11.64%<br />

2.66%<br />

10.95%<br />

-0.97%<br />

13.76%<br />

7.35%<br />

10.30%<br />

14.81%<br />

10.48%<br />

13.99%<br />

11.14%<br />

11.43%<br />

9.88%<br />

31.30%<br />

15.96%<br />

15.19%<br />

13.52%<br />

15.30%<br />

16.39%<br />

12.20%<br />

17.90%<br />

13.28%<br />

8.00%<br />

30.30%<br />

13.45%<br />

..0.26%<br />

13.64%<br />

19.07%<br />

18.30%<br />

7.19%<br />

20.10%<br />

17.80%<br />

9.30%<br />

15.93%<br />

39.54%<br />

11.75%<br />

9.28%<br />

8.81%<br />

11.92%<br />

16.60%<br />

11.60%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

-0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.Q2%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.04%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 11 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company (TIcker)<br />

[41<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[51<br />

Weight in Index<br />

[61<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m [81<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term<br />

Growth Est. DCF Result<br />

[91<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

Eastman Chemical Co. (NYSE:EMN)<br />

Eat<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:ETN)<br />

eBay Inc. (NasdaqGS:EBAY)<br />

Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL)<br />

Edis<strong>on</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al (NYSE:EIX)<br />

Edwards Ufesciences Corp. (NYSE:EW)<br />

Electr<strong>on</strong>ic Arts Inc. (NasdaqGS:EA)<br />

Ell Lilly & Co. (NYSE:LLY)<br />

EMC Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:EMC)<br />

Emers<strong>on</strong> Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR)<br />

Ensco pic (NYSE:ESV)<br />

Entergy Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:ETR)<br />

EOG Resources, Inc. (NYSE:EOG)<br />

EQT Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:EQT)<br />

Equlfax Inc. (NYSE:EFX)<br />

Equity Residential (NYSE:EQR)<br />

Exel<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:EXC)<br />

Expedia Inc. (NasdaqGS:EXPE)<br />

Expeditors Internati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Washingt<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NasdaqGS:EXPD)<br />

Express Scripts Holding Company (NasdaqGS:ESRX)<br />

Exx<strong>on</strong> Mobil Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:XOM)<br />

F5 Networks, Inc. (NasdaqGS:FFIV)<br />

Family Dollar Stores Inc. (NYSE:FDO)<br />

Fastenal Company (NasdaqGS:FAST)<br />

Federated Investors, Inc. (NYSE:FIl)<br />

FedEx Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:FDX)<br />

Fidelity Nati<strong>on</strong>al Informati<strong>on</strong> Services, Inc. (NYSE:FIS)<br />

Fifth Third Bancorp (NasdaqGS:FITB)<br />

First Horiz<strong>on</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:FHN)<br />

First Solar, Inc. (NasdaqGS:FSLR)<br />

FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE:FE)<br />

Fiserv, Inc. (NasdaqGS:FISV)<br />

FUR Systems, Inc. (NasdaqGS:FLlR)<br />

Flowserve Corp. (NYSE:FLS)<br />

Fluor Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:FLR)<br />

FMC Corp. (NYSE:FMC)<br />

FMC Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:FTI)<br />

Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F)<br />

Forest Laboratories Inc. (NYSE:FRX)<br />

Fossil, Inc. (NasdaqGS:FOSL)<br />

Franklin Resources Inc. (NYSE:BEN)<br />

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. (NYSE:FCX)<br />

Fr<strong>on</strong>tier Communicati<strong>on</strong>s Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:FTR)<br />

GameStop Corp. (NYSE:GME)<br />

Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE:GCI)<br />

Gap Inc. (NYSE:GPS)<br />

General Dynamics Corp. (NYSE:GD)<br />

Genera! Electric Company (NYSE:GE)<br />

General Mills, Inc. (NYSE:GIS)<br />

Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPCj<br />

Genworth Financial Inc. (NYSE:GNW)<br />

Gilead Sciences Inc. (NasdaqGS:GILD)<br />

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (NYSE:GT)<br />

Google Inc. (NasdaqGS:GOOG)<br />

H&R Block, Inc. (NYSE:HRB)<br />

H. J. Heinz Company (NYSE:HNZ)<br />

Halliburt<strong>on</strong> Company (NYSE:HAL)<br />

Harley-Davids<strong>on</strong>, Inc. (NYSE:HOG)<br />

Harman Internati<strong>on</strong>al Industries, Incorporated (NYSE:HAR)<br />

Harris Corp. (NYSE:HRS)<br />

Hasbro Inc. (NasdaqGS:HAS)<br />

HCP, Inc. (NYSE:HCP)<br />

Health Care REIT, Inc. (NYSE:HCN)<br />

Helmerich & Payne Inc. (NYSE:HP)<br />

Hess Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:HES)<br />

Hewlett-Packard Company {NYSE:HPQ}<br />

H<strong>on</strong>eywell Internati<strong>on</strong>al Inc. (NYSE:HON)<br />

Hormel Foods Corp. (NYSE:HRL)<br />

Hospira Inc. (NYSE:HSP)<br />

Host Hotels & Resorts Inc. (NYSE:HST)<br />

Huds<strong>on</strong> City Bancorp, Inc. (NasdaqGS:HCBK)<br />

Humana Inc. (NYSE:HUM)<br />

Huntingt<strong>on</strong> Bancshares Incorporated (NasdaqGS:HBAN)<br />

illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE:ITW)<br />

Ingersoll-Rand Pic (NYSE:IR)<br />

Integrys Energy Group, Inc. (NYSE:TEG)<br />

Intel Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:INTC)<br />

Interc<strong>on</strong>tinenta!Exchange, Inc. (NYSE:ICE)<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Business Machines Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:IBM)<br />

8,340.10<br />

14,928.70<br />

61,025.00<br />

18,565.70<br />

14,325.90<br />

12,062.00<br />

4,148.70<br />

50,171.90<br />

55,301.30<br />

36,249.80<br />

13,270.40<br />

12,167.60<br />

29,519.00<br />

7,976.40<br />

5,534.10<br />

18,241.50<br />

30,822.50<br />

7,057.20<br />

7,678.50<br />

51,121.80<br />

402,140.60<br />

7,465.80<br />

7,361.10<br />

12,844.20<br />

2,205.30<br />

27,491.80<br />

9,303.80<br />

13,829.60<br />

2,236.80<br />

1,645.50<br />

18,188.20<br />

9,696.30<br />

2,990.80<br />

6,515.00<br />

8,665.60<br />

7,374.00<br />

11,235.10<br />

35,889.60<br />

9,315.20<br />

5,113.80<br />

25,000.00<br />

33,812.20<br />

4,653.10<br />

2,541.00<br />

3,631.00<br />

17,222.30<br />

22,807.10<br />

216,561.90<br />

25,497.00<br />

9,613.20<br />

2,581.10<br />

43,888.60<br />

2,966.10<br />

222,722.80<br />

4,472.90<br />

17,920.20<br />

29,827.20<br />

9,526.30<br />

3,053.90<br />

5,299.60<br />

4,844.50<br />

19,887.00<br />

13,372.50<br />

4,679.00<br />

16,758.30<br />

33,501.40<br />

44,898.30<br />

7,616.30<br />

5,612.20<br />

11,026.60<br />

3,599.90<br />

11,274.60<br />

5,635.40<br />

27,622.80<br />

14,134.40<br />

4,233.70<br />

122,148.20<br />

9,937.80<br />

222,315.40<br />

0.06%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.46%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.38%<br />

0.42%<br />

0.27%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.38%<br />

3.03%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.27%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.17%<br />

1.63%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.33%<br />

0.02%<br />

1.68%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.34%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.92%<br />

0.07%<br />

1.67%<br />

1.88%<br />

3.40%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.25%<br />

2.97%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.36%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.15%<br />

2.61%<br />

4.88%<br />

0.63%<br />

1.63%<br />

1.57%<br />

2.24%<br />

5.76%<br />

1.01%<br />

1.53%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.61%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.32%<br />

1.76%<br />

4.52%<br />

0.64%<br />

2.54%<br />

2.11%<br />

0.45%<br />

0.00%<br />

5.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.41%<br />

1.13%<br />

1.24%<br />

0.66%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.14%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.92%<br />

3.46%<br />

8.66%<br />

5.24%<br />

5.24%<br />

1.40%<br />

3.11%<br />

3.28%<br />

3.36%<br />

3.13%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.83%<br />

3.70%<br />

1.10%<br />

1.48%<br />

1.30%<br />

2.81%<br />

3.84%<br />

4.36%<br />

5.07%<br />

0.61%<br />

0.79%<br />

3.13%<br />

2.55%<br />

2.09%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.83%<br />

4.45%<br />

1.48%<br />

2.43%<br />

2.43%<br />

1.37%<br />

5.04%<br />

3.62%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.74%<br />

7.67% 9.62%<br />

12.70% 16.32%<br />

14.00% 14.00%<br />

15.20% 16.55%<br />

1.73% 4.73%<br />

22.40% 22.40%<br />

16.90% 16.90%<br />

-6.33% -2.11 %<br />

15.40% 15.40%<br />

12.20% 15.54%<br />

14.30% 17.10%<br />

4.50% 9.49%<br />

16.00% 16.68%<br />

19.70% 21.49%<br />

11.60% 13.26%<br />

8.61% 10.95%<br />

1.72% 7.53%<br />

13.30% 14.38%<br />

11.30% 12.92%<br />

17.40% 17.40%<br />

4.41% 7.08%<br />

20.80% 20.80%<br />

14.40% 15.82%<br />

16.60% 18.51%<br />

8.07% 12.77%<br />

13.50% 14.18%<br />

11.60% 14.29%<br />

7.24% 9.43%<br />

11.60% 12.07%<br />

-3.00% -3.00%<br />

0.78% 5.83%<br />

11.80% 11.80%<br />

9.44% 10.92%<br />

10.30% 11.49%<br />

15.30% 16.63%<br />

10.70% 11.40%<br />

20,60% 20.60%<br />

5.84% 8.04%<br />

8.94% 8.94%<br />

20.30% 20.30%<br />

10.70% 11.67%<br />

3.85% 7.38%<br />

4.45% 13.30%<br />

9.40% 14.89%<br />

7.23% 12.66%<br />

10.80% 12.28%<br />

6.72% 9.93%<br />

12.70% 16.19%<br />

7.22% 10.70%<br />

8.23% 11.49%<br />

5.00% 5.00%<br />

18.40% 18.40%<br />

46.30% 46.30%<br />

16.80% 16.80%<br />

10.40% 15.48%<br />

7.15% 10.98%<br />

20.40% 21.61 %<br />

13.50% 15.08%<br />

20.00% 21.43%<br />

3.30% 6.16%<br />

8.87% 12.88%<br />

5.49% 9.97%<br />

6.40% 11.63%<br />

10.40% 11.04%<br />

4.21% 5.02%<br />

2.38% 5.55%<br />

12.90% 15.61%<br />

11.00% 13.20%<br />

8.71% 8.71%<br />

14.50% 16.46%<br />

-2.43% 1.97%<br />

9.61% 11.16%<br />

6.08% 8.58%<br />

9.72% 12.27%<br />

12.40% 13.85%<br />

4.67% 9.83%<br />

10.10% 13.90%<br />

12.20% 12.20%<br />

11.10% 12.94%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

-0.01%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.28%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.22%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 12 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company (Ticker)<br />

(4)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

(5)<br />

Weight in Index<br />

(6)<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

rn (8)<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g.Term<br />

Growth Est. DCF Resu!t<br />

(9)<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (NYSE:IFF)<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Game Technology {NYSE:IGTJ<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Paper Company (NYSE:IP)<br />

Intuit Inc. {NasdaqGS:INTUJ<br />

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (NasdaqGS:ISRG)<br />

Invesco Ltd. (NYSE:IVZ)<br />

Ir<strong>on</strong> Mountain Inc. (NYSE:IRM)<br />

J. C. Penney Company, Inc. (NYSE:JCP)<br />

Jabil Circuillnc. (NYSE:JBL)<br />

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (NYSE:JEC)<br />

JDS Uniphase Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:JDSU)<br />

Johns<strong>on</strong> & Johns<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:JNJ)<br />

Johns<strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>trols Inc. (NYSE:JCI)<br />

Joy Global, Inc. (NYSE:JOY)<br />

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)<br />

Juniper Networks, Inc. (NYSE:JNPR)<br />

Kellogg Company (NYSE:K)<br />

KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY)<br />

Kimberly·Clark Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:KMB)<br />

Kimco Realty Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:KIM)<br />

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI)<br />

KLA·Tencor Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:KLAC)<br />

Kohl's Corp. (NYSE:KSS)<br />

Kraft Foods Inc. (NasdaqGS:KFT)<br />

L·3 Communicati<strong>on</strong>s Holdings Inc. (NYSE:LLL)<br />

Laboratory Corp. <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> America Holdings (NYSE:LH)<br />

Lam Research Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:LRCX)<br />

Legg Mas<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NYSE:LM)<br />

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE:LEG)<br />

Lennar Corp. (NYSE:LEN)<br />

Leucadia Nati<strong>on</strong>al Corp. (NYSE:LUK)<br />

Lexmark Internati<strong>on</strong>al Inc. (NYSE:LXK)<br />

Ufe Technologies Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:LIFE)<br />

Limited Brands,lnc. (NYSE:LTD)<br />

Lincoln Nati<strong>on</strong>al Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:LNC)<br />

Linear Technology Corp. (NasdaqGS:LL TC)<br />

Lockheed Martin Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:LMT)<br />

Loews Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:L)<br />

Lorillard, Inc. (NYSE:LO)<br />

Lowe's Companies Inc. (NYSE:LOW)<br />

LSI Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:LSI)<br />

M&T Bank Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MTB)<br />

Macy's, Inc. (NYSE:M)<br />

Marath<strong>on</strong> Oil Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MRO)<br />

Marath<strong>on</strong> Petroleum Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MPC)<br />

Marriott Internati<strong>on</strong>al, Inc. (NYSE:MAR)<br />

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC)<br />

Masco Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MAS)<br />

Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA)<br />

Mattei, Inc. (NasdaqGS:MAT)<br />

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (NYSE:MKC)<br />

McD<strong>on</strong>ald's Corp. (NYSE:MCD)<br />

McKess<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MCK)<br />

Mead Johns<strong>on</strong> Nutriti<strong>on</strong> Company (NYSE:MJN)<br />

MeadWestvaco Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MWV)<br />

Medtr<strong>on</strong>ic, Inc. (NYSE:MDT)<br />

Merck & Co. Inc. (NYSE:MRK)<br />

MetUfe, Inc. (NYSE:MET)<br />

MetroPCS Communicati<strong>on</strong>s, Inc. (NYSE:PCS)<br />

Microchip Technology Inc. (NasdaqGS:MCHP)<br />

Micr<strong>on</strong> Technology Inc. (NasdaqGS:MU)<br />

Micros<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:MSFT)<br />

Molex Incorporated (NasdaqGS:MOLX)<br />

Mols<strong>on</strong> Coors Brewing Company (NYSE:TAP)<br />

M<strong>on</strong>santo Co. (NYSE:MON)<br />

M<strong>on</strong>ster Beverage Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:MNST)<br />

Moody's Corp. (NYSE:MCO)<br />

Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS)<br />

Motorola Soluti<strong>on</strong>s, Inc. (NYSE:MSI)<br />

Murphy Oil Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:MUR)<br />

Mylan, Inc. (NasdaqGS:MYL)<br />

Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR)<br />

Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. (NasdaqGS:NDAQ)<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al Oilwell Varco, Inc. (NYSE:NOV)<br />

NetApp, Inc. (NasdaqGS:NTAP)<br />

Netflix, Inc. (NasdaqGS:NFLX)<br />

Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NYSE:NWL)<br />

Newfield Explorati<strong>on</strong> Co. (NYSE:NFX)<br />

Newm<strong>on</strong>t Mining Corp. (NYSE:NEM)<br />

4,890.20<br />

3,237.30<br />

14,948.10<br />

17,194.30<br />

19,611.20<br />

10,605.30<br />

5,588.60<br />

5,674.50<br />

4,409.60<br />

5,122.20<br />

2,595.00<br />

185,438.60<br />

18,363.00<br />

5,468.60<br />

140,591.90<br />

9,315.30<br />

18,119.30<br />

7,925.10<br />

33,064.20<br />

8,338.50<br />

36,995.80<br />

8,678.80<br />

12,192.10<br />

74,242.40<br />

6,668.00<br />

8,464.10<br />

6,131.00<br />

3,342.70<br />

3,372.90<br />

6,003.40<br />

5,163.10<br />

1,450.70<br />

8,451.00<br />

13,928.10<br />

6,507.50<br />

7,529.80<br />

29,188.30<br />

16,136.40<br />

16,533.10<br />

33,454.20<br />

4,332.30<br />

11,077.50<br />

16,616.90<br />

19,352.30<br />

17,182.10<br />

12,145.90<br />

18,562.50<br />

5,017.30<br />

52,961.90<br />

11,922.30<br />

8,264.00<br />

89,800.80<br />

20,580.00<br />

14,995.00<br />

4,984.30<br />

42,241.90<br />

131,723.60<br />

36,116.50<br />

3.590.60<br />

6,666.90<br />

6,196.80<br />

254,729.50<br />

4,321.80<br />

8,053.80<br />

46,164.10<br />

10,100.60<br />

8,829.80<br />

30,640.10<br />

13,633.90<br />

9,951.80<br />

9,595.20<br />

4,233.80<br />

3,880.20<br />

33,290.80<br />

12,578.00<br />

3,106.00<br />

5,189.70<br />

4,363.80<br />

24,545.20<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.02%<br />

1.40%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.04%<br />

1.06%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.28%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.56%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.40%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.68%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.32%<br />

