22.11.2015 Views

Entrenamiento Médico Militar

Preview_Issue

Preview_Issue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PROFILE<br />

Airon<br />

Providing Ventilation and CPAP<br />

Systems to EMS since 2003.<br />

ABOUT AIRON CORPORATION<br />

Airon is dedicated to the development, manufacture,<br />

and distribution of safe and effective medical devices<br />

designed for life support. Their expertise and focus is<br />

on pure pneumatic technology that provides dependable,<br />

robust respiratory support of neonates up to the largest<br />

adults.<br />

HIGH QUALITY ICU VENTILATOR TYPE CPAP SYSTEMS<br />

Airon’s products are in use at hospitals and EMS<br />

agencies throughout the world. Airon believes in the<br />

effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation and designs<br />

all of their products with superior CPAP systems to<br />

maximize clinical utility. Recent published research<br />

indicates that Airon’s adult ventilators have CPAP<br />

systems that are equal to or better than modern ICU<br />

ventilators.<br />

RESPIRATORY THERAPISTS WITH CLINICAL EXPERIENCE<br />

The founders and senior management at Airon are<br />

respiratory therapists who have decades of proven<br />

experience working with clinicians in hospitals and<br />

EMS. As a customer-focused company that draws<br />

from the clinical experience of their staff and users,<br />

Airon makes easy-to-use, robust products that meet<br />

the requirements of EMS.<br />

MANUFACTURED IN USA, AVAILABLE WORLDWIDE<br />

Airon’s operations and products comply with local,<br />

national, and international regulations. Every device<br />

is manufactured in their own ISO 13485/9001 certified<br />

facility in Melbourne, Florida. Their products are all<br />

CE marked as well as USA FDA approved. Airon will<br />

only ship products that meet their customers’ quality<br />

requirements.<br />

To learn more about Airon and how they help EMS<br />

professionals obtain improved patient outcomes, visit<br />

AironUSA.com<br />

DESCOMPRESIÓN CON AGUJA<br />

tipo de agujas largas, el abordaje<br />

lateral puede aumentar<br />

el riesgo de lesiones cercanas<br />

a las estructuras vitales. Según<br />

el limitado número de estudios<br />

que han analizado las diferencias<br />

sobre la seguridad del sitio,<br />

parece que el abordaje anterior<br />

está más lejos de las estructuras<br />

vitales y tiene menos posibilidades<br />

de ocasionar lesiones<br />

por la inserción incorrecta de<br />

la aguja. 5 Sin embargo, cuando<br />

se cambia el ángulo de la<br />

aguja por uno perpendicular,<br />

el riesgo de lesiones se vuelve<br />

casi equivalente. 5<br />

En este momento no se han<br />

realizado ensayos controlados<br />

aleatorios prospectivos a gran<br />

escala o metaanálisis que conduzcan<br />

a una declaración por<br />

consenso. Como resultado, la<br />

práctica actual se basa en los<br />

diversos estudios retrospectivos<br />

más pequeños. Estos<br />

estudios presentan datos<br />

débiles si es que no son incluso<br />

contradictorios. Como tal, es<br />

LOS AUTORES<br />

Daniel Charles<br />

Kolinsky, MD,<br />

es un médico<br />

interno de<br />

medicina de<br />

emergencia de<br />

segundo año en<br />

la Universidad de<br />

Washington en<br />

St. Louis, y un graduado del Centro<br />

Estatal de Ciencias de la Salud de<br />

la Universidad de Luisiana. Entre<br />

sus intereses profesionales están<br />

la educación médica, la dinámica<br />

de médico-paciente, y cuidados<br />

críticos de EMS.<br />

Hawnwan Philip<br />

Moy, MD, es<br />

director medico<br />

ayudante del<br />

Departamento<br />

de Bomberos<br />

de San Luis, e<br />

instructor clínico<br />

y miembro de<br />

los profesores de medicina de<br />

emergencia de la Sección SME<br />

de la División de Medicina de<br />

