Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PROFILE<br />
Airon<br />
Providing Ventilation and CPAP<br />
Systems to EMS since 2003.<br />
ABOUT AIRON CORPORATION<br />
Airon is dedicated to the development, manufacture,<br />
and distribution of safe and effective medical devices<br />
designed for life support. Their expertise and focus is<br />
on pure pneumatic technology that provides dependable,<br />
robust respiratory support of neonates up to the largest<br />
adults.<br />
HIGH QUALITY ICU VENTILATOR TYPE CPAP SYSTEMS<br />
Airon’s products are in use at hospitals and EMS<br />
agencies throughout the world. Airon believes in the<br />
effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation and designs<br />
all of their products with superior CPAP systems to<br />
maximize clinical utility. Recent published research<br />
indicates that Airon’s adult ventilators have CPAP<br />
systems that are equal to or better than modern ICU<br />
ventilators.<br />
RESPIRATORY THERAPISTS WITH CLINICAL EXPERIENCE<br />
The founders and senior management at Airon are<br />
respiratory therapists who have decades of proven<br />
experience working with clinicians in hospitals and<br />
EMS. As a customer-focused company that draws<br />
from the clinical experience of their staff and users,<br />
Airon makes easy-to-use, robust products that meet<br />
the requirements of EMS.<br />
MANUFACTURED IN USA, AVAILABLE WORLDWIDE<br />
Airon’s operations and products comply with local,<br />
national, and international regulations. Every device<br />
is manufactured in their own ISO 13485/9001 certified<br />
facility in Melbourne, Florida. Their products are all<br />
CE marked as well as USA FDA approved. Airon will<br />
only ship products that meet their customers’ quality<br />
requirements.<br />
To learn more about Airon and how they help EMS<br />
professionals obtain improved patient outcomes, visit<br />
AironUSA.com<br />
DESCOMPRESIÓN CON AGUJA<br />
tipo de agujas largas, el abordaje<br />
lateral puede aumentar<br />
el riesgo de lesiones cercanas<br />
a las estructuras vitales. Según<br />
el limitado número de estudios<br />
que han analizado las diferencias<br />
sobre la seguridad del sitio,<br />
parece que el abordaje anterior<br />
está más lejos de las estructuras<br />
vitales y tiene menos posibilidades<br />
de ocasionar lesiones<br />
por la inserción incorrecta de<br />
la aguja. 5 Sin embargo, cuando<br />
se cambia el ángulo de la<br />
aguja por uno perpendicular,<br />
el riesgo de lesiones se vuelve<br />
casi equivalente. 5<br />
En este momento no se han<br />
realizado ensayos controlados<br />
aleatorios prospectivos a gran<br />
escala o metaanálisis que conduzcan<br />
a una declaración por<br />
consenso. Como resultado, la<br />
práctica actual se basa en los<br />
diversos estudios retrospectivos<br />
más pequeños. Estos<br />
estudios presentan datos<br />
débiles si es que no son incluso<br />
contradictorios. Como tal, es<br />
LOS AUTORES<br />
Daniel Charles<br />
Kolinsky, MD,<br />
es un médico<br />
interno de<br />
medicina de<br />
emergencia de<br />
segundo año en<br />
la Universidad de<br />
Washington en<br />
St. Louis, y un graduado del Centro<br />
Estatal de Ciencias de la Salud de<br />
la Universidad de Luisiana. Entre<br />
sus intereses profesionales están<br />
la educación médica, la dinámica<br />
de médico-paciente, y cuidados<br />
críticos de EMS.<br />
Hawnwan Philip<br />
Moy, MD, es<br />
director medico<br />
ayudante del<br />
Departamento<br />
de Bomberos<br />
de San Luis, e<br />
instructor clínico<br />
y miembro de<br />
los profesores de medicina de<br />
emergencia de la Sección SME<br />
de la División de Medicina de<br />
Emergencia de la Universidad<br />