0.99%<br />

0.27%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.05%<br />

1.92%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.35%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.18%<br />

2.25%<br />

1.95%<br />

3.04%<br />

1.16%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.91%<br />

3.29%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.40%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.62%<br />

2.65%<br />

1.31%<br />

3.23%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.47%<br />

2.37%<br />

3.54%<br />

3.74%<br />

3.91%<br />

3.12%<br />

2.45%<br />

2.79%<br />

2.85%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.79%<br />

4.72%<br />

0.49%<br />

1.17%<br />

5.53%<br />

0.00%<br />

8.23%<br />

1.38%<br />

3.03%<br />

4.39%<br />

0.62%<br />

4.94%<br />

2.25%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.22%<br />

1.98%<br />

2.44%<br />

2.71%<br />

1.38%<br />

2.69%<br />

2.12%<br />

0.28%<br />

3.53%<br />

2.02%<br />

3.13%<br />

0.92%<br />

1.64%<br />

3.48%<br />

2.56%<br />

3.90%<br />

2.17%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.60%<br />

3.31%<br />

2.87%<br />

1.38%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.62%<br />

1.33%<br />

2.18%<br />

2.44%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.27%<br />

0.61%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.23%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.76%<br />

7.33% 9.66%<br />

12.10% 14.17%<br />

6.00% 9.13%<br />

13.60% 14.84%<br />

20.40% 20.40%<br />

10.70% 13.77%<br />

14.20% 17.72%<br />

31.40% 31.40%<br />

13.50% 14.99%<br />

14.70% 14.70%<br />

12.00% 12.00%<br />

6.71% 10.45%<br />

16.50% 19.37%<br />

15.20% 16.61%<br />

5.70% 9.02%<br />

16.10% 16.10%<br />

7.45% 11.05%<br />

5.49% 7.93%<br />

8.44% 12.13%<br />

4.00% 7.81%<br />

15.60% 19.81%<br />

10.00% 13.28%<br />

13.40% 16.01%<br />

9.30% 12.22%<br />

1.88% 4.76%<br />

11.80% 11.80%<br />

10.00% 10.00%<br />

14.70% 16.62%<br />

15.00% 20.07%<br />

8.00% 8.51%<br />

0.00% 1.17%<br />

-9.45% 4.18%<br />

9.44% 9.44%<br />

12.40% 21.14%<br />

8.55% 9.99%<br />

11.00% 14.20%<br />

5.90% 10.42%<br />

0.00% 0.62%<br />

8.59% 13.74%<br />

15.00% 17.42%<br />

16.00% 16.00%<br />

10.20% 13.58%<br />

12.50% 14.60%<br />

-3.61% -1.21%<br />

12.30% 15.18%<br />

19.40% 20.91%<br />

11.10% 13.94%<br />

10.00% 12.23%<br />

18.30% 18.61%<br />

8.60% 12.28%<br />

9.08% 11.19%<br />

9.74% 13.02%<br />

13.60% 14.58%<br />

11.70% 13.44%<br />

10.00% 13.65%<br />

6.32% 8.96%<br />

4.66% 8.65%<br />

12.60% 14.91%<br />

12.60% 12.60%<br />

9.00% 13.22%<br />

11.70% 11.70%<br />

9.13% 11.85%<br />

11.50% 15.00%<br />

3.34% 6.26%<br />

15.10% 16.58%<br />

19.70% 19.70%<br />

14.40% 16.14%<br />

12.10% 13.51%<br />

18.90% 21.29%<br />

8.20% 10.74%<br />

10.90% 10.90%<br />

11.30% 11.30%<br />

8.86% 11.23%<br />

18.60% 19.27%<br />

13.00% 13.00%<br />

19.40% 19.40%<br />

8.16% 10.48%<br />

6.35% 6.35%<br />

-3.00% -0.28%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 130115<br />

Company (Ticker)<br />

[4)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[5)<br />

Weight in Index<br />

[5}<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term<br />

Growth Est.<br />

[8J<br />

DCF Result<br />

[91<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

News Corp. (NasdaqGS:NWSA)<br />

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE)<br />

Nike Inc. (NYSE:NKE)<br />

NiSource Inc. (NYSE:NI)<br />

Noble Corp. (NYSE:NE)<br />

Noble Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NBLj<br />

Nordstrom Inc. (NYSE:JWN)<br />

Norfolk Southem Corp. (NYSE:NSC)<br />

Northeast Utilities (NYSE:NU)<br />

Northern Trust Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:NTRS)<br />

Northrop Grumman Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:NOC)<br />

NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG)<br />

Nucor Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:NUE)<br />

NVIDIA Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:NVDA)<br />

NYSE Eur<strong>on</strong>ext, Inc. (NYSE:NYX)<br />

O'Reilly Automotive Inc. (NasdaqGS:ORL y)<br />

Occidental Petroleum Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:OXY)<br />

Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE:OMC)<br />

ONEOK Inc. (NYSE:OKE)<br />

Oracle Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:ORCL)<br />

Owens-Illinois, Inc. (NYSE:OI)<br />

PACCAR Inc. (NasdaqGS:PCAR)<br />

Pall Corp. (NYSE:PLL)<br />

Parker Hannifin Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:PH)<br />

Patters<strong>on</strong> Companies, Inc. (NasdaqGS:PDCO)<br />

Paychex, Inc. (NasdaqGS:PAYX)<br />

Peabody Energy Corp. (NYSE:BTU)<br />

People's United Rnanciallnc. (NasdaqGS:PBCT)<br />

Pepco Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:POM)<br />

Pepsico, Inc. (NYSE:PEP)<br />

PerklnElmer Inc. (NYSE:PKI)<br />

Perrigo Co. (NasdaqGS:PRGO)<br />

Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE)<br />

PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG)<br />

Philip Morris Internati<strong>on</strong>al, Inc. (NYSE:PM)<br />

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX)<br />

Pinnacle West Capital Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:PNW)<br />

Pi<strong>on</strong>eer Natural Resources Co. (NYSE:PXD)<br />

Pitney Bowes Inc. (NYSE:PBI)<br />

Plum Creek Timber Co. Inc. (NYSE:PCL)<br />

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. (NYSE:PNC)<br />

PPG Industries Inc. (NYSE:PPG)<br />

PPL Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:PPL)<br />

Praxair Inc. (NYSE:PX)<br />

Precisi<strong>on</strong> Castparts Corp. (NYSE:PCP)<br />

priceline.com Incorporated (NasdaqGS:PCLN)<br />

Principal Financial Group Inc. (NYSE:PFG)<br />

Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE:PG)<br />

Progressive Corp. (NYSE:PGR)<br />

Prolog is, Inc. (NYSE:PLD)<br />

Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU)<br />

Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (NYSE:PEG)<br />

Public Storage (NYSE:PSA)<br />

PulteGroup, Inc. (NYSE:PHM)<br />

OEP Resources, Inc. (NYSE:OEP)<br />

QUALCOMM Incorporated (NasdaqGS:OCOM)<br />

Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE:PWR)<br />

Quest Diagnostics Inc. (NYSE:DGX)<br />

R.R. D<strong>on</strong>nelley & S<strong>on</strong>s Company (NasdaqGS:RRD)<br />

Ralph Lauren Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:RLj<br />

Range Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:RRC)<br />

Raythe<strong>on</strong> Co. (NYSE:RTN)<br />

Red Hat, Inc. (NYSE:RHT)<br />

Regi<strong>on</strong>s Financial Corp. (NYSE:RF)<br />

Republic Services, Inc. (NYSE:RSG)<br />

Reynolds American Inc. (NYSE:RAI)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Robert</str<strong>on</strong>g> Half Internati<strong>on</strong>al Inc. (NYSE:RHI)<br />

Rockwell Automati<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NYSE:ROK)<br />

Rockwell Collins Inc. (NYSE:COLj<br />

Roper Industries Inc. (NYSE:ROP)<br />

Ross Stores Inc. (NasdaqGS:ROST)<br />

Rowan Companies pic (NYSE:RDC)<br />

Ryder System, Inc. (NYSE:R)<br />

Safeway Inc. (NYSE:SWY)<br />

SAIC, Inc. (NYSE:SAI)<br />

salesforce.com, Inc (NYSE:CRM)<br />

SanDisk Corp. (NasdaqGS:SNDK)<br />

SCANA Corp. (NYSE:SCG)<br />

Schtumberger Limited (NYSE:SLB)<br />

55,688.00<br />

28,405.10<br />

44,143.90<br />

7,037.20<br />

9,417.10<br />

15,346.10<br />

11,591.40<br />

22,704.90<br />

11,927.70<br />

11,244.20<br />

16,501.30<br />

4,905.50<br />

11,780.90<br />

8,223.50<br />

6,258.20<br />

9,917.70<br />

67,314.70<br />

13,713.90<br />

9,227.50<br />

154,140.70<br />

2,817.70<br />

13,839.70<br />

6,478.30<br />

11,957.00<br />

3,688.20<br />

12,137.90<br />

5,608.20<br />

4,072.00<br />

4,449.50<br />

112,798.80<br />

3,143.80<br />

10,345.40<br />

177,587.00<br />

17,901.50<br />

151,091.30<br />

26,587.80<br />

5,718.20<br />

11,966.50<br />

2,646.40<br />

6,638.60<br />

33,003.20<br />

16,516.30<br />

17,195.60<br />

31,078.50<br />

23,321.10<br />

29,740.00<br />

8,068.60<br />

185,845.70<br />

11,823.80<br />

15,875.00<br />

25,457.60<br />

16,026.80<br />

25,158.30<br />

5,276.60<br />

5,098.40<br />

103,580.70<br />

5,129.90<br />

9,652.10<br />

1,990.10<br />

14,313.00<br />

10,380.70<br />

18,742.50<br />

11,008.30<br />

9,907.50<br />

10,041.50<br />

26,270.80<br />

3,682.60<br />

10,099.20<br />

6,917.10<br />

10,024.40<br />

15,670.90<br />

4,360.50<br />

2,045.40<br />

3,788.90<br />

4,136.20<br />

20,132.80<br />

9,876.80<br />

6,289.20<br />

94,776.30<br />

0.42%<br />

0.21%<br />

0.33%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.51%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.07%<br />

1.16%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.85%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.08%<br />

1.34%<br />

0.13%<br />

1.14%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.23%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.06%<br />

1.40%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.78%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.71%<br />

0.73%<br />

3.57%<br />

1.48%<br />

3.94%<br />

1.43%<br />

1.00%<br />

1.87%<br />

2.76%<br />

3.64%<br />

2.58%<br />

3.29%<br />

1.69%<br />

3.88%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.79%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.54%<br />

2.34%<br />

2.96%<br />

0.76%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.76%<br />

1.51%<br />

2.05%<br />

1.65%<br />

3.85%<br />

1.57%<br />

5.35%<br />

5.59%<br />

2.97%<br />

1.03%<br />

0.29%<br />

3.69%<br />

4.19%<br />

3.45%<br />

1.90%<br />

4.09%<br />

0.08%<br />

11.20%<br />

4.10%<br />

2.57%<br />

2.15%<br />

4.91%<br />

2.09%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.06%<br />

3.35%<br />

2.08%<br />

3.28%<br />

2.66%<br />

4.49%<br />

3.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.28%<br />

1.63%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.12%<br />

9.47%<br />

1.01%<br />

0.25%<br />

3.54%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.58%<br />

3.40%<br />

5.12%<br />

2.28%<br />

2.61%<br />

2.46%<br />

0.54%<br />

0.81%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.10%<br />

4.47%<br />

3.93%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

4.18%<br />

1.52%<br />

17.00%<br />

5.65%<br />

13.60%<br />

8.00%<br />

10.10%<br />

7.70%<br />

12.20%<br />

14.10%<br />

6.08%<br />

12.70%<br />

1.25%<br />

20.60%<br />

6.35%<br />

12.60%<br />

7.83%<br />

16.60%<br />

-5.76%<br />

9.97%<br />

14.40%<br />

12.50%<br />

10.30%<br />

16.90%<br />

12.50%<br />

5.00%<br />

10.60%<br />

10.10%<br />

11.50%<br />

10.30%<br />

5.30%<br />

5.43%<br />

11.80%<br />

12.70%<br />

2.79%<br />

6.68%<br />

10.50%<br />

7.85%<br />

6.35%<br />

17.30%<br />

0.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

5.40%<br />

8.16%<br />

-0.34%<br />

11.50%<br />

14.20%<br />

20.70%<br />

14.10%<br />

6.93%<br />

6.74%<br />

9.26%<br />

12.00%<br />

2.24%<br />

6.07%<br />

28.40%<br />

19.50%<br />

13.80%<br />

15.20%<br />

11.20%<br />

5.20%<br />

14.00%<br />

-2.45%<br />

7.42%<br />

19.00%<br />

7.60%<br />

8.40%<br />

7.34%<br />

17.40%<br />

13.00%<br />

8.82%<br />

14.00%<br />

13.70%<br />

19.90%<br />

11.20%<br />

9.67%<br />

6.00%<br />

26.50%<br />

12.50%<br />

4.48%<br />

20.50%<br />

17.79%<br />

9.32%<br />

15.18%<br />

12.10%<br />

11.60%<br />

8.74%<br />

14.18%<br />

17.05%<br />

9.83%<br />

15.44%<br />

4.56%<br />

22.46%<br />

10.35%<br />

12.60%<br />

12.81%<br />

16.60%<br />

-3.29%<br />

12.43%<br />

17.57%<br />

13.31%<br />

10.30%<br />

20.98%<br />

14.10%<br />

7.10%<br />

12.34%<br />

14.14%<br />

13.16%<br />

15.93%<br />

11.04%<br />

8.48%<br />

12.89%<br />

13.01%<br />

6.53%<br />

11.01%<br />

14.13%<br />

9.82%<br />

10.57%<br />

17.39%<br />

11.20%<br />

9.20%<br />

8.04%<br />

10.40%<br />

4.56%<br />

13.71%<br />

14.28%<br />

20.70%<br />

17.38%<br />

10.40%<br />

8.89%<br />

12.69%<br />

14.82%<br />

6.78%<br />

9.18%<br />

28.40%<br />

19.81%<br />

15.54%<br />

15.20%<br />

12.38%<br />

14.92%<br />

15.08%<br />

-2.21%<br />

11.09%<br />

19.00%<br />

8.20%<br />

11.94%<br />

12.65%<br />

19.88%<br />

15.78%<br />

11.39%<br />

14.57%<br />

14.56%<br />

19.90%<br />

14.47%<br />

14.36%<br />

10.05%<br />

26.50%<br />

12.50%<br />

8.75%<br />

22.18%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

-0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.Q1%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.16%


Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 14 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

