21.09.2015 Views

Command

AFDD 1 - GlobalSecurity.org

AFDD 1 - GlobalSecurity.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

priorities across the AOR. The key disadvantage is that the JACCE(s) may be<br />

inadequate if subordinate JTFs require detailed support and physical leadership<br />

presence.<br />

Sub-Theater-Level Component<br />

This model establishes a subordinate AETF and COMAFFOR within a<br />

subordinate JTF, responsible for an operational area below the theater (i.e., CCDR)<br />

level. This model may be preferable when the span or scope of operations is less than<br />

theater-wide, or when operations are sufficiently fluid to require planning and execution<br />

at more tactical levels.<br />

Under this model, the CCDR-level COMAFFOR, as directed by the CCDR,<br />

relinquishes OPCON of the forces attached to the subordinate AETF, and the<br />

designated commander of the JTF accepts OPCON for the duration of the attachment.<br />

In accordance with joint and Air Force doctrine, the JTF commander then normally<br />

delegates OPCON of attached Air Force forces to the JTF COMAFFOR (i.e., the AETF<br />

commander). ADCON is retained within the Service chain from the CCDR-level<br />

COMAFFOR downward to the JTF-level COMAFFOR. The JTF-level COMAFFOR is<br />

poised to also act as the JFACC within the JTF, if so designated by the JTF<br />

commander.<br />

The key advantage of this model is that it provides fully integrated airpower to a<br />

subordinate JTF, while the theater COMAFFOR/JFACC maintains control of highdemand,<br />

low density capabilities. The key disadvantage is that Air Force forces<br />

attached to the JTF are not normally available to address demands outside their JTF.<br />

Mix of Theater- and Sub-Theater-Level Components<br />

Some theater requirements may drive a mix of the two previous models. This<br />

may be desirable when there are competing requirements for low density/high demand<br />

Service capabilities (e.g., ISR, remotely piloted aircraft, and air refueling) across the<br />

AOR, yet there is also sufficient demand for dedicated airpower at subordinate levels to<br />

drive attachment of Air Force forces to a subordinate JTF.<br />

In these circumstances, the theater COMAFFOR, as directed by the CCDR,<br />

relinquishes OPCON over those Air Force forces that are attached to the JTF as an<br />

AETF, but retains OPCON over all other Air Force forces assigned or attached to the<br />

CCDR. As a reminder, the theater COMAFFOR retains ADCON over all Air Force<br />

forces assigned or attached to the CCDR, either through the JTF level COMAFFORs for<br />

AETFs attached to the JTF or through established commanders for those Air Force<br />

forces that are retained at the CCDR level.<br />

The key advantage of this model is that it provides fully integrated airpower to a<br />

subordinate JTF, while the theater COMAFFOR/JFACC maintains control of highdemand,<br />

low density capabilities. The key disadvantage is this model creates<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!