Key data

STM HSS
3 a
The process of peer review
Q15 As an author: please rate how strongly you agree or disagree
3A with each of the following Process statements
of Peer Review
3A
Process of Peer Review
Authors
Authors
only
only
Q15 As an author: please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with each of the following statements:
Q15 As an author: please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with each of the following statements:
strongly disagree to 10 strongly agree
1 – strongly disagree to 10 – strongly agree
Humanities and Social Science Researchers
Humanities and Social Science Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
would like to see average peer review times, from
I would
submission
like to
to
see
decision
average
to
peer
publish,
review
displayed
times,
on
from
45%
16% 15% 8%
submission
journal's
to decision
website
to publish,
[n=622]
displayed on a
45%
16% 15% 8%
journal's website [n=622]
am usually kept well informed about the progress
I am
of
usually
my article
kept
through
well informed
the peer
about
review
the
process
progress
7% 8% 11% 12% 12% 14% 8% 12% 6% 10%
of my article through
[n=624]
the peer review process 7% 8% 11% 12% 12% 14% 8% 12% 6% 10%
[n=624]
10 strongly agree strongly disagree
10 - strongly agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - strongly disagree
Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers
Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
would like to see average peer review times, from
I would
submission
like to
to
see
decision
average
to
peer
publish,
review
displayed
times,
on
from
34% 16% 17% 11% 9% 8%
submission
journal's
to decision
website
to publish,
[n=427]
displayed on a 34% 16% 17% 11% 9% 8%
journal's website [n=427]
am usually kept well informed about the progress
I am
of
usually
my article
kept
through
well informed
the peer
about
review
the
process
progress
15% 9% 14% 16% 10% 14% 8% 7%
of my article through 15% 9% 14% 16% 10% 14% 8% 7%
[n=429]
the peer review process
[n=429]
10 strongly agree strongly disagree
10 - strongly agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - strongly disagree
3 a
3A The process of peer review
3A
Process
Process
of
of
Peer
Peer
Review
Review
The following questions are about the data authors gather and use during their
research (e.g. experimental results, data tables, transcripts, videos etc.).
Q16
Q16
The following questions are about the data authors gather and use during their research (e.g. experimental
The following questions are about the data authors gather and use during their research (e.g. experimental
results, data tables, transcripts, videos etc.).
results, data tables, transcripts, videos etc.).
Q16
Please
Please
rate how
rate
strongly
how
you agree
strongly
or disagree
you
with
agree
each of the
or
following
disagree
statements:
with each of
Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with each of the following statements:
the following statements
1 – strongly disagree to 10 – strongly agree
strongly disagree to 10 strongly agree
Authors
Authors
only
only
Humanities and Social Science Researchers
Humanities and Social Science Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Peer review of authors' data is desirable in principle
Peer review of authors' data is desirable in principle 19% 11% 17% 13% 11% 13% 6%
[n = 623]
19% 11% 17% 13% 11% 13% 6%
[n 623]
It is unrealistic to expect peer reviewers to review
It is unrealistic to expect peer reviewers to review 12% 8% 15% 14% 9% 16% 5% 9% 6% 6%
authors' data [n = 622]
12% 8% 15% 14% 9% 16% 5% 9% 6% 6%
authors' data [n 622]
It is unrealistic to expect authors to make available
It is unrealistic to expect authors to make available 9% 6% 12% 13% 10% 14% 6% 10% 9% 12%
their data for peer review [n = 623] 9% 6% 12% 13% 10% 14% 6% 10% 9% 12%
their data for peer review [n 623]
10 - strongly agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - strongly disagree
10 strongly agree strongly disagree
Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers
Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Peer review of authors' data is desirable in principle
Peer review of authors' data is desirable in principle 17% 11% 17% 15% 11% 18%
[n = 427]
17% 11% 17% 15% 11% 18%
[n 427]
It is unrealistic to expect peer reviewers to review
It is unrealistic to expect peer reviewers to review 8% 8% 14% 11% 13% 20% 6% 8% 6% 6%
authors' data [n = 422]
8% 8% 14% 11% 13% 20% 6% 8% 6% 6%
authors' data [n 422]
It is unrealistic to expect authors to make available
It is unrealistic to expect authors to make available 6% 7% 10% 12% 14% 20% 7% 9% 7% 7%
their data for peer review [n = 422] 6% 7% 10% 12% 14% 20% 7% 9% 7% 7%
their data for peer review [n 422]
HSS STM
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - strongly disagree 1 - Strongly Disagree
strongly disagree Strongly Disagree
2015 Taylor & Francis Peer Review Survey – Top Level Results – INTERNAL REPORT C Will Frass 23
2015 Taylor Francis Peer Review Survey Top Level Results INTERNAL REPORT Will Frass 23
20 PEER REVIEW IN 2015 A GLOBAL VIEW (A TAYLOR & FRANCIS WHITE PAPER)
PROCESS OF PEER REVIEW 21