Confessions Of A British Spy

Info

first step towards the movement that would later earn him his renown. The basis of the policy which the British have followed throughout the Muslim world consists of this three-word slogan: “Break, dominate, and destroy their faith.” They have not hesitated to fulfil all the requirements of this policy, whatsoever. The first thing they did in India was to find the people who would serve them. Using these people, they slowly lit the fire of mischief. The people most suitable for this purpose were the Hindus living under Muslims’ domination; so they used these people. The Hindus were leading a peaceful life under the equitable ruling of the Muslims, when the British approached them and gradually imbued them with the thought that Hindus were the real owners of India, that Muslims had been killing the Hindu gods in the name of religious sacrifice, and that this practice should soon be put an end to. The Hindus were on the British side now. They employed some of them as mercenaries. Thus the Hindu nescience and the British hostility against Islam and avarice for money were brought together to carry out Queen Elizabeth’s advice for the formation of an army. Discord was sown between the Muslim governors and the Hindu maharajahs. In the meantime, from amongst the Muslims, people slack in their faith were hired. The British Sir Lord Strachey, who served as the regent on several occasions and who was a member of the (Indian Organization), states about the Muslim-Hindu enmity, “Anything that will be done in order to dominate or sow discord is compatible with our government’s policy. The greater support for our policy in India is the co-existence of two autonomous societies who are hostile to each other.” Aggravating this hostility, the British supported the Hindus continuously from 1164 [A.D. 1750] until 1287 [A.D. 1870], and joined them in all the massacres of Muslims they perpetrated. Commencing in 1858, the Muslim-Hindu conflicts grew wider and wider. The British would provoke the Hindus against the Muslims and then sit and enjoy the fights as the Hindus attacked. Not a single year passed without bloody events and mischievous tumults that broke out upon the killing of a cow as a religious sacrifice and which resulted in the massacre of hundreds, nay, – 86 –
thousands of Muslims. In order to kindle the mischief from both ends, they, on the one hand, spread among the Muslims the belief that killing one cow as a sacrifice would be more pious than killing seven sheep, and, on the other hand, they rumoured among the Hindus that rescuing their bovine gods from death would earn them a lot of rewards in the next world. This mischief of theirs continued after their withdrawal from India. We would like to exemplify this fact by relating an event written in a magazine entitled Ittilâ’at, which was published in Iran in the time of its Prime Minister Musaddiq. On a day of Qurbân [1] two bearded Muslims wearing turbans and long robes bought a cow to kill as a sacrifice. As they were passing a Hindu quarter on their way home, a Hindu stopped them to ask them what they were going to do with the cow. When they said they were going to kill it as a sacrifice, the Hindu began to shout, “Hey, people! Help! These men are going to sacrifice our god.” And the two Muslims also shouted, “O Muslims! Help! These men are going to seize our sacrifice.” Hindus and Muslims gathered around the place and began to fight by using sticks and knives. Hundreds of Muslims were killed. Later, however, the two people who had been taking the cow through the Hindu quarter were seen disappearing into the British embassy. This comes to mean that this event was provoked by the British. The correspondent who relates this event adds, “We know how you spoiled Muslims’ day of Qurbân.” With tricks of this sort and innumerable other types of cruelty they tried to destroy Muslims. Later on, when they saw that the Hindus were