de Washington en Saint Louis,<br />
Missouri. Terminó su residencia<br />
en medicina de emergencia en el<br />
Hospital Judío Barnes / Universidad<br />
de Washington en Saint Louis y su<br />
beca en EMS de la Universidad de<br />
Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill.<br />
difícil hacer una nueva recomendación de Grado A para cambiarse<br />
al cuarto/quinto espacio intercostal en la línea axilar anterior como<br />
el primer sitio para la descompresión con aguja.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Beckett A, et al. Needle Decompression for Tension Pneumothorax in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Do Catheters<br />
Placed in the Midaxillary Line Kink More Often Than Those in the Midclavicular Line? J Trauma, 2011; 71: S408–12.<br />
2. Britten S, Palmer SH. Chest wall thickness may limit adequate drainage of tension pneumothorax by needle<br />
thoracocentesis. J Accid Emerg Med, 1996 Nov; 13(6): 426–7.<br />
3. Butler KL, et al. Pulmonary Artery Injury and Cardiac Tamponade after Needle Decompression of a Suspected<br />
Tension Pneumothorax. J Trauma, 2003; 54: 610–11.<br />
4. Carter TE, et al. Needle Decompression in Appalachia Do Obese Patients Need Longer Needles? West J Emerg Med,<br />
2013; 14(6): 650–2.<br />
5. Chang SJ, et al. Evaluation of 8.0-cm needle at the fourth anterior axillary line for needle chest decompression of<br />
tension pneumothorax. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014 Apr; 76(4): 1,029–34.<br />
6. Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. ATLS: Advanced Trauma Life Support—Student Course<br />
Manual, 9th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 2012.<br />
7. Defense Health Board. Decompression of Tension Pneumothorax Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guideline<br />
Recommendations 2012-05. J Special Op Med, 2012; 12(4): 118–22.<br />
8. Ferrie EP, Collum N, McGovern S. The right place in the right space? Awareness of site for needle thoracocentesis.<br />
Emerg Med J, 2005 Nov; 22(11): 788–9.<br />
9. Inaba K, et al. Optimal Positioning for Emergent Needle Thoracostomy: A Cadaver-Based Study. J Trauma, 2011;<br />
71: 1,099–103.<br />
10. Inaba K, et al. Radiologic evaluation of alternative sites for needle decompression of tension pneumothorax. Arch<br />
Surg, 2012 Sep; 147(9): 813–8.<br />
11. Martin M, Satterly S, Inaba K, Blair K. Does needle thoracostomy provide adequate and effective decompression of<br />
tension pneumothorax? J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012 Dec; 73(6): 1,412–7.<br />
12. Miller AC, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. BMJ, 1993; 307: 114–16.<br />
13. Rawlins R, et al. Life threatening haemorrhage after anterior needle aspiration of pneumothoraces. A role for<br />
lateral needle aspiration in emergency decompression of spontaneous pneumothorax. Emerg Med J, 2003 Jul;<br />
20(4): 383–4.<br />
14. Sanchez LD, et al. Anterior versus lateral needle decompression of tension pneumothorax: comparison by<br />
computed tomography chest wall measurement. Acad Emerg Med, 2011 Oct; 18(10): 1,022–6.<br />
15. Stevens RL, et al. Needle thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax: failure predicted by chest computed<br />
tomography. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2009 Jan-Mar; 13(1): 14–7.<br />
16. Warner KJ, Copass MK, Bulger EM. Paramedic use of needle thoracostomy in the prehospital environment.<br />
Prehosp Emerg Care, 2008 Apr–Jun; 12(2): 162–8.<br />
17. Wax DB, et al. Radiologic assessment of potential sites for needle decompression of a tension pneumothorax.<br />
Anesth Analg, 2007 Nov; 105(5): 1,385–8.<br />
Para mayor informatión, marque 31 en la tarjeta de Servicio al Lector<br />
16 MARZO 2015 | EMSWORLD.com