15.09.2015 Views

BUS 670 WEEK 4 DQ 2 ANTITRUST LAW

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>BUS</strong> <strong>670</strong> <strong>WEEK</strong> 4 <strong>DQ</strong> 2 <strong>ANTITRUST</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> (ASH COURSE)<br />

Click Here To Buy The Tutorial<br />

http://www.uoptutorial.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=504&product<br />

_id=7623<br />

For more course tutorials visit<br />

www.uoptutorial.com<br />

Antitrust Law. Review the “AT&T Ends $39 Billion Bid for T-Mobile” article.<br />

In 2011, AT&T attempted a merger with T-Mobile. The Justice Department sued under the act,<br />

claiming that the merger would constitute a violation of the antitrust laws. In 2012, AT&T<br />

dropped its attempt at the acquisition.<br />

If AT&T had merged with T-Mobile, would the merger have violated antitrust laws? Why, or<br />

why not? Do not be unduly influenced by the Justice Department’s stance on the issue. Use your<br />

own analysis to reach a conclusion.<br />

Guided Response:<br />

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner. Some ways to do<br />

this include the following, though you may choose a different approach, providing your response<br />

is substantive:<br />

Agree or disagree with your classmate’s position. Defend your position by using information<br />

from the week’s readings or examples from current events.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!