Emergencia de la Universidad<br />

de Washington en Saint Louis,<br />

Missouri. Terminó su residencia<br />

en medicina de emergencia en el<br />

Hospital Judío Barnes / Universidad<br />

de Washington en Saint Louis y su<br />

beca en EMS de la Universidad de<br />

Carolina del Norte en Chapel Hill.<br />

difícil hacer una nueva recomendación de Grado A para cambiarse<br />

al cuarto/quinto espacio intercostal en la línea axilar anterior como<br />

el primer sitio para la descompresión con aguja.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Beckett A, et al. Needle Decompression for Tension Pneumothorax in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Do Catheters<br />

Placed in the Midaxillary Line Kink More Often Than Those in the Midclavicular Line? J Trauma, 2011; 71: S408–12.<br />

2. Britten S, Palmer SH. Chest wall thickness may limit adequate drainage of tension pneumothorax by needle<br />

thoracocentesis. J Accid Emerg Med, 1996 Nov; 13(6): 426–7.<br />

3. Butler KL, et al. Pulmonary Artery Injury and Cardiac Tamponade after Needle Decompression of a Suspected<br />

Tension Pneumothorax. J Trauma, 2003; 54: 610–11.<br />

4. Carter TE, et al. Needle Decompression in Appalachia Do Obese Patients Need Longer Needles? West J Emerg Med,<br />

2013; 14(6): 650–2.<br />

5. Chang SJ, et al. Evaluation of 8.0-cm needle at the fourth anterior axillary line for needle chest decompression of<br />

tension pneumothorax. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014 Apr; 76(4): 1,029–34.<br />

6. Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. ATLS: Advanced Trauma Life Support—Student Course<br />

Manual, 9th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 2012.<br />

7. Defense Health Board. Decompression of Tension Pneumothorax Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guideline<br />

Recommendations 2012-05. J Special Op Med, 2012; 12(4): 118–22.<br />

8. Ferrie EP, Collum N, McGovern S. The right place in the right space? Awareness of site for needle thoracocentesis.<br />

Emerg Med J, 2005 Nov; 22(11): 788–9.<br />

9. Inaba K, et al. Optimal Positioning for Emergent Needle Thoracostomy: A Cadaver-Based Study. J Trauma, 2011;<br />

71: 1,099–103.<br />

10. Inaba K, et al. Radiologic evaluation of alternative sites for needle decompression of tension pneumothorax. Arch<br />

Surg, 2012 Sep; 147(9): 813–8.<br />

11. Martin M, Satterly S, Inaba K, Blair K. Does needle thoracostomy provide adequate and effective decompression of<br />

tension pneumothorax? J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012 Dec; 73(6): 1,412–7.<br />

12. Miller AC, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. BMJ, 1993; 307: 114–16.<br />

13. Rawlins R, et al. Life threatening haemorrhage after anterior needle aspiration of pneumothoraces. A role for<br />

lateral needle aspiration in emergency decompression of spontaneous pneumothorax. Emerg Med J, 2003 Jul;<br />

20(4): 383–4.<br />

14. Sanchez LD, et al. Anterior versus lateral needle decompression of tension pneumothorax: comparison by<br />

computed tomography chest wall measurement. Acad Emerg Med, 2011 Oct; 18(10): 1,022–6.<br />

15. Stevens RL, et al. Needle thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax: failure predicted by chest computed<br />

tomography. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2009 Jan-Mar; 13(1): 14–7.<br />

16. Warner KJ, Copass MK, Bulger EM. Paramedic use of needle thoracostomy in the prehospital environment.<br />

Prehosp Emerg Care, 2008 Apr–Jun; 12(2): 162–8.<br />

17. Wax DB, et al. Radiologic assessment of potential sites for needle decompression of a tension pneumothorax.<br />

Anesth Analg, 2007 Nov; 105(5): 1,385–8.<br />

Para mayor informatión, marque 31 en la tarjeta de Servicio al Lector<br />

16 MARZO 2015 | EMSWORLD.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!