21.09.2015 Views

A-10s over Kosovo

A-10s over Kosovo : the victory of airpower - Air University Press

A-10s over Kosovo : the victory of airpower - Air University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-<strong>10s</strong> OVER KOSOVO<br />

three very different aircraft performed the AFAC mission quite<br />

differently. For target acquisition, F-16s and F-14s used targeting<br />

pods that provided a magnified in-the-cockpit picture of the<br />

target area while A-10 pilots flew with gyrostabilized 12- or 15-<br />

power binoculars, which they often called “binos.” In much of the<br />

weather conditions during OAF, binos had much better visual<br />

resolution than targeting pods.<br />

A-<strong>10s</strong> flew more than 1,000 AFAC missions during the 78<br />

days of the OAF air campaign. Thousands of allied aircraft, representing<br />

practically every attack aircraft in the NATO inventory,<br />

were controlled by A-<strong>10s</strong>. The specifics of how A-<strong>10s</strong> performed<br />

the OAF AFAC mission are discussed in chapter 2.<br />

Combat Search and Rescue<br />

CSAR—possibly the most audacious Air Force mission—is<br />

made possible by airmen who dare to penetrate bad-guy land<br />

and rec<strong>over</strong> recently shot down aviators from under the very<br />

nose of the enemy—an enemy who has many reasons for<br />

wanting to capture hapless aviators and is all too eager to do<br />

so. Those aviators are usually downed in combat and in the<br />

course of expending ordnance on the enemy’s troops. The<br />

enemy knows that the potential prize can be exploited for intelligence<br />

(intel), propaganda, and other political ends—not to<br />

mention the pleasure of retribution. For example, during the<br />

Gulf War, Saddam Hussein tried to use photos and videos of<br />

captured aviators to negatively affect allied public support for<br />

the air campaign.<br />

With the increased use of airpower as the first instrument<br />

for coercion and peacemaking, the capture of an airman becomes<br />

more likely and could provide an enemy with a method<br />

of influencing public opinions, especially within allied democracies.<br />

An enemy may try to force “confessions” and intel disclosures<br />

from captured aviators. Dictators have demonstrated<br />

a willingness to subject helpless and, perhaps, wounded air<br />

warriors to public ridicule for political advantage without regard<br />

to the prisoner-of-war protections afforded by the Geneva<br />

convention. With the desire to support and maintain the high<br />

morale of allied airmen—and deny the enemy any opportunity<br />

for a propaganda advantage—the United States and its NATO<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!