02.03.2016 Views

Ghani vs FRN

Ghani VS FRN

Ghani VS FRN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

deposed to in support of the application were<br />

neither challenged nor disputed by the<br />

respondent. What this means is this. Those<br />

facts remain unchallenged and<br />

uncontroverted. The inevitable consequence is<br />

that those facts deposed to in the affidavit led<br />

by the applicant must be deemed to have<br />

been admitted by the respondent and must<br />

also be taken as true by the court unless they<br />

are obviously false to the knowledge of the<br />

court. See Alagbe v. Abimbola (1978) 2 SC 39<br />

at 40." Per ABOKI, J.C.A. (Pp. 71-72, paras.<br />

D-C) - read in context<br />

19<br />

ABOKI, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading<br />

Judgment): This is an appeal against the ruling of<br />

B.F.M. Nyako, J. of the Federal High Court, Abuja<br />

delivered on Thursday, 7th October, 2004 in which<br />

the learned trial Judge struck out the appellant's<br />

suit on the basis that the appellant has no locus<br />

standi to maintain the action.<br />

The facts of the case are that the appellant as<br />

plaintiff in the lower court instituted an action<br />

against the respondents seeking for determination<br />

of the following questions:-<br />

"(a) Whether any public officer in Nigeria<br />

particularly a Minister of the Federal Republic of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!