samudra

Can’t
Say No
To
Casino
When the government announced its decision to build two
integrated resorts with casinos, it was fraught with much
thought and consideration.
“This is a judgement, not a mathematical
calculation. We see the trends and feel the
need to move. Whichever way we decide,
there are risks. If we proceed, the integrated
resorts may not succeed or the social fallout
may be worse than we expect. If we do not
proceed, we are at serious risk of being left
behind by other cities,” said Prime Minister
Lee Hsien Loong.
Choosing between risks of gambling vices over high
unemployment was done with fear and trembling. NTUC
Secretary-General Lim Boon Heng admitted that he didn’t
like gambling but for the sake of revitalizing the tourism
and hospitality sector it was certainly a price to consider.
“This is not an easy decision.... But with
35,000 jobs to be created, I can’t say no.”
How can anyone say no to a decision that is expected
to create 35,000 jobs and reap $5B worth of
investments annually?
Making the announcement in Parliament, PM Lee said that
the move will give Singapore a chance to transform itself
into a vibrant hub in Asia that is ahead of its regional
competitors like Hong Kong and Shanghai, which have
unveiled ambitious plans to rake in the tourist dollars.
In clarification, PM Lee highlighted that it is not a matter
of chasing tourist numbers but about creating more jobs
in the hotel, retail, exhibition, aviation, food and beverage
industry, all of which depend on tourism.
PM Lee also gave the assurance that casinos would form
just a part of the integrated resorts. The design and
planning of the resorts shall be wholesome where the
gaming area will be separate and the gaming component
will be restricted to no more than 3 to 5% of the total area
of the integrated resort developments.
The Government has also committed itself to help set up
a national framework for addressing the problem of
gambling, support programmes to educate the public on
gambling and continue to work alongside religious groups.
As Mr Lim has encouraged, “Let us now work to
minimise the social costs and protect our
safe and wholesome living environment.”
34 Samudra April + May 2005