12.09.2015 Views

St’át’imc Runner

september fp 09_Layout 1 - The Media Co-op

september fp 09_Layout 1 - The Media Co-op

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 10<br />

Alkstálhcw<br />

The <strong>St’át’imc</strong> <strong>Runner</strong> September 2009<br />

Líl’wat Returns to SCC<br />

Chief Leonard Andrew made a<br />

presentation to the <strong>St’át’imc</strong> Chiefs<br />

Council at their July meeting.<br />

Prior to that, Líl’wat Council made<br />

a decision concerning the abeyance<br />

letter that was sent to SCC in 2005:<br />

that they would like to participate<br />

once again with the SCC.<br />

In 2005, the negotiations<br />

with BC Hydro triggered the<br />

abeyance letter. Líl’wat was going<br />

to negotiate with BC Hydro separately,<br />

and this never happened.<br />

Líl’wat had a few meetings with<br />

BC Hydro, but have now decided to<br />

come back to the SCC table for<br />

hydro negotiations.<br />

Also, Líl’wat wanted to<br />

have a protocol among the<br />

<strong>St’át’imc</strong> communities for working<br />

together. “Way back we started<br />

talking about the issues and the<br />

Declaration. When Líl’wat pulled<br />

out (of SCC), Chief and Council<br />

looked at all the issues and how fast<br />

the community was growing, this is<br />

even separate from the Olympics.<br />

There were a lot of deficits and<br />

when I became a Chief, I decided to<br />

try do something about this. I<br />

always have said we are <strong>St’át’imc</strong><br />

and we are one. When we are talking<br />

about Líl’wat Nation we are<br />

really talking about our community.<br />

Would like to begin working with<br />

all our neighbours and begin working<br />

with the Nation.”<br />

“There is change coming<br />

and we are going to have to start<br />

dealing with this. What are we<br />

going to look like in 10, 12, or 20<br />

years? We have economic development<br />

happening, building schools<br />

and homes for our people. We are<br />

now dealing with our territory and a<br />

lot of our dealings are with our territory.<br />

“What are all our dealings<br />

as a tribe? A lot of issues are<br />

important to us all. Look at<br />

Chehalis and what is happening<br />

there because of treaty.<br />

“All Líl’wat is asking really<br />

is to have a protocol amongst ourselves.<br />

We already have protocols<br />

with other neighbours. Basically<br />

Barrick Gold - “Mine.”<br />

Barrick Gold is the<br />

largest gold and copper mining<br />

company in the world. Barrick<br />

has a mining claim near Poison<br />

Mountain in northern St'át'imc,<br />

and this summer has contracted a<br />

Prince George company to do<br />

exploratory drilling.<br />

This Canadian corporation's<br />

reputation is also the worst.<br />

Most recently the company saw<br />

fit to fire on protesters in<br />

Tanzania, killing one and wounding<br />

many. The list of broken<br />

promises to the list of indigenous<br />

nations around the globe is too<br />

long to even begin.<br />

The claim was explored<br />

in the 1980's and never mined.<br />

Technology has greatly advanced<br />

since then, so a new exploration<br />

was required to assess the potential<br />

value of the claim.<br />

The Xwísten Lands and<br />

Resources found about the plans<br />

in May, and called for a meeting<br />

to find out what the company's<br />

plans were. While Barrick had<br />

apparently been consulting with<br />

communities north of the<br />

St'át'imc border, Xwísten was not<br />

on a list of Bands provided to the<br />

company by BC ministries,<br />

because they do not have a<br />

Forest and Range Agreement.<br />

The FRA's include a map of a<br />

community's stated traditional<br />

territory.<br />

Over the summer, twelve<br />

drill holes have shown about 16<br />

grams of copper per ton of gravel,<br />

and 12 grams of gold.<br />

Exploration was slowed when<br />

the camp had to be evacuated on<br />

August 30. A wildfire on Big<br />

Dog mountain burned one of the<br />

old camp's cabins, and came very<br />

close to the new camp.<br />

Barrick will decide whether to<br />

sell the claim or keep it depending<br />

on the results of the new<br />

explorations.<br />

Chiefs discuss shared<br />

areas with Chehalis<br />

Chehalis now feels there is little<br />

time to resolve their land<br />

dispute with the In-SHUCK-ch<br />