Company (TIcker)<br />

[4)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

(5)<br />

Weight in Index<br />

(6]<br />

Estimated<br />

Dividend Yield<br />

m<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-Term<br />

Growth Est.<br />

[8]<br />

DCF Result<br />

[9]<br />

Weighted<br />

DCF Result<br />

Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc. (NYSE:SNI)<br />

Seagate Technology Publlc limited Company (NasdaqGS:STX)<br />

Sealed Air Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:SEE)<br />

Sears Holdings Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:SHLD)<br />

Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE)<br />

Sigma-AldriCh Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:SIAL)<br />

Sim<strong>on</strong> Property Group Inc. (NYSE:SPG)<br />

SLM Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:SLM)<br />

Snap-<strong>on</strong> Inc. (NYSE:SNA)<br />

Southern Company (NYSE:SO)<br />

Southwest Airlines Co. (NYSE:LUV)<br />

Southwestern Energy Co. (NYSE:SWN)<br />

Spectra Energy Corp. (NYSE:SE)<br />

Sprint NeJdel Corp. (NYSE:S)<br />

SI. Jude Medical Inc. (NYSE:STJ)<br />

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (NYSE:SWK)<br />

Staples, Inc. (NasdaqGS:SPLS)<br />

Starbucks Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:SBUX)<br />

Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. (NYSE:HOT)<br />

State Street Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:STT)<br />

Stericycle, Inc. (NasdaqGS:SRCL)<br />

Stryker Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:SYK)<br />

Sunoco, Inc. (NYSE:SUN)<br />

SunTrust Banks, Inc. (NYSE:STI)<br />

Symantec Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:SYMC)<br />

Sysco Corp. (NYSE:SYV)<br />

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NasdaqGS:TROW)<br />

Target Corp. (NYSE:TGT)<br />

TE C<strong>on</strong>nectivity Ltd. (NYSE:TEL)<br />

TECO Energy, Jnc. (NYSE:TE)<br />

Tenet Healthcare Corp. (NYSE:THC)<br />

Teradata Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:TDC)<br />

Teradyne Inc. (NYSE:TER)<br />

Tesoro Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:TSO)<br />

Texas Instruments Inc. (NasdaqGS:TXN)<br />

Textr<strong>on</strong> inc. (NYSE:TXT)<br />

The AES Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:AES)<br />

The Allstate Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:ALL)<br />

The Bank <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> New York Mell<strong>on</strong> Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:BK)<br />

The Boeing Company (NYSE:BA)<br />

The Charles Schwab Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:SCHW)<br />

The Chubb Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:CB)<br />

The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX)<br />

The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO)<br />

The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE:DOW)<br />

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (NYSE:EL)<br />

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS)<br />

The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE:HIG)<br />

The Hershey Company (NYSE:HSY)<br />

The Home Depot, Inc. (NYSE:HD)<br />

The Interpublic Group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Companies. Inc. (NYSE:IPG)<br />

The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM)<br />

The Kroger Co. (NYSE:KR)<br />

The McGraw-HIli Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MHP)<br />

The Mosaic Company (NYSE:MOS)<br />

The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW)<br />

The T JX Companies, Inc. (NYSE:T JX)<br />

The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV)<br />

The Washingt<strong>on</strong> Post Company (NYSE:WPO)<br />

The Western Uni<strong>on</strong> Company (NYSE:WUj<br />

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (NYSE:TMO)<br />

Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TJF)<br />

Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE:TWC)<br />

Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:lWX)<br />

Titanium Metals Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:TIE)<br />

Torchmark Corp. (NYSE:TMK)<br />

Total System Services, Inc. (NYSE:TSS)<br />

TripAdvisor Inc. (NasdaqGS:TRIPj<br />

Tyco Internati<strong>on</strong>al Ltd. (NYSE:TYC)<br />

Tys<strong>on</strong> Foods Inc. (NYSE:TSN)<br />

U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USBj<br />

Uni<strong>on</strong> Pacific Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:UNP)<br />

United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPSj<br />

United States Steel Corp. (NYSE:X)<br />

United Technologies Corp. (NYSE:UTX)<br />

Unitedhealth Group, Inc. (NYSE:UNH)<br />

Unum Group (NYSE:UNM)<br />

Urban Outfitters Inc. (NasdaqGS:URBN)<br />

V.F. Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:VFC)<br />

8,990.20<br />

12,871.50<br />

2,741.50<br />

NIA<br />

15,865.30<br />

8,512040<br />

48,153.60<br />

7,423.60<br />

4,072.40<br />

39,777.00<br />

6,576.20<br />

10,880.40<br />

18,587.20<br />

14,401.80<br />

12,062.70<br />

11,086.60<br />

7,410.60<br />

37,627.60<br />

10,821.60<br />

19,988.30<br />

7,838.00<br />

20,475.50<br />

5,000040<br />

13,633040<br />

12,550.80<br />

17,768.30<br />

15,736.40<br />

41,807.90<br />

14,973.40<br />

3,788.00<br />

2,212.90<br />

13,053.00<br />

2,922.70<br />

5,464.60<br />

32,750.40<br />

7,419.70<br />

8,444.90<br />

18,136.30<br />

26,638.30<br />

53,279.90<br />

16,983.80<br />

19,686.10<br />

9,460.50<br />

167,831.70<br />

34,313.80<br />

23,146.90<br />

52,821.90<br />

7,713.90<br />

16,414.30<br />

85,607.60<br />

4,681.60<br />

9,502.00<br />

12,168.20<br />

14,424.70<br />

24,146.00<br />

14,690.70<br />

33,978.40<br />

24,909.50<br />

2,641.90<br />

10,638.20<br />

20,949.80<br />

7,660.30<br />

27,107.20<br />

39,238.00<br />

2,099.00<br />

4,914.00<br />

4,385.80<br />

4,931.80<br />

25,789.80<br />

5,751.20<br />

62,772.30<br />

57,903.30<br />

70,637.10<br />

2,709.50<br />

71,438.50<br />

56,344040<br />

5,462.70<br />

5,519.50<br />

16,623.30<br />

0.07%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.02%<br />

NIA<br />

0.12%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.36%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.30%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.28%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.31%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.25%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.14%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.40%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.07%<br />

1.26%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.40%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.12%<br />

0.64%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.09%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.18%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.26%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.16%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.20%<br />

0.30%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.19%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.47%<br />

0.44%<br />

0.53%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.54%<br />

0.42%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.13%<br />

0.81%<br />

4.00%<br />

3.64%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.63%<br />

1.13%<br />

2.65%<br />

3.17%<br />

1.96%<br />

4.32%<br />

0.45%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.96%<br />

0.00%<br />

2.44%<br />

2.98%<br />

4.03%<br />

1.37%<br />

0.91%<br />

2.31%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.60%<br />

1.70%<br />

0.80%<br />

0.00%<br />

3.56%<br />

2.21%<br />

2.25%<br />

2.39%<br />

5.07%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.21%<br />

2.34%<br />

0.30%<br />

1040%<br />

2.36%<br />

2.31%<br />

2.46%<br />

1.78%<br />

2.22%<br />

3.52%<br />

2.73%<br />

4.37%<br />

0.88%<br />

1.74%<br />

2.23%<br />

2.12%<br />

2.04%<br />

2.26%<br />

2.45%<br />

2.06%<br />

1.99%<br />

1.73%<br />

1.09%<br />

1.00%<br />

2.84%<br />

2.78%<br />

2.27%<br />

0.91%<br />

2.07%<br />

2.52%<br />

2.50%<br />

2045%<br />

1.17%<br />

1.73%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.89%<br />

1.02%<br />

2.33%<br />

1.98%<br />

3.09%<br />

1.03%<br />

2.68%<br />

1.57%<br />

2.67%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.89%<br />

13.20%<br />

21.20%<br />

8043%<br />

0.00%<br />

5.20%<br />

8.21%<br />

7.29%<br />

5.30%<br />

10.00%<br />

5.52%<br />

38.60%<br />

-3.07%<br />

5.20%<br />

-98.70%<br />

9.55%<br />

9.95%<br />

7.65%<br />

18.60%<br />

20.80%<br />

10.70%<br />

16.60%<br />

10.40%<br />

-2.09%<br />

16.50%<br />

8.51%<br />

8.63%<br />

13.00%<br />

12.40%<br />

13.00%<br />

2.96%<br />

11.20%<br />

15.80%<br />

11.90%<br />

20.70%<br />

9.66%<br />

29.90%<br />

8.20%<br />

9.17%<br />

9.70%<br />

10.20%<br />

11.60%<br />

9.07%<br />

7.29%<br />

8.86%<br />

8.88%<br />

14.70%<br />

18.90%<br />

13.50%<br />

9.38%<br />

15.10%<br />

16.40%<br />

8.14%<br />

8.38%<br />

11.30%<br />

11.60%<br />

11.80%<br />

12.80%<br />

10.60%<br />

0.00%<br />

11.00%<br />

11.80%<br />

14.40%<br />

17.20%<br />

12.30%<br />

15.00%<br />

9.40%<br />

10.50%<br />

15.90%<br />

16.70%<br />

7.33%<br />

8.67%<br />

15.60%<br />

11.30%<br />

5.33%<br />

10.90%<br />

12.50%<br />

9040%<br />

17.90%<br />

12.50%<br />

14.07%<br />

25.62%<br />

12.22%<br />

0.00%<br />

8.92%<br />

9.39%<br />

10.04%<br />

8.55%<br />

12.06%<br />

9.96%<br />

39.13%<br />

-3.07%<br />

9.26%<br />

-98.70%<br />

12.11%<br />

13.08%<br />

11.83%<br />

20.10%<br />

21.80%<br />

13.13%<br />

16.60%<br />

12.08%<br />

-0.41%<br />

17.36%<br />

8.51%<br />

12.34%<br />

15.35%<br />

14.79%<br />

15.55%<br />

8.11%<br />

11.20%<br />

15.80%<br />

11.90%<br />

22.04%<br />

12.11%<br />

30.24%<br />

9.66%<br />

11.64%<br />

12.12%<br />

12.79%<br />

13.48%<br />

11.39%<br />

10.94%<br />

11.71%<br />

13.44%<br />

15.64%<br />

20.80%<br />

15.88%<br />

11.60%<br />

17.29%<br />

18.85%<br />

10.69%<br />

10.53%<br />

13.40%<br />

13.43%<br />

12.95%<br />

13.86%<br />

13.59%<br />

2.78%<br />

13.39%<br />

12.76%<br />

16.62%<br />

19.94"10<br />

14.95%<br />

17.63%<br />

10.62%<br />

12.32%<br />

15.90%<br />

17.66%<br />

8.39%<br />

11.10%<br />

17.73%<br />

14.56%<br />

6.39%<br />

13.73%<br />

14.17%<br />

12.20%<br />

17.90%<br />

14.51%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

NIA<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

..Q.11%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.15%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.08%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.07%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.02%


Company (Ticker)<br />

Valero Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:VLO)<br />

Varian Medical Systems Inc. (NYSE:VAR)<br />

Ventas, Inc. (NYSE:VTR)<br />

VeriSign, Inc. (NasdaqGS:VRSN)<br />

Veriz<strong>on</strong> Communicati<strong>on</strong>s Inc. (NYSE:VZ)<br />

Viacom, Inc. (NasdaqGS:VIAB)<br />

Visa, Inc. (NYSE:V)<br />

Vomado Realty Trust (NYSE:VNO)<br />

Vulcan Materials Company (NYSE:VMC)<br />

W.W. Grainger. Inc. (NYSE:GWW)<br />

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:WMT)<br />

Walgreen Co. (NYSE:WAG)<br />

Walt Disney Co. (NYSE:DIS)<br />

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM)<br />

Waters Corp. (NYSE:WAT)<br />

Wats<strong>on</strong> Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE:WPI)<br />

Well Point Inc. (NYSE:WLP)<br />

Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE:WFC)<br />

Western Digital Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:WDC)<br />

Weyerhaeuser Co. (NYSE:WY)<br />

Whirlpool Corp. (NYSE:WHR)<br />

Whole Foods Market. Inc. (NasdaqGS:WFM)<br />

Wmiams Companies. Inc. (NYSE:WMB)<br />

Windstream Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NasdaqGS:WIN)<br />

Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin Energy Corp. (NYSE:WEC)<br />

WPX Energy, Inc. (NYSE:WPX)<br />

Wyndham Worldwide Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NYSE:WYN)<br />

Wynn Resorts Ltd. (NasdaqGS:WYNN)<br />

Xcel Energy Inc. (NYSE:XEL)<br />

Xerox Corp. (NYSE:XRX)<br />

Xilinx Inc. (NasdaqGS:XLNX)<br />

XL Group ptc (NYSE:XL)<br />

Xylem Inc. (NYSE:XYL)<br />

Yahool Inc. (NasdaqGS:YHOO)<br />

Yuml Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM)<br />

Zimmer Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:ZMH)<br />

Zi<strong>on</strong>s Bancom. (NasdagGS:ZION)<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] Equals sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Col. [9]<br />

[2] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[3] Equals [1]- [2]<br />

[4] Source: Capital 10<br />

[5] Equals weight In S&P 500 based <strong>on</strong> market capitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

[6] Source: Capital 10<br />

[7) Source: Capital IQ<br />

[8] Equals {[6] x {1 + (0.5 x [7)))) + [7)<br />

[9] Equals Col. [5] x Col. [8]<br />

[4) [5)<br />

Market<br />

Capitalizati<strong>on</strong> Weight in Index<br />

17,110.80 0.13%<br />

6,607.50 0.05%<br />

19,592.20 0.15%<br />

7,522.60 0.06%<br />

124,495.90 0.94%<br />

25,431.30 0.19%<br />

85,969.00 0.65%<br />

15,116.10 0.11%<br />

4,878.10 0.04%<br />

14,583.30 0.11%<br />

248,724.10 1.87%<br />

33,624.30 0.25%<br />

89,103.70 0.67%<br />

16,113.30 0.12%<br />

7.002.80 0.05%<br />

10,602.20 0.08%<br />

19,312.90 0.15%<br />

178,537.90 1.34%<br />

10,464.10 0.08%<br />

13.393.90 0.10%<br />

5,896.60 0.04%<br />

17.844.40 0.13%<br />

20,278.70 0.15%<br />

5,865.30 0.04%<br />

8,844.60 0.07%<br />

NfA<br />

NfA<br />

7,315.60 0.06%<br />

12,518.10 0.09%<br />

13,690.50 0.10%<br />

9,413.30 0.07%<br />

8,858.70 0.07%<br />

7,104.60 0.05%<br />

4,454.30 0.03%<br />

17,639.00 0.13%<br />

28,709.40 0.22%<br />

11,005.80 0.08%<br />

3.559.60 0.03%<br />

13,281.501.60<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

Page 15 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15<br />

[6) m (8) [91<br />

Estimated L<strong>on</strong>g-Term Weighted<br />

Dividend Yield Growth Est. DCF Result DCF Result<br />

2.24% 7.56% 9.88% 0.01%<br />

0.00% 12.10% 12.10% 0.01%<br />

3.79% 5.48% 9.37% 0.01%<br />

5.77% 15.00% 21.20% 0.01%<br />

4.66% 8.15% 13.00% 0.12%<br />

2.20% 15.50% 17.87% 0.03%<br />

0.69% 19.00% 19.75% 0.13%<br />

3.40% -4-.85% -1.53% 0.00%<br />

0.10% 9.75% 9.86% 0.00%<br />

1.55% 14.40% 16.06% 0.02%<br />

2.19% 9.52% 11.81% 0.22%<br />

3.08% 11.70% 14.96% 0.04%<br />

1.21% 12.40% 13.69% 0.09%<br />

4.11% 5.95% 10.18% 0.01%<br />

0.00% 9.99% 9.99% 0.01%<br />

0.00% 13.60% 13.60% 0.01%<br />

1.92% 10.00% 12.02% 0.02%<br />

2.88% 10.40% 13.43% 0.18%<br />

0.00% 5.03% 5.03% 0.00%<br />

2.41% 5.00% 7.47% 0.01%<br />

2.65% 0.00% 2.65% 0.00%<br />

0.58% 20.10% 20.74% 0.03%<br />

3.72% 13.00% 16.96% 0.03%<br />

10.10% -1.46% 8.57% 0.00%<br />

3.16% 5.44% 8.69% 0.01%<br />

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% NfA<br />

1.76% 20.20% 22.14% 0.01%<br />

6.78% 25.10% 32.73% 0.03%<br />

3.87% 5.31% 9.28% 0.01%<br />

2.31% 5.40% 7.77% 0.01%<br />

2.60% 12.70% 15.47% 0.01%<br />

1.90% 8.75% 10.73% 0.01%<br />

1.67% 11.00% 12.76% 0.00%<br />

0.00% 13.80% 13.80% 0.02%<br />

1.79% 13.00% 14.91% 0.03%<br />

1.17% 9.61% 10.84% 0.01%<br />

0.21% 7.33% 7.55% 0.00%<br />

13.13%


Exhibit No. RBH-6<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1<br />

Company<br />

Bloomberg, Value Line, and Calculated Beta Coefficients<br />

[1) [2)<br />

Ticker Bloomberg Value Line<br />

[3)<br />

Calculated<br />

AGL Resources Inc.<br />

Atmos Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Laclede Group, Inc. (The)<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc.<br />

South Jersey Industries, Inc.<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

