07.12.2012 Views

KAPP WELDED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERS:

KAPP WELDED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERS:

KAPP WELDED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERS:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KAPP</strong> <strong>WELDED</strong> <strong>PLATE</strong><br />

<strong>HEAT</strong> <strong>EXCHANGERS</strong>:<br />

heatex® vs SHE & PHE


Heatex® vs Spiral – Range 1/3<br />

� Available with dimpled,<br />

studded and corrugated plate<br />

� Spacing:<br />

– Plate side from 3 to 10 mm for<br />

dimpled HXE, 6 to 25 mm for<br />

studded HXS, 5 mm for<br />

corrugated HXC<br />

– Frame side from 3 to 40 mm,<br />

free gap HXE<br />

� Plate dimension, from 150x150<br />

mm (HXE15) up to 1500x1250<br />

(HXE150/125)<br />

� Plate thickness:1.2 to 2.5 mm<br />

� Number of plates:10 to 200<br />

� Total area: 0.6 to 750 m²<br />

� Available with studded plate<br />

� Spacing:<br />

– From 5 to 50 mm on both<br />

side<br />

� Coil dimension, from 150 to<br />

2000 mm, max. body<br />

diameter 3000 mm<br />

� Coil thickness: 2.0/6.0 mm<br />

� Number of coil: 2 or 4<br />

� Total area: 1.0 to 500 m²


Heatex® vs Spiral – Range 2/3<br />

� Design pressure: -1/35 bar<br />

� Design temperature: -40/500°C<br />

� Material:<br />

– AISI304L/316L/904L<br />

– Duplex SAF22-05/SAF25-07<br />

– Ni alloy C276/C22/C2000<br />

– Titanium (forecast in 2009)<br />

– Tantalum<br />

� Design code:<br />

– PED97/23/CE<br />

– AD2000<br />

– ASME<br />

– SQLO<br />

� Design pressure: -1/20 bar<br />

� Design temperature: -40/500°C<br />

� Material:<br />

– AISI304L/316L/904L<br />

– 254SMO<br />

– Ni alloy C276/C22/C2000<br />

– Titanium<br />

– Monel<br />

– Incoloy 825<br />

� Design code:<br />

– PED97/23/CE<br />

– AD2000<br />

– ASME<br />

– SQLO


Heatex® vs Spiral – Range 3/3<br />

� Plate concept: frame plate (HXS<br />

& HXC) and pressure plate<br />

available (HXE)<br />

� Stress rate & elongation:<br />

– HXS: no elongation neither stress<br />

on plate profile, bending edge<br />

10%<br />

– HXE: dimpling & bending max.<br />

10%<br />

– HXC: 35%<br />

� Mechanical cleaning:<br />

– HXE: extremely easy on free gap<br />

side, difficult on plate side<br />

– HXS: easy on both side<br />

– HXC: not possible<br />

� Plate concept: frame plate<br />

� Stress rate & elongation: Low<br />

� Mechanical cleaning:<br />

– On both side but with blind<br />

channel


1. Shape comparison<br />

Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

Dimple(Embossed) Type<br />

- One is Dimple/Other is Free Gap<br />

- More Compact (m2/m3) = 150<br />

Spiral(Studded) Type<br />

- Both side = Stud<br />

- More bigger (m2/m3) = 100


2. Plate comparison<br />

Dimple(Embossed) Type<br />

- Intensification : 2 to 6<br />

- Forming on Plate<br />

- Spot welding between Two Plate<br />

(withstand the pressure)<br />

- no limitation on flowrate<br />

Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

Spiral(Studded) Type<br />

- Intensification : 1.5 to 3<br />

- Stud welded on Plate<br />

- No setting between Two Plate<br />

- Flowrate limitation (max. coil 2<br />

meters x spacing 25 mm)


