02.03.2016 Views

Ghani vs FRN

Ghani VS FRN

Ghani VS FRN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that<br />

the plaintiff is not an ordinary person in the street.<br />

He was at the material time to this suit a Chairman<br />

of a political party, a presidential candidate, a tax<br />

payer, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and has also<br />

sworn to an Oath under the Legal Practitioners Act<br />

(LPA), 1975 to support and uphold the Constitution<br />

of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.<br />

He contended that the Legal Practitioners Act, Cap.<br />

207, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990 is an<br />

existing Law pursuant to section 315 of the<br />

Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,<br />

1999.<br />

Learned counsel argued that a person who has the<br />

civil right and obligation to sue in the instance<br />

under adjudication is clear under section 6(6)(b) of<br />

the Constitution.<br />

He contended that the operative phrase in this<br />

constitutional provision is civil rights and<br />

obligations and a cursory look at their meanings<br />

will shed more light on the locus standi of the<br />

appellant.<br />

He referred the court on the meaning of civil rights<br />

and obligations to the case of Okechukwu v.<br />

Etukokwu (1998) 8 NWLR (Pt. 562) page 513 at<br />

526.<br />

Learned counsel argued that in this case, it is clear<br />

from the provisions of section 6(6)(b) of the<br />

Constitution that actions are only competent<br />

between persons and Governments or between two<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!