EUN-JOO MIN WIPO Abstract

EUN-JOO MIN
WIPO
Abstract
ECTA Secretariat, Rue des Colonies 18/24, 9th Floor, BE- Brussels, Belgium
Tel 32/2-513 52 85 Fax 32/2-513 09 14 E-Mail ecta@ecta.org Internet http://www.ecta.eu
A company limited by guarantee. Reg. in England and Wales No. 1520996.
Reg. address: 15 Southampton Place, London WC1A 2AJ, England.
VAT No. BE0851518062

“SHOULD I LAUGH OR CRY - ICANN AND THE NEW GTLD[S]”
I. WIPO ADR Services for Domain Name Disputes
Domain Name Case Administration
• WIPO Administration of Domain Name Disputes
o WIPO Statistics
o WIPO Center 2011 Press Release
• WIPO Jurisprudential “Overview 2.0”; WIPO UDRP Legal Index
• WIPO List of Domain Name Panelists
• WIPO Procedural Guidance and Training
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Development
• First WIPO Report; Second WIPO Report
• ccTLDs
• eUDRP
• New gTLD Reports
o WIPO Report – New Generic Top-Level Domains: Intellectual Property
Considerations (2005 Report)
o WIPO End Reports on .mobi, on .biz and on .info
II.
III.
ICANN GNSO Council Requests Staff Report on the Current State of the UDRP
WIPO Activities Related to New gTLDs
Pre- (TLD) Delegation LRO Dispute Resolution Procedure
• The WIPO Center assisted ICANN in devising and applying LRO substantive criteria and
procedural rules
• LRO foundation: WIPO Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of
Marks, and Other Industrial Property Rights in Signs, on the Internet
• The WIPO Center expected to administer LRO disputes and has provided to ICANN draft
Dispute Resolution Service Provider Rules and Schedule of Fees
WIPO Center Core Concerns on Draft RPMs
• Draft Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PDDRP)
Not addressing potential instances of willful blindness in the management of New gTLDs,
misses a timely opportunity for registration authorities to responsibly partner towards a credible
DNS
• Draft Uniform Rapid Suspension Mechanism (URS)
Has become an overburdened procedure such that it is no longer a meaningful complement to
the existing UDRP
• Trademark Clearinghouse (and RPMs using such data)
Must not unfairly burden rights holders in the treatment of trademark registrations, and more
generally should not unfairly capitalize on trademark owners' enforcement concerns
Abstract – Eun-Joo Min 2