Commission
c4Wm301vL7u
c4Wm301vL7u
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
trafficking were not acted upon. Critically, many victims interviewed by FairWork found the blurring<br />
of roles between law enforcement and labour inspection to be an obstacle to engagement. Many<br />
victims did not know the difference between the labour Inspectorate and police, and would refer to<br />
labour inspectors as “police” or “the inspectorate police”.<br />
In Romania, victim detection and identification usually takes place during dedicated inspections or<br />
raids organised by police and/or labour inspection at a suspected place or in known places. The<br />
inspections are usually reactive, not pro-active, following a complaint being filed. The Labour Inspectorate<br />
does not have in its mandate the investigation of forced labour. During inspections they<br />
are therefore accompanied by the local police and if they discover a case of trafficking for labour<br />
exploitation then the specialised police take up the investigation.<br />
None of the victims interviewed who had returned to Romania after being trafficked for labour<br />
exploitation abroad were identified during their exploitation. In many cases of Romanians trafficked<br />
abroad the identification took place after they managed to escape from the trafficking situation,<br />
after return, and in some cases, many years after the exploitation. The failure to identify victims was<br />
partly attributed to a lack of trust in authorities by victims, which in some cases was justified – in one<br />
case 17 Romanians were trafficked and exploited in Greece, and when they reported to the police<br />
they were deported with no official investigation or identification.<br />
The Gangmasters Licensing Authority (GLA) in the UK is cited as a model of good practice in labour<br />
inspection and enforcement. It operates a licensing system, whereby licence violations link to<br />
forced labour indicators and violations of licence conditions result in penalties, licence revocation<br />
or criminal proceedings. Whilst its work is impressive, the GLA’s areas of inspection are limited to<br />
agriculture, horticulture, shellfish gathering, and associated food processing sectors. Outside of the<br />
GLA sectors responsibility for inspection has been described as “fragmented” (JRF, 2014, 6). Labour<br />
inspection and enforcement outside of the GLA sectors is spread across a range of regulators for<br />
whom detecting forced labour is not a primary concern, including: the Health and Safety Executive,<br />
Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) national minimum wage teams and the Employment<br />
Agency Standards Inspectorate. As noted above, the UK Immigration Bill currently under discussion<br />
proposes a new coordination mechanism to oversee disparate UK labour inspection agencies. Trafficked<br />
persons interviewed by FLEX called for increased inspection in the workplace in order to gain<br />
information about rights as well as to report abuses.<br />
Normalisation of exploitation creates a barrier to self-identification<br />
In Romania, many of those formerly trafficked persons interviewed who had been trafficked overseas<br />
said that they expected some kind of ‘improper working conditions’ when migrating for work,<br />
but none agreed to exploitation. This could also be reflected in the way Romanians are perceived<br />
in working environments abroad, as willing to accept inferior working conditions and low salaries,<br />
putting them at risk of exploitation and also impeding their self-identification as victims or access<br />
to assistance:<br />
“I thought the conditions may be hard and that I would be paid with just a little more than in Romania<br />
but I never expected or wanted such ordeal” (Interview with trafficked person, Romania, 2015)<br />
There was a sense that exploitation was a question of bad luck rather than a crime. This sense gives<br />
rise to shame and rejection of the victim status. There is also an impression that trafficking only occurs<br />
in illegal and hidden industries whereas most victims are recruited through legal job placement<br />
agencies, and leave with an engagement contract between the work and the recruiter or labour<br />
contract.<br />
CASE STUDY, Romania:<br />
“I expected it to be exploited […] I do not want to hurt anyone. It’s not their fault that I’m unlucky.” (Interview<br />
with trafficked man, Romania, 2015)<br />
16