Assessment Policy - The International School of Azerbaijan
Assessment Policy - The International School of Azerbaijan
Assessment Policy - The International School of Azerbaijan
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
TISA WHOLE SCHOOL ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
1. Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
What is assessment?<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> is the gathering and analysis <strong>of</strong> information about student performance. It identifies<br />
what students know, understand, can do and feel at different stages in the learning process.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> is integral to all learning. It is central to the PYP‟s goal <strong>of</strong> thoughtfully and<br />
effectively guiding children through the five essential elements <strong>of</strong> learning: the understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
concepts, the acquisition <strong>of</strong> knowledge, the mastering <strong>of</strong> skills, the development <strong>of</strong> positive<br />
attitudes, and the decision to take responsible action.<br />
Everyone involved in the student learning process (students, teachers, parents, administrators)<br />
must have a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the reasons for assessment, what is being assessed, the<br />
criteria for success and the method by which the assessment is made.<br />
<strong>The</strong> single most important aim <strong>of</strong> assessment in the MYP and Post 16 Programmes is to support<br />
and encourage student learning.<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary objective <strong>of</strong> assessment in the MYP is to provide a basis for future learning. <strong>The</strong><br />
assessment system <strong>of</strong> the MYP allows schools to incorporate multiple forms <strong>of</strong> assessment<br />
adapted to the learning objectives.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> in the Post 16 Programme has a number <strong>of</strong> significant purposes which includes<br />
reinforcing the teaching <strong>of</strong> the curricular goals <strong>of</strong> the programme. <strong>Assessment</strong> provides<br />
differentiated information about student achievement. It also provides the grades to award<br />
certifications <strong>of</strong> achievement whether through the IB Diploma and IB Certificates or through<br />
TISA‟s High <strong>School</strong> Graduation Certificate, transcripts and term grades.<br />
Why do we assess?<br />
<strong>The</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> assessment are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To provide feedback to students- to assist them to develop an understanding <strong>of</strong> where<br />
they are and to help them on to the next stage<br />
To provide feedback to parents - to assist them in understanding where their child is and<br />
support their child‟s learning<br />
To provide feedback to teachers - to assist them in planning and teaching<br />
To provide feedback to the administration <strong>of</strong> the school - to assist and evaluate the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the curriculum<br />
To provide feedback to colleges and universities – to assist student entry into tertiary<br />
education<br />
2. Collecting <strong>Assessment</strong> Data<br />
What do we assess in the PYP?<br />
1
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> PYP aim to thoughtfully and effectively guide children through five essential elements <strong>of</strong><br />
learning:<br />
the understanding <strong>of</strong> concepts<br />
the acquisition <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
the mastering <strong>of</strong> skills<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> positive attitudes<br />
the decision to take responsible action.<br />
Because we consider these elements essential to our programme, we need to assess student<br />
progress in each <strong>of</strong> these elements in all subject areas.<br />
What do we assess in the MYP?<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> is a continuous process and is designed to address the MYP objectives in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
eight subject groups and the personal project, according to a criterion referenced approach. <strong>The</strong><br />
assessment focuses on process as well as product. <strong>The</strong> MYP approach to assessment recognizes<br />
the importance <strong>of</strong> assessing the processes <strong>of</strong> learning as well as the products <strong>of</strong> learning, and<br />
aims to integrate and support both.<br />
What do we assess in the Post-16 Programme?<br />
A wide variety <strong>of</strong> approaches to assessment are used to support curricular goals and encourage<br />
appropriate student learning. <strong>The</strong>se assessment approaches provide students with suitable<br />
contexts in which to demonstrate their capabilities. Student learning is regularly assessed against<br />
the objectives and assessment criteria specific to each subject within the Diploma, Certificate or<br />
TISA Graduation track <strong>of</strong> the Post-16 Programme.<br />
Who assesses in the PYP?<br />
Throughout the learning process, both students and teachers should be actively involved in<br />
assessing student progress. Students will regularly be asked to assess their own work and to<br />
reflect on their learning process. Teachers will support students in assessing their own work by<br />
providing assessment criteria and by modelling the assessment process. <strong>Assessment</strong> criteria as<br />
phrased in performance lists or in rubrics should preferably be established in collaboration with<br />
the students and should guide both feedback sessions between the teacher and the student and<br />
student self assessment. <strong>The</strong> assessment criteria should be accessible for the students while they<br />
are working towards a product.<br />
Who assesses in the MYP?<br />
As in the PYP, both students and teachers are actively involved in the assessment <strong>of</strong> student<br />
work. Reflection is a crucial component <strong>of</strong> the MYP and learning in all subject areas involves<br />
the students in both peer and self-assessment. Where more than one teacher is delivering the<br />
same subject, the process <strong>of</strong> internal standardization takes place before final levels <strong>of</strong><br />
achievement are awarded. In M5 student work is sent to the IB for external moderation to ensure<br />
that programme standards are maintained.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Personal Project is completed during M5 and is a significant piece <strong>of</strong> work produced over an<br />
extended period, and is a direct application <strong>of</strong> skills acquired over the course <strong>of</strong> the programme<br />
through Approaches to Learning. <strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> completing the Personal Project is led by the<br />
student, with supervision and guidance by a teacher. <strong>The</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the personal project is a<br />
form <strong>of</strong> summative assessment <strong>of</strong> students‟ ability to conduct independent work using the Areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> Interaction as contexts for their inquiries.<br />
2
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Who assesses in the Post-16 Programme?<br />
Methods <strong>of</strong> formative assessment, particularly those involving direct interaction between teacher<br />
and student, provide both with detailed feedback on the nature <strong>of</strong> the student‟s strengths and<br />
weaknesses, and help to develop the student‟s capabilities. Teachers plan for learning activities<br />
that involve students in peer- and self-assessment. Teachers carry out summative assessment in<br />
order to measure the level <strong>of</strong> student achievement at any one time. Formal assessment <strong>of</strong> students<br />
following the Diploma and Certificate tracks will contribute to their final qualifications awarded<br />
by the IB. All courses except Creativity, Action and Service are formally assessed by external<br />
examiners and all include significant components that are internally assessed by subject teachers.<br />
Some subjects also include components that are completed by students under the supervision <strong>of</strong><br />
their teachers and which are assessed by external examiners.<br />
When do we assess in the PYP?<br />
Pre-<strong>Assessment</strong><br />
At the beginning <strong>of</strong> each Unit <strong>of</strong> Inquiry, teachers will assess children‟s prior knowledge<br />
and experience before embarking on new learning experiences.<br />
Formative <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
Ongoing and regular assessment will be used during the teaching and learning process to<br />
inform teachers and children about how the learning is developing. Formative assessment<br />
and teaching are directly linked. A variety <strong>of</strong> methods will be used.<br />
Summative assessment<br />
Summative assessment happens at the end <strong>of</strong> the teaching and learning process and is<br />
planned for in advance. <strong>The</strong> assessment is designed so that students can show their<br />
understanding in authentic contexts and apply it in new and flexible ways.<br />
We believe that assessment is most effective when it is integrated in and generated from the ongoing<br />
teaching activities that take place in the class.<br />
When do we assess in the MYP?<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> in the MYP is continuous and viewed as a necessary and important part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
learning process. By assessing students as they engage with subject content, teachers identify<br />
student learning needs in order to better inform the learning process.<br />
As well as formative and summative assessment strategies including unit tests and quizzes,<br />
formal exams are held in January and June for M4 and M5 students. <strong>The</strong> grades from these<br />
exams are used as one <strong>of</strong> the assessment tools in providing levels at the end <strong>of</strong> the term. Levels<br />
that are reported at the end <strong>of</strong> each term are based on the skill level that has been attained<br />
throughout that term.<br />
When do we assess in the Post-16 Programme?<br />
<strong>The</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> students‟ current knowledge and experience are assessed before embarking on new<br />
learning. Over the course <strong>of</strong> the Post-16 Programme, teachers must engage in assessment for<br />
learning, involving formative assessment structures and practices. Summative assessment is<br />
frequently conducted at the end <strong>of</strong> topics, options, or other sections <strong>of</strong> the curriculum.<br />
Summative assessment contributes to reported student achievement levels and predicted grades<br />
for college applications. Formal assessment <strong>of</strong> Diploma and Certificate track students is designed<br />
3
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
to record student achievement at, or towards, the end <strong>of</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> study and is used to<br />
contribute to the final qualification awarded by the IB<br />
How do we assess in the PYP?<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> strategies<br />
Observations: All children are observed informally, with the teacher taking notes on the<br />
individual, the group, and the whole class. Observations include how groups work and<br />
the roles <strong>of</strong> participants within the group.<br />
Process focus: Students‟ skills and developing understanding are observed in real<br />
contexts, wherever possible, using checklists, narrative notes and inventories. <strong>The</strong><br />
emphasis is on the process and skill application rather than the product.<br />
Selected responses: Single „snapshot‟ samples <strong>of</strong> what students know or are able to do.<br />
Open Ended tasks: Students are given a stimulus and asked to communicate an original<br />
response. No two students will have the same response. In this way the student<br />
understands and application can be individually assessed.<br />
Student Portfolios: Teachers and students maintain a portfolio <strong>of</strong> work that<br />
demonstrates growth, thinking, creativity and reflection for both academic and social<br />
development over time.<br />
Performance Tasks: represents the kind <strong>of</strong> challenges that adults face in the world<br />
beyond the classroom, requires using a repertoire <strong>of</strong> knowledge and skill to accomplish a<br />
goal or solve a problem, requires thoughtfully applying knowledge, rather than recalling<br />
facts, is open ended, developing a tangible product or performance, has an identified<br />
purpose an audience, involves a realistic scenario, and involves criteria to be met.<br />
How do we assess in the MYP?<br />
<strong>The</strong> MYP assessment model is also described as criterion related as it is based upon<br />
predetermined criteria to which all students have access. <strong>The</strong> MYP identifies a set <strong>of</strong> objectives<br />
for each subject group, which are directly related to the assessment criteria <strong>of</strong> that particular<br />
subject group.<br />
A variety <strong>of</strong> assessment strategies are applied during the programme, from the more subjective<br />
and intuitive to the more objective and scientific. Such strategies may include:<br />
Observation <strong>of</strong> students in whole class settings or individually.<br />
Selected response in the form <strong>of</strong> test and quizzes to elicit responses that will indicate<br />
understanding.<br />
Open-ended tasks presenting students with a stimulus to prompt original response.<br />
Performance assessments that allow students to perform the learned skills and show their<br />
understanding in real world contacts. <strong>The</strong>se may take the form <strong>of</strong> a composition,<br />
research report, a presentation or a proposed solution.<br />
Process journals that demonstrate reflection and metacognition, which are essential stages<br />
in the process <strong>of</strong> higher order thinking skills.<br />
Portfolio <strong>Assessment</strong> used to record student learning achievements.<br />
Complex performance tasks.<br />
How do we assess in the Post-16 Programme?<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> within the Post-16 Programme is viewed as integral with planning, teaching and<br />
learning. Learning expectations and integral assessment strategies are made clear to students and<br />
4
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
parents through the Post-16 Programme Handbook, course introduction handouts, and the<br />
