10.07.2016 Views

Tax Dispute Resolution Quarterly

29rgRWs

29rgRWs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A conversation with Greg Matson—Executive director of<br />

Multistate <strong>Tax</strong> Commission<br />

By Shirley Sicilian, National Director for State and Local <strong>Tax</strong> Controversy<br />

The Multistate <strong>Tax</strong> Commission (MTC or the Commission) marks its 49th anniversary this July. Over the<br />

years, the Commission has served as a forum for states to come together and work through the important<br />

state tax issues of the day. The issues, and the Commission members who discuss them, are always<br />

changing. But one thing that has been relatively stable is the executive director. Since the MTC began in<br />

1967, there have been only five executive directors. Greg Matson is the fifth, and is just getting started in<br />

his new role.<br />

During the Commission’s March 2016 meetings in Salt Lake City, Shirley Sicilian had an opportunity to sit<br />

down with Greg to discuss his vision for the Commission and his perspective on current multistate tax<br />

issues, as well as numerous personal reflections. The May 2016 issue of the Journal of Multistate <strong>Tax</strong>ation<br />

and Incentives includes the interview exploring his vision for the Commission and perspective on current<br />

multistate tax issues as well as how taxpayers can effectively interact with the MTC.<br />

Retroactive tax legislation—Considering both sides of the sword<br />

By Shirley Sicilian, National Director for State and Local <strong>Tax</strong> Controversy<br />

A handful of recent cases illustrate the potential for unfairness borne by taxpayers when a state retroactively<br />

imposes a tax or removes a tax benefit. The main job of the Constitution’s Due Process Clause is to preserve<br />

“fundamental fairness” in the application of law. These recent cases explore the limits of retroactive tax laws<br />

under the due process and other provisions of the U.S. and state constitutions.<br />

This article in the March/April 2016 issue of the Journal of Multistate <strong>Tax</strong>ation and Incentives illustrates how<br />

retroactive tax legislation can be beneficial to taxpayers. Proposals for creating hard-and-fast limitations on<br />

retroactive tax legislation should guard against throwing the baby out with the bathwater.<br />

State controversy and<br />

dispute resolution program<br />

During a March webcast, professionals from<br />

KPMG LLP’s State and Local <strong>Tax</strong> practice and<br />

the <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Dispute</strong> <strong>Resolution</strong> Network addressed<br />

the state implications of new federal partnership<br />

audit procedures, the most recent Direct<br />

Marketing Association decision, what is at stake<br />

in classifying property, and the flow-through of<br />

federal transfer pricing adjustments.<br />

© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated<br />

with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 568452

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!