WGL Holdings, Inc.<br />

Mean<br />

GAS 0.750 0.75<br />

ATO 0.694 0.70<br />

LG 0.661 0.55<br />

NJR 0.725 0.65<br />

NWN 0.661 0.60<br />

PNY 0.792 0.70<br />

SJI 0.783 0.65<br />

SWX 0.780 0.75<br />

WGL 0.757 0.65<br />

0.734 0.67<br />

0.752<br />

0.710<br />

0.655<br />

0.795<br />

0.594<br />

0.761<br />

0.787<br />

0.730<br />

0.798<br />

0.732<br />

Notes:<br />

[1J Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service<br />

[2J Source: Value Line<br />

[3J Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al Service; Beta coefficients calculated over 12-m<strong>on</strong>ths based <strong>on</strong> weekly returns


Exhibit No. RBH-7<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1<br />

Capital Asset Pricing Model Results<br />

Sharpe Ratio, Bloomberg, and CapitallQ Derived Market Risk Premium<br />

Natural Gas Proxy Group<br />

r11<br />

Risk-Free<br />

Rate<br />

[21<br />

Average<br />

Beta<br />

Coefficient<br />

[31 [41 [51<br />

Ex-Ante Market Risk Premium<br />

Bloomberg<br />

Market DCF<br />

Derived<br />

Sharpe<br />

Ratio<br />

Derived<br />

Capital [0<br />

Market DCF<br />

Derived<br />

[61 m [81<br />

CAPMResult<br />

Sharpe Bloomberg CapitallQ<br />

Ratio Market DCF Market DCF<br />

Derived Derived Derived<br />

PROXY GROUP 12-MONTH BETA COEFFICIENT<br />

Current 30-Year Treasury (30-day average) [9]<br />

Near-Term Pro'ected 30-Year TreasulV [101 -<br />

Mean<br />

2.71%<br />

3.00%<br />

0.732<br />

0.732<br />

8.21%<br />

8.21%<br />

10.64%<br />

10.64%<br />

10.42%<br />

10.42%<br />

8.72%<br />

9.01%<br />

8.87%<br />

10.50%<br />

10.78%<br />

10.64%<br />

10.33%<br />

10.62%<br />

10.48%<br />

Risk-Free<br />

Rate<br />

Average<br />

Beta<br />

Coefficient<br />

Ex-Ante Market Risk Premium<br />

Sharpe Bloomberg CapitallQ<br />

Ratio Market DCF Market DCF<br />

Derived Derived Derived<br />

Sharpe<br />

Ratio<br />

Derived<br />

CAPMResult<br />

Bloomberg CapitallQ<br />

Market DCF Market DCF<br />

Derived Derived<br />

PROXY GROUP BLOOMBERG BETA COEFFICIENT<br />

Current 30-YearTreasury (30-day average) [9] 2.71%<br />

Near-Term Pro·ected 30-Year Treasurv f"10·1· 3.00%<br />

Mean<br />

0.734<br />

0.734<br />

8.21% 10.64% 10.42%<br />

8.21% 10.64% 10.42%<br />

8.74%<br />

9.03%<br />

8.88%<br />

10.52%<br />

10.80%<br />

10.66%<br />

10.36%<br />

10.64%<br />

10.50%<br />

Risk-Free<br />

Average<br />

Beta<br />

Sharpe<br />

Ratio<br />

Bloomberg<br />

Market DCF<br />

PROXY GROUP VALUE LINE AVERAGE BETA COEFFICIENT<br />

Current 30-YearTreasury (30-day average) [9] 2.71% 0.667<br />

8.21% 10.64% 10.42%<br />

8.19%<br />

9.81%<br />

9.66%<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] See Notes [9] and [10}<br />

[2] Source: Exhibit No. RBH-6<br />

[3] Source: Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

[4] Source: Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

[5] Source: Exhibit No. RBH-5<br />

[6] Equals Col. [1] + (Col. [2] x Col. [3])<br />

[7] Equals Col. [1] + (Col. [21 x Col. [4])<br />

[8] Equals Col. [1] + (Col. [2] x Col. [5])<br />

[9) Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

[10] Source: Blue Chip Financial Forecasts, Vol. 31, No.8, August 1, 2012, at2


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

B<strong>on</strong>d Yield Plus Risk Premium<br />

[1] [2] f3]<br />

3O-Year<br />

Treasury<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Sio e Yield<br />

-3.24% -2.95%<br />

Current 2.71%<br />

Near Term Projected 3.00%<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g Term Pro!ected 5.30%<br />

[4]<br />

Risk<br />

Premium<br />

7.41%<br />

7.12%<br />

5.44%<br />

[5]<br />

Retum<strong>on</strong><br />

E ui<br />

10.13%<br />

10.12%<br />

10.74%<br />

Notes:<br />

[1] C<strong>on</strong>stant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> regressi<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong><br />

[2] Slope <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> regressi<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong><br />

[3] Source: Current = Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al,<br />

Near Term Projected = Blue Chip Financial Forecasts, Vol. 31, No.8, August 1, 2012, at 2,<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g Term Projected = Blue Chip Financial Forecasts, Vol. 31, No.6, June 1, 2012, at 14<br />

[4) Equals (1) + In([3]) x [2]<br />

[5] Equals [3] + (4)<br />

[6] Source: SNL Financial<br />

[7] Source: SNL Financial<br />

[8] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al, equals 188-trading day average (Le. lag period) as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> August 31, 2012<br />

[9) Equals [7] - [8]<br />

10.00%<br />

'.00%<br />

• Y = ·o.o295In(lt)· 0.0324<br />

R'mO.7185<br />

E<br />

~ 6.00%<br />

,<br />

., •<br />

"<br />

• 4.00%<br />

. ~<br />

~ 2.00%<br />

4.00% '.00% '.00% 16.00%<br />

-2.00%<br />

3(1.YeBr Tre""ury Ylald •


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

[6] [~ [8] [9]<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3O-Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum<strong>on</strong> Treasury<br />

Rate Case E9uit~ Yield<br />

""k<br />

Premium<br />

1/311980 12.55% 9.39% 3.16%<br />

1/4/1980 13.75% 9.40% 4.35%<br />

1114/1980 13.20% 9.44% 3.76%<br />

111811980 14.00% 9.47% 4.53%<br />

113111980 12.61% 9.56% 3.05%<br />

2/811980 14.50% 9.63% 4.87%<br />

211411980 13.00% 9.67% 3.33%<br />

211511980 13.00% 9.69% 3.31%<br />

2129/1980 14.00% 9.85% 4.15%<br />

315/1980 14.00% 9.90% 4.10%<br />

317/1980 13.50% 9.94% 3.56%<br />

3/14/1980 14.00% 10.03% 3.97%<br />

3/27/1980 12.69% 10.19% 2.50%<br />

4/1/1980 14.75% 10.25% 4.50%<br />

4f29/1980 12.50% 10.50% 2.00%<br />

517/1980 14.27% 10.55% 3.72%<br />

5/811980 13.75% 10.55% 3.20%<br />

5/19/1980 15.50% 10.61% 4.89%<br />

5127/1980 14.60% 10.64% 3.96%<br />

5129/1980 16.00% 10.66% 5.34%<br />

6/10/1980 13.78% 10.70% 3.08%<br />

6/25/1980 14.25% 10.73% 3.52%<br />

7/911980 14.51% 10.77% 3.74%<br />

7117/1980 12.90% 10.78% 2.12%<br />

7/18/1980 13.80% 10.79% 3.01%<br />

712211980 14.10% 10.79% 3.31%<br />

7/23/1980 14.19% 10.79% 3.40%<br />

811/1980 12.50% 10.80% 1.70%<br />

8111/1980 14.85% 10.81% 4.04%<br />

8/2111980 13.03% 10.84% 2.19%<br />

8/28/1980 13.61% 10.87% 2.74%<br />

8/28/1980 14.00% 10.87% 3.13%<br />

9/4/1980 14.00% 10.89% 3.11%<br />

9/24/1980 15.00% 10.98% 4.02%<br />

10/9/1980 14.50% 11.05% 3.45%<br />

10/9/1980 14.50% 11.05% 3.45%<br />

10/24/1980 14.00% 11.09% 2.91%<br />

10/27/1980 15.20% 11.10% 4.10%<br />

10/27/1980 15.20% 11.10% 4.10%<br />

10/28/1980 12.00% 11.10% 0.90%<br />

10/2811980 13.00% 11.10% 1.90%<br />

10/31/1980 14.50% 11.12% 3.38%<br />

11/411980 15.00% 11.13% 3.87%<br />

11/6/1980 14.35% 11.13% 3.22%<br />

11/10/1980 13.25% 11.14% 2.11%<br />

11/17/1980 15.50% 11.15% 4.35%<br />

11/19/1980 13.50% 11.15% 2.35"10<br />

121511980 14.60% 11.14% 3.46%<br />

121811980 16.40% 11.14% 5.26%<br />

1211211980 15.45% 11.15% 4.30%<br />

1211711980 14.20% 11.16% 3.04%<br />

1211711980 14.40% 11.16% 3.24%<br />

1211811980 14.00% 11.17% 2.83%<br />

1212211980 13.45% 11.16% 2.29%<br />

12126/1980 14.00% 11.15% 2.85%<br />

12130/1980 14.50% 11.15% 3.35%<br />

12131/1980 14.56% 11.15% 3.41%<br />

in/1981 14.30% 11.14% 3.16%<br />

1/1211981 14.95% 11.14% 3.81%<br />

1/2611981 15.25% 11.20% 4.05%<br />

1/30/1981 13.25% 11.23% 2.02%<br />

2111/1981 14.50% 11.33% 3.17%<br />

2120/1981 14.50% 11.39% 3.11%<br />

3/1211981 15.65% 11.59% 4.06%<br />

3/2511981 15.30% 11.73% 3.57%<br />

4/1/1981 15.30% 11.81% 3.49%<br />

4/9/1981 15.00% 11.90% 3.10%<br />

4/29/1981 13.50% 12.11% 1.39%<br />

4/29/1981 14.25% 12.11% 2.14%<br />

4130/1981 13.60% 12.13% 1.47%<br />

4/30/1981 15.00% 12.13% 2.87%<br />

5/21/1981 14.00% 12.37% 1.63%<br />

613/1981 14.67% 12.45% 2.22%<br />

6/2211981 16.00% 12.57% 3.43%<br />

6/2511981 14.75% 12.59% 2.16%<br />

7/211981 14.00% 12.64% 1.36%<br />

711011981 16.00% 12.68% 3.32%<br />

7/14/1981 16.90% 12.71% 4.19%<br />

7/21/1981 15.78% 12.77% 3.01%<br />

7/27/1981 13.77% 12.82% 0.95%<br />

7/27/1981 15.50% 12.82% 2.68%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3D-Year<br />

Natural Gas Return <strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate Case Eguit}! Yield Premium<br />

7/31/1981 13.50% 12.86% 0.64%<br />

7/31/1981 14.20% 12.86% 1.34%<br />

8/12/1981 13.72% 12.93% 0.79%<br />

8/1211981 13.72% 12.93% 0.79%<br />

8/12/1981 14.41% 12.93% 1.48%<br />

8/2511981 15.45% 13.01% 2.44%<br />

812711981 14.43% 13.04% 1.39%<br />

8/2811981 15.00% 13.05% 1.95%<br />

9/23/1981 14.34% 13.23% 1.11%<br />

9/24/1981 16.25% 13.25% 3.00%<br />

9/29/1981 14.50% 13.30% 1.20%<br />

9/30/1981 15.94% 13.32% 2.62%<br />

10{211981 14.80% 13.35% 1.45%<br />

10/1211981 16.25% 13.42% iS3%<br />

10/20/1981 15.25% 13.49% 1.76%<br />

10/20/1981 16.50% 13.49% 3.01%<br />

10/2011981 17.00% 13.49% 3.51%<br />

10/2311981 15.50% 13.53% 1.97%<br />

10126f1981 13.50% 13.55% -0.05%<br />

10129f1981 16.50% 13.59% 2.91%<br />

1114J1981 15.33% 13.62% 1.71%<br />

111611981 15.17% 13.63% 1.54%<br />

1111211981 15.00% 13.64% 1.36%<br />

11/2511981 15.25% 13.66% 1.59%<br />

11/2511981 16.10% 13.66% 2.44%<br />

11/2511981 16.10% 13.66% 2.44%<br />

11/30/1981 16.75% 13.65% 3.10%<br />

1211/1981 15.70% 13.65% 2.05%<br />

1211/1981 16.00% 13.65% 2.35%<br />

1211511981 15.81% 13.68% 2.13%<br />

12/17/1981 14.75% 13.70% 1.05%<br />

1212211981 15.70% 13.71% 1.99%<br />

12/2211981 16.00% 13.71% 2.29%<br />

12130/1981 16.00% 13.74% 2.26%<br />

12130/1981 16.25% 13.74% 2.51%<br />

1/4/1982 15.50% 13.74% 1.76%<br />

1/14/1982 11.95% 13.80% -1.85%<br />

1/25/1982 16.25% 13.64% 2.41%<br />

1/27/1982 16.84% 13.85% 2.99%<br />

1/31/1982 14.00% 13.85% 0.15% .<br />

21211982 16.24% 13.86% 2.38%<br />

21811982 15.50% 13.87% 1.63%<br />

219f1982 14.95% 13.88% 1.07%<br />

219/1982 15.75% 13.88% 1.87%<br />

2f11/1982 16.00% 13.89% 2.11%<br />

311/1982 15.96% 13.91% 2.05%<br />

3{811982 17.10% 13.91% 3.19%<br />

3/26/1982 16.00% 13.96% 2.04%<br />

3131/1982 16.25% 13.97% 2.28%<br />

41111982 16.50% 13.98% 2.52%<br />

4/6/1982 15.00% 13.98% 1.02%<br />

4/9/1982 16.50% 13.99% 2.51%<br />

4/1211982 15.10% 13.98% 1.12%<br />

4J12f1982 16.70% 13.98% 2.72%<br />

4/18/1982 14.70% 13.98% 0.72%<br />

4/27/1982 15.00% 13.97% 1.03%<br />

5/10/1982 14.57% 13.94% 0.63%<br />

5/14/1982 15.80% 13.92% 1.88%<br />

5/20/1982 15.82% 13.91% 1.91%<br />

5121/1982 15.50% 13.90% 1.60%<br />

5/2511982 16.25% 13.90% 2.35%<br />

6f2f1982 14.50% 13.87% 0.63%<br />

61711982 16.00% 13.86% 2.14%<br />

612311982 15.50% 13.81% 1.69%<br />

612511982 16.50% 13.81% 2.69%<br />

7/1/1982 15.55% 13.80% 1.75%<br />

711/1982 16.00% 13.80% 2.20%<br />

7/2f1982 15.10% 13.79% 1.31%<br />

7/1311982 16.80% 13.76% 3.04%<br />

7/2211982 14.50% 13.72% 0.78%<br />

7/2811982 16.10% 13.69% 2.41%<br />

7/30/1982 14.82% 13.67% 1.15%<br />

8/4/1982 15.58% 13.65% 1.93%<br />

81611982 16.50% 13.63% 2.87%<br />

8/11/1982 17.11% 13.62% 3.49%<br />

812511982 16.00% 13.58% 2.42%<br />

8130/1982 16.25% 13.58% 2.67%<br />

913/1982 15.50% 13.56% 1.94%<br />

9/9/1982 16.04% 13.55% 2.49%<br />

9/1511982 16.04% 13.52% 2.52%<br />

9117/1982 15.25% 13.51% 1.74%<br />

9129/1982 14.50% 13.43% 1.07%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3D-Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum <strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate case Egui~ Yield PremIum<br />

