14.10.2015 Views

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO-Myths-and-Truths-edition2

GMO-Myths-and-Truths-edition2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.4 Myth: EU research shows GM foods are safe<br />

Truth: EU research shows evidence of harm from<br />

GM foods<br />

Myth at a glance<br />

Research on GM foods commissioned by the European Union (EU) is often<br />

claimed to conclude that GM foods are safe. This is a misrepresentation of this<br />

research project, most of which was not designed to examine the safety of<br />

specific GM foods.<br />

Three animal feeding studies from the project that did examine the safety of a<br />

GM food raise concerns, including differences in organ weights <strong>and</strong> immune<br />

responses in the GM-fed animals. These findings should be followed up in<br />

long-term studies.<br />

An EU research project is often cited as providing evidence for GM crop <strong>and</strong> food safety.<br />

Those who have cited the project in this way include:<br />

➜➜<br />

The GM industry lobby group ISAAA 1<br />

➜➜<br />

Jonathan Jones, a British Monsanto-connected scientist 2,3<br />

➜➜<br />

Nina Fedoroff, 4 former science <strong>and</strong> technology adviser to US secretary of state Hillary<br />

Clinton<br />

➜➜<br />

Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, European Commissioner for research, innovation <strong>and</strong> science. 5<br />

However, the report based on this project, “A decade of EU-funded <strong>GMO</strong> research” 6 , presents<br />

no data that could provide such evidence – for example, from long-term feeding studies in<br />

animals.<br />

Indeed, the project was not even designed to test the safety of any single GM food, but to<br />

focus on “the development of safety assessment approaches”. 6 In fact, taxpayers would be<br />

entitled to ask why the Commission spent 200 million Euros of public money 6 on a research<br />

project that failed to address this most pressing of questions about GM foods.<br />

In the SAFOTEST section of the report, which is dedicated to GM food safety, only five<br />

published animal feeding studies are referenced. 7,8,9,10,11<br />

Two of these studies were carried out with a GM rice expressing a protein known to be toxic<br />

to mammals, in order to ascertain that the methodology used was sensitive enough to detect<br />

toxicity of a comparable level. 7,8<br />

None of the studies tested a commercialized GM food; none tested the GM food for longterm<br />

effects beyond the medium-term period of 90 days; all found differences in the GM-fed<br />

<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!