03.09.2015 Views

Finzi (Winston) and Anor v JMMB Merchant Bank Ltd

Finzi (Winston) and Anor v JMMB Merchant Bank Ltd

Finzi (Winston) and Anor v JMMB Merchant Bank Ltd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

exercising the power of sale under a registered mortgage from a claim for injunctive<br />

relief by the mortgagor. Sykes J was therefore correct to apply this principle on the<br />

material before him in the court below. The additional material relied on by Mr<br />

<strong>Finzi</strong>/Mahoe Bay on this application for an injunction pending appeal has failed to<br />

demonstrate that there is even an arguable case on the ground of fraud. Accordingly,<br />

for all the reasons which I have attempted to state, I have come to the clear conclusion<br />

that this application, not having met the threshold of a good arguable appeal, must be<br />

dismissed without more. In the light of the view I take on this point, it is not necessary<br />

to go on to consider matters such as whether damages would be an adequate remedy<br />

<strong>and</strong> the balance of convenience. Nor have I found it necessary to consider <strong>JMMB</strong>’s<br />

counter-notice of appeal, which therefore remains a matter for the court on the hearing<br />

of the substantive appeal.<br />

Disposal of the application<br />

[65] The application for an injunction pending appeal is dismissed. The parties are to<br />

make written submissions on the question of the costs of the application within 21 days<br />

of the date of this judgment. The court will deliver its written ruling on costs within a<br />

further 14 days of the date of receipt of the last submission.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!