gradually rising against them, they began, by 1287 [A.D. 1870], to support the Muslims against the Hindus. There appeared strange people who bore Muslim names yet who were hostile against the Ahl as-sunna, said that it was not fard to make Jihâd with the sword, said ‘halâl’ about what Islam has prescribed to be harâm, and attempted to change Islam’s principles of belief. Sir Sayyed Ahmad, Ghulâm Ahmad Qâdiyânî, Abdullah Ghaznawî, Ismâ’îl-i-Dahlawî, Nazîr Huseyn Dahlawî, Siddiq Hasan Khân Pehûpâlî, Rashîd Ahmad Kenkuhî, Wahîd uz-zamân Haydar Âbâdî, Ashraf Alî Tahânawî, and [1] One of the Muslims’ holy days on which they slaughter a sheep, a cow, or a camel as a religious sacrifice. – 87 –
Page 1 and 2:
Hakikat Kitabevi Publications No: 1
Page 3 and 4:
PREFACE Allâhu ta’âlâ declared
Page 5 and 6:
The second section relates how the
Page 7 and 8:
that might occur later were not out
Page 9 and 10:
scholars were insurmountable obstac
Page 11 and 12:
Section One PART TWO In the Hijrî
Page 13 and 14:
make an ablution. He would sit towa
Page 15 and 16:
was very much indignant over this a
Page 17 and 18:
the Ottoman Empire. After the two-h
Page 19 and 20:
Yet, being a Christian, I have not
Page 21 and 22:
Section One PART FOUR When I arrive
Page 23 and 24:
shop. His attirement was that of a
Page 25 and 26:
Sahâbîs. His statements cannot be
Page 27 and 28:
al-kerîm and hadîth-i-sherîfs co
Page 29 and 30:
He objected, “No, it is not.” I
Page 31 and 32:
was not harâm unless it had an int
Page 33 and 34:
encouraging and reassuring. Muhamma
Page 35 and 36: Section One PART FIVE It was on one
Page 37 and 38: day a flood will come and take them
Page 39 and 40: Because I was ill, my host prepared
Page 41 and 42: Section One PART SIX I stayed in Ba
Page 43 and 44: around a round table. The first man
Page 45 and 46: eceived identical answers with slig
Page 47 and 48: 4- They have completely ceased from
Page 49 and 50: maintenance of language; 4) The kno
Page 51 and 52: disputing groups, inoculating mistr
Page 53 and 54: 8- Make the following statements fo
Page 55 and 56: 14- Dirtiness is the result of lack
Page 57 and 58: Rabb (Allah)! Make us Muslims for Y
Page 59 and 60: elatives). From then on, the Messen
Page 61 and 62: graves in Samerra belong to the Abb
Page 63 and 64: Translate the Qur’ân into other
Page 65 and 66: sank their ships. They all drowned
Page 67 and 68: Kermanshah to the Nusayriya group,
Page 69 and 70: millions of Christian books free of
Page 71 and 72: “4- He is to allege that the maus
Page 73 and 74: powerful army.” I accepted his ex
Page 75 and 76: Section Two BRITISH ENMITY AGAINST
Page 77 and 78: British press and the general was d
Page 79 and 80: in the port city named Calcutta in
Page 81 and 82: surrendered yet. So Hudson set abou
Page 83 and 84: While closing the Islamic madrasas
Page 85: and baser than Russia; the statemen
Page 89 and 90: The hypocrites whom they had traine
Page 91 and 92: Jamâladdîn Afghânî was born in
Page 93 and 94: Ahmad Khân. He was born in Delhi i
Page 95 and 96: statesmen were persuaded into joini
Page 97 and 98: counterfeit friendship. He felt suc
Page 99 and 100: founded by Abd-ul-hamîd Khân was
Page 101 and 102: was a priest, like in the others. I
Page 103 and 104: formed an organization. Even in pla
Page 105 and 106: KHULÂSA-T-UL-KELÂM The following
Page 107 and 108: teaches that their religions and ca
Page 109 and 110: classified the hadîth-i-sherîfs t
Page 111 and 112: So are the Judaic books narrating t
Page 113 and 114: volume of the interpretation of the
Page 115 and 116: in the thirty-ninth verse of the De
Page 117 and 118: Zubeyr took him to Yemen. When he w
Page 119 and 120: CONCLUSION In short, Din (religion)
Page 121 and 122: expressed some facts in a covert la
Page 123 and 124: P.O.Box 4249 11th. Nov. 1991 Kaduna
Page 125 and 126: - 125 -
Page 127 and 128: - 127 -
show all

Confessions Of A British Spy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?