Evolving Higher Education Business Models
Evolving-Higher-Education-Business-Models
Evolving-Higher-Education-Business-Models
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Evolving</strong> <strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Models</strong><br />
sensus on the notion that transparency has its challenges. Some group members asked: What are we<br />
protecting that we maybe don’t need to and that may be weakening in value in higher education? Or<br />
might financial transparency reveal that the financial model is not really supporting the core mission<br />
of the campus?<br />
• Get the data out there. Several participants agreed that much of the data about costs of instruction<br />
are already available in campus information systems, but the problem is getting it out there for use in<br />
the right way with maps to guide users on direction.<br />
• Student success and innovation. The group discussions focused on the importance of degree completion,<br />
employability of graduates, and the general certifying of student learning. All stakeholders<br />
have to focus on strategy, risk, and data for estimating alternate futures, and begin making datadriven<br />
decisions on costs and activities rather than just innovating for innovation’s sake.<br />
• Leadership with data and evidence. The group all agreed that leadership was key to moving forward<br />
in this area. Participants agreed that leadership was central to creating a narrative and map of the data<br />
and meeting the difficult-to-discuss issues head-on. Several suggested that it was time to create a boot<br />
camp for data analytics, fundraising, strategic discussions in units, and using institutional data for<br />
trustees, faculty, students, and other stakeholders.<br />
Because good financial data is a key to addressing the issues of college affordability and pedagogical innovation,<br />
the group was gathered to launch a fresh discussion on what data is needed, and how to put that data<br />
into a format that provides public policymakers and institutional leaders with the information needed to<br />
sustain accountable public investment, on the one hand, and strategic financial management on the other.<br />
Group Participants<br />
• Jacalyn Askin, National Association of College and University <strong>Business</strong> Officers (NACUBO)<br />
• Kemp P. Battle, Tucker Capital Corporation<br />
• Sandy Baum, Urban Institute, The George Washington University (DC)<br />
• Stephanie Bell-Rose, TIAA Institute<br />
• Walter C. Breau, Elms College<br />
• Nancy Brickhouse, Saint Louis University<br />
• Molly Corbett Broad, American Council on <strong>Education</strong> (ACE)<br />
• Lewis Burley, TIAA<br />
• J. Michael Crafton, University of West Georgia<br />
• Ryan Craig, University Ventures<br />
• Dean Currie, California Institute of Technology<br />
• Jeff Davies, ACE<br />
• Donna Desrochers, American Institutes for Research<br />
• Bill Dillon, NACUBO<br />
• Tiffany McKillip Franks, Averett University (VA)<br />
• J. Michael Gower, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey<br />
• James Jacobs, Macomb Community College (MI)<br />
• Paul Jenny, University of Washington<br />
• Nate Johnson, Postsecondary Analytics, LLC<br />
— 42 —