relevant sections <strong>of</strong> subject guides, including assessment criteria and assessment rubrics.<br />
<strong>The</strong> school uses a balanced range <strong>of</strong> strategies for formative and summative assessment, which<br />
are reviewed regularly. Formative assessment is designed to correctly identify the knowledge,<br />
skills and understanding that the students should develop. Teachers have the responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />
designing and providing formative assessment structures and practices that help students<br />
improve their understanding <strong>of</strong> what constitutes excellence and where their own work stands in<br />
relation to this. This emphasis on „learning how to learn‟ involves methods that improve<br />
students‟ judgements <strong>of</strong> their own strengths and weaknesses and then helping them to develop<br />
strategies to improve. Summative assessment involves accurately measuring the level <strong>of</strong> each<br />
student‟s achievement at any given time.<br />
In order to ensure high validity and reliability <strong>of</strong> summative assessment, Post-16 Programme<br />
teachers use published examination questions and corresponding mark schemes (in subjects<br />
where these form part <strong>of</strong> the formal assessment) and assignments suitable for, and marked<br />
according to, criteria and rubrics for internally and externally assessed work., Formal assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> Diploma and Certificate track students is through criterion-related performance assessment,<br />
and contributes to the final qualification awarded by the IB.<br />
3. Recording <strong>Assessment</strong> Data<br />
Recording <strong>Assessment</strong> Data in the PYP<br />
All teachers at TISA have a recording system. <strong>The</strong> recording system includes record sheets on<br />
which teachers are required to write narrative comments on student performance. <strong>The</strong> school has<br />
developed record sheets that will be used by all teachers. <strong>The</strong> record sheets assist teachers to<br />
record developments in the areas <strong>of</strong> conceptual understanding, skills and attitudes. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assessment data available on students will be recorded in the recording system. In addition it is<br />
possible that assessment data are available at other places e.g. teacher comments that are<br />
included in the Portfolio or are written on student products.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> tools are used to derive meaning from the assessment data generated through the<br />
activities described under the <strong>Assessment</strong> Strategies listed above. Most assessment tools describe<br />
how well a student is doing and help to determine the progress a student has made.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> tools<br />
Performance Lists: Performance lists <strong>of</strong>fer a practical means <strong>of</strong> judging student<br />
performance based upon identified criteria. A performance list consists <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong><br />
criterion elements, but not performance levels. <strong>The</strong>se are used for students to know the<br />
criteria before embarking on their work, to assess that they met the criteria. <strong>The</strong>se do not<br />
measure how well the students performed.<br />
Holistic Rubrics: A holistic rubric provides an overall impression <strong>of</strong> a student‟s work,<br />
they yield a single score or rating for a product or performance. <strong>The</strong>y provide a quick<br />
snapshot or impact <strong>of</strong> overall performance. <strong>The</strong>se are used for complex performances<br />
where the criteria amalgamation results in the impact (ie. dramatic performance), or to<br />
get a general impression <strong>of</strong> a piece <strong>of</strong> work.<br />
5
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Analytic Rubrics: An analytic rubric divides a product or performance into distinct traits<br />
or dimensions and judges each separately. Since an analytic rubric rates each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
identified traits independently, a separate score is provided for each. <strong>The</strong>se are used for<br />
larger projects and summative assessments as well as for analysing writing.<br />
Exemplars: <strong>The</strong>se are samples <strong>of</strong> student work that serve as concrete standards against<br />
which other samples are judged. <strong>The</strong>se can be used in conjunction with rubrics or<br />
continuums.<br />
Anecdotal Notes: Anecdotal notes are written notes based on observation <strong>of</strong> children.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se notes need to be systematically compiled, organised and analysed.<br />
Continuums: <strong>The</strong>se are a visual representation <strong>of</strong> developmental stages <strong>of</strong> learning.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y show a progression <strong>of</strong> achievement or identify where a child is in a process.<br />
<strong>The</strong> reporting <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> our assessments is holistic. Reporting focuses on process as well<br />
as product and relates the assessment results to both the curriculum and the learning contexts.<br />
Recording <strong>Assessment</strong> Data in the MYP<br />
To determine the final level <strong>of</strong> achievement for a student in each <strong>of</strong> the criteria, teachers gather<br />
sufficient evidence from a range <strong>of</strong> assessment tasks to enable them to make a pr<strong>of</strong>essional and<br />
informed judgement. Teachers analyse the achievement levels <strong>of</strong> students over the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />
final school year.<br />
Recording <strong>Assessment</strong> Data in the Post-16 Programme<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are efficient systems for recording data about student learning, which are in-keeping with<br />
the requirements <strong>of</strong> the programme. Subject teachers keep their own records <strong>of</strong> formative and<br />
summative assessment in the form <strong>of</strong> qualitative observations and quantitative levels <strong>of</strong> student<br />
performance in the various summative assessment tasks. At the end <strong>of</strong> each term, teachers on end<br />
<strong>of</strong> term reports record summative achievement levels. <strong>The</strong>se reports are also used to record data<br />
related to approaches to learning and skills development. Electronic copies <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> term reports<br />
are archived on the TISA server. <strong>The</strong> Diploma Coordinator keeps an updated spreadsheet that<br />
includes levels awarded at the end <strong>of</strong> each term as well as levels achieved in the IB1 mid-year<br />
and end <strong>of</strong> year examinations, and the IB2 mock examinations. Predicted grades for college<br />
applications are also recorded on this spreadsheet. Transcripts <strong>of</strong> student achievement that cover<br />
the last four years <strong>of</strong> High <strong>School</strong> (M4 to IB2) are produced by the College Counsellor.<br />
4. Reporting <strong>Assessment</strong> Data<br />
Reporting <strong>Assessment</strong> Data in the PYP<br />
When writing written reports and preparing for Parent Teacher Conferences, teachers will<br />
consult and use their recording system. In the written reports and in the Parent Teacher<br />
conferences specific reference will be made to student performance as evidenced in written<br />
work, discussion or behaviour.<br />
We report the findings <strong>of</strong> our assessment through:<br />
Parent-Teacher Conferences<br />
6
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Parent teacher conferences will take place every year in the week before the October break.<br />
During the Parent-Teacher Conference, the teacher will describe how the student performs and<br />
behaves in the class and the parents will provide their perspective. If there is any concern about<br />
the progress <strong>of</strong> a child, this concern will be documented in a Progress Summary Report. A copy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the report will be given to the parents after the conference and another copy will be given to<br />
the principal who will file it in the student file.<br />
Additional parent teacher conferences can be scheduled upon request <strong>of</strong> either the parents or the<br />
teacher.<br />
We will book one afternoon (between 3:00 and 4:00) in the last week before the winter break and<br />
summer break for parents to sign up for optional 10 minute conferences to discuss the written<br />
report.<br />
Parents may request additional parent teacher conferences at any time during the year. Whenever<br />
a teacher is concerned about a student‟s performance, the teacher will contact the parents to<br />
request an additional parent teacher conference.<br />
Portfolios<br />
Portfolios are purposeful collections <strong>of</strong> students‟ work. Throughout the year, students regularly<br />
look back at their work, select products that show progress and reflect on them. This assists the<br />
students in becoming self-assessors. <strong>The</strong> teacher will <strong>of</strong>fer advice regarding the selection <strong>of</strong><br />
student products and the teacher may select some products. <strong>The</strong> teacher will add descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />
the context in which the student product was generated, an explanation <strong>of</strong> the task, the link to the<br />
curriculum as well as their own comments on the product. In addition, general reflections,<br />
photographs illustrating processes and other evidence <strong>of</strong> student progress may be included. A<br />
selection <strong>of</strong> work in the student portfolio should be annotated with a student reflection saying<br />
what the work shows and why it was chosen. All products in the Portfolio should be dated. <strong>The</strong><br />
student and teacher are responsible for regular additions to and revision <strong>of</strong> the portfolio. <strong>The</strong><br />
student portfolio should include self assessments, draft and final form exemplars, reflections and<br />
samples to show growth over time. Teachers will be responsible for monitoring student portfolio<br />
content, both for the teacher selected and student-selected entries. Throughout the year, Single<br />
Subject teachers will collect items that will go into the Student Portfolio and will pass the items<br />
on to the homeroom teacher.<br />
Student-Led Conferences<br />
<strong>The</strong> Student-Led Conference is a meeting in which the students use their Portfolio as a basis for<br />
discussion with their parents about their learning. <strong>The</strong> conferences allow students to play an<br />
active role in the reporting process and communicate their progress to their parents. <strong>The</strong> teacher<br />
will usually not participate in the Student-Led Conference. <strong>The</strong> teacher may be present as a<br />
facilitator, if necessary, but not as the reporting authority. At the end <strong>of</strong> the conference, the<br />
parent and the student may together fill in a form that describes strengths, goals and strategies.<br />
Each class will schedule two Student-led Conferences per year. <strong>The</strong> first one will take place<br />
between September and December. <strong>The</strong> second one will take place between January and May<br />
<strong>The</strong> Student-led Conferences can be connected to end-<strong>of</strong>-unit open houses. Each grade level will<br />
choose when they will do their student led conference /open house. This means that the studentled<br />
conferences will not all take place at the same time but will depend on when the grade level<br />
teachers schedule them.<br />
7
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Parents will be <strong>of</strong>fered the opportunity to schedule a Parent-Teacher conference as a follow up to<br />
the Student-Led conferences.<br />
Written Reports<br />
Written reports are sent home in December and June. All teachers contribute to the written<br />
reports. <strong>The</strong> reports will be issued in the second last week before the beginning <strong>of</strong> the winter and<br />
summer vacation, allowing parents to schedule a conference with a teacher should they wish to<br />
do so.<br />
Reporting <strong>Assessment</strong> Data in the MYP<br />
Students in the MYP are provided with ongoing feedback from teachers. <strong>Assessment</strong> data is<br />
communicated to parents in the form <strong>of</strong> reports at the end <strong>of</strong> each term. This information<br />
includes subject areas as well as a report on homeroom involvement focusing on the Areas <strong>of</strong><br />
Interaction. Twice yearly there are Three Way conferences, which provide students, teachers<br />
and parents with an opportunity to conference and discuss progress in the programme. Pastoral<br />
Coordinators in the MYP provide feedback with parents and students when there are concerns<br />
that assessed criteria are not being met during the remainder <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />
Reporting <strong>Assessment</strong> Data in the Post 16 Programme<br />
Students are provided with regular and prompt progress. Reports are issued at the end <strong>of</strong> each<br />
term. In addition, there are Three-way Conferences scheduled twice a year for both IB1 and IB2.<br />
Parents and students are invited to meet teachers at these conferences to discuss individual<br />
strengths and weaknesses and strategies for improvement.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> data is analysed to inform the evaluation and subsequent modification <strong>of</strong> teaching<br />
and learning strategies. Summative assessment data tracked over each two-year course, as well<br />
as the formal summative data released by the IB, are analysed by the Diploma Coordinator,<br />
Heads <strong>of</strong> Departments and individual subject teachers at the beginning <strong>of</strong> each academic year.<br />
Subject Departments set goals that might be related to modification <strong>of</strong> teaching and learning<br />
strategies with a view to improving final achievement levels. Individual teachers set Post-16<br />
Programme goals at the beginning <strong>of</strong> each year, again related to the modification <strong>of</strong> teaching and<br />
learning in order to bring about measurable improvements in student achievement. <strong>The</strong>se goals<br />
are reviewed at the end <strong>of</strong> each academic year.<br />
<strong>The</strong> summative achievement levels <strong>of</strong> M5 students, their teachers‟ knowledge <strong>of</strong> the students‟<br />
