08.03.2016 Views

Women and Chemicals

1ToENNR

1ToENNR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What are the main<br />

harmful substances that<br />

women are exposed to?<br />

Thous<strong>and</strong>s of chemicals are currently on the market worldwide. Exact numbers<br />

are difficult to know. In the EU there are more than 140 000 chemicals used <strong>and</strong><br />

traded. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, about 700 new<br />

chemicals are introduced each year. 1<br />

6<br />

For the majority of chemicals on the market we do not know<br />

their full environmental <strong>and</strong> health effects – not to mention the<br />

lack of knowledge on mixtures of those chemicals. One of the<br />

biggest unknowns at the moment is probably manufactured nanomaterials.<br />

They are not adequately controlled by regulation,<br />

nor undergo sufficient hazard <strong>and</strong> risk assessment. Despite the<br />

fact that we know very little in general about environmental <strong>and</strong><br />

health effects of chemicals, we know even less about harmful<br />

effects of chemicals for women’s health. The current knowledge<br />

on socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> health effects of hazardous chemicals on<br />

women is minuscule. Much more research is needed to gain<br />

gender disaggregated data on exposure scenarios <strong>and</strong> socioeconomic<br />

<strong>and</strong> health effects of chemicals. Ultimately this data could<br />

be basis of precautionary based legislation.<br />

Limited comprehensive information is available, but some<br />

institutions do list chemicals of concern, also for women.<br />

Existing lists of harmful chemicals<br />

Many different kinds of lists exist <strong>and</strong> are mainly used as tools<br />

for prioritizing action. The Global Chemical Outlook 2013 presents<br />

an excellent compilation of existing lists from governments,<br />

NGOs, trade unions <strong>and</strong> industry. 2 None of the lists<br />

mentioned address specifically the needs of women or take<br />

women’s different susceptibility specifically into account. The<br />

only ones that have a more direct link to women are the lists<br />

referring to cosmetics, like the skin deep database of the US<br />

based NGO Environmental Working Group, which provides<br />

information about the ingredients in cosmetics. Other lists<br />

like the GoodGuide inform about chemicals in products such<br />

as food, detergents or personal care products. Third party labels<br />

like the Nordic Swan, EU Ecolabel or the German Blue<br />

Angel should guide consumers towards more environmentally<br />

friendly products.<br />

FAO <strong>and</strong> WHO developed criteria to identify highly hazardous<br />

pesticides (HHPs) including for acute toxicity; carcinogenicity,<br />

mutagenicity <strong>and</strong> reproductive toxicity based on categories<br />

1A <strong>and</strong> 1B of the Global Harmonized System (GHS); <strong>and</strong> pesticides<br />

known to cause a high incidence of severe or irreversible<br />

adverse effects. The NGO Pesticide Action Network (PAN) developed<br />

a list of HHPs, based on the FAO/WHO criteria with additional<br />

indicators for endocrine disruption, high environmental<br />

concern <strong>and</strong> hazard to ecosystem services. This list contains currently<br />

426 pesticide active ingredients. 3 Neither sets of criteria<br />

differentiate between harmful effects on women <strong>and</strong> men.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!