Final Report: Strategic Planning and Budgeting
Effective Multi-Beneficiary Learning and Networking
Effective Multi-Beneficiary Learning and Networking
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20<br />
LEARNING AND NETWORKING PROVIDED<br />
Budget Submissions of Line Ministries<br />
SPB activity 2.14<br />
Description<br />
The learning activity was designed to strengthen budget users’ capacity to respond to budget instructions, <strong>and</strong><br />
promoted a shared underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the importance of good macrofiscal frameworks, especially in the context<br />
of preparing for EU accession. It explored key institutions involved in the budget preparation process.<br />
Participants discussed different definitions of structural reforms, <strong>and</strong> the main issues with integrating structural<br />
reforms <strong>and</strong> new policy initiatives in budget submissions. To reflect on beneficiary countries’ budget<br />
submission processes, participants discussed recent budget circulars. Finance experts of the transport sector<br />
in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia <strong>and</strong> Albania presented case studies on budget submissions in<br />
their countries. In groups, they engaged in simulations of the budget preparation in a ministry of education <strong>and</strong><br />
of giving advice to their minister on improvements of the budget submission process, <strong>and</strong> did an exercise on<br />
providing information about the fiscal implications of structural reforms in EFP/PEP reports.<br />
Contribution to EU pre-accession agenda<br />
Beneficiaries’ EFP/PEP reports shall provide realistic <strong>and</strong> consistent information on fiscal implications of envisaged<br />
structural reforms. Shortcomings in that regard have been linked to coordination <strong>and</strong> responsibility<br />
issues between budget users, to issues with ministries of finance’ guidance of budget users, as well as to budget<br />
users’ limited capacities in preparing their budget submissions. By addressing those issues, the activity<br />
helped strengthen the quality of budget submissions, <strong>and</strong> budget users’ inputs to EFP/PEP reports.<br />
Beneficiary feedback<br />
»Incorporation of PEP tables was a good idea. It gave participants a good oversight of how it works in the sense<br />
of the Ministry of Finance side, <strong>and</strong> line ministries’ inputs.«