of southern <strong>St’át’imc</strong>. A ratification<br />

vote on the treaty<br />

group’s Final Agreement may<br />

be as close as next Spring.<br />

Several areas of land are at<br />

issue for Chehalis, but most<br />

especially 20 Mile Bay on<br />

Harrison Lake.<br />

The <strong>St’át’imc</strong> Chiefs<br />

Council met on Tuesday,<br />

September 1, in Líl’wat. All eleven<br />

community Chiefs were present.<br />

Important guests from<br />

Chehalis were also in attendance.<br />

Chief Willie Charlie, Councilor<br />

Boyd Peters, Fran Douglas, Senior<br />

Research Assistant, Aboriginal<br />

Rights and Title, and<br />

Archaeologist Gordon Mohs came<br />

to discuss the question of our<br />

shared areas along the Harrison<br />

Lake.<br />

Chehalis has now<br />

approached the Chiefs Council<br />

since their discussions with In-<br />

SHUCK-ch have been fruitless.<br />

What are the inter-tribal<br />

boundaries? Traditionally the families<br />

there were cooperative; both<br />

sides recall sharing the lake and<br />

valley for hunting, fishing and<br />

gathering. Now that the land is<br />

assigned cash values by a modern<br />

economy, it becomes difficult to<br />

share.<br />

The In-SHUCK-ch<br />

Agreement in Principle, in the BC<br />

treaty process, was revealed in<br />

2006. This document came as a<br />

shock to Chehalis, whose then-<br />

Chief Alex Paul believed he had<br />

reached agreement with the In-<br />

SHUCK-ch Chief Negotiator that<br />

areas around and south of 20 Mile<br />

Bay would not be in the treaty<br />

negotiations. 20 Mile Bay is now<br />

an important part of the proposed<br />

Treaty Settlement Lands. It is also,<br />

and has always been, an important<br />

village and burial site for Chehalis.<br />

The fee simple title ownership of<br />

the place would be unacceptable to<br />

Chehalis, and they have always<br />

made this clear.<br />

The treaty controversy<br />

within <strong>St’át’imc</strong>, home to three<br />

other formerly attempted modern<br />

If the treaty was ratified, BC<br />

would recognize fee simple<br />

title ownership of the property<br />

by In-SHUCK-ch. BC and<br />

Canada maintain, in the treaty<br />

itself, that this does not affect<br />

anyone else’s aboriginal rights.<br />

Chehalis thinks it does, and<br />

their last option is to take up<br />

the issue with the <strong>St’át’imc</strong> as<br />

a whole.<br />

day treaties with BC and Canada, is<br />

substantial. The matter has not<br />

been addressed directly between the<br />

Chiefs. A ratification vote on the<br />

Final Agreement is imminent. This<br />

will force Chehalis, according to<br />

Mohs, to provide proof of their<br />

strength of claim to lands as far<br />

north along the lake as Port<br />

Douglas, Xáxtsa7. This is where<br />

solid lines on maps come in.<br />

Such legalistic and exclusive jurisdictions<br />

is not part of indigenous<br />

history in many cases, particularly<br />

this one.<br />

Chief Harris of Xáxtsa7 has<br />

explained how the families along<br />

the lake were always in a state of<br />

accommodation and support, even<br />

while the rest of the two countries<br />

may have been at odds. They relied<br />

on each other, and relied on the<br />

hunting, fishing and gathering lands<br />

between them respectfully and<br />

mutually. The Lillooet River provided<br />

a great trade route from the<br />

Fraser valley to the interior.<br />

Several of the <strong>St’át’imc</strong><br />

Chiefs spoke to the ideal situation<br />

of an open, honest and evolving<br />

protocol between Chehalis and<br />

<strong>St’át’imc</strong> in these lands. Chehalis<br />

responded that they have exhausted<br />

their good faith in discussions with<br />

the treaty group, which actually<br />

asserts that <strong>St’át’imc</strong> has no interest<br />

in those lands.<br />

Several Chiefs were able to<br />

point to examples of other shared<br />

area protocols, such as that between<br />

Líl’wat and Squamish; with<br />

Nlaka’pamux to the east, primarily<br />

regarding fisheries, and the beginning<br />

of dialogue with Tsilhqot’in to<br />

the north and Secwepemc to the<br />

north east.<br />

Further meetings between<br />

the Chiefs Council and Chehalis are<br />

anticipated.<br />

Next SCC meeting:<br />

Tuesday October 6, Xwísten

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!