9/30/1982 14.74% 13.42% 1.32%<br />

9/30/1982 15.50% 13.42% 2.08%<br />

9130/1982 16.50% 13.42% 3.08%<br />

913011982 16.70% 13.42% 3.28%<br />

10/1/1982 16.50% 13.41% 3.09%<br />

10/811982 15.00% 13.34% 1.66%<br />

10/15/1982 15.90% 13.26% 2.64%<br />

10119/1982 15.90% 13.23% 2.67%<br />

10/27/1982 17.00% 13.13% 3.87%<br />

10/28/1982 14.75% 13.11% 1.64%<br />

11/211982 16.25% 13.08% 3.17%<br />

11/4/1982 15.75% 13.04% 2.71%<br />

11/511982 14.73% 13.02% 1.71%<br />

11/1711982 16.00% 12.87% 3.13%<br />

11/2311982 15.50% 12.79% 2.71%<br />

11/2411982 14.50% 12.78% 1.72%<br />

11/2411982 16.02% 12.78% 3.24%<br />

1113011982 12.98% 12.73% 0.25%<br />

1113011982 15.50% 12.73% 2.77%<br />

1113Of1982 15.50% 12.73% 2.77%<br />

11/30f1982 15.65% 12.73% 2.92%<br />

11/30f1982 16.00% 12.73% 3.27%<br />

11/30f1982 16.10% 12.73% 3.37%<br />

12f3f1982 15.33% 12.68% 2.65%<br />

1218f1982 15.75% 12.64% 3.11%<br />

1211311982 16.00% 12.59% 3.41%<br />

12114f1982 16.40% 12.57% 3.83%<br />

12f17f1982 16.25% 12.53% 3.72%<br />

12120f1982 15.00% 12.51% 2.49%<br />

12121/1982 15.70% 12.S0% 3.20%<br />

1212811982 15.2S% 12.43% 2.82%<br />

1212811982 15.25% 12.43% 2.82%<br />

1212911982 16.25% 12.41% 3.84%<br />

1212911982 16.25% 12.41% 3.84%<br />

1/11/1983 15.90% 12.26% 3.64%<br />

1/1211983 15.50% 12.25% 3.25%<br />

1/18/1983 15.00% 12.19% 2.81%<br />

1/24/1983 15.50% 12.14% 3.36%<br />

1/24/1983 16.00% 12.14% 3.86%<br />

1/28/1983 14.90% 12.09% 2.81%<br />

1/31/1983 15.00% 12.07% 2.93%<br />

211011983 15.00% 11.98% 3.02%<br />

2125/1983 15.70% 11.85% 3.85%<br />

3f2/1983 15.25% 11.80% 3.45%<br />

3/16f1983 16.00% 11.64% 4.36%<br />

3121f1983 14.96% 11.58% 3.38%<br />

312311983 15.40% 11.54% 3.86%<br />

312311983 16.10% 11.54% 4.56%<br />

312411983 1S.00% 11.S3% 3.47%<br />

4/1211983 13.25% 11.31% 1.94%<br />

4/29'1983 15.05% 11.11% 3.94%<br />

5/311983 15.40% 11.08% 4.32%<br />

5/911983 15.50% 11.01% 4.49%<br />

5/19'1983 14.85% 10.90% 3.95%<br />

5/31/1983 14.00% 10.85% 3.15%<br />

6f2l1983 14.S0% 10.83% 3.67%<br />

6f7f1983 14.50% 10.81% 3.69%<br />

61911983 14.85% 10.80% 4.05%<br />

6/2011983 14.15% 10.74% 3.41%<br />

6/20/1983 16.50% 10.74% 5.76'%<br />

6127/1983 14.50% 10.72% 3.78%<br />

6/30/1983 14.80% 10.71% 4.09%<br />

6/30/1983 15.90% 10.71% 5.19%<br />

7/1/1983 14.80% 10.70% 4.10%<br />

7/S/1983 15.00% 10.70% 4.30%<br />

7/8/1983 15.50% 10.69% 4.81%<br />

7/19/1983 15.00% 10.71% 4.29%<br />

7/19/1983 15.10% 10.71% 4.39%<br />

8'1811983 15.30% 10.81% 4.49%<br />

8'1911983 15.79% 10.82% 4.97%<br />

812911983 16.00% 10.85% 5.15%<br />

8/3111983 14.7S% 10.86% 3.89%<br />

8/31/1983 15.25% 10.86% 4.39%<br />

SlBf1983 14.75% 10.89% 3.86%<br />

9/16'1983 15.51% 10.93% 4.58%<br />

9/2611983 14.50% 10.96% 3.54%<br />

9/2811983 14.25% 10.97% 3.28%<br />

9/30/1983 16.15% 10.98% 5.17%<br />

9/3011983 16.25% 10.98% 5.27%<br />

10'111983 16.25% 10.98% 5.27%<br />

10/13/1983 15.52% 11.02% 4.50%<br />

10/19/1983 15.20% 11.04% 4.16%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3O·Year<br />

Natural Gas Return <strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

RaleCase Eguit}!: Yield Premium<br />

10/26{1983 14.75% 11.06% 3.69%<br />

10/27/1983 14.88% 11.07% 3.81%<br />

10/27/1983 15.33% 11.07% 4.26%<br />

11/911983 14.82% 11.10% 3.72%<br />

11{9/1983 16.51% 11.10% 5.41%<br />

111911983 16.51% 11.10% 5.41%<br />

12/1/1983 14.50% 11.17% 3.33%<br />

12/811983 15.90% 11.20% 4.70%<br />

12/9/1983 15.30% 11.21% 4.09%<br />

12/12/1983 14.50% 11.21% 3.29%<br />

12/12/1983 15.50% 11.21% 4.29%<br />

12120/1983 15.40% 11.26% 4.14%<br />

12}20/1983 16.00% 11.26% 4.74%<br />

1212211983 15.75% 11.27% 4.48%<br />

12/29/1983 15.00% 11.29% 3.71%<br />

12130/1983 15.00% 11.30% 3.70%<br />

1/10/1984 15.90% 11.34% 4.56%<br />

111311984 15.50% 11.36% 4.14%<br />

1/1811984 15.53% 11.38% 4.15%<br />

1/2611984 15.90% 11.41% 4.49%<br />

211411984 14.25% 11.50% 2.75%<br />

2128/1984 14.50% 11.58% 2.92%<br />

3/20/1984 16.00% 11.69% 4.31%<br />

3/23/1984 15.50% 11.72% 3.78%<br />

419/1984 15.20% 11.81% 3.39%<br />

4/18{1984 16.20% 11.85% 4.35%<br />

4/27/1984 15.85% 11.90% 3.95%<br />

511511984 13.35% 11.99% 1.36%<br />

5116/1984 15.00% 12.00% 3.00%<br />

512211984 14.40% 12.03% 2.37%<br />

6/1311984 15.50% 12.18% 3.32%<br />

7/10/1984 16.00% 12.36% 3.64%<br />

81711984 16.69% 12.50% 4.19%<br />

8/9/1984 15.33% 12.51% 2.82%<br />

8117/1984 14.82% 12.53% 2.29%<br />

8/21/1984 14.64% 12.54% 2.10%<br />

8/27/1984 14.52% 12.56% 1.96%<br />

8/28/1984 14.75% 12.56% 2.19%<br />

8/30/1984 15.60% 12.57% 3.03%<br />

9/1211984 15.60% 12.60% 3.00%<br />

9/1211984 15.90% 12.60% 3.30%<br />

9/2511984 16.25% 12.61% 3.64%<br />

10f211984 14.80% 12.62% 2.18%<br />

10/911984 14.75% 12.63% 2.12%<br />

10/1011984 15.50% 12.63% 2.87%<br />

10/18/1984 15.00% 12.64% 2.36%<br />

10/24{1984 15.50% 12.64% 2.86%<br />

11/7/1984 15.00% 12.64% 2.36%<br />

11/20/1984 15.92% 12.62% 3.30%<br />

11/30/1984 15.50% 12.60% 2.90%<br />

1211811984 15.00% 12.55% 2.45%<br />

12120/1984 15.00% 12.53% 2.47%<br />

12128/1984 15.75% 12.51% 3.24%<br />

1212811984 16.25% 12.51% 3.74%<br />

1/211985 16.00% 12.50% 3.50%<br />

1/31/1985 14.75% 12.37% 2.38%<br />

217/1985 14.85% 12.33% 2.52%<br />

211511985 15.00% 12.28% 2.72%<br />

2120/1985 14.50% 12.26% 2.24%<br />

212211985 14.86% 12.26% 2.60%<br />

311411985 15.50% 12.17% 3.33%<br />

312811985 14.80% 12.09% 2.71%<br />

4/9/1985 15.50% 12.03% 3.47%<br />

4/1611985 15.70% 11.97% 3.73%<br />

6/10/1985 15.75% 11.59% 4.16%<br />

6/2611985 14.82% 11.47% 3.35%<br />

7f9/1985 15.00% 11.39% 3.61%<br />

7/2611985 14.50% 11.27% 3.23%<br />

8129/1985 14.50% 11.12% 3.38%<br />

8/3011985 14.38% 11.11% 3.27%<br />

9/1211985 15.25% 11.07% 4.18%<br />

9/2311985 15.30% 11.04% 4.26%<br />

9/2511985 14.50% 11.03% 3.47%<br />

9/26/1985 13.80% 11.02% 2.78%<br />

9/2611985 14.50% 11.02% 3.48%<br />

10/2511985 15.25% 10.92% 4.33%<br />

11/8/1985 12.94% 10.86% 2.08%<br />

11/20/1985 14.90% 10.81% 4.09%<br />

11/2511985 13.30% 10.79% 2.51%<br />

1216/1985 12.00% 10.72% 1.28%<br />

12111/1985 14.90% 10.69% 4.21%<br />

12/20/1985 14.88% 10.60% 4.28%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 6 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3O-Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum<strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate Case Eguity Yield Premium<br />

12120/1985 15.00% 10.60% 4.40%<br />

12120/1985 15.00% 10.60% 4.40%<br />

12130/1985 15.75% 10.53% 5.22%<br />

12/31/1985 14.00% 10.52% 3.48%<br />

12/31/1985 14.50% 10.52% 3.98%<br />

1/17/1986 14.50% 10.38% 4.12%<br />

2/11/1986 12.50% 10.21% 2.29%<br />

2/12/1986 15.20% 10.20% 5.00%<br />

3/11/1986 14.00% 9.98% 4.02%<br />

4/211986 12.90% 9.77% 3.13%<br />

4/28/1986 13.01% 9.47% 3.54%<br />

5/21/1986 13.25% 9.19% 4.06%<br />

5/28/1986 14.00% 9.12% 4.88%<br />

5/2911986 13.90% 9.11% 4.79%<br />

61211986 13.00% 9.08% 3.92%<br />

6{11{1986 14.00% 8.98% 5.02%<br />

6f1311986 13.55% 8.95% 4.60%<br />

S127/19BS 11.88% 8.78% 3.10%<br />

7/14f1986 12.60% 8.60% 4.00%<br />

7J30f1986 13.30% 8.39% 4.91%<br />

8(14/1986 13.50% 8.23% 5.27%<br />

9/5/1986 13.30% 8.03% 5.27%<br />

9123/1986 12.75% 7.91% 4.84%<br />

10{30/1986 13.00% 7.68% 5.32%<br />

10/31/1986 13.75% 7.67% 6.08%<br />

11/10/1986 14.00% 7.62% 6.38%<br />

11/1911986 13.75% 7.57% 6.18%<br />

11/2511986 13.15% 7.54% 5.61%<br />

1212211986 13.80% 7.48% 6.32%<br />

12130/1986 13.90% 7.47% 6.43%<br />

1/20/1987 12.75% 7.47% 5.28%<br />

1/2311987 13.55% 7.47% 6.08%<br />

1/27/1987 12.16% 7.47% 4.69%<br />

211311987 12.60% 7.47% 5.13%<br />

212411987 12.00% 7.47% 4.53%<br />

3130/1987 12.20% 7.46% 4.74%<br />

3131/1987 13.00% 7.46% 5.54%<br />

5/511987 12.85% 7.60% 5.25%<br />

5/28/1987 13.50% 7.72% 5.78%<br />

6/15/1987 13.20% 7.80% 5.40%<br />

6/30/1987 12.60% 7.85% 4.75%<br />

7/10/1987 12.90% 7.88% 5.02%<br />

7/27/1987 13.50% 7.93% 5.57%<br />

8125/1987 11.40% 8.08% 3.32%<br />

9/18/1987 13.00% 8.27% 4.73%<br />

10/20/1987 12.60% 8.54% 4.06%<br />

10/20/1987 12.98% 8.54% 4.44%<br />

11/1211987 12.75% 8.67% 4.08%<br />

11113/1987 12.75% 8.68% 4.07%<br />

11124/1987 12.50% 8.73% 3.77%<br />

121811987 12.50% 8.81% 3.69%<br />

1212211987 12.00% 8.90% 3.10%<br />

12131/1987 12.85% 8.93% 3.92%<br />

12131/1987 13.25% 8.93% 4.32%<br />

1/15/1988 13.15% 8.98% 4.17%<br />

1/20/1988 12.75% 8.99% 3.76%<br />

1/29/1988 13.20% 8.99% 4.21%<br />

214/1988 12.60% 8.99% 3.61%<br />

3/23/1988 13.00% 8.94% 4.06%<br />

5f27/1988 13.18% 9.02% 4.16%<br />

611411988 13.50% 9.00% 4.50%<br />

6/17/1988 11.72% 8.99% 2.73%<br />

6124{1988 11.50% 8.97% 2.53%<br />

7/1/1988 12.75% 8.95% 3.80%<br />

718t1988 12.00% 8.94% 3.06%<br />

7/18f1988 12.00% 8.91% 3.09%<br />

7/2011988 13.40% 8.90% 4.50%<br />

8f8t1988 12.74% 8.90% 3.84%<br />

9/2011988 12.90% 8.93% 3.97%<br />

9/26/1988 12.40% 8.93% 3.47%<br />

9/27/1988 13.65% 8.93% 4.72%<br />

9/3011988 13.25% 8.94% 4.31%<br />

10/1311988 13.10% 8.93% 4.17%<br />

10/21/1988 12.80% 8.93% 3.87%<br />

10/25/1988 13.25% 8.94% 4.31%<br />

10/26/1988 13.50% 8.94% 4.56%<br />

10/27/1988 12.95% 8.94% 4.01%<br />

10/28/1988 13.00% 8.94% 4.06%<br />

11/15/1988 12.00% 8.97% 3.03%<br />

11/29/1988 12.75% 9.01% 3.74%<br />

1211911988 13.00% 9.05% 3.95%<br />

12121/1988 12.90% 9.05% 3.85%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 7 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Dale <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

30·Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum<strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate Case E!3ujt~ Yield Premium<br />

1212211988 13.50% 9.05% 4.45%<br />

1/26/1989 12.60% 9.06% 3.54%<br />

1/27/1989 13.00% 9.06% 3.94%<br />

218/1989 13.37% 9.05% 4.32%<br />

3I8f1989 13.00% 9.04% 3.96%<br />

5/4f1989 13.00% 9.04% 3.96%<br />

61811989 13.50% 8.96% 4.54%<br />

7/19f1989 11.80% 8.84% 2.96%<br />

7/2511989 12.80% 8.82% 3.98%<br />

7/31/1989 13.00% 8.80% 4.20%<br />

8/14/1989 12.50% 8.76% 3.74%<br />

8/2211989 12.80% 8.73% 4.07%<br />

8/23/1989 12.90% 8.73% 4.17%<br />

9/21/1989 12.10% 8.63% 3.47%<br />

10/611989 13.00% 8.58% 4.42%<br />

10/1711989 12.41% 8.54% 3.87%<br />

10/18/1989 13.25% 8.54% 4.71%<br />

10/2011989 12.90% 8.53% 4.37%<br />

10/31/1989 13.60% 8.50% 5.10%<br />

11/3/1989 12.93% 8.48% 4.45%<br />

11/511989 13.20% 8.48% 4.72%<br />

ll/S/1SSS 12.60% 8.46% 4.14%<br />

11/9/1989 13.00% 8.46% 4.54%<br />

11/28f1989 12.75% 8.37% 4.38%<br />

1217/1989 13.25% 8.33% 4.92%<br />

1211511989 13.00% 8.28% 4.72%<br />

1212011989 12.90% 8.26% 4.64%<br />

12/21/1989 12.80% 8.26% 4.54%<br />

12121/1989 12.90% 8.26% 4.64%<br />

12127/1989 12.50% 8.24% 4.26%<br />

119/1990 13.00% 8.19% 4.81%<br />

1/18/1990 12.50% 8.17% 4.33%<br />

1/26/1990 12.10% 8.15% 3.95%<br />

3121/1990 12.80% 8.15% 4.65%<br />

3128/1990 13.00% 8.16% 4.84%<br />

4/5/1990 12.20% 8.17


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 8 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Datecf<br />