strengths and weaknesses, interviews with each student and input from parents are all used to<br />
help guide students on which Post-16 Programme track might be most suited to their needs and<br />
which courses would allow them to be successful. Students entering the Post-16 Programme<br />
from outside TISA sit entrance tests in English, Second Languages, Maths, and a Science<br />
subject. <strong>The</strong> tests give Faculty Coordinators assessment data related to student skills and<br />
understanding in those subject areas. <strong>The</strong> tests are designed to measure achievement levels<br />
appropriate to a student at the end <strong>of</strong> M5.<br />
5. <strong>Assessment</strong> in Learning Support<br />
8
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Diagnostic assessments are used to identify and support learning difficulties. When it is<br />
appropriate the results <strong>of</strong> assessments are used to develop Individual Education Plans, which<br />
focus on meeting specific targets<br />
6. Significant <strong>Assessment</strong> Schedule for the Middle <strong>School</strong><br />
To avoid student overload in the middle years an Significant <strong>Assessment</strong> Schedule is placed on<br />
the Server. Only one major project and one major test can be due for a class on a given day.<br />
7. Awards for Secondary Student Achievement<br />
In the Secondary <strong>School</strong>, students are eligible for progress and achievement awards. <strong>The</strong> two<br />
MYP students with the highest academic achievement per grade level receive the Principal‟s<br />
Award each term. <strong>The</strong>se awards are presented at Assemblies. In the MYP each Term, one<br />
achievement award is presented per grade level for the student receiving the highest number <strong>of</strong><br />
IB points.<br />
In the Post-16 Programme the Principal‟s Award is made to students who receive a total <strong>of</strong> 35<br />
points or more at the end <strong>of</strong> a term. <strong>The</strong>se awards are presented in assemblies. At the end <strong>of</strong> IB1<br />
and IB2, Honours Awards are presented to those students receiving more than 30 points on<br />
average over the three terms. A High Honours Award is presented to a student who achieves<br />
more than 36 points on average over the three terms. <strong>The</strong>se achievement awards are presented at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the school year, either in an assembly or during the Graduation Ceremony.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Valedictorian is awarded to the student who has received the highest cumulative total grade<br />
during the two years <strong>of</strong> the Post 16 Programme. <strong>The</strong> Salutatorian is awarded to a student who<br />
has received the second highest cumulative total grade during the two years <strong>of</strong> the Post 16<br />
Programme. Cumulative total grades are calculated using the reported grades from each subject<br />
from Groups 1 to 6 over the six terms <strong>of</strong> the Post 16 Programme.<br />
10. Admission <strong>Assessment</strong> Requirements<br />
Primary <strong>School</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no formal assessment for children applying for the Primary <strong>School</strong> at TISA. However,<br />
the English Learning Support Coordinator will interview children in need <strong>of</strong> English Learning<br />
Support.<br />
Secondary <strong>School</strong><br />
If the supporting documents are in order, students applying to enter the Secondary <strong>School</strong><br />
may be invited to write assessments in the following subjects:<br />
Math<br />
English<br />
French/Spanish/Russian (if not a beginner)<br />
Biology/Chemistry/Physics (as applicable for IB 1)<br />
9
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Coordinator <strong>of</strong> the programme for placement purposes will assess students in need <strong>of</strong><br />
English Language Support.<br />
All new students joining the Secondary <strong>School</strong> have to complete the Cognitive Abilities Test<br />
(CAT). This is a standardized test, which assesses cognitive ability and learning potential. If<br />
concerns are raised after having admitted a student, a referral process will be followed.<br />
Specific assessment procedures and subject criteria can be viewed in:<br />
<strong>The</strong> PYP Handbook<br />
<strong>The</strong> MYP Handbook<br />
<strong>The</strong> Post 16 Handbook<br />
<strong>The</strong> Student Parent Handbook<br />
10
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
SECONDARY DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT POLICIES<br />
ENGLISH A DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
THE CRITERIA<br />
Criterion A - Content<br />
Criterion A is assessed through investigations and research, and critical reading and analysis set<br />
in the class and as homework. Evidence <strong>of</strong> understanding is displayed through written and oral<br />
articulation.<br />
Criterion B - Organization<br />
Criterion B is assessed through various assignments that require organization, supported<br />
argumentation, and formal elements <strong>of</strong> writing.<br />
Criterion C - Style and Language<br />
Criterion C is assessed through assignments that require varied language usage including formal<br />
language, informal language and dialect, dialogue and various narrative styles.<br />
HOMEWORK POLICY - MYP<br />
Classroom studies and work are rigorous and broad. Homework tasks are <strong>of</strong>ten continuations <strong>of</strong><br />
classroom work. Typical homework tasks would include further reading and research, publishing<br />
<strong>of</strong> written work, and reflection. Regular reading is actively encouraged.<br />
Certain homework and class activities may not be directly assessed by the criteria, but are<br />
corrected and gone over in class or are a necessary step towards final summative assessment<br />
marks.<br />
All homework is to be checked or discussed to ensure student understanding, and teachers will<br />
provide written feedback on homework, tests, etc, on a regular basis. Students who do not<br />
complete homework activities need to make up the time or complete the work.<br />
Students understand homework not completed will have an impact on their ability to succeed on<br />
summative assessment tasks and will result in a - for that assignment.<br />
It is expected that students will have homework ready at the beginning <strong>of</strong> class on the due date<br />
unless otherwise negotiated with the teacher<br />
Please refer to TISA general homework policy for quantity <strong>of</strong> homework (varies depending on<br />
year level).<br />
11
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
HOMEWORK POLICY – POST-16<br />
Classroom studies and work are rigorous and broad. Typically homework tasks <strong>of</strong>ten include<br />
continuation <strong>of</strong> classroom work, critical reading and analysis, research and informal and formal<br />
writing. Preparation for all formal IB English assessments must be completed outside <strong>of</strong> class<br />
time with strict internal deadlines.<br />
Certain homework and class activities may not be directly assessed, but are corrected and gone<br />
over in class or are a necessary step towards summative assessment tasks.<br />
All homework is to be checked or discussed to ensure student understanding, and teachers will<br />
provide written feedback on homework, tests, etc, on a regular basis.<br />
Students who do not complete homework activities need to make up the time or complete the<br />
work.<br />
Students understand homework not completed will have an impact on their ability to succeed on<br />
summative assessment tasks and will result in a zero for that assignment.<br />
It is expected that students will have homework ready at the beginning <strong>of</strong> class on the due date<br />
unless otherwise negotiated with the teacher<br />
Please refer to TISA general homework policy for quantity <strong>of</strong> homework (varies depending on<br />
year level).<br />
FREQUENCY OF ASSESSMENT<br />
Diagnostic assessment or background research tasks can occur at the beginning <strong>of</strong> each unit to<br />
ensure a base <strong>of</strong> prior knowledge is collected.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> is ongoing. On average, each assessment criteria is applied twice on every unit <strong>of</strong><br />
work depending on the length <strong>of</strong> the project. Within each unit, formative assessments lead to<br />
culminating summative assessments.<br />
WEIGHTING OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ASSESSMENT<br />
<strong>The</strong> criteria assessment rubric is evenly distributed throughout each unit. In this way, students<br />
adequately employ all areas <strong>of</strong> the MYP criteria.<br />
USE OF CRITERIA<br />
Task specific criteria sheets are given to students with the task. At that time, the criteria and<br />
expectations are reviewed as a class. Students are encouraged to use criteria as a guide.<br />
TYPES OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT<br />
Formative assessments are those given on a regular basis throughout a unit. Teachers and<br />
students use them to assure on-going growth in learning and skill. Teachers use them to assess<br />
the success <strong>of</strong> their teaching materials and practices. <strong>The</strong>y include:<br />
12
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Homework responses to questions/Reflections on topics<br />
Pop quizzes<br />
Class discussion<br />
Clear notes in notebook<br />
Self-assessment<br />
Sharing/presentation <strong>of</strong> information collected to class<br />
Research skills<br />
In-class writing<br />
Formal writing<br />
TYPES OF SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT<br />
Summative assessments are usually the culminating unit assessment and are given at least once<br />
in each unit taught. <strong>The</strong>y provide the student the opportunity to show what they have learned and<br />
produce their best work. <strong>The</strong>y include:<br />
Posters<br />
Presentations<br />
Essays and other formal writing tasks<br />
Brochures<br />
Technology integrated presentations – e.g. videos/recordings, slideshows<br />
Debate<br />
Speeches<br />
Dramatic activities e.g. role-plays, skits<br />
Teaching others<br />
Monologues<br />
Formal IB summative assessments include Individual Oral Commentary, Individual Oral<br />
Presentation or Interactive Oral Task, World Literature Essay(s) or Written Tasks, and Final<br />
Exam Papers.<br />
TYPES OF STUDENT REFLECTION AND SELF ASSESSMENT<br />
Students self-assess and/or peer assess against the rubric. Final assessments are <strong>of</strong>ten designed to<br />
include a reflective element. Student portfolios are maintained and reviewed at regular intervals<br />
by students. Self-assessment and reflective activities include:<br />
Peer assessment<br />
Written responses to reflective questions (e.g. What did I learn? What was the<br />
best/worst?)<br />
Reflection on ATL skills and Criteria C skills<br />
Self assessment <strong>of</strong> criteria before/during/after summative assessment<br />
Group discussion<br />
STANDARDIZATION AND MODERATION<br />
<strong>The</strong> Department meets regularly to share sample student work to be assessed by all Department<br />
members.<br />
13
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
External Moderation occurs in M5. All Department members aid in the process <strong>of</strong> standardizing<br />
the marks before submission to IB.<br />
Post-16 summative assessment tasks are externally assessed, and written feedback is reviewed<br />
annually.<br />
PROVISIONS FOR LEARNING SUPPORT<br />
Some students meet LS coordinator to aid with time-management and other skills, but this does<br />
not affect class time. LS coordinator determines necessary modifications. Modifications may<br />
include:<br />
Modified summative assessment expectations<br />
Time allowance for tests/quizzes<br />
Extra time to aid with organization and homework diary maintenance<br />
Collaboration work with LS department<br />
Liaising with homeroom teacher to aid with organizational and time-management skills<br />
PROVISIONS FOR ELS<br />
Students who are formally designated as ELS are placed in ELS English classrooms. Students<br />
who have been exited from the ELS program are placed into English A classrooms. Once placed,<br />
English A teachers will meet with ELS Department members to discuss concerns if they arise.<br />
PLACEMENT POLICY<br />
Essay exams are conducted by admissions <strong>of</strong>fice and assessed by the English Department.<br />
Students are then placed in ELS or English A accordingly.<br />
STUDENT PORTFOLIOS<br />
Student portfolios are maintained and reviewed at regular intervals by students and are used to<br />
monitor growth and improvement. Portfolios are available to students who leave TISA. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />
available for teachers to review student achievement between grades.<br />
14
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
Middle Years Programme<br />
<strong>The</strong> Criteria<br />
Oral communication<br />
Criterion A - Oral communication – message and interaction<br />
Criterion B - Oral<br />
Criterion C - Writing – message and organization<br />
Criteria D – Writing – language<br />
Criteria E: Reading Comprehension<br />
<strong>The</strong> language department has three sets <strong>of</strong> criteria, adapted one for M1 and M2, another for M3<br />
and the published MYP criteria are used for M4 and M5. Each criterion is used at least two times<br />
each term.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the term the teacher calculates the levels <strong>of</strong> each criterion to give a term criterion<br />
levels total for language B for each student. Students have the opportunity to gain a maximum<br />
level <strong>of</strong> eight (8) for criteria A, B, C and D, and maximum level <strong>of</strong> sixteen (16) for criterion E.<br />
<strong>The</strong> maximum criterion total for Language B is forty-eight (48).<br />
<strong>The</strong> Language B grade boundaries<br />
GRADE BOUNDARIES<br />
1 0 - 8<br />
2 9 - 16<br />
3 17 - 23<br />
4 24 - 30<br />
5 31 - 36<br />
6 37 - 42<br />
7 43 - 48<br />
Post-16 Programme<br />
Paper 1: Written response Max. marks/ 10<br />
Written production & Oral component<br />
Criterion A : Language Max. marks/ 10<br />
Criterion B : Culture Interaction Max. marks/ 10<br />
Criterion C: Message Max. marks/ 10<br />
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT/ FREQUENCY OF ASSESSMENT<br />
Summative<br />
This is the assessment <strong>of</strong> a student‟s achievement reached at the end <strong>of</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />
It is designed to measure the final achievement <strong>of</strong> a student. Each assessment criterion is applied<br />
