OVER-POLICED YET UNDERSERVED POLICE MISCONDUCT IN WEST BALTIMORE
No-Boundaries-Layout-Web-1
No-Boundaries-Layout-Web-1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
fraud were reported in 70% of accounts, while<br />
instances in which officers planted, tampered<br />
with, or invented evidence to advance a case<br />
were reported in 45%. It was alleged in 46% of<br />
cases that the department manipulated institutional<br />
procedures to frustrate the advancement<br />
of an investigation or unfairly penalize<br />
claimants. Similarly, 29% of accounts cited the<br />
utilization of excessive paperwork and filing<br />
processes to delay or exhaust an investigation.<br />
A failure to hold abusive officers accountable<br />
was presented as the factor most damaging to<br />
the legitimacy of the bpd:<br />
““<br />
When you got police officers that sworn to<br />
protect and serve the community, and you<br />
violate or take advantage of the privilege of<br />
your badge to violate, imprison and just have<br />
no disregards for anybody’s civil rights, you<br />
should be held accountable.<br />
—Mr. O., Resident<br />
There was a consensus expressed within the<br />
testimonies that misconduct from individual<br />
officers stems from and is perpetuated by an<br />
institutional culture that fails to hold wrongdoers<br />
accountable. In cases in which informants<br />
filed complaints and sought legal redress for<br />
their grievances, only 25% saw their cases officially<br />
resolved, and only 2% to their satisfaction.<br />
The sentiment that “the system is broken” and<br />
PICTURED IS THE FAMILY OF JEFFREY MARROW,<br />
WHO WAS KILLED <strong>IN</strong> A <strong>POLICE</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLVED<br />
SHOOT<strong>IN</strong>G <strong>IN</strong> 2006.<br />
that the law enforcement structure is<br />
riddled with corruption was echoed<br />
repeatedly among the testimonies.<br />
A family that lost a loved one to<br />
a police-involved shooting shared<br />
the following account. The State’s<br />
Attorney deemed the shooting “justified”<br />
and refused to provide the<br />
family members with any information<br />
about the investigation leading<br />
to that conclusion. In addition, the<br />
government performed an autopsy<br />
without familial consent, which<br />
the family would not have provided<br />
for religious reasons. During<br />
the investigation, the family called<br />
the detective’s office “almost every<br />
day” and “couldn’t even talk to the<br />
detective.” The family was never<br />
given an autopsy report; the family<br />
learned that their loved one’s<br />
death was caused by a shot to the<br />
back of the head because the funeral<br />
home director provided them with<br />
photographs.<br />
<strong>WEST</strong> <strong>BALTIMORE</strong> COMMUNITY COMMISSION ON <strong>POLICE</strong> <strong>MISCONDUCT</strong> 17