09.09.2015 Views

Treating Customers Fairly (TCF)

Leanne Jackson – Financial Services Board - Sauma

Leanne Jackson – Financial Services Board - Sauma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Financial<br />

Services<br />

Board<br />

<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

(<strong>TCF</strong>)<br />

Presentation for the South African Underwriting<br />

Managers Association (SAUMA)<br />

Annual Conference, May 2013<br />

By: Leanne Jackson<br />

Head: <strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

Financial Services Board<br />

1


Agenda<br />

<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

• <strong>TCF</strong> and the regulatory framework<br />

• The 6 <strong>TCF</strong> Outcomes<br />

• <strong>TCF</strong> considerations for underwriting managers<br />

• <strong>TCF</strong> and binder agreements<br />

• Roll-out of the <strong>TCF</strong> framework<br />

2


<strong>TCF</strong> and the financial regulatory<br />

framework<br />

<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

• National Treasury published its policy position for financial sector<br />

regulation in “A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa Better”<br />

(The “Red Book”) with the Feb 2011 Budget Speech<br />

• Policy objectives: (1) Financial stability (2) Consumer protection<br />

and market conduct (3) Expanding access through financial<br />

inclusion (4) Combating financial crime<br />

• Shift to “twin peaks” regulation – prudential regulation under SARB<br />

and market conduct regulation (including banking conduct) under<br />

FSB<br />

• Financial Regulatory Reform SC (NT, FSB, SARB) has published<br />

Twin Peaks Implementation document on 1 Feb 2013<br />

Implementing <strong>TCF</strong> will be a key component of the FSB’s enhanced<br />

market conduct mandate<br />

3


The 6 <strong>TCF</strong> outcomes<br />

<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

1. <strong>Customers</strong> can be confident they are dealing with firms where <strong>TCF</strong> is<br />

central to the corporate culture<br />

2. Products & services marketed and sold in the retail market are designed to<br />

meet the needs of identified customer groups and are targeted accordingly<br />

3. <strong>Customers</strong> are provided with clear information and kept appropriately<br />

informed before, during and after point of sale<br />

4. Where advice is given, it is suitable and takes account of customer<br />

circumstances<br />

5. Products perform as firms have led customers to expect, and service is of<br />

an acceptable standard and as they have been led to expect<br />

6. <strong>Customers</strong> do not face unreasonable post-sale barriers imposed by firms<br />

to change product, switch providers, submit a claim or make a complaint<br />

These outcomes are to be demonstrably delivered throughout the<br />

product life cycle, from product design and promotion, through advice<br />

and servicing, to complaints and claims handling – and throughout the<br />

product value chain.<br />

4


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

General <strong>TCF</strong> considerations for<br />

underwriting managers<br />

• Are you clear about your <strong>TCF</strong> responsibilities - at all<br />

times – vs. those of the insurer, broker, other service<br />

provider?<br />

• Are customers clear on this too?<br />

• Who is responsible for <strong>TCF</strong> in your firm? Have your staff<br />

been trained on <strong>TCF</strong>?<br />

• How do you measure <strong>TCF</strong> delivery?<br />

• How do you take <strong>TCF</strong> into account when deciding<br />

whether to act for an insurer?<br />

5


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

<strong>TCF</strong> considerations for underwriting<br />

managers: Outcome 2 (Product design)<br />

• What is your role in product design – is it “your”<br />

product or the insurer’s? Are you and the insurer<br />

giving a consistent message?<br />

• What do you do to ensure the product design meets<br />

the needs of identified customer groups?<br />

• Do you monitor whether products actually reach<br />

their intended markets?<br />

6


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

<strong>TCF</strong> considerations for underwriting<br />

managers: Outcome 3 (Disclosure)<br />

• Do you develop disclosure material, or use material<br />

developed by the insurer? In either case, do you test it for<br />

clarity and appropriateness?<br />

• What do you do to ensure customers get information<br />

(including post-sale information) when they need it?<br />

• Are you confident information is adequately accessible to<br />

customers and brokers?<br />

7


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

<strong>TCF</strong> considerations for underwriting<br />

managers: Outcome 4 (Advice)<br />

• In practice, who “owns” the relationship with advisers – you<br />

or the insurer?<br />

• What responsibility do you accept for ensuring advisers have<br />

adequate product training?<br />

• Do you insist that the insurer provides your staff and / or the<br />

advisers with product training?<br />

• What do you do to mitigate risks for customers if you become<br />

aware of inappropriate advice?<br />

Non-mandated intermediaries of course have more direct<br />

responsibility for this Outcome<br />

8


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

<strong>TCF</strong> considerations for underwriting managers:<br />

Outcome 5 (Delivery on expectations)<br />

• Are customers clear on the service standards they can<br />

expect in relation to your functions?<br />

• Do you have the necessary controls in place to ensure your<br />

binder activities in no way compromise fair treatment of<br />

customers – whether by you or the insurer?<br />

• What level of feedback do you give insurers and brokers on<br />

their products and service?<br />

9


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

<strong>TCF</strong> considerations for underwriting managers:<br />

Outcome 6 (Claims, Complaints, Switches)<br />

• Where you handle claims, have you tested your process<br />

from a <strong>TCF</strong> perspective?<br />

• Do you have a review process in place to test the fairness of<br />

repudiations?<br />

• Do your claims service standards focus on more than just<br />

turnaround times?<br />

• Do you analyse and act on complaints for <strong>TCF</strong> purposes?<br />

10


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

<strong>TCF</strong> aspects of implementing binder agreements<br />

In addition to the general <strong>TCF</strong> considerations discussed, binder<br />

relationships have specific <strong>TCF</strong> implications:<br />

• Is your binder fee reasonably commensurate with your<br />

binder activities? Is it clear what activities are covered by the<br />

fee? Is there a risk that the value chain is carrying multiple<br />

costs for the same activities, to the detriment of fair pricing?<br />

• Does your data provide sufficient management information<br />

for you and / or the insurer to measure delivery of <strong>TCF</strong><br />

outcomes?<br />

11


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

Roll-out of the <strong>TCF</strong> framework<br />

• <strong>TCF</strong> Regulatory Framework SC has carried out a gap analysis of a wide range of<br />

existing consumer protection legislation<br />

• Final <strong>TCF</strong> self assessment tool has been issued for industry use – to be regarded<br />

as regulatory guidance<br />

• A <strong>TCF</strong> baseline study is in progress – involves a range of FSB regulated sectors<br />

(including binder holders), plus banks (approx. 100 groups, 250 questionnaires).<br />

Findings will be published.<br />

• <strong>TCF</strong> reporting requirements and indicators – for both regulatory and public<br />

reporting – to be developed<br />

• Key sub-projects: Key information documents; complaints handling, reporting<br />

and categorisations; planned review of insurance claims handling practices<br />

Not all elements of the <strong>TCF</strong> regulatory and supervisory framework require<br />

legislative amendment. A number of elements can be – and are being - rolled<br />

out within the existing regulatory framework<br />

12


<strong>Treating</strong> <strong>Customers</strong> <strong>Fairly</strong><br />

Thank you<br />

Questions please?<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!