27.05.2016 Views

WILLING

1WoapVd

1WoapVd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5: Addressing employment discrimination against Australians with disability — conclusions and recommendations<br />

The DSS National Disability Employment Framework Discussion Paper noted that there are differing<br />

views on ADEs:<br />

One in support of ADEs as they currently are; and one that recognises the need for supported<br />

employment, but believes the current ADE model is segregated and produces poor wage<br />

outcomes for people with disability. 47<br />

ADEs…can be viewed as unfair and inequitable because wage-setting arrangements are<br />

controversial. 48<br />

The Inquiry notes that the Australian Government is currently engaging with stakeholders through the<br />

Fair Work Commission to develop a new wage tool for use in supported employment. 49<br />

Another significant concern raised with the Inquiry in relation to both the Supported Wage System and<br />

Australian Disability Enterprises was that individuals are not given sufficient opportunities to transition<br />

to open employment or to a full wage. Although there are over 20,500 people with disability employed<br />

in ADEs across Australia, 50 in 2014 only 159 ADE employees (0.8%) moved into open employment. 51<br />

The DSS National Disability Employment Framework Discussion Paper also noted that ADE’s have been<br />

criticised for taking on employees who may benefit from working in open employment with adequate<br />

support. 52<br />

The Discussion Paper has proposed a new system to improve the operation of ADEs, under which ADEs<br />

could become businesses that were willing to employ people with disability who received an ongoing<br />

support package. 53 They would not be required to be notforprofit and could compete in the open market<br />

on the same basis as other businesses. In this way, ADEs could continue to be an option for some job<br />

seekers with particular needs, provided sufficient numbers of such job seekers choose to work with<br />

these employers to make this business model viable.<br />

Options for ADEs operating in a market-based environment could include:<br />

• focusing on the enterprise side of their business and becoming like any other employer that<br />

employs people with disability<br />

• focusing on providing an ongoing support service to other employers<br />

• becoming a training organisation for people with disability and a pathway to open employment<br />

funded under the training section of the service catalogue<br />

• moving to a labour hire model where the ADE employs, places and supports employees in<br />

other businesses (some ADEs are already moving in this direction).<br />

5.5 Self-employment<br />

The issue of self-employment for people with disability was raised on a number of occasions with the<br />

Inquiry.<br />

The Inquiry heard that the benefits of self-employment for a person with disability include a sense<br />

of independence and autonomy, financial independence, flexibility and the chance to use skills,<br />

qualifications and experience. The Inquiry argues that a pathway into self-employment should be simple<br />

and accessible. However a number of issues were raised in relation to having to come through the DES<br />

system in order to access assistance through the New Enterprise Incentive Scheme (NEIS):<br />

My DES Provider tried to deter me from enrolling in the NEIS Program, even though I had the<br />

necessary skills and qualifications and had spent many years working in the industry. 54<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!