15.02.2016 Views

Building prisons in England and Wales the bigger the better?

HoC-Building-Prisons-in-England-and-Wales_The-Bigger-the-Better_Feb16_Briefing-05646

HoC-Building-Prisons-in-England-and-Wales_The-Bigger-the-Better_Feb16_Briefing-05646

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 <strong>Build<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>prisons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Engl<strong>and</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wales</strong>: <strong>the</strong> <strong>bigger</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>better</strong>?<br />

4. Will a ris<strong>in</strong>g prison population<br />

defeat <strong>the</strong> MoJ’s plans?<br />

In its March 2015 report Prisons: Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> policies, <strong>the</strong> Justice<br />

Committee expressed some scepticism (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of estimates of<br />

<strong>the</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs aris<strong>in</strong>g from build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new prison at Wrexham) about<br />

NOMS’ ability, because of <strong>the</strong> ris<strong>in</strong>g prison population, actually to close<br />

<strong>the</strong> old <strong>in</strong>efficient prison places <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore realise <strong>the</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

The Committee concluded that <strong>the</strong> modernisation policy was good <strong>in</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, although (it observed) <strong>the</strong> National Audit Office (NAO) had<br />

reached <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> closures of smaller <strong>prisons</strong> were more about<br />

cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs than <strong>the</strong>y were about performance.<br />

The Committee remarked too on <strong>the</strong> decrepit state of some <strong>prisons</strong>:<br />

We recognise <strong>in</strong> particular that some <strong>prisons</strong> have been operat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>and</strong> some cont<strong>in</strong>ue to operate, with decrepit build<strong>in</strong>gs that h<strong>in</strong>der<br />

effective rehabilitation; <strong>and</strong> we note that redesign <strong>and</strong> reconfiguration<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> opportunity for new technologies <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir result<strong>in</strong>g efficiencies to be embedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure of<br />

<strong>the</strong> prison estate. 31<br />

The Committee noted too that <strong>prisons</strong> were often not <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />

useful or appropriate locations, often be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas, far from<br />

prisoners’ homes:<br />

Phil Wheatley CB, former Director General of NOMS, expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

that decisions about where <strong>and</strong> when to build new <strong>prisons</strong> were<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ed by several factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> imprecise nature of<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> time taken to build new places, secur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

necessary f<strong>in</strong>ance from <strong>the</strong> Treasury, <strong>and</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

permission. The Prison Officers’ Association characterised NOMS’<br />

approach as build<strong>in</strong>g where it was cheapest <strong>and</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

prisoners accord<strong>in</strong>gly. 32<br />

The Committee considered <strong>the</strong> evidence that had been put before it<br />

about <strong>the</strong> new for old programme.<br />

It noted that various benefits had been ascribed to newer <strong>prisons</strong>,<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g from mak<strong>in</strong>g more use of technology <strong>and</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g various<br />

costs to enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prison to run with fewer staff. 33 None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong><br />

Committee also identified several potential problems or pitfalls which<br />

might get <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way of <strong>the</strong> MoJ’s plans to close old, <strong>in</strong>efficient <strong>prisons</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> replace <strong>the</strong>m with new <strong>and</strong> <strong>better</strong>-designed <strong>prisons</strong>.<br />

Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>prisons</strong> - however antiquated <strong>the</strong>y might be - still (<strong>the</strong><br />

Committee suggested) posed considerable challenges. HM Prison<br />

Dartmoor was a case <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t:<br />

For example, when we visited HMP Dartmoor dur<strong>in</strong>g our <strong>in</strong>quiry<br />

<strong>in</strong>to older prisoners it was clear to us that <strong>the</strong> facilities were<br />

unsuitable for current purposes, <strong>and</strong> modernisation was not<br />

31<br />

Justice Committee, Prisons: Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Policies, 18 March 2015, HC 309 2014-15:<br />

page 19<br />

32<br />

Ibid: page 10<br />

33<br />

Ibid: page 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!