a few times a term.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> summative assessment in Language B are:<br />
Exams<br />
Presentations<br />
Essays<br />
Brochures<br />
Debate<br />
15
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Speeches<br />
Creative writing<br />
Interview<br />
Reading comprehension<br />
Formative<br />
In formative assessment the objectives are shared with students with feedback taking place as<br />
soon as possible.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> formative assessment in Language B are:<br />
Quizzes<br />
Homework assignments<br />
Grammar exercises/revision<br />
Paragraph writing<br />
HOMEWORK MYP<br />
Homework is set at least three times a week. Homework tasks are checked and discussed, and<br />
teacher will provide feedback on a regular basis. Students who do not complete homework need<br />
to finish the work the next night or during break time. If students are constantly not completing<br />
their homework, a note will be sent home in the diary.<br />
HOMEWORK – POST 16<br />
Typically homework tasks include continuation <strong>of</strong> class work, reading comprehensions, research,<br />
creative writing, grammar exercises, and preparation for interactive oral.<br />
Certain homework may not be graded, but are checked and discussed in class, and teacher will<br />
provide written feedback on a regular basis. A record <strong>of</strong> missed homework tasks will be kept to<br />
help with report writing. Students who do not complete homework tasks need to do the work by<br />
the next lesson.<br />
Please refer to TISA general homework policy for quantity <strong>of</strong> homework.<br />
SELF ASSESSMENT<br />
This is intended primarily to help students reflect on their progress and study skills. <strong>The</strong> ways<br />
are:<br />
Write a reflection on work done<br />
Predict their grade by using the criteria<br />
Peer assessment<br />
IBO MODERATION /STANDARDIZATION<br />
For language B the work requested consists <strong>of</strong>:<br />
One writing samples produced under supervision in class<br />
Two reading comprehension exercises completed under supervision in class<br />
A cassette or CD recording <strong>of</strong> an oral activity<br />
<strong>The</strong> members <strong>of</strong> department meet on a regular basis to share student work to be assessed by<br />
specific language teachers. External Moderation takes place in M5. All teachers are involved in<br />
standardizing the marks for each student work submitted for moderation.<br />
PLACEMENT POLICY<br />
16
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Students who come from other schools and have previous language background are required<br />
to take a language test to determine their Language level.<br />
CURRENT STUDENTS<br />
Transition from Standard level to Advance level<br />
<strong>The</strong> process typically takes place after M4. For recommended entry into the<br />
language B advanced a student needs to achieve an eight in a minimum <strong>of</strong> the 3<br />
criteria graded by the MYP programme.<br />
<strong>The</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> total points should be 43 out <strong>of</strong> 48.<br />
STUDENT PORTFOLIOS<br />
Each student‟s summative assessments are kept in a folder.<br />
ELS ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> + Frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
ELS English students are assessed formally against MYP Language B criteria a few times a term<br />
(summative assessment), and informally throughout the year (formative assessment). <strong>The</strong> final<br />
term grade is calculated against the MYP Language B boundaries, and is then reflected in the<br />
narrative reports twice a year. M1 – M4 assignments are set against modified criteria at a<br />
Foundation or Advanced level, which in turn are task-specific. M5 assignments are set against<br />
the IB published criteria. Homework is set at least three times a week and mostly incorporates<br />
the four macro skills <strong>of</strong> reading, writing, listening and speaking.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> Techniques<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> Summative <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
Criterion A (Speaking and Listening – Message and Interaction) and Criterion B (Speaking –<br />
Style and Language) are assessed through interactive and prepared orals, interviews,<br />
collaborative and flexible grouping, role play, dramatic production, presentations (PowerPoint,<br />
video, posters, flash and index cards etc.), as well as question and answers at the end <strong>of</strong> a<br />
presentation.<br />
Criterion C (Writing – Message and Organisation) and Criterion D (Writing– Style and<br />
Language Use) are assessed through essays, posters, PowerPoint presentations, poetry, letters,<br />
reports, book reviews, brochures, pamphlets, proposals, summaries and plays.<br />
Criterion E (Text Interpretation – Reading Comprehension) is assessed through reading<br />
comprehensions where the questions are designed according to different levels <strong>of</strong> thinking<br />
(Blooms Taxonomy).<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> Formative <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
Reading/viewing/writing: note taking, summarizing, discussion, comprehensions,<br />
paragraphing, drawing conclusions, writing evaluations, short scenes in a play, role-play,<br />
grammar exercises, games, singing, vocabulary games, predicting and using graphic<br />
organizer to show planning etc.<br />
Listening: visualizing, recall, imaginative writing, diagram <strong>of</strong> major points, graphic<br />
organisers etc.<br />
Speaking: small group discussion, dramatic interpretation, informal interviews etc.<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> Student Reflection and Self <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
Students are encouraged to reflect on their own work in the following ways:<br />
17
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Predict their grade by using the relevant criteria, before the teacher grades it<br />
Write written reflections on oral, written or practical work done. A framework, which<br />
includes reflective questions, is given to guide them.<br />
After being assessed by their peers, students reflect on the comments made and act<br />
accordingly<br />
Reflect either orally or in writing, on the relevant AOI, at the end <strong>of</strong> a unit<br />
Reflect on their collaborative/group skills<br />
Standardization/Moderation<br />
All summative assessments are moderated within the department.<br />
Provision for LS Students<br />
Lessons are automatically differentiated according to the student‟s English language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency.<br />
<strong>The</strong> types <strong>of</strong> differentiation are similar to those used for LS students.<br />
Placement <strong>Policy</strong><br />
Students applying to TISA who are non-native speakers <strong>of</strong> English may be candidates for the<br />
ELS programme. Upon application to the school, parents are asked to complete a „Language<br />
Background‟ survey giving information about languages spoken and levels <strong>of</strong> literacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prospective student. Before entry (or during orientation at TISA) students will be given a written<br />
placement test to determine their level <strong>of</strong> English language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency and gauge how much<br />
ELS instruction may be required. If they are potential candidates for the ELS Language<br />
programme, they may also be invited for a more comprehensive oral examination.<br />
<strong>The</strong> progress and needs <strong>of</strong> individual students are discussed at regular ELS department meetings.<br />
If a student is functioning at grade level in mainstream subject areas, he or she may no longer<br />
require ELS support. If a student is ready to exit ELS English and enter mainstream English, a<br />
process <strong>of</strong> testing, inspection <strong>of</strong> portfolio work and teacher consultation with parents and the<br />
mainstream English teacher will occur. Students who are exiting ELS to mainstream classes will<br />
do so at the end <strong>of</strong> a term. During the period <strong>of</strong> transition the student is monitored by the ELS<br />
and subject teacher to ensure that he or she is performing as expected in the mainstream class.<br />
Student Portfolios<br />
Every ELS student has an individual portfolio (hanging file) located in the filing cabinet in<br />
Room 332A. Copies <strong>of</strong> all their summative assessments and process writing are placed in it.<br />
18
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
HUMANITIES ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
THE CRITERIA<br />
Criteria A – Knowledge and Understanding<br />
(10)<br />
Criteria B – Concepts (10)<br />
Time, Place and Space, Change,<br />
Systems, Global Awareness<br />
Criteria C – Skills (10)<br />
Technical, Analytical, Decisionmaking,<br />
Investigative<br />
Criteria D – Organization and Presentation (8)<br />
All the criteria can be used in almost all summative<br />
assessment tasks depending on the focus decided by the<br />
teacher/unit. For specific types <strong>of</strong> assessment tasks and<br />
specific criteria see below**.<br />
HOMEWORK POLICY - MYP<br />
Certain homework and classwork activities may not be directly assessed by the criteria,<br />
but are corrected and gone over in class or are a necessary step towards a final summative<br />
assessment marks<br />
All homework is to be checked or discussed to ensure student understanding and teachers<br />
will provide written feedback on homework, tests, etc, on a regular basis.<br />
On a discretionary basis, students who do not complete homework activities need to<br />
make up the time or complete the work for the teacher on a case by case basis<br />
Students accept homework not completed will have an impact on summative assessment<br />
marks<br />
Failure to complete homework after repeated requests will result in a zero for relevant<br />
summative assessment marks<br />
It is expected that students will have homework ready at the beginning <strong>of</strong> class on the due<br />
date unless otherwise specified by the teacher<br />
Please refer to TISA general homework policy for quantity <strong>of</strong> homework (varies<br />
depending on year level)<br />
FREQUENCY OF ASSESSMENT<br />
Diagnostic assessment can occur at the beginning <strong>of</strong> each unit where prior knowledge is<br />
collected (Guiding Questions and AOI are <strong>of</strong>ten used as a focus tool)<br />
Formative assessment is ongoing to ensure understanding and activities will range in size<br />
and structure<br />
Each unit will have a minimum <strong>of</strong> two summative assessment tasks to ensure<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the unit content – these will assessed according to one or more criteria<br />
and marks will be recorded and go towards final grade/report card marks<br />
USE OF CRITERIA<br />
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES INCLUDE (both using and not<br />
using criteria):<br />
19
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
homework responses to questions/Reflections on topics<br />
Textbook questions<br />
Pop quizzes<br />
Class discussion<br />
Clear notes in notebook<br />
Self-assessment<br />
Sharing/presentation <strong>of</strong> information collected to class<br />
Finishing classwork activities<br />
Research skills<br />
SUMMATIVE TYPES OF ASSESSMENT INCLUDE (using criteria):<br />
Tests (Criteria A, B, C**)<br />
Exams (A, B, C, D)<br />
Quizzes (A, B, C)<br />
Posters (A, B, C, D)<br />
Presentations (A, B, C, D)<br />
Essays (A, B, C, D)<br />
Brochures (A, B, C, D)<br />
Technology integrated presentations – e.g. videos/recordings, slideshows (A, B, C, D)<br />
Debate (A, B, C, D)<br />
Speeches (A, B, C, D)<br />
Dramatic activities e.g. Role-plays, skits (A, B, D)<br />
Teaching others (A, B, C, D)<br />
TYPES OF STUDENT REFLECTION AND SELF ASSESSMENT<br />
Peer assessment (A, B, C, D)<br />
Written responses to reflective questions (e.g. What did I learn? What was the<br />
best/worst?)<br />
Reflection on ATL skills and Criteria C: Skills<br />
Self assessment <strong>of</strong> criteria before/during/after summative assessment (A, B, C, D)<br />
Group discussion (e.g. <strong>of</strong> collaboration skills)<br />
WEIGHTING OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ASSESSMENT<br />
Depends on unit and year level<br />
STANDARDIZATION/MODERATION<br />
<strong>The</strong> department meets regularly to share sample student work to be assessed by all<br />
department members<br />
External Moderation occurs in M5 – all department members aid in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
standardizing the marks<br />
20
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
HOMEWORK- POST-16 PROGRAMME<br />
Psychology, History and Economics maintain subject specific requirements<br />
Regular revision is expected<br />
FREQUENCY OF ASSESSMENT<br />
Psychology, History and Economics maintain subject specific requirements<br />
Diploma Examination style tests at varying frequency<br />
Regular short assessments and quizzes<br />
PROVISIONS FOR ELS STUDENTS<br />
In-class support<br />
Visual aids for students during discussions<br />
Lists <strong>of</strong> pertinent vocabulary<br />
Collaboration work with ELS department (sharing unit planners and extended activities<br />
in ELS classtime)<br />
Allowing use <strong>of</strong> electronic and other dictionaries<br />
Allowing use <strong>of</strong> mother tongue research/articles<br />
Extra time allowance and occasional ELS teacher support on quizzes and tests<br />
Spelling and grammar errors has no affect on criteria marks for ELS students (for<br />
Criterion D organization and presentation marks in particular)<br />
PROVISIONS FOR LEARNING SUPPORT STUDENTS<br />
Some students meet LS coordinator to aid with time-management and other skills but this<br />
does not affect Humanities class time<br />
Modified summative assessment expectations<br />
Time allowance for tests/quizzes<br />
Extra time to aid with organization and homework diary maintenance<br />
Collaboration work with LS department<br />
Liaising with homeroom teacher to aid with organizational and time-management skills<br />
PLACEMENT POLICY<br />
Currently all students attend MYP humanities<br />
STUDENT PORTFOLIOS<br />
A folder is kept in the classroom with a copy <strong>of</strong> the criteria, samples <strong>of</strong> formative<br />
assessments, the summative assessment tasks and the marks – some information will be<br />
kept in the MYP portfolio (with the homeroom teacher) at the end <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
21
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
