Wessex Archaeology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scoping Study Wessex Archaeology 66641.02 The number of known aircraft crash sites on the seabed as recorded by the National Monuments Record and local Sites and Monuments Records and Historic Environment Records is relatively small. The known resource is therefore relatively small. Notwithstanding issues concerning survival, the potential therefore exists for the presence of a very large number of currently unknown crash sites on the seabed and, to some extent, in the inter-tidal zone. Recent discoveries of previously unknown aircraft crash sites in licenced marine aggregate dredging areas suggests that there is a need for urgent national and local record enhancement in areas of seabed likely to be impacted by human activities. The discrepancy between the known resource and the potential resource can be addressed by research of both primary and secondary material. However, there is a huge amount of this material and it is not complete. There is also likely to be a lack of good quality data concerning the positions of losses. Enhancing existing databases is likely to be very time consuming and therefore can most effectively be achieved by harnessing the information and expertise of existing aviation researchers, both in the UK and abroad. Much of the work undertaken by these researchers is not geographically orientated and may require further work in this respect. In addition much of it is currently unpublished and therefore vulnerable to loss. Seabed and inter-tidal environments, particularly those that result in burial or other favourable preservation environments, currently offer the potential for much more intact survival than most terrestrial sites. This can be seen in the case studies examined as part of this project. However, locating well preserved sites is problematic and currently largely a matter of chance. Management and research considerations are dominated by the application of the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 to most of the sites that constitute the resource. They are also complicated by the possible presence of human remains from what are, archaeologically speaking, recent casualties and by various international interests. English Heritage has devised a method of assessing the importance of aircraft crash sites through research conducted for the Monuments Protection Programme. The approach suggested appears to be simple and effective, although lists of ‘extinct’ and otherwise important aircraft need updating. Through the same research a basic research agenda that could be applied to aircraft crash sites on the seabed has been suggested. This requires more detail and imput from all stakeholders to ensure that it becomes a truly workable strategy. An agreed means of risk assessing known aircraft crash sites is not currently available. The question of preservation in situ needs further consideration and consultation. A preservation in situ policy has been advanced by English Heritage in relation to archaeological sites on the seabed in the last few years. However current English Heritage guidelines for managing aircraft crash sites do not envisage the preservation in situ of most aircraft remains and control of the licencing process is not directly in the hands of English Heritage. Aircraft crash sites appear to be of widespread interest to the general public and to special interest groups. Numerous potential stakeholders have been identified, some of whom, such as aircraft recovery groups, may not have research agendas that sit entirely comfortably with current heritage management thinking. This needs to be addressed further. The following key recommendations are made: ii
Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scoping Study Wessex Archaeology 66641.02 • Aircraft crash sites at sea should be given greater attention and priority in both research and management agendas on both national and regional levels. • The existing national and local monument records require enhancement in respect of aircraft crash sites at sea order to make them more useful. Priority should be given to incorporating existing relevant unpublished research over undertaking original research. • A more detailed and specific national research agenda for aviation archaeology should be established. The approach taken should be flexible and should address and incorporate the potential interests of all stakeholders. The agenda set out in Modern Military Matters, together with an updated list of ‘extinct’ aircraft would be a suitable starting point. • Existing guidance for marine industries does not fully address the specific problems of aircraft crash sites. Additional archaeological and heritage management guidance specific to aircraft crash sites should therefore be prepared for all sectors of marine industry that may have an impact upon aircraft crash sites. • Joint Casualty & Compassionate Centre and the British Aviation Archaeology Council should be encouraged to continue to promote and improve basic standards of archaeological recording and reporting amongst Protection of Military Remains Act licence holders. • A method of risk assessing aircraft crash sites is required. The approach adopted in relation to sites designated under the Protection of Wrecks Act (1973) is recommended (EH 2007). • Research should be undertaken in a number of areas in order to inform the above guidance and to assist in the management of aircraft crash sites. Draft interim guidance for the marine aggregate industry on dealing with aircraft crash sites at sea has been produced. This builds on the existing industry protocol for reporting finds of archaeological interest and is included as an Appendix in the report. iii
Page 1 and 2: Wessex Archaeology Aircraft Crash S
Page 3: Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scop
Page 7 and 8: Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scop
Page 55 and 56:
Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scop
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
February-November 1941 October-Marc
Page 167 and 168:
Scattered Wreckage Area Not Searche
Page 169 and 170:
Snorkel parka on engine 1 (from ROV
Page 171 and 172:
This material is for a client repor
Page 173 and 174:
0 50 mm This material is for a clie
Page 175:
WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY LIMITED. Registe
show all

Wessex Archaeology

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?