BREIFING ON OSCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Improving standards – 1 Format •Structured interaction between examiner and candidate •Patients participating should have real physical signs •Patients relate their own history (may have some details modified to fit the scenario) •Surrogate or simulated patients - learnt the scenario and history to be discussed and related to the candidate •Surrogate patients - have no abnormal physical findings Format Examiners
Improving standards – 2 Marking •The marking scheme for each station is structured •Weighting •Global vs. checklist scoring •Discussion of marking inconsistencies Examiners • Examiners must understand the principles of <strong>OSCE</strong>s
Page 1: BREIFING ON OSCE Nagy Sayed-Ahmed
Page 4 and 5: The Pillars of Education Knowledge
Page 6 and 7: Lecture Clinical Seminars Knowledge
Page 8 and 9: Clinical Sems - Exams & Marks Item
Page 10 and 11: Is it a reliable examination?
Page 12 and 13: Is it feasible?
Page 14 and 15: WHAT IS AN OSCE? This is an assess
Page 18 and 19: Practicalities of OSCE • Suitabl
Page 20 and 21: DESIGNING A CLINICAL EXAMINATION SK
Page 25 and 26: On the Day • Admin to supervise
Page 27 and 28: CONSIDER THE CURRICULUM / ASSESSMEN
Page 29: Station Number Code (admin. use onl
Page 32 and 33: WRITE INSTRUCTIONS FOR PATIENT OR R
Page 34 and 35: DESIGN THE MARKING CRITERIA
Page 36 and 37: What can go wrong? • Examiners la
Page 38 and 39: Thank you! • We appreciate your c
Page 40: The objectives of the OSCE - 2 Sty
Page 45 and 46: How the station works • Students
Page 51 and 52: The mark sheet There are 3 parts:
Page 53 and 54: Written feedback • There is a box
Page 55 and 56: Marking fairly • Do not compare s
Page 57 and 58: You are not the final decision! •
Page 61: Thank you! We welcome suggestions f
Page 65 and 66: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Page 71:
And more importantly
show all

BREIFING ON OSCE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?