MATHS DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
MYP (M1 – M5) – including Homework<br />
<strong>The</strong> Criteria<br />
a) In MYP, the 4 Criteria used for assessment are:<br />
Criteria A Knowledge and Understanding Max marks / 8<br />
All tests, exams and the vast majority <strong>of</strong> homework tasks are assessed according to Criteria A<br />
Criteria B Investigating patterns Max marks / 8<br />
Criteria C Communication Max marks / 6<br />
Criteria D Reflection and Evaluation Max marks / 6<br />
<strong>The</strong> Investigations (1 or 2 for each term) assess the other 3 Criteria (B, C and D)<br />
Whilst the rubrics for various assessed tasks may change, the maximum marks available are set<br />
as above.<br />
b) Diploma Math<br />
Math Studies <strong>Assessment</strong> Criteria<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are 2 examination papers (Paper 1 and Paper 2), on consecutive days and each take 90<br />
minutes to complete. Each paper contributes 40% for the final grade.<br />
<strong>The</strong> remaining 20 % comes from an internally graded and externally moderated Math Project -<br />
the criteria for this is listed in the table below.<br />
Criteria Description Max’m marks allocated<br />
A Introduction 2<br />
B Information / Measurement 3<br />
C Mathematical Processes 5<br />
D Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Results 3<br />
E Validity 2<br />
F Structure and Communication 3<br />
G Commitment 2<br />
Math Standard Level <strong>Assessment</strong> Criteria<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are 2 examination papers (Paper 1 and Paper 2), on consecutive days and each take 90<br />
minutes to complete. Each paper contributes 40% for the final grade.<br />
<strong>The</strong> remaining 20 % comes from two pieces <strong>of</strong> internally graded and externally moderated<br />
coursework tasks – Type I (mathematical investigation) and Type II (mathematical modeling).<br />
<strong>The</strong> assessment criteria for these are listed in the tables below.<br />
Type I<br />
Criteria Description Max’m marks allocated<br />
A Use <strong>of</strong> terminology and notation 2<br />
B Communication 3<br />
C Mathematical process – searching for<br />
5<br />
patterns<br />
D Results - generalization 5<br />
E Use <strong>of</strong> technology 3<br />
F Quality <strong>of</strong> work 2<br />
22
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Type II<br />
Criteria Description Max’m marks allocated<br />
A Use <strong>of</strong> terminology and notation 2<br />
B Communication 3<br />
C Mathematical process – developing a model 5<br />
D Results – interpretation 5<br />
E Use <strong>of</strong> technology 3<br />
F Quality <strong>of</strong> work 2<br />
Maths High Level <strong>Assessment</strong> Criteria<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are 3 examination papers (Paper 1 and Paper 2), on consecutive days and each take 90<br />
minutes to complete. Each paper contributes 35% for the final grade. Paper 3 is taken some days<br />
later. It is one hour long, based on the chosen HL Option topic, and constitutes 20% <strong>of</strong> the final<br />
assessment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> remaining 20 % comes from two pieces <strong>of</strong> internally graded and externally moderated<br />
coursework tasks – Type I (mathematical investigation) and Type II (mathematical modelling).<br />
<strong>The</strong> assessment criteria for these are listed in the tables below.<br />
Type I<br />
Criteria Description Max’m marks allocated<br />
A Use <strong>of</strong> terminology and notation 2<br />
B Communication 3<br />
C Mathematical process – searching for<br />
5<br />
patterns<br />
D Results - generalization 5<br />
E Use <strong>of</strong> technology 3<br />
F Quality <strong>of</strong> work 2<br />
Type II<br />
Criteria Description Max’m marks allocated<br />
A Use <strong>of</strong> terminology and notation 2<br />
B Communication 3<br />
C Mathematical process – developing a model 5<br />
D Results – interpretation 5<br />
E Use <strong>of</strong> technology 3<br />
F Quality <strong>of</strong> work 2<br />
Homework<br />
M1 and M2 will have a graded homework assignment every 2 weeks. This will usually be a<br />
longer piece <strong>of</strong> work (approx 30 – 45 mins) than the normal homework set – we aim to set a<br />
minimum <strong>of</strong> 2 home-works per week. Work books will be collected and a comment made<br />
approximately each 2 weeks. <strong>The</strong> homework tasks may be written on separate sheets, in the back<br />
23
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the students general work book or as a continuation <strong>of</strong> the normal class room work – it is up to<br />
the teacher how this will be set out.<br />
M3 – M5 will generally have more graded homework than in M1and M2. It will be assessed<br />
once or twice a fortnight. <strong>The</strong> Extended classes will usually have tasks that are longer than those<br />
set for the Standard classes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> information above applies to both the extended and standard classes in M3 – M5, as well as<br />
the general classes in M1 and M2. It is different in the Diploma program.<br />
When students do not complete homework, they must finish the set work the next night or during<br />
break times. If students are persistently not completing all their homework, a note will be sent<br />
home to parents in the diary. Follow up to this is at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the teacher.<br />
IB Diploma Homework<br />
All IB Math classes have homework set as it is imperative to do so in order to both complete the<br />
required work in the syllabus and especially to practice skills learnt in class relating to the<br />
syllabus content. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> work actually set depends to a fair degree on the actual level <strong>of</strong><br />
Math course and the stage <strong>of</strong> the course work.<br />
As a minimum requirement however, there will be homework set on at least 2 separate occasions<br />
during a normal school week, or if it is only set once, then it would be an extended amount <strong>of</strong><br />
work requiring 2 – 4 days to complete (this happens quite a lot in Higher level Math classes).<br />
<strong>The</strong> homework set should take between 1-2 hours to complete for the Standard Math courses and<br />
2-3 hours for the Extended Math course (average per week). Completed homework needs to be<br />
sighted by the teacher and checked to see that correct processes are followed. A record <strong>of</strong> missed<br />
or incomplete homework tasks will be kept to assist with report writing. Some homework tasks<br />
may be graded and used in the calculations for the end <strong>of</strong> term grade – this is up to the discretion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the teacher, but in all cases the end <strong>of</strong> term grade will be determined by tests that come from<br />
past exam questions. Some graded homework assignments (especially in HL courses) will also<br />
be taken into account when determining the end <strong>of</strong> term grade, but not in determining the<br />
predicted grade.<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
In each terms we aim to have at least 3 tests completed, 2 investigations (although this is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
difficult to achieve in each <strong>of</strong> the 3 terms) and at least 4 graded homework activities. <strong>The</strong> number<br />
<strong>of</strong> graded homework tasks will vary depending on the year level, but there is likely to be at least<br />
3 for the term in M3 – M5 and 3-5 for M1 – M2. M4 and M5 will also have an exam in both<br />
Term 2 and Term 3. At the end <strong>of</strong> the school year the M1 – M3 have a longer test than normal to<br />
help prepare them for the idea <strong>of</strong> exams later in M4 onwards. Tests and Investigations should be<br />
signed by the parent(s) after they have been graded.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> Criteria (see above for the actual list <strong>of</strong> the 4 Criteria A, B, C and D).<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> each term, the final grade (from 1 – 7) is obtained using all the assessed tasks from<br />
that term. A weighting is applied to the exams (they count for double a normal test), and all the<br />
homework grades are combined to become the equivalent <strong>of</strong> one test grade. <strong>The</strong> most sustained<br />
level within each Criteria is used, not the average level.<br />
<strong>The</strong> boundaries for the actual grades are determined by the IB and is as follows (for each year<br />
level):<br />
Grade Boundaries<br />
Grade<br />
Boundaries<br />
24
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
1 0 - 4<br />
2 5 - 8<br />
3 9 – 12<br />
4 13 - 17<br />
5 18 - 21<br />
6 22 - 25<br />
7 26 - 28<br />
If a student has an overall grade that is “right on the boundary” ie within one mark <strong>of</strong> the next<br />
boundary, there may be cause to give the student the grade from the accompanying boundary –<br />
depending on the teacher‟s justification <strong>of</strong> this (eg as a consequence <strong>of</strong> general class work<br />
results).<br />
Summative and Formative assessments<br />
Exams for M4 and M5 at the end <strong>of</strong> the year and mid-term 2 along with end <strong>of</strong> unit tests are<br />
Summative assessments and the other set assessments are Formative<br />
Student Reflection and Self <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
All Investigations have Criteria D as part <strong>of</strong> the assessed component – these deal with<br />
reflections (eg why did you choose a particular method to solve a problem and what are the<br />
advantages / disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the methods you could have chosen). In some investigations<br />
students are asked to provide some self assessment, and at the end <strong>of</strong> each test students have the<br />
opportunity to comment on how they felt re the success or otherwise <strong>of</strong> the test.<br />
Standardisation / Moderation<br />
<strong>The</strong> teachers meet and discuss / standardise grading <strong>of</strong> assignments, particularly in the earlier<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the school year and where there are year levels being taught by more than one teacher.<br />
M5 coursework is sent away for moderation (Extended and Standard classes separately) in<br />
March. Samples <strong>of</strong> work from 4 students (one above average, 2 average and one below average)<br />
is sent. <strong>The</strong> materials sent consist <strong>of</strong> 2 samples for each <strong>of</strong> the 4 Criteria, and must include 1<br />
exam.<br />
ELS students<br />
This is provided by the ELS Department if there is deemed to be a need for support within the<br />
classroom. <strong>The</strong> ELS teacher generally provides this support twice a week and works closely with<br />
the students in most need <strong>of</strong> the support.<br />
Learning Support<br />
This is provided by the Learning Support Department if there is deemed to be a need for support<br />
within the classroom. <strong>The</strong> ELS teacher generally provides this support twice a week and works<br />
closely with the students in most need <strong>of</strong> the support.<br />
Placement <strong>Policy</strong><br />
At the beginning <strong>of</strong> M3 students complete placement tests which, along with their results from<br />
M2, help determine whether they move into the Extended or Standard class.<br />
25
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Movement between Standard and Extended Classes<br />
Math classes in years M3-M5 are divided into a Standard and an Extended program. Movement between<br />
the standard and extended programs is easiest during M3 and becomes progressively more problematic by<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> M5. This is due to differentiation between the two levels with respect to topics covered.<br />
Students may move between levels as they continue to develop their mathematical skills. In order to move<br />
from Math Standard to Math Extended students need to achieve a high level on a minimum <strong>of</strong> 3<br />
consecutive assessment items (greater than or equal to level 6 for Criterion A or a score <strong>of</strong> 15 or higher<br />
for criteria B, C and D for an Investigation). Students can be moved from a Math Extended class to a<br />
Math Standard Class if they have achieved less than a level 4 on Criteria A or a score <strong>of</strong> less than 10 for<br />
criteria B, C and D for an Investigation on 3 consecutive assessment items. Parents <strong>of</strong> course will be<br />
notified <strong>of</strong> any impending changes.<br />
M5 students do need to be aware that the deadline for registration for the MYP certificate is usually mid-<br />
October <strong>of</strong> each academic year. Any level changes after this date will involve payment <strong>of</strong> the MYP<br />
change <strong>of</strong> registration fee. Movement between courses is possible until the beginning <strong>of</strong> term 3.<br />
Entry to IB Math Courses<br />
<strong>The</strong> Math Dept encourages students to aim high and achieve the best they can at the highest possible<br />
level. Students also need to demonstrate that they are capable <strong>of</strong> studying at a particular level.<br />
However there should be no assumptions that a student in M5 can automatically move into a Diploma<br />
Math course <strong>of</strong> their choice. <strong>The</strong> following levels <strong>of</strong> expertise and understanding have to be attained in<br />
the respective M5 Math course as a pre-requisite to entry to Diploma courses. Emphasis here is on the<br />
score for Criteria A in their M5 results, but consideration will also be given to the Criteria B, C and D<br />
scores as there are internally assessed ―investigative type assignments in the Diploma Math courses.<br />
Students should have a minimum combined score <strong>of</strong> 8 / 20 for these 3 Criteria (sustained score).<br />
For (consideration for) entry to HL (Higher Level) Math, a student has to consistently achieve a minimum<br />
level <strong>of</strong> 6 out <strong>of</strong> 8 under Criterion A (Knowledge and Understanding) in the M5 extended Math class.<br />
For (consideration for) entry into the Math Standard Level course, a student has to consistently achieve a<br />
minimum level <strong>of</strong> 4 out <strong>of</strong> 8 under Criterion A (Knowledge and Understanding) in the M5 extended Math<br />
class. If a student is in the M5 Standard class, they will have to be consistently scoring a level 7 or higher<br />
for Criteria A in order to be considered for Math Standard level in IB 1<br />
For entry into Math Studies, a student has to consistently achieve a minimum level <strong>of</strong> 3 out <strong>of</strong> 8 under<br />