3O-Year<br />

Natural Gas Return <strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

RaleGase Eguit~ Yield Premium<br />

1019/1991 11.70% 8.21% 3.49%<br />

10{1511991 13.40% 8.20% 5.20%<br />

11/1/1991 12.90% 8.20% 4.70%<br />

1118/1991 12.75% 8.20% 4.55%<br />

11/2611991 11.60% 8.18% 3.42%<br />

11/26/1991 12.00% 8.18% 3.82%<br />

11/27/1991 12.70% 8.18% 4.52%<br />

1216/1991 12.70% 8.16% 4.54%<br />

1211011991 11.75% 8.16% 3.59%<br />

12119/1991 12.60% 8.14% 4.46%<br />

1211911991 12.80% 8.14% 4.66%<br />

1213Of1991 12.10% 8.11% 3.99%<br />

1/2211992 12.84% 8.05% 4.79%<br />

1/31/1992 12.00% 8.03% 3.97%<br />

2/20/1992 13.00% 8.00% 5.00%<br />

2/2711992 11.75% 7.99% 3.76%<br />

3118/1992 12.50% 7.95% 4.55%<br />

511511992 12.75% 7.87% 4.88%<br />

6124/1992 12.20% 7.85% 4.35%<br />

6f29/1992 11.00% 7.85% 3.15%<br />

7/14/1992 12.00% 7.83% 4.17%<br />

7/2211992 11.20% 7.82% 3.38%<br />

8{10/1992 12.10% 7.79% 4.31%<br />

8f26{1992 12.43% 7.75% 4.68%<br />

9/30{1992 11.60% 7.72% 3.88%<br />

10{6{1992 12.25% 7.72% 4.53%<br />

10{1311992 12.75% 7.71% 5.04%<br />

10/2311992 11.65% 7.71% 3.94%<br />

10{28{1992 12.25% 7.71% 4.54%<br />

10{29f1992 12.75% 7.71% 5.04%<br />

10{30f1992 11.40% 7.70% 3.70%<br />

11{9/1992 10.60% 7.70% 2.90%<br />

11/25/1992 11.00% 7.68% 3.32%<br />

11/2511992 12.00% 7.68% 4.32%<br />

121311992 11.85% 7.67% 4.18%<br />

12116/1992 11.90% 7.64% 4.26%<br />

12/2211992 12.30% 7.63% 4.67%<br />

1212211992 12.40% 7.63% 4.77%<br />

12130/1992 12.00% 7.61% 4.39%<br />

12131/1992 12.00% 7.61% 4.39%<br />

1/1211993 12.00% 7.59% 4.41%<br />

1/1211993 12.00% 7.59% 4.41%<br />

21211993 11.40% 7.53% 3.87%<br />

212211993 11.60% 7.48% 4.12%<br />

412311993 11.75% 7.27% 4.48%<br />

513/1993 11.50% 7.25% 4.25%<br />

513/1993 11.75% 7.25% 4.50%<br />

S/3/1993 12.00% 7.20% 4.80%<br />

Snl1993 11.50% 7.20% 4.30%<br />

6f2211993 11.75% 7.16% 4.59%<br />

7/21/1993 11.78% 7.07% 4.71%<br />

7/21/1993 11.90% 7.07% 4.83%<br />

7/2311993 11.50% 7.06% 4.44%<br />

7/29/1993 11.50% 7.03% 4.47%<br />

8{1211993 10.75% 6.98% 3.77%<br />

8124/1993 11.50% 6.92% 4.58%<br />

8/31/1993 11.90% 6.88% 5.02%<br />

9/1/1993 11.25% 6.88% 4.37%<br />

9/1/1993 11.47% 6.88% 4.59%<br />

9/27/1993 10.50% 6.74% 3.76%<br />

9/29/1993 11.00% S.73% 4.27%<br />

9/30/1993 11.60% 6.72% 4.88%<br />

10/8/1993 11.50% 6.68% 4.82%<br />

10/14/1993 11.20% 6.65% 4.55%<br />

10/1511993 11.75% 6.65% 5.10%<br />

10/2511993 11.55% 6.60% 4.95%<br />

10/2811993 11.50% 6.58% 4.92%<br />

10/29/1993 10.10% 6.58% 3.52%<br />

10/29/1993 10.20% 6.58% 3.62%<br />

10/29/1993 11.25% 6.58% 4.67%<br />

11/211993 10.80% 6.56% 4.24%<br />

11/1211993 11.80% 6.53% 5.27%<br />

11/2311993 12.50% 6.51% 5.99%<br />

11/26/1993 11.00% 6.50% 4.50%<br />

1211/1993 11.45% 6.49% 4.96%<br />

1211611993 10.60% 6.46% 4.14%<br />

12116/1993 11.20% 6.46% 4.74%<br />

12/21/1993 11.30% 6.45% 4.85%<br />

12/2211993 11.00% 6.44% 4.56%<br />

12/2311993 10.10% 6.44% 3.66%<br />

1/5/1994 11.50% 6.41% 5.09%<br />

1110/1994 11.00% 6.40% 4.60%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

30-Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum<strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate Gase Eguit~ Yield Premium<br />

1/2511994 12.00% 6.37% 5.63%<br />

2/211994 10.40% 6.35% 4.05%<br />

219/1994 10.70% 6.34% 4.36%<br />

4/6/1994 11.24% 6.35% 4.89%<br />

412511994 11.00% 6.39% 4.61%<br />

6f16/1994 10.50% 6.63% 3.87%<br />

6f2311994 10.60% 6.67% 3.93%<br />

7/19/1994 10.70% 6.83% 3.87%<br />

9/29/1994 10.90% 7.20% 3.70%<br />

9/2911994 11.00% 7.20% 3.80%<br />

10f711994 11.87% 7.25% 4.62%<br />

10{,8/1994 11.50% 7.31% 4.19%<br />

10/18/1994 11.50% 7.31% 4.19%<br />

10/2411994 11.00% 7.35% 3.65%<br />

11/2211994 12.12% 7.52% 4.60%<br />

11/2911994 11.30% 7.55% 3.75%<br />

1211/1994 11.00% 7.56% 3.44%<br />

1218/1994 11.50% 7.59% 3.91%<br />

12/8{1994 11.70% 7.59% 4.11%<br />

12/1211994 11.82% 7.60% 4.22%<br />

12/14{1994 11.50% 7.61% 3.89%<br />

12{19f1994 11.50% 7.62% 3.88%<br />

4/19/1995 11.00% 7.71% 3.29%<br />

9/11/1995 11.30% 7.16% 4.14%<br />

9/15/1995 10.40% 7.13% 3.27%<br />

9/29/1995 11.50% 7.06% 4.44%<br />

10/13/1995 10.76% 6.99% 3.77%<br />

111711995 12.50% 6.87% 5.63%<br />

11/811995 11.10% 6.86% 4.24%<br />

11/8/1995 11.30% 6.86% 4.44%<br />

1111711995 10.90% 6.81% 4.09%<br />

1112011995 11.40% 6.80% 4.60%<br />

11127/1995 13.60% 6.77% 6.83%<br />

12114/1995 11.30% 6.68% 4.62%<br />

12120/1995 11.60% 6.65% 4.95%<br />

1/31/1996 11.30% 6.46% 4.84%<br />

3/11/1996 11.60% 6.40% 5.20%<br />

4/311996 11.13% 6.41% 4.72%<br />

4/1511996 10.50% 6.41% 4.09%<br />

4117/1996 10.77% 6.41% 4.36%<br />

4126/1996 10.60% 6.40% 4.20%<br />

5/10/1996 11.00% 6.41% 4.59%<br />

5113/1996 11.25% 6.41% 4.84%<br />

713f1996 11.25% 6.49% 4.76%<br />

7/2211996 11.25% 6.54% 4.71%<br />

1013/1996 10.00% 6.77% 3.23%<br />

10f29/1996 11.30% 6.84% 4.46%<br />

11/26/1996 11.30% 6.86% 4.44%<br />

11/27/1996 11.30% 6.86% 4.44%<br />

11/29f1996 11.00% 6.85% 4.15%<br />

1211211996 11.96% 6.85% 5.11%<br />

12117/1996 11.50% 6.85% 4.65%<br />

1/2211997 11.30% 6.83% 4.47%<br />

1/27/1997 11.25% 6.83% 4.42%<br />

1/31/1997 11.25% 6.83% 4.42%<br />

2113/1997 11.00% 6.82% 4.18%<br />

2113/1997 11.80% 6.82% 4.98%<br />

2120/1997 11.80% 6.81% 4.99%<br />

3/27/1997 10.75% 6.79% 3.96%<br />

4129/1997 11.70% 6.80% 4.90%<br />

7f17l1997 12.00% 6.77% 5.23%<br />

10/29/1997 10.75% 6.70% 4.05%<br />

10/3111997 11.25% 6.70% 4.55%<br />

12124/1997 10.75% 6.53% 4.22%<br />

4f28/1998 10.90% 6.11% 4.79%<br />

4/30/1998 12.20% 6.10% 6.10%<br />

6f30f1998 11.00% 5.94% 5.06%<br />

8f26/1998 10.93% 5.82% 5.11%<br />

9f3f1998 11.40% 5.80% 5.60%<br />

9/15/1998 11.90% 5.77% 6.13%<br />

101711998 11.06% 5.70% 5.36%<br />

10/30/1998 11.40% 5.63% 5.77%<br />

12110/1998 12.20% 5.52% 6.68%<br />

12117/1998 12.10% 5.49% 6.61%<br />

2119/1999 11.15% 5.32% 5.83%<br />

3/1/1999 10.65% 5.31% 5.34%<br />

3/1/1999 10.65% 5.31% 5.34%<br />

6/8/1999 11.25% 5.35% 5.90%<br />

11/1211999 10.25% 5.92% 4.33%<br />

12114/1999 10.50% 5.99% 4.51%<br />

1/28/2000 10.71% 6.16% 4.55%<br />

2117/2000 10.60% 6.20% 4.40%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3D-Year<br />

Natural Gas Return <strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate Gase Egui~ Yield Premium<br />

5125/2000 10.80% 6.19% 4.61%<br />

611912000 11.05% 6.18% 4.87%<br />

612212000 11.25% 6.18% 5.07%<br />

7117/2000 11.06% 6.15% 4.91%<br />

7120/2000 12.20% 6.14% 6.06%<br />

8f1112000 11.00% 6.11% 4.89%<br />

912712000 11.25% 6.01% 5.24%<br />

9129f2000 11.16% 6.00% 5.16%<br />

101512000 11.30% 5.98% 5.32%<br />

11/28/2000 12.90% 5.87% 7.03%<br />

11/30/2000 12.10% 5.87% 6.23%<br />

2/512001 11.50% 5.7,6% 5.74%<br />

311512001 11.25% 5.67% 5.58%<br />

5/8/2001 10.75% 5.61% 5.14%<br />

10/2412001 10.30% 5.54% 4.76%<br />

10/2412001 11.00% 5.54% 5.46%<br />

119{2002 10.00% 5.50% 4.50%<br />

1/30f2002 11.00% 5.47% 5.53%<br />

1/3112002 11.00% 5.47% 5.53%<br />

4/17/2002 11.50% 5.44% 6.06%<br />

4129f2002 11.00% 5.45% 5.55%<br />

6111/2002 11.77% 5.48% 6.29%<br />

6/20/2002 12.30% 5.47% 6.83%<br />

8/2812002 11.00% 5.49% 5.51%<br />

9/11/2002 11.20% 5.45% 5.75%<br />

9/12/2002 12.30% 5.45% 6.85%<br />

10/28/2002 11.30% 5.35% 5.95%<br />

10/30/2002 10.60% 5.34% 5.26%<br />

111112002 12.60% 5.34% 7.26%<br />

111712002 11.40% 5.33% 6.07%<br />

111812002 10.75% 5.33% 5.42%<br />

11120f2002 10.00% 5.30% 4.70%<br />

11120f2002 10.50% 5.30% 5.20%<br />

1214/2002 10.75% 5.27% 5.48%<br />

12f3012002 11.20% 5.19% 6.01%<br />

1/6/2003 11.25"10 5.17% 6.08%<br />

212812003 12.30% 5.01% 7.29%<br />

317/2003 9.96% 4.99% 4.97%<br />

311212003 11.40% 4.97% 6.43%<br />

312012003 12.00% 4.95% 7.05%<br />

41312003 12.00% 4.93% 7.07%<br />

512/2003 11.40% 4.88% 6.52%<br />

511512003 11.05% 4.87% 6.18%<br />

612612003 11.00% 4.80% 6.20%<br />

71112003 11.00% 4.80% 6.20%<br />

7/29f2003 11.71% 4.78% 6.93%<br />

8122/2003 10.20% 4.82% 5.38%<br />

9117/2003 9.90% 4.84% 5.06%<br />

9/2512003 10.25% 4.85% 5.40%<br />

1011712003 10.54% 4.87% 5.67%<br />

1012212003 10.46% 4.87% 5.59%<br />

10/22/2003 10.71% 4.87% 5.84%<br />

10/3012003 11.00% 4.88% 6.12%<br />

10/31/2003 10.20% 4.88% 5.32%<br />

10131/2003 10.75% 4.88% 5.87%<br />

11/10/2003 10.60% 4.89% 5.71%<br />

1219/2003 10.50% 4.93% 5.57%<br />

1211812003 10.50% 4.94% 5.56%<br />

12119/2003 12.00% 4.94% 7.06%<br />

12119/2003 12.00% 4.94% 7.06%<br />

111312004 10.25% 4.95% 5.30%<br />

1/1312004 12.00% 4.95% 7.05%<br />

219/2004 11.25% 4.98% 6.27%<br />

3116/2004 10.90% 5.05% 5.85%<br />

3116/2004 10.90% 5.05% 5.85%<br />

512512004 10.00% 5.06% 4.94%<br />

£/212004 11.22% 5.07% 6.15%<br />

6/30/2004 10.50% 5.10% 5.40%<br />

7/8/2004 10.00% 5.10% 4.90%<br />

7/22/2004 10.25% 5.10% 5.15%<br />

812612004 10.50% 5.10% 5.40%<br />

812612004 10.50% 5.10% 5.40%<br />

9/912004 10.40% 5.10% 5.30%<br />

9/21/2004 10.50% 5.09% 5.41%<br />

9/27/2004 10.30% 5.09% 5.21%<br />

9/27/2004 10.50% 5.09% 5.41%<br />

10/20/2004 10.20% 5.08% 5.12%<br />

11/30/2004 10.60% 5.08% 5.52%<br />

1218/2004 9.90% 5.09% 4.81%<br />

12/21/2004 11.50% 5.09% 6.41%<br />

12/22/2004 11.50% 5.09% 6.41%<br />

12/28/2004 10.25% 5.09% 5.16%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 11 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

30-Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum <strong>on</strong> Treasury<br />

I<br />

Risk<br />

3/2912005 11.00% 4.86% 6.14%<br />

4/1312005 10.60% 4.84% 5.76%<br />

4/2812005 11.00% 4.80% 6.20%<br />

511712005 10.00% 4.77% 5.23%<br />

6/8/2005 10.18% 4.71% 5.47%<br />

6/10/2005 10.90% 4.71% 6.19%<br />

7/612005 10.50% 4.65% 5.85%<br />

7/19/2005 11.50% 4.63% 6.87%<br />

8{11/2005 10.40% 4.60% 5.80%<br />

911912005 9.45% 4.53% 4.92%<br />

9/3012005 10.51% 4.52% 5.99%<br />

10(4/2005 9.90% 4.52% 5.38%<br />

10/4/2005 10.75% 4.52% 6.23%<br />

10/1412005 10.40% 4.52% 5.88%<br />

10/31/2005 10.25% 4.53% 5.72%<br />

11/212005 9.70% 4.53% 5.17%<br />

11/3012005 10.00% 4.54% 5.46%<br />

121912005 9.70% 4.53% 5.17%<br />

12/12/2005 11.00% 4.53% 6.47%<br />

12/2012005 10.13% 4.53% 5.60%<br />

12/21/2005 10.40% 4.53% 5.87%<br />

12/21/2005 11.00% 4.53% 6.47%<br />

12/22/2005 10.20% 4.53% 5.67%<br />

12/2212005 11.00% 4.53% 6.47%<br />

12/28/2005 10.00% 4.52% 5.48%<br />

1/5/2006 11.00% 4.52% 6.48%<br />

1/2512006 11.20% 4.52% 6.6S%<br />

1/2512006 11.20% 4.52% 6.6S%<br />

213/2006 10.50% 4.52% 5.9S%<br />

211512006 9.50% 4.53% 4.97%<br />

4126/2006 10.60% 4.65% 5.95%<br />

712412006 9.60% 4.86% 4.74%<br />

712412006 10.00% 4.86% 5.14%<br />

9/20/2006 11.00% 4.93% 6.07%<br />

9/26/2006 10.75% 4.93% 5.82%<br />

10/20/2006 9.S0% 4.96% 4.S4%<br />

111212006 9.71% 4.96% 4.75%<br />

11/9/2006 10.00% 4.97% 5.03%<br />

11/2112006 11.00% 4.98% 6.02%<br />

121512006 10.20% 4.97% 5.23%<br />

1/5/2007 10.40% 4.95% 5.45%<br />

1/9/2007 11.00% 4.94% 6.06%<br />

1/11/2007 10.90% 4.94% 5.96%<br />

1/19/2007 10.80% 4.93% 5.S7%<br />

1126/2007 10.00% 4.92% 5.08%<br />

218/2007 10.40% 4.91% 5.49%<br />

3114/2007 10.10% 4.86% 524%<br />

3120/2007 10.25% 4.85% 5.40%<br />

3121/2007 11.35% 4.84% 6.51%<br />

312212007 10.50% 4.84% 5.66%<br />

3129/2007 10.00% 4.83% 5.17%<br />

6/1312007 10.75% 4.81% 5.94%<br />

6/29/2007 9.53% 4.S4% 4.69%<br />

6/29/2007 10.10% 4.S4% 5.26%<br />

71312007 10.25% 4.S5% 5.40%<br />

7/1312007 9.50% 4.S6% 4.64%<br />

7/24/2007 10.40% 4.S7% 5.53%<br />

811/2007 10.15% 4.S8% 5.27%<br />

8/29/2007 10.50% 4.91% 5.59%<br />

9/10/2007 9.71% 4.91% 4.80%<br />

9/19/2007 10.00% 4.91% 5.09%<br />

912512007 9.70% 4.91% 4.79%<br />

10/S/2007 10.48% 4.92% 5.56%<br />

10/1912007 10.50% 4.91% 5.59%<br />

10/2512007 9.65% 4.91% 4.74%<br />

11/1512007 10.00% 4.89% 5.11%<br />

11/20/2007 9.90% 4.89% 5.01%<br />

11/27/2007 10.00% 4.SS% 5.12%<br />

11/29/2007 10.90% 4.88% 6.02%<br />

12114/2007 10.80% 4.87% 5.93%<br />

12118/2007 10.40% 4.86% 5.54%<br />

12/19/2007 9.S0% 4.S6% 4.94%<br />

12/19/2007 9.S0% 4.S6% 4.94%<br />

12/19/2007 10.20% 4.S6% 5.34%<br />

12/21/2007 9.10% 4.S6% 4.24%<br />

1/S/2008 10.75% 4.S3% 5.92%<br />

1/1712008 10.75% 4.S1% 5.94%<br />

1/1712008 10.75% 4.S1% 5.94%<br />

2/5/2008 9.99% 4.7S% 5.21%<br />

215/2008 10.19% 4.7S% 5.41%<br />

2113/2008 10.20% 4.76% 5.44%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 12 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Datecf<br />

