Commission
c4Wm301vL7u
c4Wm301vL7u
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ally thereafter. If after three years proceedings are still ongoing, or the perpetrator has been found<br />
guilty, then permanent residency may be applied for. If the victim decides not to cooperate in criminal<br />
proceedings, support ends. There is an option to still enter the support structures, when the<br />
victim is willing to cooperate but cannot due to threats of violence or for medical reasons, however<br />
trafficked persons rarely take this route.<br />
Lack of genuine informed consent to engage in the anti-trafficking system<br />
As noted by the Commentary to the OHCHR Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human<br />
Rights and Human Trafficking, a human rights approach to human trafficking requires the provision<br />
of care and support to be both informed and non-coercive (OHCHR, 2010). According to the<br />
OHCHR, this requires victims of trafficking to receive information on their entitlements so that<br />
they can make an informed decision about their support provision (ibid., 150). Recital 21 of the EU<br />
Trafficking Directive also elaborates that ‘Victims should … be informed of the important aspects<br />
of those measures and they should not be imposed on victims’ (2011, 5).<br />
A common concern raised in the UK is the lack of informed consent to enter the National Referral<br />
Mechanism for victims of trafficking (NRM). The lack of independent legal advice was particularly<br />
highlighted as a gap in the services provided to individuals picked up in raids or referred by non-specialist<br />
organisations, which contributed to a lack of informed consent prior to referral into the<br />
NRM. The UK NRM Review suggested that ‘information to support a referral could be collected<br />
in slower time after a potential victim has been extricated from their trafficker and placed safely’<br />
(Home Office, 2014, 28). Of the trafficked people interviewed who had entered the NRM in the UK<br />
there was limited knowledge about the NRM system, including a lack of awareness as to the support<br />
offered, the standard of support to expect, how to complain about such support and how to access<br />
independent legal advice on a needs basis. For example, one Polish man when asked whether he was<br />
referred into the NRM replied:<br />
“Don’t know what that is. They’re not saying everything, I learn through other Poles that I meet –<br />
people who have had certain things that I haven’t.” (Interview with trafficked man, UK, 2015)<br />
The research in the Netherlands also showed that informed consent is not always easy to achieve.<br />
Some trafficked persons reported a disconnect between the actual support received and the support<br />
that they were led to understand they would receive:<br />
“The police described it as paradise, but I am disappointed about the reality. I have nothing to do.<br />
Everything is far away and I get only little money to do anything.” (Interview with trafficked man,<br />
Netherlands, 2015)<br />
In this case, the trafficked person had understood that cooperation with the police would guarantee<br />
him specific remedies, but the reality did not meet his expectations. Also other cases showed that<br />
it is important to inform trafficked persons in a clear and transparent way so that they are well informed<br />
about all their options and do not have unrealistic expectations.<br />
The Dutch Instruction on Victim Care states that victims are to be kept informed on the progress of<br />
their case (Staatscourant 2010 number 20746). Whilst trafficked persons interviewed said that information<br />
was important to them, some did not think that they had received adequate details about<br />
their support:<br />
“I have been in the shelter for three months now, and I don’t know what is happening. I have told<br />
them my story. I don’t know what procedure it is. I am waiting.” (Interview with trafficked man,<br />
Netherlands, 2015)<br />
In Romania, there is no formal way of applying for the reflection and recovery period. The National<br />
Agency against Trafficking in Persons has a procedure that they follow upon first encounter with a<br />
trafficked person, where they provide information on the rights process and gain the victim’s agreement.<br />
One of the main steps in in this process involves informing victims of their rights (to recovery<br />
and reflection, on available support, on the relation with law enforcement) and obtaining their<br />
consent to sharing information relating to their case for referrals. Victims receive a written form<br />
22