Criterion A (Knowledge and Understanding) in the M5 Standard class. Students who achieve lower than<br />
this level in M5 Standard may be required to repeat the year M5 Math course. Much will depend on their<br />
results in other subjects<br />
A combination <strong>of</strong> aptitude and a willingness to work hard are important for success in the IB diploma. In<br />
addition to the grade pre-requisites as listed above, we also recommend that attitude towards the subject<br />
and the students„ overall work ethic be taken into consideration, particularly when borderline cases apply.<br />
Student Portfolios<br />
All Math students keep their assessed work in a portfolio which is kept by the teacher. This folio<br />
is then used to help the teacher and the student during 3 way conferences and the ongoing<br />
summary sheet <strong>of</strong> grades obtained helps determine the end <strong>of</strong> term / year grade.<br />
26
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Science Department <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> for MYP<br />
<strong>The</strong> Criteria assessment techniques<br />
A One World<br />
o Write an essay, poster, presentation, blog entry, debate<br />
B Communication in science<br />
o Through essay, process journals, posters, presentation<br />
C Knowledge and understanding <strong>of</strong> science<br />
o Tests, guides, posters, responses to questions<br />
D Scientific inquiry<br />
o Open-ended experimental investigations<br />
E Processing data<br />
o Experimental work/investigations, data analysis tasks<br />
F Attitudes in science<br />
o Observation during experimental work<br />
Homework <strong>Policy</strong> and procedures<br />
Follow the general school guide <strong>of</strong> M1–M3: 80 min/wk; M4-M5: 90 min/wk<br />
Maximum <strong>of</strong> two homeworks per week<br />
When related to summative assessment, time given for completion: 1 week; other homeworks:<br />
until the next lesson.<br />
Summative assessment is always marked, with feedback, using MYP criteria. If handed in late<br />
without good reason a -is awarded.<br />
Other homework is marked with tick/cross/comments as necessary & wherever possible „two<br />
stars and a wish‟ (two positives and an improvement) for feedback. Homework not handed in<br />
should be completed – during lunch/break if necessary and a note made in the mark book.<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> assessment<br />
IB defines the minimum assessment in M5 as follows: MYP sciences have six criteria and so at<br />
least twelve judgments (two per criterion) must be made for each student in the final year for<br />
the purposes <strong>of</strong> final assessment (p38 MYP Sciences Guide).<br />
Extrapolating this to all year groups and to assist in adhering to the school reporting needs, we<br />
will aim to summatively assess each criterion once a term (3 times a year, i.e. a minimum <strong>of</strong> 3<br />
assessments x 6 criteria = 18 grades) and in each Unit to assess 2-3 criteria (i.e. 2-3 criteria x 9<br />
units = 18 to 27 possible grades)<br />
Summative assessment grade are entered on the „MYP Sci Sum Asses marks‟ spreadsheet.<br />
This calculates a grade for the end <strong>of</strong> term 1-7 grade based on the number <strong>of</strong> criteria assessed<br />
(scaling the boundaries as necessary).<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> summative assessment<br />
As above in „<strong>The</strong> Criteria assessment techniques‟<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> formative assessment<br />
As per the Faculty Handbook, p28 „How do we assess in the MYP?‟ (adapted):<br />
Observation <strong>of</strong> students in whole class settings or individually – especially during<br />
investigation practicals and extensive use <strong>of</strong> open questioning techniques at all<br />
times.<br />
27
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Selected response in the form <strong>of</strong> test and quizzes to elicit responses that will<br />
indicate understanding – especially ranking, sorting and matching activities –<br />
some <strong>of</strong> which are available as ICT activities.<br />
Open-ended tasks presenting students with a stimulus to prompt original response<br />
– usually in the form <strong>of</strong> a practical investigation or a One World piece <strong>of</strong><br />
research.<br />
Performance assessments that allow students to perform the learned skills and<br />
show their understanding in real world contexts. <strong>The</strong>se may take the form <strong>of</strong> a<br />
composition, research report, a presentation or a proposed solution.<br />
Process journals that demonstrate reflection and metacognition, which are<br />
essential stages in the process <strong>of</strong> higher order thinking skills – only in extended<br />
practical investigations.<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> student reflection and self assessment<br />
End <strong>of</strong> Unit reflections; self/peer marking <strong>of</strong> summative tasks; reflections<br />
/evaluations/improvements after the return <strong>of</strong> marked summative tasks.<br />
Standardization/Moderation<br />
When at all possible, „A‟ and „B‟ classes should be given the same summative assessments,<br />
marked to the same standards. For M5 this is vital – where practical the same teacher should<br />
mark all M5 work for a particular assessment.<br />
Agreement as to the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the rubric vocabulary is an ongoing activity between<br />
teachers.<br />
To maintain general standards across year groups, student work is marked in Dept Meets.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is moderation between three teachers for the M5 samples before sending.<br />
Provisions for ELS students<br />
Sue/Mary-Beth in lessons; modification <strong>of</strong> tests to reduce the load (and where possible<br />
pro<strong>of</strong>ing by ELS teachers to provide vocab sheets); picture labels on cupboards. Wherever<br />
possible essential vocabulary sheets produced for all units.<br />
Provisions for Learning Support<br />
As per LS instructions;<br />
Placement <strong>Policy</strong> if relevant<br />
All students do Science<br />
Student Portfolios<br />
Marking cover sheets for summative assessments kept; all M5 work is kept<br />
Science Department <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> for DP<br />
<strong>The</strong> Criteria assessment techniques<br />
Design<br />
o Writing a plan – care with collusion and plagiarism <strong>of</strong> methods – start in lesson time to get<br />
the RQ set independently.<br />
Data collection and processing<br />
o From an experiment – avoid any guidance in terms <strong>of</strong> how to record/treat data.<br />
28
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Conclusion and evaluation<br />
o From experiment – best achieved if from student‟s own design.<br />
Manipulative skills<br />
o Over the whole course.<br />
Personal skills<br />
o During Group 4 project.<br />
Homework <strong>Policy</strong> and procedures<br />
Approx 2hrs a week; deadline ranges from next day to 1 week depending on task.<br />
Tasks range from writing up IA; Example Qus from book/past papers; research for case<br />
studies/presentations/debates; peer assessment<br />
IA receives IB 1-6 grade & detailed written feedback on coversheet; Qus tick/cross & suitable<br />
guiding comments; oral feedback<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> assessment<br />
Summative tests at the end <strong>of</strong> topics, about every 3-6 weeks<br />
IA about one a month<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> summative assessment<br />
Tests during year and Exams Jan/June (all based on IB past questions)<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> formative assessment<br />
Homework; approach to experiments; oral and written Q&A in class;<br />
presentations/debates/projects<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> student reflection and self assessment<br />
Self-marking <strong>of</strong> IA; activities such as writing Qs for Answers; predicting scores in tests; end <strong>of</strong><br />
topic review/feedback<br />
Standardization/Moderation<br />
Marking <strong>of</strong> student work in Dept Meets; use <strong>of</strong> OCC/IB marked sample practicals; two<br />
teachers signing <strong>of</strong>f on IA samples.<br />
Provisions for ELS students<br />
None specifically, where appropriate encourage use <strong>of</strong> dictionaries; construction <strong>of</strong> glossaries.<br />
Provisions for Learning Support<br />
None (extra time for exams)<br />
Placement <strong>Policy</strong> if relevant<br />
Subject & H/SL decisions based on M5 performance<br />
Student Portfolios<br />
Only stored IA work<br />
29
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
THE CRITERIA<br />
Criteria A – Investigation (6)<br />
This criteria assesses the student‟s ability to write:<br />
Design Brief – overview <strong>of</strong> project<br />
Research – analysis, evaluation <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> information to help in creation <strong>of</strong> project.<br />
What ideas can the research give them to design specs for a project.<br />
Design Specifications – list <strong>of</strong> criteria describing essential, desirable and undesirable<br />
features and characteristics <strong>of</strong> product solution<br />
Testing Details – descriptions <strong>of</strong> how final product will be tested against design<br />
specification (3 tests)<br />
Bibliography – MLA format <strong>of</strong> all sources and cited within text<br />
Criteria B – Design (6)<br />
Students produce 3+ designs for a possible product solution. Each design must be<br />
evaluated against the design spec and final choice justified.<br />
Criteria C – Plan (6)<br />
Students develop a detailed logical plan <strong>of</strong> how their product will be created showing use<br />
<strong>of</strong> time, resources and skills and techniques needed. Plan must be evaluated.<br />
Criteria D – Create (6)<br />
Students create product by following their design specification, design and plan. A<br />
detailed, dated process journal must be kept.<br />
Criteria E – Evaluation (6)<br />
Students test their finished product and evaluate it against the design specification. <strong>The</strong><br />
evaluation includes: self testing, feedback from end users, evaluation <strong>of</strong> their<br />
performance, suggestions for improvement and effect <strong>of</strong> society/environment etc.<br />
Criteria E – Attitude (6)<br />
Students‟ attitude to work, such as their motivation, cooperation with others, attention to<br />
safety and timely handing in <strong>of</strong> work.<br />
HOMEWORK POLICY MYP<br />
Students will not be able to carry out practical applications at home due to lack <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware and tools. However, the following can be completed at home: Criteria A, B, C<br />
and E. Students are expected to plan how to carry out these criteria both in class and at<br />
home. Time is allocated at home, as well as in class, to complete projects and other tasks.<br />
Late submission <strong>of</strong> work incurs reduced points for Criteria F.<br />
Late work also entails detention.<br />
After one reminder a zero is given for late work unless there is a reasonable excuse.<br />
Homework is not set on any particular day as it depends on the stage <strong>of</strong> a project task.<br />
30
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Students must plan when to do their homework as part <strong>of</strong> fulfilling their planning criteria.<br />
M5 homework has to be saved electronically. Other homework is saved in a format at the<br />
discretion <strong>of</strong> the teacher.<br />
Homework is collected (or saved on server) during the lesson.<br />
Homework is returned with a highlighted, and/or commented, rubric attached so that<br />
students can see exactly how and why they have scored a certain level.<br />
FREQUENCY OF ASSESSMENT<br />
Grade CT Homework DT Homework<br />
M1 Formative structured tasks once a week.<br />
Summative project every unit (one every 10<br />
weeks)<br />
(every 8 weeks)<br />
M2<br />
M3<br />
M4<br />
M5<br />
Formative structured tasks once a week,<br />
which usually consist <strong>of</strong> finishing <strong>of</strong>f<br />
worksheets. Summative project every unit<br />
(one every 6 weeks)<br />
Formative structured tasks once a week,<br />
which usually consist <strong>of</strong> finishing <strong>of</strong>f<br />
worksheets. Summative project every unit<br />
(one every 6 weeks)<br />
4 projects over the whole year. Each criteria<br />
for each project has a separate deadline –<br />
approx every 2 weeks.<br />
3 projects over the whole year. 2 are used<br />
for moderation. Each criteria for each<br />
project has a separate deadline – approx<br />
every 2 weeks.<br />
Formative structured tasks once a<br />
week. Summative project every unit<br />
Formative structured tasks once a<br />
week. Summative project every unit<br />
(every 8 weeks)<br />
Formative structured tasks once a<br />
week. Summative project every unit<br />
(every 8 weeks)<br />
4 projects over the whole year. Each<br />
student has a project brief and<br />
portfolios taken in every month to do a<br />
formative assessment<br />
3 projects over the whole year. 2 are<br />
used for moderation. Each student has<br />
a project brief and workbooks taken in<br />
every month to do a formative<br />
assessment.<br />
USE OF CRITERIA<br />
M1 – M4 (term1) use modified rubrics which are task specific.<br />
M4 term 2 – 3 use the MYP unmodified criteria.<br />
M5 use the MYP unmodified criteria.<br />
TYPES OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT<br />
CT – use <strong>of</strong> worksheets with exercises to learn s<strong>of</strong>tware. <strong>The</strong>re are several tasks that test<br />
student understanding <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware ie criteria D.<br />
In DT each design and workshop skill is assessed.<br />
Finishing class work activities<br />
Class discussions<br />
Questions and Answers<br />
TYPES OF SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT<br />
31
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Whole projects testing all or some <strong>of</strong> the criteria.<br />
M1 – M3 have projects that concentrate on a few <strong>of</strong> the criteria<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the M4 projects address all 5 criteria<br />
All M5 projects address ALL <strong>of</strong> the criteria.<br />
Example projects include:<br />
o Brochures<br />
o Websites<br />
o Posters<br />
o Animations<br />
o Movies<br />
o Multimedia productions<br />
TYPES OF STUDENT REFLECTION AND SELF ASSESSMENT<br />
Written reflection is part <strong>of</strong> 4 criteria – Design (B), Plan(C), Create (D) and Evaluation<br />
(E).<br />