3O-Year<br />

Natural Gas Return <strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate case Eguil:i Yield Premium<br />

3131/2008 10.00% 4.63% 5.37%<br />

5/2812008 10.50% 4.53% 5.97%<br />

6/24/2008 10.00% 4.52% 5.48%<br />

6/27/2008 10.00% 4.52% 5.48%<br />

7/31/2008 10.70% 4.50% 6.20%<br />

7/31/2008 10.82% 4.50% 6.32%<br />

8/27/2008 10.25% 4.50% 5.75%<br />

9f212Q08 10.25% 4.50% 5.75%<br />

9/19f2008 10.70% 4.48% 6.22%<br />

9/24/2008 10.68% 4.48% 6.20%<br />

9/24/2008 10.68% 4.48% 6.20%<br />

9/24/2008 10.68% 4.48% 6.20%<br />

9/30/2008 10.20% 4.48% 5.72%<br />

10/312008 10.30% 4.47% 5.83%<br />

101812008 10.15% 4.47% 5.68%<br />

10120/2008 10.06% 4.47% 5.59%<br />

10/24/2008 10.60% 4.46% 6.14%<br />

10/24/2008 10.BO% 4.46% 6.14%<br />

1112112008 10.50% 4.42% 6.08%<br />

11/2112008 10.50% 4.42% 6.08%<br />

1112112008 10.50% 4.42% 6.08%<br />

11/2412008 10.50% 4.42% 6.08%<br />

121312008 10.39% 4.37% 6.02%<br />

1212412008 10.00% 4.26% 5.74%<br />

12126/2008 10.10% 4.24% 5.86%<br />

12129/2008 10.20% 4.23% 5.97%<br />

1/1312009 10.45% 4.14% 6.31%<br />

21212009 10.05% 4.04% 6.01%<br />

319/2009 10.30% 3.90% 6.40%<br />

3/25/2009 10.17% 3.84% 6.33%<br />

41212009 10.75% 3.81% 6.94%<br />

5/5/2009 10.75% 3.71% 7.04%<br />

5/15/2009 10.20% 3.70% 6.50%<br />

5129/2009 9.54% 3.70% 5.84%<br />

6/3/2009 10.10% 3.71% 6.39%<br />

6/2212009 10.00"k 3.73% 6.27%<br />

6/29/2009 10.21% 3.74% 6.47%<br />

6/30/2009 9.31% 3.74% 5.57%<br />

7/17/2009 9.26% 3.75% 5.51%<br />

7/17/2009 10.50% 3.75% 6.75%<br />

10/1612009 10.40% 4.09% 6.31%<br />

10/26/2009 10.10% 4.11% 5.99%<br />

10/2812009 10.15% 4.11% 6.04%<br />

10/2812009 10.15% 4.11% 6.04%<br />

10/3012009 9.95% 4.12% 5.83%<br />

11/2012009 9.45% 4.18% 5.27%<br />

12114/2009 10.50% 4.24% 6.26%<br />

12116/2009 10.75% 4.25% 6.50%<br />

1211712009 10.30% 4.25% 6.05%<br />

12/1812009 10.40% 4.26% 6.14%<br />

12/18/2009 10.40% 4.26% 6.14%<br />

12118/2009 10.50% 4.26% 6.24%<br />

1212212009 10.20% 4.27% 5.93%<br />

1212212009 10.40% 4.27% 6.13%<br />

12128/2009 10.85% 4.29% 6.56%<br />

12129/2009 10.38% 4.29% 6.09%<br />

1/11/2010 10.24% 4.34% 5.90%<br />

1/21/2010 10.23% 4.37% 5.86%<br />

1/21/2010 10.33% 4.37% 5.96%<br />

1/26/2010 10040% 4.37% 6.03%<br />

2110/2010 10.00% 4.39% 5.61%<br />

212312010 10.50% 4.40% 6.10%<br />

319/2010 9.60% 4.40% 5.20%<br />

3/24/2010 10.13% 4.42% 5.71%<br />

3/31/2010 10.70% 4.43% 6.27%<br />

4/1/2010 9.50% 4.43% 5.07%<br />

41212010 10.10% 4.44% 5.66%<br />

4/8/2010 10.35% 4.44% 5.91%<br />

4/29/2010 9.19% 4.46% 4.73%<br />

4/29/2010 9.40% 4.46% 4.94%<br />

4/29/2010 9.40% 4.46% 4.94%<br />

5/17/2010 10.55% 4.46% 6.09%<br />

5124/2010 10.05% 4.46% 5.59%<br />

613/2010 11.00% 4.46% 6.54%<br />

6/16/2010 10.00% 4.45% 5.55%<br />

6/18/2010 10.30% 4.45% 5.85%<br />

819/2010 12.55% 4.41% 8.14%<br />

8117/2010 10.10% 4.40% 5.70%<br />

9/16/2010 9.60% 4.31% 5.29%<br />

911612010 10.00% 4.31% 5.69%<br />

9/1612010 10.00% 4.31% 5.69%<br />

9/1612010 10.30% 4.31% 5.99%


Exhibit No. RBH-8<br />

Page 13 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13<br />

Date <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

3D-Year<br />

Natural Gas Retum<strong>on</strong> Treasury Risk<br />

Rate Case Eguit}! Yield Premium<br />

10{2l/20l0 10.40% 4.20% 6.20%<br />

11/212010 9.75% 4.18% 5.57%<br />

11/2J2010 9.75% 4.18% 5.57%<br />

11/3/2010 10.75% 4.17% 6.58%<br />

11/19/2010 10.20% 4.15% 6.05%<br />

12/112010 10.00% 4.13% 5.87%<br />

1216/2010 9.56% 4.12% 5.44%<br />

12/612010 10.09% 4.12% 5.97%<br />

12/9f2010 10.25% 4.12% 6.13%<br />

12/14/2010 10.33% 4.12% 6.21%<br />

12/17/2010 10.10% 4.11% 5.99%<br />

12/20/2010 10.10% 4.11% 5.99%<br />

12123/2010 9.92% 4.11% 5.81%<br />

1/6/2011 10.35% 4.09% 6.26%<br />

1/12/2011 10.30% 4.09% 6.21%<br />

111312011 10.30% 4.09% 6.21%<br />

3/10/2011 10.10% 4.16% 5.94%<br />

313112011 9.45% 4.20% 5.25%<br />

4118{2Q11 10.05% 4.23% 5.82%<br />

4/21/2011 10.00% 4.24% 5.76%<br />

5/13/2011 11.35% 4.28% 7.07%<br />

512612011 10.50% 4.31% 6.19%<br />

6/21/2011 10.00% 4.36% 5.64%<br />

6/29/2011 8.83% 4.37% 4.46%<br />

8/1/2011 9.20% 4.41% 4.79%<br />

9/1/2011 10.10% 4.33% 5.77%<br />

11/14/2011 9.60% 3.93% 5.67%<br />

1211312011 9.50% 3.76% 5.74%<br />

12120/2011 10.00% 3.72% 6.28%<br />

1212212011 10.40% 3.70% 6.70%<br />

1/10/2012 9.06% 3.60% 5.46%<br />

1/10/2012 9.45% 3.60% 5.85%<br />

1110/2012 9.45% 3.60% 5.85%<br />

1/2312012 10.20% 3.53% 6.67%<br />

1/3112012 10.00% 3.49% 6.51%<br />

4/24/2012 9.50% 3.16% 6.34%<br />

4/24/2012 9.75% 3.16% 6.59%<br />

517/2012 9.80% 3.13% 6.67%<br />

512212012 9.60% 3.10% 6.50%<br />

5124/2012 9.70% 3.09% 6.61%<br />

6f712012 10.30% 3.06% 7.22%<br />

6/1512012 10.40% 3.05% 7.32%<br />

6/18/2012 9.60% 3.05% 6.52%<br />

71212012 9.75% 3.04% 6.67%<br />

Average 4.34%<br />

Count 945


Exhibit No. RBH-9<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1<br />

Small Size Premium<br />

[1[ [2]<br />

NorthWestern Energy Equity<br />

Median Market to Book for Camp Group<br />

NorthWestern Energy Implied Market Cap<br />

Customers (Mil) ($BiI)<br />

0.182 $ 0.147<br />

1.57<br />

$ 0.231<br />

Company Name<br />

AGL Resources Inc.<br />

Atmas Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Laclede Group, Inc.<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc.<br />

South Jersey Industries, Inc.<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

WGL Holdings, Inc.<br />

Median<br />

Mean<br />

[3] [4]<br />

Market Cap<br />

Ticker Customers (Mil) ($BiI)<br />

GAS 2.5 $ 4.66<br />

ATO 3.2 $ 3.15<br />

LG 0.6 $ 0.95<br />

NJR 0.5 $ 1.86<br />

NWN 0.7 $ 1.32<br />

PNY 1.0 $ 2.24<br />

SJI 0.3 $ 1.53<br />

SWX 1.8 $ 1.97<br />

WGL 1.1 $ 2.01<br />

1.0 $ 1.97<br />

1.3 $ 2.19<br />

[5]<br />

Market to<br />

Book Ratio<br />

1.37<br />

1.34<br />

1.56<br />

2.23<br />

1.79<br />

2.11<br />

2.29<br />

1.54<br />

1.57<br />

1.57<br />

1.75<br />

Market Capitalizati<strong>on</strong> ($Mil)<br />

Decile Low High<br />

2 $ 6,927.557 $ 15,408.314<br />

3 $ 3,596.535 $ 6,896.389<br />

4 $ 2,366.464 $ 3,577.774<br />

5 $ 1,621.096 $ 2,362.532<br />

6 $ 1,090.652 $ 1,620.860<br />

7 $ 683.059 $ 1,090.515<br />

8 $ 422.999 $ 682.750<br />

9 $ 206.802 $ 422.811<br />

10 $ 1.028 $ 206.795<br />

[6)<br />

Size Premium<br />

0.78%<br />

0.94%<br />

1.17%<br />

1.74%<br />

1.75%<br />

1.77%<br />

2.51%<br />

2.80%<br />

6.10%<br />

Proxy Group Median $ 1,971<br />

9th Decile Size Premium<br />

Difference from Proxy Group Median<br />

1.74%<br />

2.80%<br />

1.06% 1[7]<br />

Notes:<br />

[1]2011 SEC F<strong>on</strong>n 10-K<br />

[2] Data provided by Company<br />

[3] Source: SNL Financial<br />

[4] Source: SNL Financial as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8/31/2012<br />

[5] Source: SNL Financial as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8/31/2012<br />

[6] Source: Ibbots<strong>on</strong> Associates, 2012 Valuati<strong>on</strong> Yearbook, "Key Variables in Estimating Cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Capital. n<br />

[7] Equals 2.80% ~ 1.74%


Exhibit No. RBH-10<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4<br />

Revenue Stabilizati<strong>on</strong> Mechanisms<br />

Company Ticker Infrastructure Oecoupling<br />

AGL Resources GAS v v<br />

Atlanta Gas Light Co. ./ [1], [2J<br />

Northern Illinois Gas Co.<br />

Virginia Natural Gas ./ [1], (2)<br />

Elizabethtown Gas ./ [1], [2] ./ [1], [2]<br />

Florida City Gas<br />

Chattanooga Gas ./ [1], [2]<br />

Atmos Energy ATO v v<br />

Atmos Energy (Colorado)<br />

Atmos Energy (Georgia) ./ [2J ./ [1], [2J<br />

Atmos Energy (Iowa)<br />

Almas Energy (Illinois)<br />

Atmos Energy (Kansas) ./ (1J. [2] ./ [1], [2]<br />

Atmos Energy (Kentucky)<br />

./ (1], (2] ./ [1], (2]<br />

Atmos Energy (Louisiana)<br />

./ [1], [2]<br />

Atmos Energy (Mississippi)<br />

./ [1]. [2]<br />

Atmos Energy (Missouri)<br />

./ [1), [2]<br />

Atmos Energy (Tennessee)<br />

./ [1), [2]<br />

Atmos Energy (Texas)<br />

./ [1J, [2] ./ [1), [2J<br />

Atmos Energy (Virginia) ./ [2]<br />

Laclede Group LG v<br />

Laclede Gas Co.<br />

./ (1J. [2]<br />

New Jersey Resources NJR v v<br />

New Jersey Natural Gas<br />

./ [1], [2] ./ 11], [2]<br />

Northwest Natural Gas NWN v v<br />

Northwest Natural Gas (Oreg<strong>on</strong>) ./ [1], (2J ./ [1]. [2]<br />

Northwest Natural Gas (Washingt<strong>on</strong>)<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas PNY v<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas (North Carolina)<br />

./ [1J, [2]<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas (South Carolina) ./ [1], [2J<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas (Tennessee) ./ [1], (2J<br />

South Jersey Industries 5JI v v<br />

SJG<br />

./ [1J. [2J ./ [1], [2J<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> 5WX v<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> (Ariz<strong>on</strong>a)<br />

./ [1J, [2)<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> (California) ./ [1J, [2J<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> (Nevada) ./ [1J, (2)<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas Light WGL v v<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas - DC<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas - MD ./ [1]. [2]<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas - VA V l'l.l-' -/'<br />

[1] RRAAdJustment Clauses and Rate Riders, March 21, 20120<br />

[2] Innovative Rates, N<strong>on</strong>-Volumetric Rates, and Tracking Mechanisms: Current List, March 2012<br />

[3]2011 SEC Form 10-K<br />

Expense<br />

v<br />

./ [1]<br />

./ [11, [2]<br />

./ [1], [2]<br />

./ [1]<br />

./ (1], [2]<br />

v<br />

./ [2]<br />

./ [2]<br />

./ [1],[2]<br />

./ [2J<br />

./ [2]<br />

./ [2J<br />

./ 11J. [2J<br />

./ [2J<br />

./ [2]<br />

v<br />

./ [lJ,(2)<br />

v<br />

./ [2J<br />

./ [2]<br />

./ [2]<br />

v<br />

./ [3J<br />

v<br />

./ [1J, [2J<br />

v<br />

./ [2J<br />

./ [2J<br />

-/ l'l


Exhibit No, RBH-10<br />

Page 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>4<br />

Revenue StabilizatiO!1 Mechanisms<br />

,II<br />

t<br />

are recovered from customers. Costs are primarily recovered through deferred<br />

dollar-for-dollar re


Exhibit No. RBH-10<br />

Page 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4<br />

Revenue Stabilizati<strong>on</strong> /lAechanlsms<br />

"<br />

Com<br />

South Jersey Industries<br />

Ticker<br />

SJI<br />

Disclosed in SEC Form 1().K Filin<br />

SJG was pennitted to recover regulatory assets c<strong>on</strong>tained In its petiti<strong>on</strong> and defer certain federally mandated pipeline<br />

