13.11.2015 Views

Stateless Democracy

NWA5-Stateless-Democracy1.pdf?utm_content=buffer7beda&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

NWA5-Stateless-Democracy1.pdf?utm_content=buffer7beda&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dear Friends,<br />

I first of all would like to say that I am indeed very happy to<br />

be here amongst you all in discussing the freedom struggle<br />

of women in general but specifically the Kurdish women’s<br />

struggle especially during such times. I personally never<br />

thought that I would go through such history-making moments<br />

in my own lifetime. We are indeed witnessing the<br />

making of history in Kobanê, West Kurdistan. I thank the<br />

organizers for such an opportunity.<br />

I suppose beginnings are very important for everything<br />

and everyone but especially for political movements. The<br />

moral values and political principles that form the basis<br />

of any given movement give it the ability to transform<br />

and transcend itself. One can put the Kurdish freedom<br />

movement and its main strategist and leader, Abdullah<br />

Öcalan, in this category. Indeed, the Kurdistan Workers’<br />

Party (PKK) came to life just after the tremendous revolutionizing<br />

effects of 1968. Early group formation began in<br />

the early 1970s and finally, the PKK was founded in 1978.<br />

Thus, it did not end up being an organization that can<br />

totally be considered to reside within the old-left nor the<br />

new-left categories.<br />

Yet there was a striking uniqueness about it. The founders<br />

of the PKK came from all different walks of life — different<br />

beliefs, different ethnicities, and women formed its<br />

core group early on. This combination of rural and urban<br />

youth, most of whom were students, gave a tremendous<br />

dynamism to this young movement. Such a combination<br />

also did not allow for dogmatism. Feudalism, chauvinism,<br />

nationalism, and male domination in general were rejected<br />

from the onset and gave the movement a good base upon<br />

which to develop itself.<br />

It would be unfair to claim that the depth of understanding<br />

and analysis of the women’s question was as profound<br />

58–59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!