22.06.2016 Views

Commission

c4Wm301vL7u

c4Wm301vL7u

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

trafficking were not acted upon. Critically, many victims interviewed by FairWork found the blurring<br />

of roles between law enforcement and labour inspection to be an obstacle to engagement. Many<br />

victims did not know the difference between the labour Inspectorate and police, and would refer to<br />

labour inspectors as “police” or “the inspectorate police”.<br />

In Romania, victim detection and identification usually takes place during dedicated inspections or<br />

raids organised by police and/or labour inspection at a suspected place or in known places. The<br />

inspections are usually reactive, not pro-active, following a complaint being filed. The Labour Inspectorate<br />

does not have in its mandate the investigation of forced labour. During inspections they<br />

are therefore accompanied by the local police and if they discover a case of trafficking for labour<br />

exploitation then the specialised police take up the investigation.<br />

None of the victims interviewed who had returned to Romania after being trafficked for labour<br />

exploitation abroad were identified during their exploitation. In many cases of Romanians trafficked<br />

abroad the identification took place after they managed to escape from the trafficking situation,<br />

after return, and in some cases, many years after the exploitation. The failure to identify victims was<br />

partly attributed to a lack of trust in authorities by victims, which in some cases was justified – in one<br />

case 17 Romanians were trafficked and exploited in Greece, and when they reported to the police<br />

they were deported with no official investigation or identification.<br />

The Gangmasters Licensing Authority (GLA) in the UK is cited as a model of good practice in labour<br />

inspection and enforcement. It operates a licensing system, whereby licence violations link to<br />

forced labour indicators and violations of licence conditions result in penalties, licence revocation<br />

or criminal proceedings. Whilst its work is impressive, the GLA’s areas of inspection are limited to<br />

agriculture, horticulture, shellfish gathering, and associated food processing sectors. Outside of the<br />

GLA sectors responsibility for inspection has been described as “fragmented” (JRF, 2014, 6). Labour<br />

inspection and enforcement outside of the GLA sectors is spread across a range of regulators for<br />

whom detecting forced labour is not a primary concern, including: the Health and Safety Executive,<br />

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) national minimum wage teams and the Employment<br />

Agency Standards Inspectorate. As noted above, the UK Immigration Bill currently under discussion<br />

proposes a new coordination mechanism to oversee disparate UK labour inspection agencies. Trafficked<br />

persons interviewed by FLEX called for increased inspection in the workplace in order to gain<br />

information about rights as well as to report abuses.<br />

Normalisation of exploitation creates a barrier to self-identification<br />

In Romania, many of those formerly trafficked persons interviewed who had been trafficked overseas<br />

said that they expected some kind of ‘improper working conditions’ when migrating for work,<br />

but none agreed to exploitation. This could also be reflected in the way Romanians are perceived<br />

in working environments abroad, as willing to accept inferior working conditions and low salaries,<br />

putting them at risk of exploitation and also impeding their self-identification as victims or access<br />

to assistance:<br />

“I thought the conditions may be hard and that I would be paid with just a little more than in Romania<br />

but I never expected or wanted such ordeal” (Interview with trafficked person, Romania, 2015)<br />

There was a sense that exploitation was a question of bad luck rather than a crime. This sense gives<br />

rise to shame and rejection of the victim status. There is also an impression that trafficking only occurs<br />

in illegal and hidden industries whereas most victims are recruited through legal job placement<br />

agencies, and leave with an engagement contract between the work and the recruiter or labour<br />

contract.<br />

CASE STUDY, Romania:<br />

“I expected it to be exploited […] I do not want to hurt anyone. It’s not their fault that I’m unlucky.” (Interview<br />

with trafficked man, Romania, 2015)<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!