Volume 9 No. 2 - Adask's law

“charity” cheated on and give you your cut.
(It may take some time to collect, but some
of these cash rewards just might seriously
enhance your retirement.)
Based on my legal right to inspect
the IRS-CPA’s income tax return
records, on October 22, 1998, I sent
the following request:
The Internal Revenue Service –
Certified Public Accountants
300 N. Los Angeles Street – Room 5077
Los Angeles CA 90012
Dear Internal Revenue Service - Certified
Public Accountants: EIN 95-3276035
Pursuant to USC Title 26, Section 6104
(e) et seq., please provide a copy of:
1. Your 1023 form.
2. Your letter of determination ruling.
3. All correspondence to and from the
IRS regarding your organization.
4. The last three years of your 990
or 990EZ or whatever form you filed in lieu
of a 990.
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information
Act, provide a copy of the agreement
between the government and your organization
allowing the 300 N. Los Angeles
building to be used for your charity.
Thank you,
s/ Marvin Bryer
In response to my request, I
received the following reply:
December 3, 1998
Dear Mr. Bryer:
We are writing in response to your letter
of October 22, 1998.
1) In regard to your request for a form
1023 for our organization, please find enclosed
a copy of section 6104(e) of the Internal Revenue
Code, which provides that this request
is not applicable.
2) In regard to your request for our
letter of determination ruling, please find
enclosed a copy of the letter.
3) In regard to your request for copies
of our correspondence to and from the IRS,
please find enclosed a copy of the aforementioned
determination letter, along with
a copy of section 6104(e), which provides
that this request is not applicable.
4) In regard to your request for a copy
of our forms 990, please be advised that
our revenue is not sufficient for our organization
to meet the filing requirements of
section 6033 of the Internal Revenue Code.
5) Please note that the Freedom of
Information Act does not apply to exempt
organizations.
Yours truly,
S/ Lawrence G. Edgar
Co-President
Internal Revenue Service -
Certified Public Accountants
The IRS-CPA’s “Co-President”
(also an IRS agent) refused to disclose
the paperwork they submitted – to
themselves (the IRS) – to become a taxexempt
charitable corporation. He also implied
the IRS-CPA isn’t covered by the tax
code. Who does he think he’s fooling? I
didn’t fall off the proverbial turnip truck.
All tax exempt organizations have to show
the papers they filed to become exempt. In
this case, we’re talking about – at minimum
– their 1023 application form filed with the
IRS to be registered as a tax-exempt organization.
Since they won’t provide that
original form, maybe these guys don’t have
one! Perhaps the agents need time to manufacture
records that don’t (yet) exist!
In any case, their response did disclose
that Lawrence G. Edgar was the IRS-CPA’s
“Co-President”. Now I have my legal sights
on IRS agent Edgar and I don’t mean to
sound cocky, but he doesn’t know what he’s
in for. Mr. Pentoney (who managed the
L.A. County Judges’ slush fund I found in
1997) also tried to hide his financial records
from me – then he went to jail. I refuse to
be cheated by any government agent.
Since the IRS-CPA charity
claims to be a corporation, I went to
California’s Secretary of State (Bill Jones)
and paid $4 for a “status inquiry” and a
copy of the IRS-CPA’s corporation papers.
Bill says there’s no record of any California
corporation called the “Internal Revenue
Service Certified Public Accountants”. This
means the IRS-CPA is not incorporated in
California and may be guilty of incorporation
fraud.
However, if the IRS-CPA isn’t a legitimate
corporation, it’s probably an association.
The power to sue an association
can be devastating since there’s no corporate
immunity and therefore each member
of the association may be personally liable
for the association’s debts, fines and obligations.
Incidentally, IRS agent Lawrence
Edgar mailed his letter of refusal to me in a
weirdly colored pink envelope. I investigated
and learned the pink envelope is government-issue
and intended for inter-office
mail. Looks like the IRS-CPA “charity”
used the IRS property paid for by taxpayers
to tell me his “charity” is exempt from
Internal Revenue Code disclosure requirements.
Just like using a federal building for
personal use, private use of government
property (including pink envelopes) is also
a no-no.
Since the IRS-CPA “charity”
refused to show their records, I determined
they were in violation of IRS reporting
law [26 USC 6104(e)]. Therefore, I
reported them to the IRS. On December
21, 1998, I filed a complaint on the IRS-
CPA with the IRS:
To: The IRS at 300 N. Los Angeles Street,
Los Angeles CA 90012 Administration
room 5078
COMPLAINT REGARDING TAX FRAUD
BY AN IRS AGENT:
An Internal Revenue Service agent
named Lawrence Edgar is operating a charity
scam inside a federal building. See Exhibit
1 – his letter to me.
Edgar alleges his corporation is a
“charity”, so I am giving the IRS a donation
of $10 to submit to Edgar’s corporation. 1
Frankly, I consider his IRS corporation to
be a FRAUD.
I have detected that IRS agents are giving
continuing legal education seminars with
judges and lawyers who launder the money
collected into a “court” slush fund. I suspect
Edgar may be involved, but I have to
prove that.
I have reported the [slush] fund to the
IRS to no avail. Obviously there is a coverup.
I will be escalating this to my Senators
and House of Representatives and I will
ask for a NEW HEARING regarding the
internal workings of the IRS. Frankly, the
system does not work and persons are selectively
incriminated while IRS agents and
judges are excluded from law enforcement.
The “charity” I am reporting calls itself
the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
44 ANTISHYSTER Volume 9 (1999 A.D.) www.antishyster.com adask@gte.net 972-418-8993