Stateless Democracy
NWA5-Stateless-Democracy1.pdf?utm_content=buffer7beda&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
NWA5-Stateless-Democracy1.pdf?utm_content=buffer7beda&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dear Friends,<br />
I first of all would like to say that I am indeed very happy to<br />
be here amongst you all in discussing the freedom struggle<br />
of women in general but specifically the Kurdish women’s<br />
struggle especially during such times. I personally never<br />
thought that I would go through such history-making moments<br />
in my own lifetime. We are indeed witnessing the<br />
making of history in Kobanê, West Kurdistan. I thank the<br />
organizers for such an opportunity.<br />
I suppose beginnings are very important for everything<br />
and everyone but especially for political movements. The<br />
moral values and political principles that form the basis<br />
of any given movement give it the ability to transform<br />
and transcend itself. One can put the Kurdish freedom<br />
movement and its main strategist and leader, Abdullah<br />
Öcalan, in this category. Indeed, the Kurdistan Workers’<br />
Party (PKK) came to life just after the tremendous revolutionizing<br />
effects of 1968. Early group formation began in<br />
the early 1970s and finally, the PKK was founded in 1978.<br />
Thus, it did not end up being an organization that can<br />
totally be considered to reside within the old-left nor the<br />
new-left categories.<br />
Yet there was a striking uniqueness about it. The founders<br />
of the PKK came from all different walks of life — different<br />
beliefs, different ethnicities, and women formed its<br />
core group early on. This combination of rural and urban<br />
youth, most of whom were students, gave a tremendous<br />
dynamism to this young movement. Such a combination<br />
also did not allow for dogmatism. Feudalism, chauvinism,<br />
nationalism, and male domination in general were rejected<br />
from the onset and gave the movement a good base upon<br />
which to develop itself.<br />
It would be unfair to claim that the depth of understanding<br />
and analysis of the women’s question was as profound<br />
58–59