01.10.2015 Views

SCZ-Verslag Wedstrijd te Leuven op 01/06/2003 onder de ...

SCZ-Verslag Wedstrijd te Leuven op 01/06/2003 onder de ...

SCZ-Verslag Wedstrijd te Leuven op 01/06/2003 onder de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SCZ</strong>-<strong>Verslag</strong><br />

<strong>Wedstrijd</strong> <strong>te</strong> <strong>Leuven</strong> <strong>op</strong> <strong>01</strong>/<strong>06</strong>/<strong>2003</strong> <strong>on<strong>de</strong>r</strong> <strong>de</strong> reglemen<strong>te</strong>n van K.B.Z.B.<br />

<strong>Wedstrijd</strong> 16<br />

100 m Vrije slag Heren<br />

Ka<strong>de</strong>t<strong>te</strong>n<br />

1. LECOUTERE JEROEN BEST /108/87 (0.53.89) 00.53.96 JH 713<br />

50m 0.25.84<br />

2. MEYERS SEPP BRABO/070/87 (0.56.35) 00.55.90 JH 641<br />

50m 0.26.79<br />

3. LAMAIRE DIMITRI BEST /159/88 (0.58.83) 00.59.21 LV 539<br />

50m 0.28.68<br />

4. DESFOSSES BERND BRABO/086/87 (0.59.61) <strong>01</strong>.00.97 494<br />

50m 0.28.99<br />

5. CONARD ALEXANDER BEST /181/88 (1.04.<strong>06</strong>) <strong>01</strong>.04.95 409<br />

50m 0.31.34<br />

6. MOLKERS STEVEN BRABO/080/88 (1.07.74) <strong>01</strong>.08.51 348<br />

50m 0.32.95<br />

7. MORDIJCK KWINTEN BEST /098/88 (1.09.90) <strong>01</strong>.09.04 340<br />

50m 0.33.21<br />

LUPPENS JURGEN<br />

DIZV /095/88 (1.03.17) Uitgeslo<strong>te</strong>n AT<br />

Junioren<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

BUELENS HANS LOR /114/86 (0.54.22) 00.57.54 588<br />

STEVENHEYDENS GINO LOR /115/86 (0.58.05) 00.58.78 551<br />

50m 0.27.10<br />

THAENS WOUTER BEST /091/86 (1.00.07) <strong>01</strong>.00.55 504<br />

50m 0.28.87<br />

11/<strong>06</strong>/<strong>2003</strong> Disclaimer : Deze rappor<strong>te</strong>ring mag niet als officieel document beschouwd wor<strong>de</strong>n<br />

Page 20 of 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!