MMW Teacher and Secondary Health Chair, Deanne Hoppe, spoke ...

9
Strategic Plan approved in 2003 had an IBO component and the 2004-05 Instructional
Models Task Force recommended pursuing the Middle Years IB model.
Dr. Larson spoke about the eight subject groups of the curriculum and explained the areas of
interaction including approaches to learning; community awareness; health and social
education and the environment. He also outlined the areas of focus that included
communication; holistic learning; internationalism and cultural awareness and shared
information on how students were selected; where the programme should be located; the
challenges and solutions; start-up costs; and the next steps that would include gathering
public input and getting direction from the School Board.
Middle School Principal, Bill Jacobson, expressed his enthusiasm for the program, saying it
was a “perfect fit” at the middle level. He said staff members were supportive and
enthusiastic about the program because it “…aligned with everything they want to do for
their students in middle school.”
Discussion followed, at which time Board members shared their opinions about the Pre-AP
and Middle Years IB programs. Board member Stefan said both were “very interesting
concepts,” but said she did not think she could support either of them for the upcoming fall.
Board member Wenmark expressed caution because of the cost of the program and his
reluctance to “outsource our students to anybody.” Chairperson Adams said she was
personally “very interested” in both the Pre-AP and Middle Years IB programs, and
applauded the analysis and wisdom of staff members in looking at what happens at the
middle school level because of the impact it has on the success of the program at the high
school. Dr. Peterson said because it was important to consider how Pre-AP and middle years
IB programs at one or both middle schools would impact students moving to the high school,
these programs would have to be studied for at least a year.
Board members then discussed next steps in the consideration of the instructional models
presented that evening.
10. ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Langseth moved, Erdahl seconded, adjournment to executive session at 10:45 p.m. Upon
vote being taken thereon, the motion carried unanimously.
____________________________________
Pamela J. Langseth, Clerk