ff
STUDY ON REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IMPACT OF ... - UNFPA, Egypt
STUDY ON REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IMPACT OF ... - UNFPA, Egypt
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HSRP-supportive projects (UNFPA-Supply/Demand Project) improve integration through training<br />
in evaluation of performance using specific formats, training of physicians and nurses and through<br />
adding new ideas for evaluation of the performance of the health facilities (Souhag, Quena,<br />
Alexandria).<br />
Shortcomings of FHM: The performance of the service providers in the FHM facilities is not<br />
good compared to the non-FHM facilities, because the training of family physicians is not of<br />
acceptable quality and there is no referral system (Quena).<br />
E-Referral Services<br />
Positive impact of FHM: Referral system is implemented (Alexandria). There are views that<br />
referral system is working, because it is linked with the FHU physician incentive system<br />
(Menofia).<br />
Shortcomings of FHM: The referral system is not working e<strong>ff</strong>iciently due to the high cost of the<br />
referral process. The doctors do not know the standards/requirements for referral of cases. People<br />
do not understand the benefits of referral process: enrolment for specialist services, follow up, and<br />
feedback services (Menofia). In Quena the referral system is not working due to nonreceiving/delay<br />
in receiving fund from FHF and the hospital sta<strong>ff</strong> is not motivated to provide care<br />
to referred cases (Quena). In Suez there are no changes in the current system of referral from the<br />
health unit to the general hospital.<br />
Quotation (20): people do not like referral to hospital through FHU. There are many steps: folder, heath<br />
unit visit payment, cost of enrolment for specialist services etc. The private physician is one step/less<br />
cost service.<br />
DPO Menofia<br />
There is no relation between the DPO and the hospital, because the hospitals are a<strong>ff</strong>iliated to the<br />
MOHP-curative care sector. The health district is concerned with the health units which are<br />
a<strong>ff</strong>iliated to MOHP- preventive medicine sector. In either case the district cannot support the<br />
hospital or the health units due to lack of resources at the district level (Suez).<br />
F-Quality of RH services<br />
Positive impact of FHM: The sta<strong>ff</strong> is aware about accreditation process, and how to achieve, and<br />
the indictors used for periodic evaluation (Alexandria, Souhag) and the links between accreditation<br />
and getting financial support (Suez).<br />
Shortcomings of FHM: The quality indicators are set by the STSP without involvement of the<br />
health district sta<strong>ff</strong> (Alexandria). The indicators used to monitor performance are concerned with<br />
quantitative performance rather than quality (Quena). STSP does not provide enough support in<br />
order to setting plans and providing resources to facilities to achieve accreditation (Quena). The<br />
units are selected for accreditation by the health directorate, which provide resources to the<br />
selected units. However, this support is incomplete and sporadic (Suez).<br />
The allocation of 36% of the health facility revenue for maintenance of equipment, building of the<br />
health facility etc., is not enough.<br />
Cost-sharing policy limits the utilization of the health facilities, irrespective to quality services<br />
(Menofia).<br />
Quotation (21): Utilization of health services is related to cost rather than the quality. Out of the 26<br />
FHUs, there were 4 non-accredited facilities. Non-accredited facilities had high case load due to low<br />
cost of service<br />
DPO Menofia<br />
62<br />
Impact of FHM on supply of RH-services