Dimple(Embossed) Type<br />

- Nusselt Number(Turbulent flow)<br />

Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

3. Technologies Comparison<br />

A x 0.023Re^0.8Pr^0.33<br />

A = 2/6<br />

-> More easy to make Turbulent flow<br />

-> More efficient<br />

Spiral(Studded) Type<br />

- Nusselt Number(Turbulent flow)<br />

A x 0.023Re^0.8Pr^0.33<br />

A = 1.5/3.0<br />

- Lower tubulence


Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

Plate pack is made as a shell and tube heat<br />

exchanger bundle:<br />

- dimpled plates are fitted into a end<br />

connecting plate as tube in tube sheet<br />

-Plate replacement possible as in a shell<br />

and tube HE<br />

- Repair possible as in a shell and tube HE<br />

- SHE consist of two parallel sheet-metal<br />

ribbons that are coiled in such a way as to<br />

form two separate channels. Welded-in<br />

spacers pins, the heights of which correspond<br />

to the desired channel cross-section, ensure<br />

precise spacing of the coils.<br />

-- Leak occuring in central winding can not<br />

be repaired


Dimple(Embossed) Type<br />

Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

4. Maintenance Comparison<br />

- Easy mechanical cleaning on Process side<br />

as channel is free rectangular short cleaning<br />

length, can see across the channel<br />

- Easy to open doors on both side thanks to<br />

hinges<br />

- It can be possible to Mechanical cleaning<br />

under both pipe line connected. (one door<br />

without nozzles)<br />

- More easy to find defective part in visual<br />

if any (all welding accessible)<br />

- More easy to Repair for Welded part<br />

defective if any (one plate can be replaced)<br />

Spiral(Studded) Type<br />

- Mechanical cleaning difficult on both<br />

side, dues to spacers (studs) and<br />

channel is blind (not possible to see<br />

across, if coil is 1 meter, nearly<br />

impossible to clean at 1 m depth unless<br />

getting a very wide spacing (25 mm)<br />

which is not good for efficiency)<br />

- Need to dismantle nozzle before<br />

opening covers.<br />

- Difficult to find defective point if any<br />

- Repair not possible


Dimple(Embossed) Type<br />

- Good for Vibration shock<br />

- Good for external mechanical shock<br />

- No plugging risk because not contact<br />

point on process side<br />

- self venting and self draining<br />

Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

5. Operating Comparison<br />

Spiral(Studded) Type<br />

- Weak for Vibration shock<br />

- Weak for external&Internal<br />

mechanical shock<br />

-> It can be defective stud welded<br />

point & stud go through the next plate<br />

even though small mechanical shock.<br />

-Plugging risk due to studs<br />

- difficult to vent and drain due to<br />

winding coil


Heatex® Dimple Type vs Spiral Type<br />

Hinges for easy opening<br />

One door per channel<br />

without nozzle, easy<br />

cleaning<br />

1 cover per side, not posisble to see<br />

across the channel<br />

Need to dismantle<br />

nozzle for cover<br />

opening before<br />

cleaning


Heatex® vs Plate Heat Exchanger<br />

(GPHE)<br />

<strong>HEAT</strong>EX®<br />

PHE


Heatex® vs GPHE – Range 1/3<br />

� Available with dimpled,<br />

studded and corrugated plate<br />

� Spacing:<br />

– Plate side from 3 to 10 mm for<br />

dimpled HXE, 6 to 25 mm for<br />

studded HXS, 5 mm for<br />

corrugated HXC<br />

– Frame side from 3 to 40 mm,<br />

free gap HXE<br />

� Plate dimension, from 150x150<br />

mm (HXE15) up to 1500x1250<br />

(HXE150/125)<br />

� Plate thickness:1.2 to 2.5 mm<br />

� Number of plates:10 to 200<br />

� Total area: 0.6 to 750 m²<br />

� Available only with corrugated<br />

plate, gasketted type (GPHE),<br />

semi-welded (SWPHE) or free<br />

flow (FFPHE)<br />

� Spacing:<br />

– 2.6 to 4 mm for GPHE&SWPHE<br />

– 6.0 to 12.0 mm for FFPHE<br />

� Plate dimension, from 0.03 up<br />

to 4 m²/plate<br />

� Plate thickness: 0.4/0.8 mm<br />

� Number of plates:10 to 1000<br />

� Total area: 1.0 to 4000.0 m²<br />

GPHE<br />

SWPHE<br />

FFPHE


� Design pressure: -1/35 bar<br />

� Design temperature: -40/500°C<br />

� Material:<br />

– AISI304L/316L/904L<br />

– Duplex SAF22-05/SAF25-07<br />

– Ni alloy C276/C22/C2000<br />

– Titanium (forecast in 2009)<br />

– Tantalum<br />

� Design code:<br />

– PED97/23/CE<br />

– AD2000<br />

– ASME<br />

– SQLO<br />

Heatex® vs GPHE – Range 2/3<br />

� Design pressure: 0/20 bar<br />

� Design temperature: 0/150°C<br />

� Material:<br />

– AISI304/316<br />

– 254SMO<br />

– Ni alloy C276/C22/C2000<br />

– Titanium (Ti-Pd)<br />

– Ni 200<br />

� Design code:<br />

– PED97/23/CE<br />

– AD2000<br />

– ASME<br />

– SQLO


Heatex® vs GPHE – Range 3/3<br />

� Plate concept: frame plate (HXS<br />

& HXC) and pressure plate<br />

available (HXE)<br />

� Stress rate & elongation:<br />

– HXS: no elongation neither stress<br />

on plate profile, bending edge<br />

10%<br />

– HXE: dimpling & bending max.<br />

10%<br />

– HXC: 35%<br />

� Mechanical cleaning:<br />

– HXE: extremely easy on free gap<br />

side, difficult on plate side<br />

– HXS: easy on both side<br />

– HXC: not possible<br />

� Plate concept: frame plate<br />

� Stress rate & elongation: 40%<br />

� Mechanical cleaning:<br />

– GPHE/FFPHE: by dismantling<br />

frame, in most of the time<br />

gaskets are damaged and need<br />

to be replaced<br />

– SWPHE: only one side


Punching allow low stress forming,<br />

dimpled plates are spot welded<br />

together to form a channel which<br />

withstand the pressure.<br />

Heatex® vs GPHE– Fabrication 1/3<br />

Pressing give a chevron profile to<br />

every plate which can get different<br />

angle, wave pitch or depth<br />

Gasket allows tigthening with<br />

external and avoid fluid mixing (ring<br />

gasket)


