01.09.2015 Views

BUS 415 Week 4 Discussion Question 3/ Tutorialrank

For more course tutorials visit www.tutorialrank.com Tutorial Purchased: 2 Times, Rating: A+ Note: Please do not attempt to look up this case on the Internet; I want your initial response and subsequent discussion to based on your own analysis and the textbook. I will post the actual opinion in this case at the end of our discussion.


For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 2 Times, Rating: A+

Note: Please do not attempt to look up this case on the Internet; I want your initial response and subsequent discussion to based on your own analysis and the textbook. I will post the actual opinion in this case at the end of our discussion.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Packard's policy prohibiting harassment. Throughout the relevant period,<br />

Hewlett-Packard's harassment policy stated as follows:<br />

Any comments or conduct relating to a person's race, gender,<br />

religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, or ethnic background<br />

that fail to respect the dignity and feeling [sic] of the individual are<br />

unacceptable.<br />

Over the course of several days after Peterson posted the Biblical<br />

materials, he attended a series of meetings with Hewlett-Packard<br />

managers, during which he and they tried to explain to each other their<br />

respective positions. Peterson explained that he meant the passages to<br />

communicate a message condemning "gay behavior." The scriptural<br />

passages, he said, were "intended to be hurtful. And the reason [they<br />

were] intended to be hurtful is you cannot have correction unless people<br />

are faced with truth." Peterson hoped that his gay and lesbian co-workers<br />

would read the passages, repent, and be saved.<br />

In these meetings, Peterson also asserted that Hewlett-Packard's<br />

workplace diversity campaign was an initiative to "target" heterosexual<br />

and fundamentalist Christian employees at Hewlett-Packard, in general,<br />

and him in particular. Ultimately, Peterson and the managers were<br />

unable to agree on how to resolve the conflict. Peterson proposed that he<br />

would remove the offending scriptural passages if Hewlett-Packard<br />

removed the "Gay" posters; if, however, Hewlett-Packard would not<br />

remove the posters, he would not remove the pas-sages. When the<br />

managers rejected both options, Peterson responded: "I don't see any<br />

way that I can compromise what I am doing that would satisfy both<br />

[Hewlett-Packard] and my own conscience." He further remonstrated:<br />

"as long as [Hewlett-Packard] is condoning [homosexuality] I'm going<br />

to oppose it. . . ."<br />

Peterson was given time off with pay to reconsider his position. When<br />

he returned to work, he again posted the scriptural passages and refused

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!