31.07.2016 Views

FORGING THE CHAIN

9789241510004_eng

9789241510004_eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F<br />

54 “EVEN FREE OF<br />

CHARGE IS TOO<br />

EXPENSIVE FOR US”<br />

“Drugs are donated for treatment, but what good do<br />

they do if cases are detected too late? Understanding<br />

this, the company donating the drugs also gives WHO<br />

the funds needed to support active screening …<br />

Industry commitment continues because my staff took<br />

A few years ago, a representative of WHO enthusiastically<br />

told an African minister of health that the pharmaceutical<br />

firm Aventis had agreed to provide drugs<br />

against sleeping sickness for free.<br />

The minister responded that, “Even free of charge<br />

is too expensive for us.”<br />

He was proved right and the phrase “free of charge<br />

is too expensive” subsequently became a motto for<br />

campaigns against NTDs.<br />

The reality is that a drug, free of charge, does not<br />

get the job done. It does not guarantee delivery to<br />

remote populations, as someone has to pay for it to<br />

be shipped and distributed. It also has to be correctly<br />

administered, which means that health staff must be<br />

trained.<br />

the company’s CEO and senior executives on a field trip<br />

to Africa last month. These executives saw the people,<br />

the illness, the lumbar punctures under the mango<br />

trees, the cases detected, and the medicines given.<br />

Seeing the people, being eye-to-eye with their misery,<br />

p66<br />

has great power to motivate the right kind of publicprivate<br />

partnership …<br />

Results build trust, and with trust, commitment<br />

escalates.”<br />

Dr Margaret Chan, 2012<br />

After training, money must be found to send<br />

those staff members into the field. A free drug,<br />

moreover, is of no use if the people who need it<br />

are not diagnosed. Active disease-screening programmes<br />

are costly, especially if performed in remote<br />

locations. Passive screening, where patients seek<br />

diagnosis, requires that health centres be constructed<br />

and staffed in locations where people can reach them.<br />

Discussions of donations to the campaign against<br />

NTDs now routinely include consideration of the costs<br />

of access, training, diagnosis and related expenses.<br />

Participating pharmaceutical firms, including Sanofi,<br />

Bayer HealthCare and Gilead Sciences, regularly contribute<br />

to the costs of delivery as well as providing<br />

medications free of charge.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!