Heatex® vs GPHE– Fabrication 2/3<br />

Every single dimpled plate channel<br />

(rectangular tube) is inserted into a end<br />

connecting plate (tube sheet)<br />

Dimpled plate 1.5/2.0 mm thick form the<br />

plate side with the « plate sheet », free<br />

gap between plate form the rectangular<br />

tube on frame side<br />

Plates are fitted into a frame made of a<br />

fixed plate (1), a removable rear plate(2).<br />

Plates are sliding on a up guide bar (4).<br />

Plate pack is tightened through bolts (7)<br />

Corrugated plates 0.6/0.8 mm thick<br />

form channel with contact points


Heatex® vs GPHE– Fabrication 3/3<br />

Plate pack consist in dimpled<br />

plate welded on the “plate<br />

sheet”, every plate is<br />

independent, free of expansion<br />

(U plate design thermal<br />

gradient higher then 200°C).<br />

Every channel can be repaired<br />

or replaced<br />

Every fluid flows between two plates, in<br />

counter current flow, with generally parallel<br />

distribution, inlet on the up port hole, outlet<br />

from the down port hole, and inversely for the<br />

other fluid.


Heatex® vs GPHE<br />

Strengths & weaknesses<br />

�Easy mechanical cleaning from the ideal<br />

free gap rectangular channel on HXE type<br />

to the studded channels on HXS.<br />

�No plugging risk, spacing up to 40 mm<br />

�HXE type can offer one channel<br />

completely free gap, without any contact<br />

points nor retention which is requested<br />

for cGMP plants (FDA request)<br />

�Low stress rate for HXE and HXS<br />

avoiding upgrading material for pitting<br />

corrosion<br />

�Good thermal fatigue resistance<br />

particularly thanks to U plate concept<br />

�Thermal expansion possible as every<br />

plate is independant and even free with U<br />

plate concept<br />

�All welding are accessible, plate sheet<br />

to plate channel easy to repair<br />

�Plate channel can be replaced one by<br />

one.<br />

�HXE & HXS has lower efficiency<br />

compared to GPHE<br />

�HXS very expensive compared GPHE<br />

�Plugging risk due to contact points<br />

�Retention due to contact points (leak<br />

point for FDA)<br />

�High stress rate on the plate,<br />

increasing the corrosion risk (pitting!),<br />

plate 0.6 mm – 40% = 0.36 mm!!!<br />

�Limited pressure and thermal fatigue<br />

resistance due gaskets<br />

�Temperature limit use 150°C<br />

�Pressure limit use 18 bar<br />

�High maintenance cost (spare parts)<br />

�High thermal efficiency<br />

�Very price-competitive<br />

�Extension possible<br />

�Cleaning possible by dismantling the<br />

frame and removing plates


Heatex® vs GPHE<br />

Case study: the problem<br />

� Customer Rohm&Haas<br />

– Fluid to be cooled: Visquous emulsion<br />

(300 mPa.s) with aromatics contents<br />

– Service side: cooling water at 27°C<br />

– Duty: 1025 kW<br />

– Hot side: from 95°C down to 45°C


� <strong>HEAT</strong>EX ® HXE50 – 70 m²<br />

� 140 plates<br />

� Kvalue= 478 W/m².°C<br />

� Price= 59000 €<br />

� Weight= 3200 kgs<br />

� Plate pack AISI 316L<br />

� Frame CS lined<br />

� Doors gasket PTFE on process,<br />

EPDM on water<br />

720 mm<br />

Heatex® vs GPHE<br />

Case study: Solutions<br />

2050 mm<br />

� FH40 – 30.8 m²<br />

� 78 plates<br />

� Kvalue = 1060 W/m².°C<br />

� Price= 9500 €<br />

� Weight= 610 kgs<br />

� Plates AISI 316<br />

� Gaskets Viton<br />

� Frame CS, rubber liner port hole<br />

560 mm<br />

1579 mm


Heatex® vs GPHE<br />

Case study: Results<br />

� Customer preferred solution:<br />

GPHE FH4O (under budget constraint)<br />

� Every 2 months opening for cleaning<br />

� Production losses not estimated<br />

� Maintenance cost: 2400 €<br />

� Set of spare part gaskets: 8800 €<br />

� Yearly maintenance cost: 67200 €<br />

� Conclusion: Heatex pay back 10 months!!!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!