16.09.2016 Views

z kara-f ates- a sbır

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Some ORIGINAL quality SCIENTIFIC parameters PAPER investigated in Sultani Çekirdeksiz (Vitis vinifera L.) clones during<br />

ripening period<br />

Some quality parameters investigated in Sultani<br />

Çekirdeksiz (Vitis vinifera L.) clones during<br />

ripening period<br />

Zeki KARA 1 , Fadime ATES 2 , Ali SABIR 1<br />

1<br />

University of Selcuk, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, 42003 Konya, Turkey<br />

(e-mail: z<strong>kara</strong>@selcuk.edu.tr)<br />

2<br />

Viticultural Research Institute, 45000 Manisa, Turkey<br />

Abstract<br />

Sultani Çekirdeksiz (SC) is the most important grape cultivar cultivated in Turkey, produced<br />

for raisin and table grape purposes. Manisa Viticultural Research Institute (MVRI) selected 4<br />

clones during 1989-1997 periods out of a Sultani population for Eagan Region for different<br />

usage purposes. In this research, some quality parameters such as yield, cluster number, berry<br />

weight, cluster weight, berry shape index, soluble solids of must, pH, titration acidity, P-value,<br />

berry color and ripening index of selected clones were studied during the ripening periods. In<br />

addition, traditional raisin and table grapes were also used for a more logical comparison of the<br />

studied clones. There were markedly significant variation recorded in the field observations and<br />

laboratory analyzes with respect to the traditional quality components as well as electrochemical<br />

parameters. Clonal variations reflected in all measured quality parameters. S4 selected for table<br />

grape and raisin purpose performed best for ripening index.<br />

Key words: Sultani Cekirdeksiz, clones, table grape, raisin, quality parameters<br />

Introduction<br />

Fresh grape (Vitis vinifera L.) production is 66.41 million ton in 7.32 million ha area during 2009-2010<br />

period and main producers are Italy, Spain, France, USA, China and Turkey. The grape production in<br />

Turkey is 3.61 million tons on 0.48 million ha of viticulture area (FAO, 2011). Around the world, 64% of<br />

total production has been used for wine production, 21% for raisins, 8% for fresh table grape consumption,<br />

and 7% for other minor processing purposes. There has been a producing about 400.000 ton raisins yearly in<br />

Turkey, the important raisin producer country in the world. About 40-50% of world raisin production has<br />

been carried out by Turkey (Kara 2007).<br />

The quality of the raisins and table grapes can be monitored by employing the conventional and recently<br />

developing electrochemical methods. The P value, a calculated numeral derivative from the pH-value,<br />

design<strong>ates</strong> the redox potential and the electrical conductivity, and is calculated by P=Eh2/R equation. This<br />

equation appears to be a possibly valid method, incorporating the electrochemical values in a single number.<br />

In the food quality researches, the P-value is to the fore factor. In fact, food with low redox values is named<br />

as “rich of electrons” and “very energetic”. This can be interpreted as more advantageous for consumers<br />

(Heilmann, 2000).<br />

The clonal selection studies were carried out for choosing productive, high quality clones on SC variety.<br />

MVRI selected SC clones, S1 was selected for raisin production, S5 and S6 were selected for table grape<br />

production and S4 was selected for bought purpose by Ilgın et al. (1999) in Eagan Region among Sultani<br />

population.<br />

In this research, the effects of clones (clonal variation) on some quality parameters such as yield, cluster<br />

number, berry weight, cluster weight, berry shape index, soluble solids of must, pH, titration acidity, P-value,<br />

berry color and ripening index were studied.<br />

Proceedings . 47th Croatian and 7th International Symposium on Agriculture . Opatija . Croatia (761–765)<br />

Section 8 . Viticulture and Enology 761


Zeki KARA, Fadime ATES, Ali SABIR<br />

Materials and methods<br />

This research was held in MVRI Turkey during the 2008 vegetation periods in Manisa province. Manisa is<br />

located at 71 m above sea level, and 38˚36” East and 27˚24” North hemisphere. According to the climatic<br />

records of state meteorology station, in vegetation period the day number with the average temperature<br />

above 10 ⁰C was 271, from 27th February to 23rd November 2008. Mean temperature was 21.5 ⁰C, and the<br />

sum of effective temperature was 2880.3 ⁰C. Annual precipitation was 480 mm, and relative humidity was<br />

60.5.<br />

SC was used by two different cultivation techniques as raisin (SC r) and table grape SC tg) production<br />

purpose which was used for understanding the differences of selected clones as S, S4, S5 and S6.<br />

Samples were collected during ripening period by a week intervals and at local harvest tame for determine<br />

the varietal and cultivation differences. Samples were collected during ripening period from 08,07,2008 to<br />

