04.03.2016 Views

for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs)

Z3q53

Z3q53

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OFFICIAL<br />

4.10.2 DURING THE PROCEDURE<br />

i. Be<strong>for</strong>e removal of the prosthesis from its packaging, the operator should confirm<br />

the following prosthesis characteristics with the procedural team:<br />

ii.<br />

• Type, design, style or material.<br />

• Size.<br />

• Laterality.<br />

• Manufacturer.<br />

• Expiry date.<br />

• Sterility.<br />

• Dioptre <strong>for</strong> lens implants.<br />

• Compatibility of multi-component prostheses.<br />

• Any other required characteristics.<br />

Once the correct prosthesis has been selected, any prostheses not to be used<br />

<strong>for</strong> that patient should be clearly separated from the correct prosthesis to<br />

minimise the risk of confusion between prostheses at the time of implantation.<br />

4.10.3 AFTER THE PROCEDURE<br />

i. A record of the implants used must be made in the patient’s notes and<br />

appropriate details should be shared with the patient after the procedure.<br />

When a manufacturer’s label is available, this should be placed in the notes.<br />

When it is not, the following should be recorded:<br />

• Manufacturer.<br />

• Style.<br />

• Size.<br />

• Manufacturer’s unique identifier <strong>for</strong> the prosthesis, e.g. the serial<br />

number.<br />

ii. Compliance with local, national and international implant registries is<br />

encouraged, and in certain cases may be a mandatory legal requirement.<br />

iii.<br />

iv.<br />

The organisation must have a process in place <strong>for</strong> recording which prostheses<br />

are used <strong>for</strong> which patients.<br />

The organisation must ensure that appropriate and agreed stock levels of<br />

prostheses are maintained.<br />

v. Instances of failed prosthesis verification, wrong prosthesis insertion and “near<br />

misses” should be reported, recorded and openly discussed at the debriefing,<br />

and fed into local governance processes to act as the basis <strong>for</strong> learning and<br />

the development of new or altered procedures to promote patient safety.<br />

vi.<br />

vii.<br />

Audit of prosthesis verification data must be per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

When manufacturers’ labelling, packaging or implant defects contribute to<br />

failure of prosthesis verification, a process must be in place through which<br />

both the manufacturers and the MHRA (Devices) are in<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!