their Geographical Neighbourhood
n?u=RePEc:eiq:eileqs:97&r=all
n?u=RePEc:eiq:eileqs:97&r=all
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Location Strategies of EU-15 MNEs in the European Neighborhood<br />
4. Methodology<br />
4.1. Capturing MNEs heterogeneous preferences for economic<br />
institutions: Mixed Logit Models<br />
Following McFadden (1974), the great majority of the empirical literature on<br />
investment location decisions implies that MNE strategies are fundamentally<br />
driven by individual maximization choices. In other words, it is thought that<br />
MNEs select locations on the basis of the expected utility or profit that each site<br />
may yield on the basis of the characteristics of the host economies. Conditional<br />
Logit (CL) models allow exploring the effect of alternative-specific attributes on<br />
the probabilities that firms select a particular location among the set of<br />
alternatives. The main assumption in the CL is the Independence of Irrelevant<br />
Alternatives (IIA), which implies that the error term εij is independent across<br />
locations.<br />
An extension of the analysis of MNE location behaviour is developed by<br />
implementing a Mixed Logit (MXL) model. This is basically a generalization of<br />
the standard logit and offers the possibility to relax completely any restriction<br />
associated with the IIA. The existing literature on MNE location choices has<br />
rarely employed MXL, despite the advantages associated to it. Notable<br />
exceptions are relatively recent and include works by Defever (2006; 2012),<br />
Cheng (2008) and Basile et al. (2008). The present analysis implements a randomcoefficient<br />
derivation of the MXL, in line with Defever (2006; 2012) and Cheng<br />
(2008), with the aim of analysing whether MNEs have heterogeneous preferences<br />
over location attributes when they strategically select a location for greenfield<br />
22