06,08,2008 for each analyze.<br />

In the field, yield (kg vine-1) was determined by weighting all the clusters on 10 vines and mean cluster<br />

weight were determined by using 10 clusters for each clone. Cluster numbers (n) was determined by<br />

observing all clusters on 10 vines for each grape genotype.<br />

In the laboratory, berry weight (g bery-1) was determined by 100 berries collected from 10 clusters. Berry<br />

shape index (l/w) was calculated by 100 berries collected from 10 clusters. Soluble solids of must (⁰Brix)<br />

analyzed by hand refractometer (Atago 9313), PH was determined by pH meter. Titration acidity (tartaric<br />

acid) was analyzed by titration method (Anonymous 1997). P-value was tested in sample juices by the Bio-<br />

Electronical Terrain-Analysis (BE-T-A) from MED Tronic MT 732-Full-Microprocessor-Controlled System<br />

(Heinrich and Rey, 1997).Berry color was determined by cromometer (Konica Minolta CR400 with the<br />

Hunter scale, L, a, b; McGuire 1992).<br />

The researches were designed as 3 replicated randomized parcels. Data were analyzed using SPSS for<br />

Windows 12.1, and graphs were performed by Windows Excel.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Yield<br />

Yield values (kg vine-1) of SC clones were recorded 22.39, 19.11, 16.43, 11.92, 11.05 and 7.62 kg vine-1 that<br />

from SC r, SC tr, S5, S1, S6 and S4 respectively (Tab. 1). The highest yield value was obtained from SC r as<br />

22.39 kg/vine -1 and least yield was observed from S4 clone as 7.62 kg/vines-1. The difference between S4<br />

and SC r was about 3 fold. There was also two fold difference between S4 and S5 clones.<br />

Cluster numbers<br />

Cluster numbers were determined as 62.33, 32.3, 29, 27, 27 and 25 from SC r, SC tg, S1, S5, S6 and S4<br />

respectively (Tab. 1). The maximum cluster number SC r was almost 2 fold the other clones. There were<br />

close values of cluster numbers among the clones S1, S4, S5 and S6.<br />

Berry weights<br />

Single berry weights were observed between 1.68 g from SC r which was for raisin production purpose and<br />

3.04 g from SC tg which was for table grape (Tab. 1). Because of the much more gibberellins application for<br />

table grape production the biggest berries was obtained. There was only one gibberellins application as 20<br />

ppm at the end of fruit set in Turkish raisin industry.<br />

Cluster weights<br />

Cluster weights of the clones were 604.37 g, 602 g, 454.6 g, 389.8 g, 375.3 g and 357.23 g from SC tg, S5, S6,<br />

S1, S4 and SC r respectively (Tab. 1). Because of gibberellins application SC tg cultivated for table grape<br />

purpose cluster weights were the maximum but S5 was differed among the other clones that is also attributed<br />

to its genetic difference.<br />

762<br />

47th Croatian and 7th International Symposium on Agriculture


Some quality parameters investigated in Sultani Çekirdeksiz (Vitis vinifera L.) clones during<br />

ripening period<br />

Table 1. Yield, cluster numbers, berry and cluster weights value of SC clones.<br />

Clones Yield (kg vine -1 ) Cluster number (n) Berry weight (g) Cluster weight (g)<br />

SC tg 19.11 32.30 3.04 604.37<br />

SC r 22.39 62.33 1.68 357.23<br />

S1 11.92 29.00 2.09 389.80<br />

S4 7.62 25.00 2.56 375.30<br />

S5 16.43 27.00 2.85 602.00<br />

S6 11.05 27.00 2.86 454.60<br />

Berry shape index (l/w)<br />

Berry shape can be described as oblate and/or ovate (Anonymous 1997) in all clones, and shape index (l/w)<br />

were calculated as 0.81 from SC r, 0.7 from S5, 0.67 from S4, 0.66 from S6 and 0.6 from S1 at the harvest (Fig.<br />

1). Main difference can be arisen from genetic variations of clones.<br />

Soluble solids of must (⁰Brix)<br />

Soluble solids of must gradually rose up during ripening in all clones. At the harvest ⁰Brix values were<br />

measured as 23.9 for SC r, 19.5 for S4, 17.43 for SC tg, 17.3 for S1, 16.8 for S6 and 16.2 for S5 (Fig. 2). The<br />

highest ⁰Brix was obtained from SC cultivated for raisin, and the other clones’ ⁰Brix values were typical for<br />

table grape of SC including multipurpose clone S4.<br />

Figure 1. Berry shape index (l/w) course of SC clones<br />

for trough to harvest<br />

Figure 2. Soluble solid content course of fruit juice<br />

(⁰Brix) of SC clones for trough to harvest<br />

PH<br />

PH in the table grape must have a fundamental role in taste of a given variety as it affects phenol stability<br />

(Piljac-Žegarac 2009). PH values of the must increased trough to harvest in all clones that were recorded as<br />

