Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
US<br />
Jean Pawlow<br />
Jean A Pawlow is a partner <strong>in</strong> the global law firm of McDermott<br />
Will & Emery. She serves on the firm’s Management<br />
Committee and F<strong>in</strong>ance Committee and she is co-chair of the<br />
firm’s tax controversy practice. US News and Best Lawyers<br />
named McDermott ‘<strong>Tax</strong> Litigation Firm of the Year’ for 2014.<br />
Jean has been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> represent<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses and <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
on significant tax controversy matters for 25 years.<br />
Substantive issues <strong>in</strong> dispute have <strong>in</strong>cluded transfer pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />
issues under Code section 482, tax advantaged transactions, tax<br />
account<strong>in</strong>g issues, <strong>in</strong>surance tax matters, the tax treatment of<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments, foreign tax credit and research credit<br />
issues, leveraged leases, credit card <strong>in</strong>terchange and orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
issue discount (OID), excise taxes, reasonable compensation,<br />
estate and gift tax issues, and charitable contribution deductions.<br />
She also advises on California and District of Columbia<br />
state tax controversies.<br />
Jean has litigated cases before the US <strong>Tax</strong> Court, the Court<br />
of Federal Claims, US district courts, US Courts of Appeal and<br />
the Supreme Court. She also has extensive experience with IRS<br />
alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fast<br />
track settlement, rapid appeals, post-appeals mediation, pre-fil<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agreements and CAP audits. She frequently represents<br />
McDermott Will & Emery<br />
500 North Capitol Street, NW<br />
Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC 20001<br />
US<br />
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100<br />
Menlo Park, CA 94025<br />
US<br />
Tel: +1 202 756 8297<br />
Tel: +1 650 815 7558 (CA)<br />
Fax: +1 202 756 8087<br />
Email: jpawlow@mwe.com<br />
Website: www.mwe.com<br />
clients who are be<strong>in</strong>g audited by the IRS Global High Wealth Industry Group.<br />
Jean is a frequent writer and speaker on tax controversy matters and has appeared on CBS<br />
and CNBC. She is the contribut<strong>in</strong>g editor of a 2015 book on global tax controversies. The<br />
Legal 500 has named Jean a lead<strong>in</strong>g lawyer every year s<strong>in</strong>ce 2009, and quoted a client who<br />
described her as “a pleasure to work with, clever, an excellent advocate, personable and possessed<br />
of an <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctive bus<strong>in</strong>ess understand<strong>in</strong>g”. She has been nationally ranked as a lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tax litigation lawyer <strong>in</strong> every edition of Chambers USA s<strong>in</strong>ce 2010 as “one of the preem<strong>in</strong>ent<br />
tax lawyers <strong>in</strong> the US” and noted for her “dedication to client service”. Jean was also listed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Best Lawyers <strong>in</strong> America <strong>in</strong> 2012, 2013 and 2014. She serves on the <strong>Tax</strong> Committee for<br />
the US Court of Federal Claims Advisory Council and is a fellow of the American College of<br />
<strong>Tax</strong> Counsel.<br />
Jean received her bachelor’s degree (with high honours) from University of California at<br />
Berkeley <strong>in</strong> 1985 and her JD (cum laude) from Harvard Law School <strong>in</strong> 1988.<br />
Her representative docketed cases <strong>in</strong>clude: D<strong>in</strong>e Equity v Commissioner; DiMare v<br />
Commissioner; Estate of Stanton v Commissioner; John Hancock Life Insurance v<br />
Commissioner; Siemens v Office of <strong>Tax</strong> & Revenue; Novitsky v Siemens; Ambassador<br />
Blankenship v Commissioner; USAA v United States and USAA v Commissioner; Goodrich v<br />
United States; Boe<strong>in</strong>g v United States; Wal-Mart Stores v Commissioner; and Texas Instruments<br />
v Commissioner.<br />
91 WOMEN | www.<strong>in</strong>ternationaltaxreview.com IN TAX LEADERS www.<strong>in</strong>ternationaltaxreview.com WOMEN IN TAX LEADERS | 91