02.09.2015 Views

Helmut Segner Fish Nociception and pain A biological perspective

Helmut Segner Fish Nociception and pain A ... - EKAH - admin.ch

Helmut Segner Fish Nociception and pain A ... - EKAH - admin.ch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Preface<br />

In spring 2010, the Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human<br />

Bio technology (ECNH; Eidgenössische Ethikkommission für die<br />

Biotechnologie im Ausserhumanbereich, EKAH) commissioned<br />

two studies on <strong>pain</strong> perception <strong>and</strong> consciousness in fish. Both<br />

studies were intended to critically review the recent literature on<br />

cognitive abilities of fish <strong>and</strong> their capability to feel <strong>pain</strong>. These<br />

questions can be approached both from a <strong>biological</strong> <strong>perspective</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> from a philosophical <strong>perspective</strong>, as the issues of consciousness<br />

<strong>and</strong> cognition are not only a matter of <strong>biological</strong> facts – which<br />

fall within the competence of life sciences – but also a matter of<br />

notions <strong>and</strong> terms, which are within the competence of philosophy.<br />

Therefore, two studies were done in parallel, with one report<br />

written by a biologist (<strong>Helmut</strong> <strong>Segner</strong>), <strong>and</strong> one written by a philosopher<br />

(Markus Wild).<br />

The two reports can be read independently of each other; however,<br />

they are complementary in many aspects. While, for instance,<br />

Markus Wild’s report touches only shortly on the neurological ​<br />

basis of <strong>pain</strong> perception in man <strong>and</strong> fish, <strong>Helmut</strong> <strong>Segner</strong>’s report<br />

places great emphasis on this aspect. In contrast, while <strong>Segner</strong>’s<br />

report provides little detail on the terminology <strong>and</strong> notion of<br />

conscious ness, Wild presents a systematic <strong>and</strong> in-depth discussion<br />

of this aspect.<br />

We investigated the same topic from different <strong>perspective</strong>s.<br />

Despite our differences in background, methodological approach,<br />

focus, argumentation <strong>and</strong> assessments, we converge <strong>and</strong> agree in<br />

the two major results of our studies: First, we are both convinced<br />

that a new picture of the cognitive capabilities of fish has been<br />

emerging over recent years. <strong>Fish</strong> should no longer be considered<br />

simple-minded, inflexible “reflex machines”, but there is increasing<br />

awareness of their surprisingly complex cognitive competences.<br />

This picture is developing only now, <strong>and</strong> we are still in an early<br />

<strong>Fish</strong>. <strong>Nociception</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>pain</strong> | Contributions to Ethics <strong>and</strong> Biotechnology 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!