WRIT
med_1015634__the_writ_spring_final
med_1015634__the_writ_spring_final
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
14 Journal of the LSNI<br />
Spring 2016<br />
Beware of the<br />
limitations of<br />
Discounted Gift<br />
Trusts in Estate<br />
Planning<br />
Estate planning invariably attempts<br />
to achieve a blend of the following<br />
objectives – mitigating a Potential<br />
Inheritance Tax (‘IHT’) liability, allowing<br />
beneficiaries access to assets at an<br />
appropriate time and (the illusive)<br />
ability for the settlor to retain some<br />
access to the assets or receive an<br />
income.<br />
The most simple and cost effective solution<br />
of an outright gift is often dismissed as many<br />
people are not in a position to gift capital, as<br />
they cannot be sure they will not need it to<br />
provide for their own future financial security.<br />
Therefore the ideal solution for many clients is<br />
one where they can achieve the potential IHT<br />
savings that an outright gift offers yet retaining<br />
access to capital or an income.<br />
The Gift with Reservation of Benefit (‘GWR’)<br />
rules introduced in 1986 and Pre-Owned Assets<br />
(‘POA’) rules of 2004/05 target some of the<br />
more aggressive structures aimed at achieving<br />
the “have your cake and eat it” objective.<br />
Discounted Gift Trusts (‘DGT’) are often portrayed<br />
as the structure which best achieves this goal.<br />
The key attractions of a DGT are twofold. Firstly,<br />
the ability to place an amount greater than the<br />
available nil rate band into a discretionary trust<br />
without incurring a Chargeable Lifetime Transfer<br />
(‘CLT’) and secondly the ability to retain an<br />
ongoing “income” from the trust.<br />
While a DGT undoubtedly has some very<br />
attractive features (the discount is outside<br />
the estate immediately and the remainder<br />
after seven years), the discount is merely the<br />
capitalised value of the retained income rights<br />
and these “income” payments will simply<br />
accrue back into the settlor’s estate unless<br />
spent. Therefore the DGT is unlikely to be<br />
suitable for those clients that do not require an<br />
immediate and ongoing income.<br />
“Careful consideration should be made<br />
prior to establishing a Discounted Gift<br />
Trust and in many cases the lesser<br />
known Flexible Reversionary Trust may<br />
be a more appropriate solution.”<br />
A further disadvantage of the DGT is that while<br />
the settlor retains an “income” they lose the<br />
access to capital. In addition the income level<br />
and timing of payments is likely to be set at<br />
outset and cannot be changed. While this may<br />
not seem like an issue at the outset it can create<br />
problems in the future. An income set at 5% of<br />
the initial DGT value will fall by 22.4% in real<br />
terms with an inflation rate of 2.5% per annum<br />
over 10 years. While inflation is low at the<br />
moment, many predict it will rise in the future<br />
as Governments pay the price of Quantitative<br />
Easing (‘QE’).<br />
“For it is in giving that we receive” - St<br />
Francis of Assisi<br />
For many clients, as they grow older and have<br />
more certainty that their own needs will be<br />
met, they can now afford to give away assets<br />
and benefit from seeing the joy their gift gives<br />
to the beneficiaries. The perceived value of the<br />
gift by the beneficiary is also likely to be greater<br />
the sooner in life that they receive it. A 40 year<br />
old with a mortgage and three children is likely<br />
to appreciate a gift more so than a 60 year old<br />
with no mortgage and financially independent<br />
children. Many DGTs do not allow payments to<br />
beneficiaries until the settlor has died.<br />
Having looked at the disadvantages of the DGT,<br />
what alternatives are there? An often overlooked<br />
gem is the little known Flexible Reversionary<br />
Trust (‘FRT’). Similar to a DGT the right to an<br />
“income” is carved out at the outset, however<br />
the power of the trustees to vary the “income”,<br />
creates additional, valuable flexibility. The<br />
main advantages of an FRT over a DGT are that<br />
income benefits need not be taken at all. They<br />
can be deferred to a later date and can vary<br />
in the amount taken. But a ‘discount’ will not<br />
be available. After seven years, if the annual<br />
“income” payments have been deferred the<br />
settlor would have the whole value of the trust<br />
fund outside of their estate while retaining<br />
access to the full trust value. In addition,<br />
payments can be made to beneficiaries at any<br />
time without further IHT implications.<br />
FRTs therefore often appeal to clients who want<br />
to set up a discretionary trust but want to retain<br />
access to the capital, knowing that they are