28.06.2016 Views

WRIT

med_1015634__the_writ_spring_final

med_1015634__the_writ_spring_final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 Journal of the LSNI<br />

Spring 2016<br />

Beware of the<br />

limitations of<br />

Discounted Gift<br />

Trusts in Estate<br />

Planning<br />

Estate planning invariably attempts<br />

to achieve a blend of the following<br />

objectives – mitigating a Potential<br />

Inheritance Tax (‘IHT’) liability, allowing<br />

beneficiaries access to assets at an<br />

appropriate time and (the illusive)<br />

ability for the settlor to retain some<br />

access to the assets or receive an<br />

income.<br />

The most simple and cost effective solution<br />

of an outright gift is often dismissed as many<br />

people are not in a position to gift capital, as<br />

they cannot be sure they will not need it to<br />

provide for their own future financial security.<br />

Therefore the ideal solution for many clients is<br />

one where they can achieve the potential IHT<br />

savings that an outright gift offers yet retaining<br />

access to capital or an income.<br />

The Gift with Reservation of Benefit (‘GWR’)<br />

rules introduced in 1986 and Pre-Owned Assets<br />

(‘POA’) rules of 2004/05 target some of the<br />

more aggressive structures aimed at achieving<br />

the “have your cake and eat it” objective.<br />

Discounted Gift Trusts (‘DGT’) are often portrayed<br />

as the structure which best achieves this goal.<br />

The key attractions of a DGT are twofold. Firstly,<br />

the ability to place an amount greater than the<br />

available nil rate band into a discretionary trust<br />

without incurring a Chargeable Lifetime Transfer<br />

(‘CLT’) and secondly the ability to retain an<br />

ongoing “income” from the trust.<br />

While a DGT undoubtedly has some very<br />

attractive features (the discount is outside<br />

the estate immediately and the remainder<br />

after seven years), the discount is merely the<br />

capitalised value of the retained income rights<br />

and these “income” payments will simply<br />

accrue back into the settlor’s estate unless<br />

spent. Therefore the DGT is unlikely to be<br />

suitable for those clients that do not require an<br />

immediate and ongoing income.<br />

“Careful consideration should be made<br />

prior to establishing a Discounted Gift<br />

Trust and in many cases the lesser<br />

known Flexible Reversionary Trust may<br />

be a more appropriate solution.”<br />

A further disadvantage of the DGT is that while<br />

the settlor retains an “income” they lose the<br />

access to capital. In addition the income level<br />

and timing of payments is likely to be set at<br />

outset and cannot be changed. While this may<br />

not seem like an issue at the outset it can create<br />

problems in the future. An income set at 5% of<br />

the initial DGT value will fall by 22.4% in real<br />

terms with an inflation rate of 2.5% per annum<br />

over 10 years. While inflation is low at the<br />

moment, many predict it will rise in the future<br />

as Governments pay the price of Quantitative<br />

Easing (‘QE’).<br />

“For it is in giving that we receive” - St<br />

Francis of Assisi<br />

For many clients, as they grow older and have<br />

more certainty that their own needs will be<br />

met, they can now afford to give away assets<br />

and benefit from seeing the joy their gift gives<br />

to the beneficiaries. The perceived value of the<br />

gift by the beneficiary is also likely to be greater<br />

the sooner in life that they receive it. A 40 year<br />

old with a mortgage and three children is likely<br />

to appreciate a gift more so than a 60 year old<br />

with no mortgage and financially independent<br />

children. Many DGTs do not allow payments to<br />

beneficiaries until the settlor has died.<br />

Having looked at the disadvantages of the DGT,<br />

what alternatives are there? An often overlooked<br />

gem is the little known Flexible Reversionary<br />

Trust (‘FRT’). Similar to a DGT the right to an<br />

“income” is carved out at the outset, however<br />

the power of the trustees to vary the “income”,<br />

creates additional, valuable flexibility. The<br />

main advantages of an FRT over a DGT are that<br />

income benefits need not be taken at all. They<br />

can be deferred to a later date and can vary<br />

in the amount taken. But a ‘discount’ will not<br />

be available. After seven years, if the annual<br />

“income” payments have been deferred the<br />

settlor would have the whole value of the trust<br />

fund outside of their estate while retaining<br />

access to the full trust value. In addition,<br />

payments can be made to beneficiaries at any<br />

time without further IHT implications.<br />

FRTs therefore often appeal to clients who want<br />

to set up a discretionary trust but want to retain<br />

access to the capital, knowing that they are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!