Integrity management program costs for recovery in its next base rate case. In additi<strong>on</strong>, annual depreciati<strong>on</strong> expense will be<br />

reduced by SI.2 milli<strong>on</strong> as a resull<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the amortizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> excess cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> removal recoveries. The BPU also authorized a<br />

Phase II <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the base rate proceeding to review the costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>CIRT projects not rolled into rate base In the September2010<br />

seWement (pg 119)<br />

The BGSS price structure was approved by the BPU in January 2003, and allows SJG to recover all prudently Incurred gas<br />

costs. BGSS cha es 10 customers can be either m<strong>on</strong>thlvor enodic annuall. too 1191<br />

C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Incentive Program (CIP) - The primary purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CIP is 10 promote c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> eff<strong>on</strong>s, without negatiVely<br />

Impacting financial stability and to base SJG's pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it margin <strong>on</strong> the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> customers rather than the amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> natural<br />

gas distributed to customers. In October20D6, the BPU approved SJG's CIP as a three year pilot program. In January2010,<br />

the BPU approved an extensi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this program through September 2013. Each CIP year begins October 1 and ends<br />

September 30 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the subsequent year. On a m<strong>on</strong>thly basis during the CIP year, SJG records adjustments to earnings based<br />

<strong>on</strong> weather and customer usage factors, as incurred. Subsequent to each year, SJG will make filings with the BPU to review<br />

and app~(:~~funts recorded under the CIP. BPU approved cash Inflows or outflows generally will not begin until the next<br />

CIPyear. 66<br />

CapJtallnvestment RecoveryTracker (CIRD -In January 2009, SJG made a filing with the BPU requesting approval for an<br />

accelerated Infrastructure Investment program. The purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the CIRTwas to accelerate $103.0 milli<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital<br />

expenditures from five years to \'M:I years. The petiti<strong>on</strong> requested that the Company be allowed to earn a return <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and a<br />

return <strong>on</strong>, its investment Under the CIRT, 2009 spending was projected to be $70.5 mllli<strong>on</strong> and 2010 spending was<br />

projected to be $32.5 milli<strong>on</strong>. On a m<strong>on</strong>thly basis during the CIRTyear, SJG records adjUstments to earnings based <strong>on</strong><br />

actual CIRT program expenditures, as incurred. Annually, SJG makes a filing to the BPU for review and approval <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

exoenditures recorded under the CIRT. (00 661<br />

Energy EfficlencyTracker (EET) -In January 2009, SJG filed a petitlOri with the BPU requestirlg approval <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an energy<br />

efficlency program for residential, commercial and Industrial customers. Under this program, SJG can lnvest$17.0 mill10n<br />

overtwo years In energy efficiency measures to be Installed In customer homes and businesses. SJG can recover<br />

incremental operating and maintenance expenses and earn a return <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and return <strong>on</strong>, program Investments. (pg 67)<br />

Societal Benefits Clause (SBC) - The SSC allows SJG to recover costs related to several BPU-mandated programs. Within<br />

the SSC are a Remediati<strong>on</strong> Adjustment Clause (RAG), a New Jersey Clean Energy Program (NJCEP). a UnIversal Service<br />

Fund USF ram and a C<strong>on</strong>sumer Educati<strong>on</strong> Pram CEP I. (~ 68<br />

Remediati<strong>on</strong> Adjustment Clause (RAC) - The RAC recovers envir<strong>on</strong>mental remediati<strong>on</strong> costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12 former gas manufacturing<br />

plants (See Note 15). The BPU allows SJG to recover such costs over seven year amortizati<strong>on</strong> periods. The net between the<br />

amounts actually spent and amounts recovered from customers Is recorded as a regulatory asset. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

Remediati<strong>on</strong> Cost Expended - Net Note that RAC activity affects revenue and cash flows but does not directly affect<br />

earnings because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cost recovery over seven year amortizati<strong>on</strong> periods. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> December 31,2011 and 2010, SJG<br />

reflected the unamortized remediati<strong>on</strong> costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>$45.8 millI<strong>on</strong> and $39.1 milli<strong>on</strong>, respectively, <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>solIdated balance<br />

sheets under Regulatory Assets {See N.O/~\I~\Slnce implementing the RAC In 1992, SJG has recovered $58.6 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

throuah rates as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> December 31. 2011. 68<br />

New JerseyClean Energy Program (NJCEP) - This mechaniSm recovers costs associated with SJG's energy efficiency and<br />

renewable energy programs. In August2008, the BPU approved the statewide funding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the NJCEP <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>$l.2 billi<strong>on</strong> forthe<br />

years 2009 through 2012. Of this amount SJG will be resp<strong>on</strong>sible for approximately $41.5 milli<strong>on</strong> over the four-year period.<br />

NJCEP adjustments affect revenue and cash ;~~:I~\t do notdirecUy affect earnings as related costs are deferred and<br />

recovered throuoh rates <strong>on</strong> an <strong>on</strong>-ooino basis. 68<br />

Universal Service Fund (USF)· The USF Is a statewide program through which funds for the USF and Lifeline Credit and<br />

Tenants Assistance Programs are collected from customers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all New Jersey electric and gas utilities. USF adjustments<br />

affect cash flows but do not directly affect revenue oreamings as related costs are deferred and recovered through rates <strong>on</strong><br />

an <strong>on</strong>-oolno basis. (00 66)<br />

Unbundling - Effective January 10, 2000, the BPU approved full unbundling <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>SJG's s~tem. This allows all natural gas<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumers 10 select their natural gas commodity supplier. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> December 31, 2011, 35,880 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>SJG's residential customers<br />

were purchasing Ihelrgas commodity from some<strong>on</strong>e other than SJG. Customers choosing 10 purchase natural gas from<br />

providers other than the utility are charged forthe cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gas by the marketer. The resulting decrease In utility revenues Is<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fset by a corresp<strong>on</strong>ding decrease In gas costs. While customer choice can reduce utility revenues, itdoes not negatively<br />

affectSJG's net income or financial c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>. The BPU c<strong>on</strong>tinues to allow for full recovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prudenUy incurred natural gas<br />

costs through the BGSS.;~:ul~:;ing did not change the fact that SJG still recovers cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> service, including certain deferred<br />

costs through base rates. 69<br />

Pipeline Integrity- In October 2005, SJG filed a petiti<strong>on</strong> with the BPU to Implement a Pipeline Integrity Management Tracker<br />

(Tracker). The purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ttlis Trackerwas to recover incremental costs to be Incurred by SJG as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> newfederal<br />

regulaU<strong>on</strong>s, whIch are aimed at enhanCing public safety and reliability. The regulati<strong>on</strong>s require that utilities use a<br />

comprehensive anal~is to assess, evaluate, repair and validate the integrity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> certain transmissi<strong>on</strong> lines In the event <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

leak or failure. As part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SJG's September 201 0 base rate Increase, SJG was pennitled to recover previously deferred<br />

plpel1ne Integrity costs Incurred through September 2010. In additi<strong>on</strong>, SJG is authorized to defer future program costs, and<br />

related carrying costs, for recovery in the next base rate proceeding, subject to review by the BPU. Accordingly, SJG<br />

withdrew its petiti<strong>on</strong> for the Pipeline Integrity ManagementTracker. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> December 31, 2011 and 2010, deferred pipeline<br />

integrity costs totaled $1.2 milli<strong>on</strong> and $1.7 milli<strong>on</strong>, respectiVely, and are Included in other regulatory assets. (pg 69)<br />

Southwest Gas Corp.<br />

SWX<br />

Rate design is the primary mechanism avaJlable to Southwest to mitigate weather risk. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> January 2012, all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Southwesfs<br />

service territories have decoupled rate structures whIch mitigate weather risk. 1(1 California, CPUC regulati<strong>on</strong>s allow<br />

Southwest to decouple operating margin from usage and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fset weather risk. In Nevada, a decoupled rate structure applies to<br />

most customer classes providing stablITty In annual operating margIn by insulating the Company from the effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower<br />

usage (including volumes associated with unusual weather). In Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, the ACC recenUy approved a fully decoupled rate<br />

structure with a m<strong>on</strong>thly weather normalizati<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong> effective January 2012. (pg (2)<br />

There are approximately 100,000 customers in Ariz<strong>on</strong>a whose natural gas meters are set-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f away from the customer's home<br />

(e.g., near a backyard property line), as opposed to a more traditi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong> In which the meter is adjacent to the<br />

home. To address the cost n<strong>on</strong>nally bome by the customer to repair or replace the COYL, the Company received approval<br />

to Implement a new program (as part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its recent Ariz<strong>on</strong>a rate case decisi<strong>on</strong>) under which the Company will replace the<br />

customer's facllifies at no Immedfate direct costto the customer, and relocate the customer's meter adjacent to the home. In<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, the program provides for the Company to endeavor to leak survey all such COYLs over a 3-year period; anticipated<br />

costs for the survey are reflected in current rates. The costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the replacement porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thiS program Will be capitalized by<br />

the Company. SubJect to an annual reporting requirement, a surcharge will be added to all bills to recover an amount<br />

approximately equal to the amount that the Company would have earned If the additi<strong>on</strong>al pipe replacement costs had been<br />

included in the rate base amount filed in the recenUy c<strong>on</strong>cluded Ariz<strong>on</strong>a rate case. Recovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the surcharge will cease as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the next Ariz<strong>on</strong>a general rate case (as the expenditures will then be Included In rate base). (pg 27)


Exhibit No. RBH-10<br />

Page 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>4<br />

Revenue Stabilizati<strong>on</strong> Mechanisms<br />

Com an Ticker Disclosed In SEC Form 10-K Filin<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas Light WOL<br />

[Regarding the recovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> HHC related costs, the 2009 Stipulati<strong>on</strong> 'Nith the DC OPC] provides for the cost<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the program to<br />

be fetovered throu9h an annual sl.lrcharge based <strong>on</strong> actl.lal expenditures for coupling replacement and encapsula~<strong>on</strong> that<br />

'Nill become effective at the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the existing base ratefreeze (October 1,2011). The cost v.illinciude both a return <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> and<br />

return o~ :: ~~t <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> coupling replacement and encapsulati<strong>on</strong>, computed In accordance v.ith the terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the rates currenUy<br />

In effect. 76<br />

[In the April 2011 new rate base request] Washingt<strong>on</strong> Gas has also included a request for approval <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a rate adjustment<br />

me


Flotati<strong>on</strong> Cost Adjuslment<br />

Exhibit No. RBH-11<br />

Page 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1<br />

Two most recent open market comm<strong>on</strong> stock Issuances per company, if available<br />

N,I<br />

Shares Offering Underwriting Offering Proceeds Per Total Flotati<strong>on</strong> Gross Equity Issue Flotati<strong>on</strong> Cost<br />

Company Date Issued Price Discount _Expense Share ____ Costs Before Cos!~_ Net Proceeds Percentage<br />

NorthWestern Corp. 101212002 11,500,000 $8.75 $0.4375 51,025,000 $8.22 $6,056,250 $100,625,000 594,568,750 6.019%<br />

NorthWestern Corp. 10/1612001 3.680,000 521.25 $0.8500 $100,000 520.37 $3,228,000 578,200,000 574,972,000 4.128%<br />

AGL Resources Inc. 1111912004 11,040,000 531,01 50.9300 $400,000 $30.04 510,667,200 5342,350.400 $331,683,200 3,116%<br />

AGL Resources Inc. 2/1112003 6,440,000 $22.00 $0.7700 $250,000 $21,19 $5,208,800 $141,680,000 $136,471,200 3.676%<br />

Almos Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> 121712006 6,325,000 531.50 $1.1025 $400,000 530.33 $7,373,313 5199.237,500 $191,864,188 3.701%<br />

Almos Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> 1012112004 16.100,000 $24.75 $0.9900 $400.000 $23.74 516,339,000 $398,475,000 5382,136,000 4.100%<br />

Laclede Group, Inc. 512512004 1,725,000 526.80 $0.8710 $100,000 525.87 $1,602,475 $46,230,000 $44,627,525 3.466%<br />

Northwest Natura! Gas Company 3/3012004 1,290,000 $31.00 $1.0100 $175,000 $29.85 $1,477,900 $39,990,000 $38,512,100 3.696%<br />

P"ledm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company, Inc. 112012004 4.887,500 $42.50 $1.4900 $350.000 $40.94 $7,632,375 $207,718,750 5200,086,375 3.674"A><br />

WGL Holdings, Inc. 612012001 2,058,500 526.73 $0.8950 $56,218 $25.81 $1,898,576 $55,023,705 553,125,130 3,450"A><br />

Mean $6,148,389 5160.953,036<br />

WEIGHTED AVERAGE FLOTATION COSTS: 3.820%<br />

C<strong>on</strong>stant Growth Discounted Cash Flow Model Adjusted for Flotati<strong>on</strong> Costs· 30 Day Average Stock Price<br />

[11 [2] [3] r4] 15] (6) [71 r8) [9] (10) [11] [12]<br />

Average Expected t;>ividend Yjeld Zacks First Call Value Line Average Flotati<strong>on</strong><br />

Annualized Stock DIvidend Adjusted for Earnings Earnings Earnings Sustainable Earnings Adjusted<br />

Company Ticker Dividend Price Yield Current Flol Costs Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth OCF k(e) DCF k(e)<br />

AGL Resources Inc, GAS $1.84 $40,10 4,59% 4.71% 4.90% 4.28%<br />

Atmos Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong> ATO 51.38 $35,97 3.84% 3.93% 4.09% 5.83%<br />

Laclede Group, Inc. LG 51.66 $42.07 3.95% 4.02% 4,18% 3.00%<br />

New Jersey Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> NJR $1.52 545,53 3,34% 3,41% 3.55% 3.35%<br />

Northwest Natural Gas Company NWN $1.78 549.03 3.63% 3.72% 3,87% 4.17%<br />

Piedm<strong>on</strong>t Natural Gas Company. Inc. PNV $1.20 $31.63 3,79% 3.86% 4.01% 4.70%<br />

South Jersey industries, Inc. SJI $1.61 $51,95 3,10% 3.23% 3,35% 6.00%<br />

Southwest Gas Corporati<strong>on</strong> SWX $1.18 $43,74 2.70% 2.78% 2.89% 4,37%<br />

WGL Holdings, Inc. WGL 51.60 $40.29 3.97% 4.06% 4.22% 5.37%<br />

PROXY GROUP MEAN<br />

Notes:<br />

The proxy group DCI'" resui! is adjusted for flotati<strong>on</strong> costs by dividing each company's expected dividend yield by (1 - flotati<strong>on</strong> cost). The<br />

flotati<strong>on</strong> cost adjustment is derived as the difference between the unadjusted DCF result and the DCF result adjusted for flotati<strong>on</strong> costs,<br />

]1] Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

]2J Source: Bloomberg Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

]3) Equals [1J 1 [2J<br />

{4J Equals [3J x (1 + 0.5x [10])<br />

I5J Equals [4J I (1 -0.0381)<br />

16] Source: Zacks<br />

[7] Source: Yahoo! Finance<br />

18] Source: Value Line<br />

[9} Source: Exhibit No. RBH-3<br />

[10J Equals Average([6J, [7]. [8], [9])<br />

[11J Equals [4} + [10]<br />

[12] Equals [51 + [10]<br />

{131 Equals average 112]- average [11]<br />

NA 5.50% 5.96% 5,25% 9.95% 10.14%<br />

5.50% 4.00% 4.01% 4.84% 8.77% 8.92%<br />

5.30% 2.00% 5.57% 3.97% 7.99% 8.15%<br />

1.85% 5.50% 7.20% 4,47% 7.89% 8.02%<br />

4.50% 4.00% 7.34% 5.00% 8.72% 8.87%<br />

4.70% 2,50% 2.19% 3.52% 7.38% 7.54%<br />

6,00% 9.00% 11.58% 8,15% 11.37% 11.50%<br />

4.05% 9,00% 6.60% 6.01% 8.78% 8.90%<br />

5.60% 3.00% 3.78% 4.44% 8,50% 8.66%<br />

8.82% 8.97%<br />

DCF Result Adjusted For Flotati<strong>on</strong> Costs: 8.97%<br />

DCF Result Unadjusted For Flotati<strong>on</strong> Costs: 8.82%<br />

Difference (Flotati<strong>on</strong> Cost Adjustment):1 0.15%1[13]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!