Anambra State Post-Campaign Net Tracking Survey

Anambra LLIN campaign evaluation
knowledge levels showed a weaker association that was not statistically significant (67.4% vs
56.9%, p=0.14).
Figure 14: Reported discussions within household about net use
Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval
In an attempt to distinguish between perceived obligation to provide a positive answer and the
actual intention, respondents were asked what they thought their neighbour’s net use pattern
was. Two thirds, 67.6% (95%CI 62.0 to 72.7%) did not feel confident to comment on that, but if
the “don’t know” responses were excluded, the response pattern was very similar to that given
for their own family (Figure 14).
Figure 15: Reported intention to use nets and perceived neighbour’s use
40