DT – Self and peer assessment in place this year – CT to activate this idea.<br />
STANDARDIZATION/MODERATION<br />
Department meetings consist <strong>of</strong> regular review <strong>of</strong> assignments tasks to standardize.<br />
Example student work is examined by CT and DT to review grades.<br />
External Moderation occurs in M5. DT and CT liaise to moderate samples.<br />
HOMEWORK POST 16 PROGRAMME<br />
No Technology courses are <strong>of</strong>fered in Post 16 Programme<br />
PROVISION FOR ELS STUDENTS<br />
All instructions are written out on worksheets and any difficult words explained<br />
Students work at own pace during lessons and can help each other<br />
PLACEMENT POLICY<br />
M1 – M3 students take 2 periods <strong>of</strong> DT and 2 periods <strong>of</strong> CT every week<br />
M3 students choose between DT and CT at the end <strong>of</strong> M3<br />
M4 – M4 students take 4 periods <strong>of</strong> DT or CT each week.<br />
STUDENT PORTFOLIOS<br />
All students have a plastic wallet where they keep a record <strong>of</strong> their work<br />
All projects are saved on the server and a back up copy is made <strong>of</strong> the M5‟s –portfolios<br />
for moderation.<br />
32
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
ARTS ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
Guiding Philosophy<br />
We believe that using assessment for learning is an excellent way to make students more<br />
engaged in their own education. By increasing their self awareness and guiding them in making<br />
value judgments against assessment criteria, students become increasingly aware about what is<br />
needed to improve and can therefore make plans and set targets that will help them to achieve<br />
this. In this way, the department uses self, peer and teacher assessment as a teaching tool to<br />
ensure that students get the most out <strong>of</strong> their studies. To further facilitate this process, for each<br />
assessment task, we aim to provide a „Guide, Checklist & Criteria‟ sheet that not only provides<br />
the criteria that the student will be assessed by, but that the student can use to guide them<br />
through the process step by step.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> Criteria: MYP Arts<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the really great things about the MYP Creative Arts is that from M1 – M5 students are<br />
judged against the same four assessment objectives, so students get plenty <strong>of</strong> practice meeting<br />
them. Additionally, Music, Art & Drama all use the same four objectives for assessment which<br />
enables us to streamline the programme that we deliver.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Developmental Workbook<br />
Accompanying the practical work, students must complete a „Developmental Workbook‟ that<br />
contains ideas, analysis, reflections and explorations. It is important that the „DW‟ is an accurate<br />
reflection <strong>of</strong> a student‟s ability in the subject as this is sent away for moderation in M5 and is a<br />
tool that helps teachers to justify the grades that they have been given.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Criterion MYP<br />
Knowledge & Understanding: Students have to show that they understand the content and<br />
skills that they are being taught. <strong>The</strong>y can do this through an analysis <strong>of</strong> a piece <strong>of</strong> work in the<br />
style that they are studying, an essay that explores how that art form has originated from culture,<br />
a brochure teaching younger students about the art form, a rubric that could be used to assess<br />
other people working within that art form, a PowerPoint presentation etc. (Marked out <strong>of</strong> eight)<br />
Application: This is where the students‟ practical work is assessed – where students actually<br />
work with the knowledge from Criterion A. Students must apply skills, techniques and processes<br />
to create perform and/or present Art work. (Marked out <strong>of</strong> ten.)<br />
Reflection & Evaluation: Students will be asked to reflect and evaluate both verbally and in<br />
their Developmental Workbook. Students should reflect on the process <strong>of</strong> creating Art work as<br />
well as the final product that they create. (Marked out <strong>of</strong> eight.)<br />
Personal Engagement: This assessment objective is concerned with a student‟s attitude to<br />
learning throughout the unit, whether they are motivated, show initiative and curiosity and if they<br />
are receptive to Art forms from all around the world. This will be evident both in the practical<br />
33
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
work done in class time and in the work that evolves through the Developmental Workbook.<br />
(Marked out <strong>of</strong> eight.)<br />
N.B. Each <strong>of</strong> the assessment criteria has an emphasis on studying, applying, reflecting on or<br />
being open to Art practices from different cultures<br />
Summative <strong>Assessment</strong> Examples:<br />
Students may be asked to create a brochure, an essay, a piece <strong>of</strong> reflection, an analysis on the art<br />
style, a practical piece <strong>of</strong> work. For specific information regarding how the summative tasks fit<br />
with the individual criteria, please refer to the section entitled, „<strong>The</strong> Criterion MYP‟.<br />
Formative <strong>Assessment</strong> Examples:<br />
Everything that we ask the students to do in the Arts is, in some way, an example <strong>of</strong> formative<br />
assessment in action. Students are given continuous verbal and written feedback and are<br />
expected to apply this to their work; this may be a piece <strong>of</strong> practical work, or a DW entry or even<br />
an essay. This is fully in line with our guiding philosophy and the MYP aims.<br />
Homework<br />
M1 – M3 Arts: Students will generally be asked to complete an activity at home that addresses<br />
the objectives covered in Criterion A. This varies between subjects but is generally between one<br />
and two projects per term. All <strong>of</strong> the other assessment criteria are met during the class time.<br />
M4 – M5 Arts: In addition to one or two assessment tasks that address Criterion A, students are<br />
also expected to add reflections and ideas to their Developmental Workbook. Depending on the<br />
subject, these are collected in weekly or bi-weekly.<br />
Delayed Work<br />
As a department we are committed to supporting our students in their education and will have a<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> flexibility in dealing with student work that misses the deadline. Additionally, students<br />
who submit work that falls well below the expected standard will be allowed the opportunity to<br />
try to apply the feedback that they have been given. This practice further hi-lights our application<br />
<strong>of</strong> formative assessment principles.<br />
Standardisation<br />
<strong>The</strong> Creative Arts Department recognizes the importance <strong>of</strong> standardizing across the three<br />
subjects. Although teaching three different subjects creates some difficulties in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
moderating subject specific work, sharing the same assessment criteria does present one or two<br />
opportunities. <strong>The</strong> Creative Arts Department aims to moderate student work in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
grades at least twice a year, with the focus being on transferable skills such as reflection and<br />
analysis and personal engagement.<br />
ELS Students<br />
34
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Creative Arts department is very aware <strong>of</strong> the necessity <strong>of</strong> creating avenues that make the<br />
curriculum more accessible to students whose first language is not English. <strong>The</strong>re are a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
strategies that we may employ, depending <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> need and the nature <strong>of</strong> what we are<br />
assessing. Strategies may include extending the deadline, adjusting the level descriptors,<br />
modifying the task, not assessing grammar & spelling.<br />
Learning Support Students<br />
At TISA, we teach students whose learning needs vary tremendously. In addition to utilizing a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> teaching strategies we recognize that it is our responsibility to ensure that all students<br />
can have some success at the work that we assign. We ensure that the types <strong>of</strong> assessment tasks<br />
vary, that students can complete assessments in a variety <strong>of</strong> formats e.g. record it rather than<br />
write it and that we unpack the assessment task as we assign it so that all students have a full<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> what is expected <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
POST 16 ARTS ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
Guiding Philosophy<br />
We believe that by sharing assessment criteria early on with students, we are engaging,<br />
supporting and empowering the students to take the initiative for their own education. We can<br />
justify everything we teach and assess throughout the two years as preparing the post 16 students<br />
for their final IB assessments; familiarizing the students with the standards expected to reach the<br />
higher grades. Whilst we may adjust the grade boundaries or modify the assessment expectations<br />
for IB1 students, we are really careful to include every objective that the IB Diploma expects to<br />
be met for that particular assessment.<br />
Diploma Arts teachers share a belief that by providing students with detailed feedback that<br />
correlates with the assessment criteria we are more fully preparing them for the rigors <strong>of</strong> IB<br />
assessment. Careful checks <strong>of</strong> future work watch out for the explicit application <strong>of</strong> this feedback.<br />
For each assessment task that we issue, we provide students with a clear set <strong>of</strong> guidelines, a<br />
checklist and, in some cases, a template that, if followed, will ensure a minimum standard is met.<br />
Underpinning our work on assessment is the belief that self and peer assessment encourages<br />
students to not only develop their critical thinking skills but increases their awareness <strong>of</strong> how<br />
their work can improve and what targets need to be set in order for it to get there.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Arts teachers at TISA evaluate the IB Diploma results every year and read both the subject<br />
report and the examiner feedback on internal assessment in order to ensure that our knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
assessments is up to date and wholly accurate.<br />
Here at TISA, we <strong>of</strong>fer Diploma <strong>The</strong>atre & Visual Arts. As each subject has very different<br />
objectives & dynamics for assessment, further clarification can be found below.<br />
Visual Arts<br />
Students are assessed on their „Investigation Workbook‟ which then leads on to (and enhances)<br />
the assessment <strong>of</strong> their Studio Work. <strong>The</strong> course is finalized by a visiting examiner reading the<br />
Investigation Workbook, looking at the Studio Work and asking the students questions to clarify<br />
35
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
their understanding <strong>of</strong> how they have approached Visual Arts and the creation <strong>of</strong> the work being<br />
displayed.<br />
Throughout the two year course, students are prepared for the completion <strong>of</strong> the two assessments<br />
and the visiting examiner through careful construction <strong>of</strong> questioning, feedback and teacher<br />
input.<br />
<strong>The</strong> course is almost entirely student led in that students determine an artistic avenue to follow.<br />
<strong>The</strong> teacher then modifies their input according to the needs <strong>of</strong> the student and the work style.<br />
Every month students are expected to complete one studio piece and to have completed the<br />
correlating entries into the Investigation Workbook (this work supports and enhances the studio<br />
piece).<br />
Students are expected to use both class time and homework time in order to meet this deadline.<br />
Those who have not completed work on their studio piece or Investigation Workbook by the<br />
deadline will be marked on the work that they have completed. Students are given written<br />
feedback and a mark that correlates with the IB grading system.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> Objectives for Investigation, Option A & B<br />
All criteria for this assessment are combined to form one descriptor for each level, rather than<br />
separate criterion. <strong>The</strong> assessment emphasis for the Investigation is on the following categories;<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> Art from different times & culture, skills, techniques and processes used when<br />
analyzing art work, focused investigative strategies, development <strong>of</strong> ideas, use <strong>of</strong> specialist<br />
vocabulary, appropriate use <strong>of</strong> correctly annotated sources, presents work creatively and the<br />
presentation <strong>of</strong> a focused relationship between investigation & studio.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> Objectives for Studio, Option A & B<br />
All criteria for this assessment are combined to form one descriptor for each level, rather than<br />
separate criterion. <strong>The</strong> assessment emphasis for Studio, Option A is on the following categories;<br />
excellent understanding <strong>of</strong> artistic techniques, production <strong>of</strong> artwork exploring ideas, thoughtful<br />
development <strong>of</strong> ideas, sensitivity to materials and their use, technical competence, confidence<br />
and inventiveness and extending boundaries through reflective judgment.<br />
(For more comprehensive information, please refer to the red book issued to all Art students and<br />
the IB Diploma TISA guide.)<br />
<strong>The</strong>atre<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are four assessment tasks for IB <strong>The</strong>atre; two <strong>of</strong> which are internally assessed and<br />
moderated and two are externally assessed. Internal assessments include the TPPP (a<br />
presentation that reflects on how the student has progressed and what they have learned<br />
throughout the year) and the IPP (an independent project where the student practically explores<br />
an aspect <strong>of</strong> theatre and then writes this up as a portfolio). <strong>The</strong> external assessments are the RI (a<br />
formal essay that the student writes having researched an unfamiliar theatre practice and play)<br />
and the PPP (a creative exercise where the students respond to a stimulus in order to put together<br />
