The Silver Canvas - Daguerrotype Masterpieces (Art Photography Ebook)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter One<br />
THE WORLD POSES FOR THE SUN<br />
Detail, Plate 5<br />
WHEN, IN 1839, word first began to<br />
make its way from the scientific and<br />
literary gazettes into the popular<br />
press that a French artist had found a way to make<br />
the sun itself create a work of art that exactly copied<br />
a scene from nature without any aid from an artist's<br />
brush, the general public was suspicious. After all,<br />
only four years earlier these same newspapers had<br />
startled the world by reporting that people actually<br />
lived on the moon, even showing illustrations of<br />
winged moon-creatures lolling on the beach of a<br />
lunar lake. 1<br />
Such images had been described as coming<br />
from sightings made by the eminent scientist Sir John<br />
Herschel through his gigantic telescope in South<br />
Africa. For months, detailed articles traveled around<br />
the globe and were taken so seriously that a group of<br />
clergy began planning how missionaries could be<br />
sent to the moon to spread the word of the gospel.<br />
Although finally revealed as a hoax perpetrated by an<br />
ingenious New York Sun reporter and denounced as<br />
false by Herschel, the moon story had made such an<br />
impact that the world greeted other startling scientific<br />
news with skepticism.<br />
Now, only a few years later, should the public<br />
believe these astonishing reports of "sun pictures,"<br />
especially when the same scientist, Herschel,<br />
endorsed them as being genuine? What was one to<br />
believe from such reports? If people had unscrupulously<br />
been led to believe winged creatures occupied<br />
the moon, why should they now believe the<br />
sun would be willing to be shut up in a box to produce<br />
works of art on a metal plate with the curious<br />
name daguerreotype'?<br />
During the months before any accurate details<br />
emerged about what appeared to be more a concoction<br />
of fiction than a scientific invention, newspapers<br />
compounded, rather than explained, the mystery<br />
of the daguerreotype because the editors themselves<br />
were not actually confident of their own understanding.<br />
One of the earliest examples of such reports<br />
appeared in the Cincinnati Republican of March 1839,<br />
where it was intriguingly entitled "Farewell to Ink,<br />
Types, Clocks!" 2 This headline represented what the<br />
editors understood from early London reports about<br />
this new invention—that the daguerreotype could<br />
do everything previously accomplished by painting<br />
and printing and could show the passage of time<br />
because plates made early in the morning looked different<br />
from those made at noon or in the evening.<br />
Fantasies about this new use of the sun blossomed<br />
during this early period of little precise information,<br />
and one American wrote a lengthy poem<br />
about what the new solar device would allow him to<br />
23