3.87 from S4, 3.74 from S1, 3.73 from S6, 3.72 from S5, 3.67 from SC r, and 3.64 from SC tg (Fig 3).<br />

Titration acidity<br />

Titration acidity values decreased gradually during ripening. The values were 8.75 (S1), 8.29 (SC tg), 7.65 (SC<br />

r), 7.25 (S5), 6.94 (S4), 6.89 (S6) at the must of harvested clusters (Fig 4). The most rapid acid decreasing<br />

obtained S5 clone but at the harvest least acidity analyzed from S4 clone.<br />

Section 8 . Viticulture and Enology 763


Zeki KARA, Fadime ATES, Ali SABIR<br />

Figure 3. PH course of fruit juice of SC clones for<br />

trough to harvest.<br />

Figure 4. Total acidity (g/L) course of fruit juice of SC<br />

clones for trough to harvest.<br />

P-values<br />

P-value (μW) can be indicated as a parameter for quality description, and give us wider range than some<br />

conventional quality parameters that calculated from redox potential, pH-value and electrical conductivity,<br />

indicating the activity of electrons. Low P-value was suggested health promoting (Kara et al. 2008). P vales<br />

rose up during ripening in all SC clones that were recorded as 141 (SC r), 139 (S4), 127 (SC tg), 126 (S1 and<br />

S5) and 124 (S6) at harvested fruit juice (Fig 5). P-value determinations could be helpful for conventional<br />

grading methods that have been using as traditional methods in grape and raisin industry (Kara et al. 2008).<br />

S6 performed best for electrochemical parameter p value.<br />

Berry colors<br />

Berry color of the clones were determined as L, a, b that were also differed by clones. L values were between<br />

47.5 (S6) to 43.16 (S4), a values were between 17.77 (SC r) and 13.62 (S4), b values were determined between<br />

7.81 (S6) and 5.87 (S1) (Fig. 6). Color values were close to those referred by Kara et al. (2008)<br />

Figure 5. P values (μW) course of fruit juice of SC<br />

clones trough to harvest.<br />

Figure 6. Berry colors (L,a,b) of SC clones.<br />

764<br />

47th Croatian and 7th International Symposium on Agriculture


Some quality parameters investigated in Sultani Çekirdeksiz (Vitis vinifera L.) clones during<br />

ripening period<br />

Ripening indexes<br />

Ripening index (⁰Brix / Titration acidity) of SC cultivated for raisin production found as 31.24 at harvest<br />

time, and S4, S6, S5, SC tg, and S1 fallowed it as 27.95, 24.38, 22.34, 21.03 and 19.77 respectively (Fig 7).<br />

Among the clones S4 selected for table grape and raisin purpose performed best for ripening index.<br />

Figure 7.<br />

Ripening index (°Brix / Titration acidity) course of SC clones for trough to harvest.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous (1997) Descriptors for Grapevine (Vitis spp.), International Plant Genetic Resources<br />

Institute, Rome. 62 p.<br />

FAO (2011) www.faostat.fao.org Accessed on 2 Now 2011.<br />

Heilmann H (2000) Methodologische Konsequenzen aus Vergleichsuntersuchungen an ökologisch<br />

und konventionell erzeugten Äpfeln. 7. Internationale Tagung elektrochemischer Qualitätstest.<br />

Veitshöchheim.<br />

Heinrich H, Rey CH (1997) Lebensmittelqualität und elektrochemie, in: Vom Lebendigen in<br />

Lebensmitteln, M. Hoffmann [Hrsg.], Deukalion-Verlag.<br />

Ilgın C, Ozturk H, Kader S, Erdem A, Gokcay E (1999) Ege Bölgesinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan bazı<br />

çekirdeksiz üzüm çeşitlerine ait tiplerin belirlenmesi üzerine araştırmalar, TC Tarım ve Köyişleri<br />

Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar genel Müdürlüğü Yayın no 80 46s.<br />

Kara Z (2007) Sustainable viticulture activities in Turkey, Agricultura, 1-2(61-62): 128-139.<br />

Kara Z, Akay A, Ateş F, Yağmur B (2008) The P-value as a tool for quality measurements in grape<br />

industry. 31. World Congress of Vine and Wine, 6. General Assembly of the O.I.V., Growing<br />

Techniques: Sustainability and Specificity of Production, 15-20 June 2008,Verona-Italy.<br />

McGuire RG (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27 (12): 1254-1255.<br />

Piljac-Žegarac J, Valek L, Martinez S, Belščak A (2009) Fluctuations in the phenolic content and<br />

antioxidant capacity of dark fruit juices in refrigerated storage. Food Chemistry 113: 394–400.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Turkey, and<br />

Selcuk University of Scientific Research Foundation (BAP) for funding this study.<br />

sa2012_0803<br />

Section 8 . Viticulture and Enology 765

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!