ideas for a play).<br />
36
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Students are given a practice attempt at completing the RI, two practice attempts at completing<br />
the TPPP, two practice attempts for the PPP and parallels and connections to the IPP are made<br />
explicit throughout the course.<br />
Throughout the two years, students have to make regular contributions to a written journal that<br />
documents work they have done, ideas they have had, research they have found out, analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
work and connections between different areas <strong>of</strong> theatre practice that they have been exposed to.<br />
This work is marked using a combination <strong>of</strong> assessment criteria from the IPP and the TPPP as<br />
both assessment tasks use skills and knowledge made explicit in the journal<br />
For each <strong>of</strong> the 4 major assessments, students are provided with a „Student Guide‟ to that<br />
specific assessment. <strong>The</strong> guides all have a similar format in that they break the assessment down<br />
into what the assessment is for, what is being assessed, ideas that could be used, examiner tips,<br />
comments from the subject reports, a suggested template and a guide to getting started. In<br />
addition to these guides, students will be presented with „Guide & <strong>Assessment</strong>‟ sheets for<br />
smaller assessment tasks such as writing the journal. We only ever assess skills and knowledge<br />
that will enhance the student‟s work in one <strong>of</strong> the four final assessments. For example, as<br />
practical performing skills are not assessed by the IB, they are never needlessly assessed on<br />
them.<br />
Students use a significant amount <strong>of</strong> class time to complete the practical work. However, where<br />
students are attempting to approach a new assessment some class time will be allocated in order<br />
to ensure that the students are receiving enough input.<br />
At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year, the teacher presents the students with a year outline that identifies<br />
key assessments in advance. In this way, students are given long term deadlines in order to meet<br />
the demands <strong>of</strong> the assessment tasks. <strong>The</strong>re is some flexibility with the deadline and students are<br />
not penalized if an extension on the practice assessments has been negotiated. <strong>The</strong>re is very little<br />
flexibility with the final version <strong>of</strong> the four assessment tasks and the teacher has a responsibility<br />
to communicate a significant delay in submitting the work to the IB.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> objectives<br />
Research Investigation (25%)<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are 3 separate assessment criteria for this task, with Higher level students also being<br />
assessed on their ability to critique their sources. All students have to demonstrate that they can<br />
effective research skills, select and use relevant information, show initiative and perseverance<br />
and write a formal essay by using an appropriate format.<br />
Practical Performance Proposal (25%)<br />
All criteria for this assessment are combined to form one descriptor for each level, rather than<br />
separate criterion. <strong>The</strong> assessment emphasis for the PPP is on the following categories; Creative<br />
response to the stimulus, a consideration <strong>of</strong> alternative ideas, a practical understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
production elements and their effects and the ability to generate a coherent performance concept.<br />
HL students have to write an essay justifying their artistic choices against theory into<br />
performance.<br />
37
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong>atre Performance & Production Presentation (25%)<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are three separate assessment criterion that all students have to meet. Additionally, HL<br />
students must show that they can reflect theory against practice. Students must demonstrate the<br />
ability to identify, understand and apply skills from specific theatre practices in addition to<br />
analysing productions that they have been in and also seen. Students must seek to find<br />
connections between theatre practices and experiment imaginatively with the individual<br />
elements. Students are assessed on their ability to reflect on the course and their own progress<br />
and on how their work links with the work <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
Independent Project Portfolio (25%)<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are four common assessment criteria for all students in addition to HL students needing to<br />
demonstrate how they have applied research on theory into performance into their practical<br />
work. All students are assessed on their creative ideas, on the amount <strong>of</strong> initiative and<br />
perseverance that they demonstrate and on their understanding <strong>of</strong> production elements and the<br />
task. Additionally, students must write their IPP in a specific format and are assessed on the<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> their reflections on the evolution <strong>of</strong> the actual project.<br />
Homework <strong>Policy</strong> for Visual Arts and <strong>The</strong>atre IB Diploma<br />
In Visual Arts, students are expected to produce one studio piece and the accompanying<br />
workbook pages every month. Students will use both class time and homework time in order to<br />
meet this deadline. As a result, the amount <strong>of</strong> homework each Diploma student will do, will<br />
depend entirely on the project that they are completing.<br />
If a student does not fully complete their work, they will be given a mark using the same<br />
criterion that would have been used had the work been completed. Consequently, although the<br />
student will not get a „0‟, it is likely that the unfinished nature <strong>of</strong> the project will be reflected in<br />
the eventual grade.<br />
Typically, <strong>The</strong>atre students will submit their journal once a week and are graded against the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> reflection and connections they are able to establish, using the criteria from the TPPP<br />
and the IPP. In this way, they are improving their skills in preparation for the final assessments.<br />
In addition to the regular journal entries, students complete two practice PPPs, two practice<br />
TPPPs and one practice RI over the two years <strong>of</strong> study. Although some class time is put aside for<br />
the first attempt at an assessment, the student is usually expected to complete the projects in their<br />
own time.<br />
Students will only get a zero if absolutely nothing is submitted to the teacher in the way <strong>of</strong><br />
assessment. Students are not penalized if their work is late, rather the students work to a deadline<br />
that they initiate. Students will receive both feedback and a grade from the assessment criteria<br />
used for the eventual assessment in IB2. However, where students are attempting an assessment<br />
task for the first time, they may first be assessed against SL criteria.<br />
Standardization<br />
It is not possible to participate in meaningful standardization between the Arts as there is only<br />
one Diploma teacher <strong>of</strong> each subject. However, teachers will actively seek out opportunities to<br />
standardize their marking by using the examples provided on the OCC and other opportunities<br />
such as becoming an examiner for their subject.<br />
38
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
ELS & Learning Support Students<br />
In the Arts department, we recognize that students following the Diploma programme may need<br />
the work modifying, or the curriculum to be re-structured in order to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> our<br />
students. Templates, examples and booklets are provided for all students to ensure that they can<br />
maximize their success in the Arts at Diploma level. Additionally, where it is the students‟<br />
preference (and the work lends itself), some assessment tasks may be submitted in a verbal<br />
format.<br />
Finally …<br />
We believe that assessment should be used to enhance student learning rather than to simply<br />
record it. This informs the majority <strong>of</strong> the decisions that the department makes together.<br />
39
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
PHYSICAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT POLICY<br />
Criteria A – Use <strong>of</strong> Knowledge (8)<br />
Portfolio/PE diary, written assignments, written unit test, use <strong>of</strong> observation sheets (peer<br />
assessment, self assessment, group assessment), unit research assignment.<br />
Criteria B – Movement composition (6)<br />
Summative assessment, group, self and peer assessment, assessment made by teacher,<br />
video analysis.<br />
Criteria C – Performance (10)<br />
Skills assessment, use <strong>of</strong> smart goals, collecting and analyzing data from PE<br />
performance, use <strong>of</strong> observations (teacher, self, peer and group observation), video<br />
analysis.<br />
Criteria D – Social skills and personal engagement (8)<br />
On-going procedure where students are assessed on attitudes and approaches to learning,<br />
including: tardies to class, preparedness for class, collaboration with teacher and peers,<br />
following essential class agreement, bringing (medical) excuse notes, meeting due dates<br />
for assignments.<br />
All the criteria can be used in almost all summative assessment tasks depending on the focus<br />
decided by the teacher/unit. For specific types <strong>of</strong> assessment tasks and specific criteria see<br />
below**.<br />
Homework <strong>Policy</strong> MYP<br />
Students keep a portfolio. Portfolios are handed in to the teacher at regular intervals in<br />
order to assess learning and understanding.<br />
All portfolio homework is to be checked or discussed to ensure student understanding<br />
and teachers will provide written feedback on portfolio entries on a regular basis.<br />
On a discretionary basis, students who do not complete portfolio activities need to make<br />
up the time or complete the work for the teacher on a case by case basis. <strong>The</strong> students<br />
will be reminded once to complete assignment. If the assignment is not handed in, the<br />
parents <strong>of</strong> the student will receive an email and the student will receive a department<br />
detention to complete assignment if this is not completed with seven (7) days. If the<br />
assignment is still not completed within another seven (7) days the parents <strong>of</strong> the student<br />
will be contacted by phone and a school detention will be assigned.<br />
Students accept homework not completed will have an impact on summative assessment<br />
marks<br />
Failure to complete homework after repeated requests will result in a zero for relevant<br />
summative assessment marks<br />
It is expected that students will have homework ready at the beginning <strong>of</strong> class on the due<br />
date unless otherwise specified by the teacher<br />
Missing or tardy work is not graded unless there is a warranted reason.<br />
40
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Please refer to TISA general homework policy for quantity <strong>of</strong> homework (varies<br />
depending on year level)<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
Pre assessment can occur at the beginning <strong>of</strong> each unit where prior knowledge is<br />
collected (Guiding Questions and AOI are <strong>of</strong>ten used as a focus tool)<br />
Formative assessment is ongoing to ensure understanding and activities will range in size<br />
and structure<br />
Each unit will have a minimum <strong>of</strong> two summative assessment tasks to ensure<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the unit content – these will be assessed according to one or more<br />
criteria and marks will be recorded and go towards final grade/report card marks<br />
Formative assessment activities include (both using and not using criteria):<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> task specific rubrics.<br />
Homework responses to questions/Reflections on topics in portfolio.<br />
Unit questions in class<br />
Class discussion<br />
Clear notes in portfolio notebook<br />
Self-assessment<br />
Sharing/presentation <strong>of</strong> information collected to class<br />
Finishing class work activities<br />
Research skills<br />
Summative Types <strong>of</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> (using criteria) include:<br />
Tests (Criteria A, B, C**)<br />
Quizzes (A, B, C)<br />
Posters (A, B, C, D)<br />
Presentations (A, B, C, D)<br />
Brochures (A, B, C, D)<br />
Technology integrated presentations – e.g. videos/recordings, slideshows (A, B, C, D)<br />
Teaching others (A, B, C, D)<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> anecdotal notes <strong>of</strong> the teacher<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> student reflection and self-assessment<br />
Peer assessment (A, B, C, D)<br />
Written responses to reflective questions (e.g. What did I learn? What was the best?<br />
Where can I improve?)<br />
Reflection on ATL skills and Criteria C: Performance<br />
Self assessment <strong>of</strong> criteria before/during/after summative assessment (A, B, C, D)<br />
Group discussion (e.g. <strong>of</strong> collaboration skills)<br />
41
<strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Standardization/Moderation<br />
<strong>The</strong> department meets regularly to share sample student work to be assessed by all<br />
department members<br />
External Moderation occurs in M5 – all department members aid in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
standardizing the marks<br />
Provisions for ELS students (to be developed with collaboration with ELS department)<br />
Visual aids for students (use <strong>of</strong> flashcards)<br />
Lists <strong>of</strong> pertinent vocabulary<br />
Collaboration work with ELS department (sharing unit planners)<br />
Extra time allowance and occasional ELS teacher support on quizzes and tests<br />
Spelling and grammar errors has no affect on criteria marks for ELS students (for<br />
Criterion D organization and presentation marks in particular)<br />
Provisions for Learning Support students (to be developed with collaboration with LS<br />
department)<br />
Time allowance for tests/quizzes<br />
Extra time to aid with organization and homework diary maintenance<br />
Collaboration work with LS department<br />
Liaising with homeroom teacher to aid with organizational and time-management skills<br />
Student portfolios<br />
A notebook is kept with the teacher with a copy <strong>of</strong> the four criteria used in Physical<br />
Education.<br />
42