IQ-Magazine-Issue-11
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>IQ</strong> business planning<br />
length to something like War and<br />
Peace. This is not the case and often<br />
the best business plans are those that<br />
are succinct in their content, as they<br />
are easier to communicate and act<br />
upon.<br />
Another major shortfall in a lot of<br />
business plans is the mediocrity of<br />
the plan and the lack of vision or<br />
step change. Whilst there may be<br />
inherit resistance to change, it is often<br />
transformational change and change<br />
that takes us outside of our comfort<br />
zone that brings about the desired<br />
results that most business plans need<br />
to achieve.<br />
The development of most business<br />
plans is limited by the ideas, thoughts<br />
and visions of those charged with<br />
producing them. Though perhaps by<br />
engaging with others who are not in<br />
the business and adopting a different<br />
approach to the plan formulation<br />
your plan can surpass your own<br />
expectations, and also make it a more<br />
stimulating process to go through.<br />
Depending on your preference there are many<br />
different ways to approach or start your planning<br />
exercise. These could include any of the following:-<br />
Scenario Planning<br />
By considering or hypothesising over future events and<br />
how they could impact on your business, you can take<br />
a viewpoint on what you may or may not want to do<br />
in the future. Given for example we are approaching<br />
an election year, you may want to consider the impact<br />
of a change of government. Closer to your business,<br />
you may want to consider the impact that the loss of a<br />
key customer or supplier may have, or the threat of a<br />
competitor entering you market or even your product<br />
or process becoming obsolete.<br />
What do you want<br />
from the business?<br />
It is often the case that business people find themselves<br />
running a business which is not necessarily the one they<br />
either set out to run or even enjoy or want to run today.<br />
For such people, the planning exercise is likely to major on<br />
getting back to basics in terms of what they want and in<br />
some cases this may result in a decision to scale down, scale<br />
up or even sell.<br />
Sustainability Planning<br />
The sense is, not least pre-recession, that business,<br />
like some people’s approach to life was ‘live for today’<br />
with business owners and manages focusing on short-term<br />
financial gains. There does however seem to be a new order,<br />
with a growing number of businesses that are increasingly<br />
concerned about ensuring they continue to be in business<br />
and that they can derive income and financial return for<br />
a longer-term future. This is an approach which requires<br />
planning to focus on what you need to do to ensure you<br />
have both a market in the future as well as the capabilities,<br />
resources and capacity to service it.<br />
Re-acquainting Yourself<br />
With Your customers needs<br />
All too often it is the case that businesses believe they<br />
are providing their customers with products or services<br />
that fulfil their needs, but invariably and not least over<br />
time, this may not be the case. Customer needs are<br />
constantly changing and typically many suppliers are<br />
too complacent, and they fail to keep up with changing<br />
customer needs. Certainly getting back to basics and<br />
speaking to long standing, new and potential customers<br />
can be a great driver for developing any business plan.<br />
These are just some ideas on a fresh approach to the business plan. Ultimately though, the success of any plan is down<br />
to its implementation. Therefore, whatever approach you decide to take to its creation, ensuring a clear, accountable and<br />
measurable timescale of delivery is essential to avoid the great failure to implement.<br />
issue <strong>11</strong> | page 17