Anambra State Post-Campaign Net Tracking Survey

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Results Sample characteristics Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation Out of the 1020 targeted households 1012 (99.2%) were visited and valid questionnaires obtained. This completion rate was similar in the two strata with 99.6% in the areas with estimated higher pre-campaign ITN ownership and 98.8% in the area with estimated lower coverage. Basic household characteristics Table 1 shows some basic characteristics of the sampled households. About three quarters of households were headed by a man, with a proportion of 76.1% versus 23.9% for female headed households. The mean age of the household heads was 51 years with no difference between men and women. There was no statistically significant variation detected across types of residence or wealth quintiles. The average household size was 4.4 (95% CI 4.3 to 4.6), and was ranging from 1 to 12 people. Mean household size was significantly lower than the 5.0 assumed for the quantification of LLIN before the campaign. The overall proportion of households with any child under 5 was rather low with 31.3% (95% CI 25.5 to 37.7%) and did not vary by background characteristic. A currently pregnant woman was living in 8.3% (95% CI 6.6 to 10.5%) of the households. Rural families were more likely to have any pregnant woman compared to urban ones but this difference was not statistically significant at the 5% level. It appeared that families in poorer quintile were less likely to have any pregnant woman and an increasing trend can be observed but this association was not statistically significant (p=0.12). Table 1: Characteristics of sampled households Background characteristic Residence Urban Rural Pre-Campaign LLIN>15% LLIN
Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation also higher in urban areas (p15% LLIN15% LLIN
Page 1 and 2: Evaluation of the distribution camp
Page 3 and 4: Table of Content Anambra LLIN campa
Page 5 and 6: List of Figures Anambra LLIN campai
Page 7 and 8: Abbreviations Anambra LLIN campaign
Page 9 and 10: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation Am
Page 11 and 12: Introduction Anambra LLIN campaign
Page 13 and 14: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation An
Page 15 and 16: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation St
Page 17: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation be
Page 21 and 22: Figure 4: Population distribution b
Page 23 and 24: Table 6: Outcome of registration Ba
Page 25 and 26: Figure 7: Equity of LLIN distributi
Page 27 and 28: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation po
Page 29 and 30: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation 16
Page 31 and 32: Use of nets Anambra LLIN campaign e
Page 33 and 34: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation ne
Page 35 and 36: Figure 12: Status of children under
Page 37 and 38: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation On
Page 39 and 40: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation Ta
Page 41 and 42: Impact on actual behaviour Anambra
Page 43 and 44: Table 21: Comparison of key indicat
Page 45 and 46: Discussion Survey methodology and d
Page 47 and 48: Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation ca
Page 49 and 50: References Anambra LLIN campaign ev
Page 51 and 52: Anambra State Post-Campaign Net Tra
Page 53 and 54: SECTION 1: People living in the hou
Page 55 and 56: ID number No Question Categories Sk
Page 57 and 58: ID number No Question Categories Sk
Page 59 and 60: SECTION 3: Distribution of campaign
Page 61 and 62: SECTION 5: Nets owned by the househ
Page 63 and 64: ID number No Question Mosquito net
Page 65 and 66: ID number No Question Mosquito net
Page 67 and 68: SECTION 6: Previously owned mosquit

Anambra State Post-Campaign Net Tracking Survey

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?